Clinical T1 Research Articles

Endoscopic therapy replaces surgery for clinical T1 oesophageal cancer in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based study

BackgroundEndoscopic resection for early oesophageal cancer was introduced around 2000 in the Netherlands. The scientific question was how the treatment and survival of early oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer has changed over time in the Netherlands.MethodsData were obtained from the nationwide population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. All patients diagnosed with clinical in situ or T1 oesophageal or GOJ cancer without lymph node or distance metastasis during the study period (2000–2014) were extracted. Primary outcome parameters were the trends in treatment modalities over time and relative survival of each treatment regime.ResultsA total of 1020 patients were diagnosed with a clinical in situ or T1 oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer without lymph node or distance metastasis. The proportion of patients who received endoscopic treatment increased from 2.5% in 2000 to 58.1% in 2014. During the same period the proportion of patients who received surgery decreased from 57.5 to 23.1%. Five-year relative survival of all patients was 69%. Five-year relative survival after endoscopic therapy was 83% and after surgery 80%. Relative excess risk analyses showed no significant difference in survival between patients in the endoscopic therapy group and patients in the surgery group after adjustment for age, sex, clinical TNM classification, morphology and tumour location (RER 1.15; CI 0.76–1.75; p 0.76).ConclusionOur results demonstrate an increase in endoscopic treatment and a decrease of surgical treatment for in situ and T1 oesophageal/GOJ cancer between 2000–2014 in the Netherlands. The relative 5-year survival after endoscopic treatment is high (83%) and comparable with surgery (80%).

Role of transoral robotic surgery in surgical treatment of early-stage supraglottic larynx carcinoma.

There are several options for primary surgical treatment of early-stage supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), including transoral robotic surgery (TORS). The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of TORS to open partial laryngectomy and transoral laser microsurgery (TLM). Patients with clinical classification T1-2 supraglottic SCC diagnosed 2010-2019, treated with TORS, open partial laryngectomy, or TLM in the National Cancer Database were selected. One thousand six hundred three patients were included: 17% TORS, 26.5% TLM, 56.5% open. TORS patients had the lowest rates of adjuvant treatment (28.4% vs. TLM: 45.0%, open: 38.5%, p < 0.001), and lower positive margin rates than TLM (16.9% vs. 30.5%, p < 0.001). Thirty-day and ninety-day post-operative mortality did not differ between the approaches. Five-year survival was higher following TORS compared to open surgery (77.8% vs. 66.1%, p=0.01); this difference persisted following matched-pair analysis. TORS may be a safe and effective surgical approach for early-stage supraglottic SCC in appropriate patients.

Consideration for reclassification of pathologically upstaged T3a renal cell carcinomas.

644 Background: Pathological upstaging to pT3a disease can occur after the surgical treatment of clinical T1 and T2 Renal Cell Carcinomas (RCCs), and this upstaging has been previously shown to be associated with poorer outcomes. With an intent to delve deeper into the disparateness in outcomes of pT3a disease, we investigated the survival of patients with an initial clinical stage of cT1, cT2 and cT3a. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), patients with RCC were categorized by pathological and clinical staging of RCC according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Guidelines (AJCC). The primary outcome was measured as overall survival (OS) at the end of follow up. Five-year survival rates and Kaplan-Meier Analysis assessed the differences between cT1 → pT3a, cT2 → pT2, cT2 → pT3a, and cT3a → pT3a. Multivariable cox regression (MVA) assessed predictors OS with age, sex, ethnicity, Charlson Score, socioeconomic status, geography, tumor size histology and grade, lymph node metastasis, surgical margins, and surgery type (partial versus radical nephrectomy) as covariates. Results: 53908 patients were analyzed (10789 cT1 → pT3a, 22183 cT2 → pT2, 9676 cT2 → pT3a, 11260 cT3a → pT3a, mean follow up 62.3 months). Of all pT3a patients, 64.5% were upstaged from cT1-2. MVA for OS demonstrated Hispanic ethnicity to be protective (hazard ratio [HR]=0.88, P&lt;0.001) and revealed different histologic risks. MVA for OS demonstrated that cT2 → pT3a (HR=1.33, P&lt;0.001, cT1 → pT3a [ref]) and cT3a → pT3a (HR=1.35, P&lt;0.001, cT1 → pT3a [ref]) were associated with worsened OS, and that cT1 → pT3a and cT2 → pT2 (HR=0.96, P&lt;0.052, cT1 → pT3a [ref]) were associated with improved OS. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a difference in 5 year overall survival as well (cT1→pT3a 72%, cT2→pT2 77%, cT2→pT3a 61%, and cT3a→pT3a 59%, p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with cT1 upstaged to pT3a have similar outcomes to cT2 staged to pT2 and better outcomes than cT2 upstaged with the latter’s outcomes being more like cT3a staged to pT3a. The TNM staging system from AJCC for RCCs should consider these outcomes and adjust the grouping for RCCs accordingly.

Adjuvant Radiation and Survival Following Surgical Resection of Sinonasal Adenocarcinoma.

This study aims to investigate the utility of adjuvant radiation in patients who undergo surgical resection for the management of node-negative sinonasal adenocarcinoma (SNAC). Retrospective database review. The 2004-2016 National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was used to extract patients with surgically resected node-negative SNAC. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox-Proportional Hazards Modelling were used to analyze the impact of adjuvant radiation on overall survival (OS) following surgery. 349 patients with SNAC underwent surgical resection. Of these patients, 154 (44.1%) received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Although there was no significant difference in race, age, or sex of those receiving RT, those receiving RT have more advanced diseases and are more likely to have positive margins. Kaplan Meier analysis showed no significant difference in 5-year OS in patient who received adjuvant RT in comparison to those who underwent surgical resection alone (65.7% vs. 72.6%, respectively; p=0.378). In addition, when looking at only patients with positive margins, 5-year OS still did not have a significant difference (73.8% vs. 61.6%, respectively; p=0.101). Only patients with clinical AJCC T4 showed a statistically significant survival benefit with adjuvant RT (56.9% vs. 29.9%, respectively; p=0.009). Adjuvant RT does not appear to provide a significant survival benefit in patients with resected SNAC, with the exception of those with clinically AJCC T4 disease. 4 Laryngoscope, 133:2603-2612, 2023.

DeepSWI: Using Deep Learning to Enhance Susceptibility Contrast on T2*-Weighted MRI.

Although susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) is the gold standard for visualizing cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) in the brain, the required phase data are not always available clinically. Having a postprocessing tool for generating SWI contrast from T2*-weighted magnitude images is therefore advantageous. To create synthetic SWI images from clinical T2*-weighted magnitude images using deep learning and evaluate the resulting images in terms of similarity to conventional SWI images and ability to detect radiation-associated CMBs. Retrospective. A total of 145 adults (87 males/58 females; 43.9 years old) with radiation-associated CMBs were used to train (16,093 patches/121 patients), validate (484 patches/4 patients), and test (2420 patches/20 patients) our networks. 3D T2*-weighted, gradient-echo acquired at 3T. Structural similarity index (SSIM), peak signal-to-noise-ratio (PSNR), normalized mean-squared-error (nMSE), CMB counts, and line profiles were compared among magnitude, original SWI, and synthetic SWI images. Three blinded raters (J.E.V.M., M.A.M., B.B. with 8-, 6-, and 4-years of experience, respectively) independently rated and classified test-set images. Kruskall-Wallis and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare SSIM, PSNR, nMSE, and CMB counts among magnitude, original SWI, and predicted synthetic SWI images. Intraclass correlation assessed interrater variability. P values <0.005 were considered statistically significant. SSIM values of the predicted vs. original SWI (0.972, 0.995, 0.9864) were statistically significantly higher than that of the magnitude vs. original SWI (0.970, 0.994, 0.9861) for whole brain, vascular structures, and brain tissue regions, respectively; 67% (19/28) CMBs detected on original SWI images were also detected on the predicted SWI, whereas only 10 (36%) were detected on magnitude images. Overall image quality was similar between the synthetic and original SWI images, with less artifacts on the former. This study demonstrated that deep learning can increase the susceptibility contrast present in neurovasculature and CMBs on T2*-weighted magnitude images, without residual susceptibility-induced artifacts. This may be useful for more accurately estimating CMB burden from magnitude images alone. 3. Stage 2.

Genomic Prostate Score: A New Tool to Assess Prognosis and Optimize Radiation Therapy Volumes and ADT in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Genomic classifiers such as the Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) could help to personalize treatment for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (I-PCa). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the ability of the GPS to change therapeutic decision making in I-PCa. Only patients in the intermediate NCCN risk group with Gleason score 3 + 4 were considered. The primary objective was to assess the impact of the GPS on risk stratification: NCCN clinical and genomic risk versus NCCN clinical risk stratification alone. We also analyzed the predictive role of the GPS for locally advanced disease (≥pT3+) and the potential change in treatment strategy. Thirty patients were tested for their GPS between November 2018 and March 2020, with the median age being 70 (45-79). Twenty-three patients had a clinical T1 stage. Eighteen patients were classified as favorable intermediate risk (FIR) based on the NCCN criteria. The median GPS score was 39 (17-70). Among the 23 patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy, Gleason score 3 + 4 was found in 18 patients. There was a significant correlation between the GPS and the percentage of a Gleason grade 4 or higher pattern in the surgical sample: correlation coefficient r = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.2-0.8; p = 0.005. In this study, the GPS combined with NCCN clinical risk factors resulted in significant changes in risk group.

Multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to upfront surgery in pancreatic cancer of the body and tail using the National Cancer Database.

722 Background: While neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly being using in pancreatic cancer treatment, it is unclear whether it is beneficial in treatment of body and tail tumors. Randomized controlled trials are lacking and previous observational studies have not demonstrated any benefit. We aimed to assess survival associations, trends over time and patient selection associations for multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy treated pancreatic cancer of the body and tail using data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods: We queried the NCDB for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the body or tail diagnosed between 2010 – 2018 that received multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or a distal pancreatectomy. Patients with clinical M1, clinical T4 and surgery other than partial pancreatectomy were excluded. Survival was compared with Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox Proportional Hazard Estimates. Results: Between 2010 – 2018, the use of multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased from 5.7% to 31.8%. In total, 1951 patients were included with n = 384 receiving multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cases) and n = 1567 undergoing upfront surgery (controls). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with younger age, tumor in the pancreatic body, clinical N1-2 and with Ca 19-9 ≥98 U/mL. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a decreased mortality rate in multivariable Cox regression models adjusting for preoperatively assessed variables (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53 – 0.81, p &lt; 0.001) and results were significant in both clinical T1-2 and T3 tumors. Patients treated with upfront surgery had higher rates of adjuvant chemotherapy receipt after resection (41.4% vs 70.6%) but there was no difference in R1 resection rates or 90-day postoperative mortality between the groups. The addition of neoadjuvant radiotherapy was not associated with improved survival in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: Multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly being used in the treatment of pancreatic cancer of the body and tail, especially in younger patients and patients with more aggressive tumor characteristics. Multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival but randomized trials are needed to establish causal relationships.

Docetaxel+Cisplatin+5-FU (DCF) Therapy as a Preoperative Chemotherapy to Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-center Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objective The aim of this study was to determine the safety and clinical efficacy of docetaxel+cisplatin+5-fluorouracil (DCF) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods In this single-center study, patient background and treatment outcomes (NAC efficacy assessment, NAC adverse events, short-term postoperative outcomes, and one-year postoperative outcomes) in patients treated with preoperative DCF and preoperative cisplatin+5-FU (CF) were compared retrospectively. Patients Seventeen patients diagnosed with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and treated with preoperative DCF therapy and 50 patients treated with preoperative CF therapy between January 2013 and July 2019 were included in this study. Results There were significant differences in clinical T factor and clinical stage between the CF and DCF groups (p<0.05). All patients in the DCF therapy group were above clinical T3 and clinical stage III. The clinical response after NAC was partial response (PR) for 23 patients (46.0%) in the CF group and 13 patients (76.5%) in the DCF group (p=0.030). Regarding adverse events in NAC, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia (FN), diarrhea, and stomatitis were observed more frequently in the DCF group than in the CF group (p<0.05). The postoperative results [overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), one-year OS, one-year RFS] of the DCF group were comparable to those of the CF group. Conclusion DCF therapy has been recognized as an effective treatment option for advanced ESCC. However, the indication for DCF therapy should be chosen carefully because of the high incidence of adverse events.

Prediction Formula for Pathological Depth of Invasion From Clinical Depth of Invasion in Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) Stage I/II Cases.

The depth of invasion (DOI) of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is an important prognostic factor. The definition is clear for pathological DOI (pDOI), but the treatment strategy is determined by the preoperative clinical DOI (cDOI). Few studies have investigated the difference between these DOIs. The purpose of this study was to obtain the correlation equation between cDOI and pDOI for Stage I/II tongue SCC and to consider the points to be noted in actual clinical practice. In this retrospective study, 58 patients with clinical stage I/II tongue SCC were included. Correlations between cDOI and pDOI were obtained for all 58 cases, as well as for 39 cases which excluded superficial and exophytic lesions. The overall cDOI and pDOI median values were 8.0 and 5.5 mm, respectively; the 2.5 mm reduction was significant (p< 0.01). The correlation equation was pDOI = 0.81 × cDOI-0.23 (r = 0.73). Furthermore, re-analysis of the 39 cases revealed that pDOI = 0.84 × cDOI-0.37 (r = 0.62). Hence, a derived equation pDOI = 0.84 × (cDOI-0.44) was obtained to predict pDOI from cDOI. This study indicated that it is necessary to consider contraction due to specimen fixation by subtracting the thickness of the mucosal epithelium. Clinical T1 cases with a cDOI of 5 mm or less had a pDOI of 4 mm or less, and it would be expected to have low positive rate of neck lymph node metastasis.

Abstract 116: Cortical Thickness Estimation From Clinical T1 Weighted Magnetic Resonance Images To Predict Functional Outcomes After Mechanical Thrombectomy

Background: Endovascular treatment (EVT) is the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, successful EVT does not result in functional independence in many patients. This may be due to pre-existing cortical atrophy that might reduce compensatory plasticity and attenuate recovery. Identifying patients who will most benefit from EVT may be possible using baseline cortical thickness measures as a marker of brain health and providing additional prognostic utility for clinical T1-weighted (T1w) MRI. Objective: Estimate hemispheric and regional cortical thickness from clinical T1w-MRI and determine its influence on functional outcomes post successful EVT. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (n=602), collected between 2015 - 2021. We selected 213 patients (mean age 67.5 ± 14.6, 49.3% female) who had adequate quality MRI within 14 days of EVT and a record of the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days post EVT. Clinical T1w images were transformed into high-resolution images using the convolutional neural network SynthSR. Then, FreeSurfer was used to estimate hemispheric and regional mean cortical thickness from the side contralateral to the stroke, to avoid local lesion effects. In addition to hemispheric cortical thickness, we selected the insula, superior frontal gyrus (SFG), and superior temporal gyrus (STG) for the analysis due to their importance in sensorimotor processing, self-awareness, and social cognition respectively which are important during rehabilitation. Results: In an ordinal regression model adjusted for baseline mRS, the cortical thickness of the SFG and the STG was significantly predictive of 90-day mRS (p=0.005 and p=0.003 respectively), while hemispheric and insular cortical thickness were not. After adjusting for confounders and comorbidities, SFG and STG cortical thickness remained significant predictors of 90-day mRS (p&lt;0.001 for both). Conclusions: The correlation between decreased cortical thickness in specific regions and worse functional outcomes elucidates the effects of pre-existing cortical atrophy in key areas of the brain that may be more important than others during recovery.

Long-term results from NRG-GI002: A phase II clinical trial platform using total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

7 Background: This NCTN multi-arm randomized phase II modular clinical trial platform utilizes TNT with parallel experimental arms (EAs) in LARC. EAs are not intended for direct comparison, but rather to concurrently randomized control arm (CA) patients. Primary endpoint (EP) and available secondary EPs (from EA1 using veliparib [V], PARPi; and EA2 using pembrolizumab [P], anti-PD-1) have been previously reported. We present long-term outcomes of all pts enrolled (NCT02921256). Methods: Stage II/III pts with MSS LARC (with any ONE of the following: distal location [cT3-4 ≤5cm from anal verge, any N]; bulky [any cT4 or tumor within 3mm of mesorectal fascia]; high risk for metastatic disease [cN2]; or not a sphincter-sparing surgery [SSS] candidate) were randomized to CA (neoadjuvant FOLFOX [x 4mo] → chemoRT [capecitabine with 50.4Gy] → surgery 8-12 wks later). EA1 added V (400mg PO BID) and EA2 added P (200mg IV Q3 wks x 6 doses) each concurrent with chemoRT. Primary EP: 4-point reduction in Neoadjuvant Rectal Cancer (NAR) score with a one-sided α=0.10, 80% power. NAR compared by linear model controlling for clinical T4 at entry (Y/N). Secondary EPs: OS, DFS. p-values are two-sided. Results: From 10/2016-2/2018, 178 pts were randomized (88 CA, 90 EA1). From 8/2018-5/2019, 185 pts were randomized (95 CA, 90 EA2). Baseline characteristics were previously reported. Median follow-up is 3.50 yrs for the 1st comparison. Median follow-up is 3.15 yrs for the 2nd comparison. Updated primary and long-term secondary outcomes are in the table. Conclusions: With longer follow-up, addition of V to TNT provided no significant differences in the NAR score or 3yr outcomes. The addition of P to TNT was associated with a statistically significant improvement in 3yr OS, but not DFS. Correlative molecular analyses are ongoing. Support: U10CA180868, -180822; UG1-189867; U24-196067; AbbVie; Merck. Clinical trial information: NCT02921256 . [Table: see text]

A novel nomogram to predict lymph node metastasis in cT1 non-small-cell lung cancer based on PET/CT and peripheral blood cell parameters

BackgroundAccurately evaluating the lymph node status preoperatively is critical in determining the appropriate treatment plan for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. This study aimed to construct a novel nomogram to predict the probability of lymph node metastasis in clinical T1 stage patients based on non-invasive and easily accessible indicators.MethodsFrom October 2019 to June 2022, the data of 84 consecutive cT1 NSCLC patients who had undergone PET/CT examination within 30 days before surgery were retrospectively collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors of lymph node metastasis. A nomogram based on these predictors was constructed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the calibration curve was used for assessment. Besides, the model was confirmed by bootstrap resampling.ResultsFour predictors (tumor SUVmax value, lymph node SUVmax value, consolidation tumor ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio) were identified and entered into the nomogram. The model indicated certain discrimination, with an area under ROC curve of 0.921(95%CI 0.866–0.977). The calibration curve showed good concordance between the predicted and actual possibility of lymph node metastasis.ConclusionsThis nomogram was practical and effective in predicting lymph node metastasis for patients with cT1 NSCLC. It could provide treatment recommendations to clinicians.

Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of neoadjuvant systemic therapy and primary surgical treatment of patients with &lt;i&gt;BRCA&lt;i/&gt;-associated triple-negative T1 breast cancer

BACKGROUND: BRCA-associated triple-negative breast cancer does not only have a better overall survival rate, but also a longer recurrence-free period in compatison to patients with sporadic breast cancer. BRCA-associated triple-negative breast cancer shows high sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents, but the benefit of systemic neoadjuvant therapy for patients with tumor size T1 in triple-negative breast cancer is unclear.&#x0D; AIM: The aim of the study is to determine the recurrence rate in the patients with BRCA-associated triple-negative breast cancer and to determine the recurrence rate for the group of patients with tumor size T1, depending on the initial treatment.&#x0D; MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study includes the data of 129 patients diagnosed with BRCA-associated triple-negative breast cancer treated in the period from 2010 to 2022 at the Department of Breast Tumors of the N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology. All the patients have been divided into two groups depending on the initial treatment. Group I included 93 (72.1%) patients whose treatment was started with systemic neoadjuvant therapy, group II, whose initial treatment involved surgery, included 36 (27.9%) patients.&#x0D; RESULTS: In group I, the number of recurrences was 22 (23.6%), and in group II 6 (16.6%). Depending on the pathomorphological response to systemic neoadjuvant therapy, the patients of group I have been separated: in the group of patients with a complete pathomorphological response, the number of relapses was 6 (13.3%), and in the group of patients with a partial pathomorphological response 16 (33.3%). A comparative analysis of 2 groups with tumor size T1 has shown that in group I the number of patients with tumor size T1 was 11 (11.8%) cases, and in group II 16 (44.4%). Subgroup comparative analysis in group I, taking into account tumor size T1, has shown that recurrence has not been observed when a complete pathomorphological response was achieved in 8 (17.7%) patients, and in the group with partial pathomorphological response in 3 (6.25%) patients with tumor size T1. A relapse has been observed in 1 (2%) case. With clinical tumor size T1 (n = 16), there was no recurrence in group II.&#x0D; CONCLUSIONS: Patients diagnosed with BRCA-associated triple-negative breast cancer remain at a high risk of recurrence at a later stage of the disease, but this does not apply to patients with a tumor size T1 since the difference in relapse-free survival [AP1] between patients, whose treatment was started with neoadjuvant systemic therapy and patients, whose initial treatment involved surgery % with a clinical tumor size T1, is not confirmed.

Comparison between de novo and metachronous metastatic breast cancer: the presence of a primary tumour is not the only difference-a Dutch population-based study from 2008 to 2018.

The aim of this study was to compare characteristics and survival of patients with de novo and metachronous metastatic breast cancer. Data of patients with metastatic breast cancer were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were categorized as having de novo metastatic breast cancer (n = 8656) if they had distant metastases at initial presentation, or metachronous metastatic disease (n = 2374) in case they developed metastases within 5 or 10years after initial breast cancer diagnosis. Clinicopathological characteristics and treatments of these two groups were compared, after which multiple imputation was performed to account for missing data. Overall survival was compared for patients treated with systemic therapy in the metastatic setting, using Kaplan Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. The hazard ratio for overall survival of de novo versus metachronous metastases was assessed accounting for time-varying effects. Compared to metachronous patients, patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer were more likely to be ≥ 70years, to have invasive lobular carcinoma, clinical T3 or T4 tumours, loco-regional lymph node metastases, HER2 positivity, bone only disease and to have received systemic therapy in the metastatic setting. They were less likely to have triple negative tumours and liver or brain metastases. Patients with de novo metastases survived longer (median 34.7months) than patients with metachronous metastases (median 24.3months) and the hazard ratio (0.75) varied over time. Differences in clinicopathological characteristics and survival between de novo and metachronous metastatic breast cancer highlight that these are distinct patients groups.

Long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation vs. partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Partial nephrectomy (PN) is one of the most preferred nephron-sparing treatments for clinical T1 (cT1) renal cancer, while radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is usually used for patients who are poor surgical candidates. The long-term oncologic outcome of RFA vs. PN for cT1 renal cancer remains undetermined. This meta-analysis aims to compare the treatment efficacy and safety of RFA and PN for patients with cT1 renal cancer with long-term follow-up of at least 5years. This meta-analysis was performed following the PRISMA reporting guidelines. Literature studies that had data on the comparison of the efficacy or safety of RFA vs. PN in treating cT1 renal cancer were searched in databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from 1 January2000 to 1 May 2022. Only long-term studies with a median or mean follow-up of at least 5years were included. The following measures of effect were pooled: odds ratio (OR) for recurrence and major complications; hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Additional analyses, including sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and publication bias analysis, were also performed. A total of seven studies with 1,635 patients were finally included. The treatment efficacy of RFA was not different with PN in terms of cancer recurrence (OR = 1.22, 95% CI, 0.45-3.28), PFS (HR = 1.26, 95% CI, 0.75-2.11), and CSS (HR = 1.27, 95% CI, 0.41-3.95) as well as major complications (OR = 1.31, 95% CI, 0.55-3.14) (P > 0.05 for all). RFA was a potential significant risk factor for OS (HR = 1.76, 95% CI, 1.32-2.34, P < 0.001). No significant heterogeneity and publication bias were observed. This is the first meta-analysis that focuses on the long-term oncological outcomes of cT1 renal cancer, and the results suggest that RFA has comparable therapeutic efficacy with PN. RFA is a nephron-sparing technique with favorable oncologic efficacy and safety and a good treatment alternative for cT1 renal cancer.

Protocol for a MULTI-centre feasibility study to assess the use of 99mTc-sestaMIBI SPECT/CT in the diagnosis of kidney tumours (MULTI-MIBI study)

IntroductionThe incidence of renal tumours is increasing and anatomic imaging cannot reliably distinguish benign tumours from renal cell carcinoma. Up to 30% of renal tumours are benign, with oncocytomas the...

How far has robot-assisted partial nephrectomy reached?

Nephron-sparing surgery is the standard treatment for small renal mass (SRM). Nephron-sparing surgery has evolved from an open to a minimally invasive technique. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is the latest technique in this field and is reported to be safe and feasible, showing oncologically and functionally superior or compatible results compared with open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for SRM. This is not limited to only SRM but also applies to large and complex renal masses and other challenging situations. RAPN showed good oncological and functional outcomes for ≥clinical T2 renal tumors, complex renal masses (PADUA score ≥10, RENAL score ≥10), hilar renal tumors, and multiple renal tumors. In addition, the outcomes of RAPN in these challenging cases were not inferior to those in conventional cases. RAPN could also be applied to a number of challenging cases in which the open technique was considered first. RAPN showed good results in patients with a solitary kidney, horseshoe kidney, and in repeat surgeries. Furthermore, RAPN could be safely performed on obese, elderly, and pediatric patients. Finally, this review evaluates efficiency and utility of RAPN based on the results of challenging cases of renal masses and to project the future of RAPN.

Does postoperative chemotherapy improve overall survival of patients with ypT1-2N0 cancer?

BackgroundPerioperative chemotherapy combined with curative gastrectomy has been increasingly represented the standard therapeutic strategy for resectable gastric cancer (GC). However, it is still unclear whether postoperative chemotherapy has a survival benefit for ypT1-2N0 gastric cancer patients who have undergone preoperative chemotherapy followed curative gastrectomy.MethodsThe data of patients who undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy and had pathological classification of ypT1–2N0 between March 2016 and December 2020 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Chi-square test was adopted to compare the difference between the patients with postoperative chemotherapy (pCHT) and without postoperative chemotherapy (no pCHT). Survival curves for overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare survival difference. Univariate and multivariate analyses for prognostic factors were based on the Cox regression.ResultsA total of 134 patients met the inclusion criteria and 56 (41.8%) of them have undergone postoperative chemotherapy. There were no statistically significant differences in demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics between pCHT group and no pCHT group (all p > 0.05). Postoperative chemotherapy was not associated with a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.815, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.403–1.650; p = 0.474). Subgroup analyses demonstrated survival was equivalent between pCHT and no CHT group in ypT1N0 patients (HR 0.832, CI 0.222–3.121; p = 0.786) and ypT2N0 patients (HR 1.284, CI 0.564–2.924; p = 0.551). Multivariable analysis identified that clinical T stage independently influenced prognosis (cT3 vs. cT2: HR 2.875, 95% CI 0.998–8.281, p = 0.050; cT4 vs. cT2: HR 7.382, 95% CI 2.569–21.211, p < 0.001). In clinical T3–4 patients, there was an overall survival benefit for postoperative chemotherapy (HR 0.270, 95% CI 0.114–0.634; p = 0.006). No survival benefit of postoperative chemotherapy was identified in clinical T2 patients (HR 0.689, 95% CI 0.200–2.372; p = 0.579). Furthermore, postoperative chemotherapy was proved to be an independently positive prognostic factor for clinical T3–4 patients (HR 0.132, 95% CI 0.051–0.345; p < 0.001).ConclusionPostoperative chemotherapy might offer survival benefit to patients with ypT1-2N0 gastric cancer whose clinical T stage was T3–4 before preoperative chemotherapy.

Facility volume and survival: Human papilloma virus positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

BackgroundTo analyze the impact of facility volume on survival for human papilloma virus positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+ OPSCC) patients. MethodsPatients treated for HPV+ OPSCC from 2010 to 2017 were queried from the National Cancer Database. Facilities of average annual case volume <50th percentile were categorized as low-volume (LV) and >95th percentile as high-volume (HV). Results11,546 were included, with 10,305 patients (89.3 %) treated at LV and 1241 (10.7 %) at HV facilities. A greater proportion of cases involving resection of base of tongue and lingual tonsil were treated at HV (30.3 %) compared to LV (22.3 %) facilities (p < 0.001). Patients treated at a HV facility had greater percentage of clinical T4 (11.2 % vs. 8.6 %, p = 0.001) and N+ disease (90.5 % vs. 85.7 %, p < 0.001) patients. Survival analysis showed no statistically significant difference between five-year overall survival rates by facility volume (p = 0.388) for all patients. On multivariable analysis, facility volume was not associated with survival (HR: 0.968 [0.758–1.235], p = 0.791). These trends were found for both patients undergoing primary surgery or chemoradiotherapy. ConclusionOur data indicates that patients with HPV+ OPSCC do not experience a survival benefit with treatment at HV facility, suggesting these patients may be adequately treated at LV centers.

Prognostic Factors in Patients with Clinic Locally Advanced T4 Lung Cancer: Surgical Considerations.

Inclusion of surgery in the treatment of T4 lung cancer has been a debate for the last two decades. The aim of this study is to investigate the potential prognostic factors which could affect the outcome. Fifty-seven clinical T4 non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients out of 716 lung resections, who were operated at a single institution in 7 years period, were included in this study. Patients are grouped into three groups as patients with neoadjuvant treatment group (group 1 n: 16), salvage surgery group (surgery after 3 months of definitive chemotherapy and radiotherapy) (group 2 n: 14), and straightforward surgery group (group 3 n: 27) with adjuvant treatment. Groups were analyzed and compared in terms of postoperative complications, 30 days of mortality, disease free survival, and overall survival. Mean overall survival (OS) was 48.43 ± 4.4 months and mean disease-free survival (DFS) 40.55 ± 4.46 months for all patients. Thirty days mortality was 5.2% and complication rates were 63.1%. Two years OS was 61.4 ± 6.4%, DFS was 58.1 ± 7.8%. Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 patients had mean 39.14 ± 5.6, 44.7 ± 7.1, and 62.9 ± 4.8 months for OS (p: 0.09), and 29.6 ± 7.2, 38.4 ± 9.1, and 46.9 ± 6 months for DFS (p: 0.27). Patients who received blood transfusion showed significantly worse outcomes (p: 0.001 for DFS and p: 0.004 for OS). According to our outcomes, surgery should be included in the treatment of clinical T4 lung cancer when physiologically and oncologically possible with careful patient selection. This study demonstrates that patients receiving straightforward surgery have longer survival, in spite of higher perioperative mortality rate. Risks and benefits should be considered carefully.