Clinical Quality Measures Research Articles

Building an Interactive Geospatial Visualization Application for National Health Care-Associated Infection Surveillance: Development Study.

BackgroundThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) is the most widely used health care–associated infection (HAI) and antimicrobial use and resistance surveillance program in the United States. Over 37,000 health care facilities participate in the program and submit a large volume of surveillance data. These data are used by the facilities themselves, the CDC, and other agencies and organizations for a variety of purposes, including infection prevention, antimicrobial stewardship, and clinical quality measurement. Among the summary metrics made available by the NHSN are standardized infection ratios, which are used to identify HAI prevention needs and measure progress at the national, regional, state, and local levels.ObjectiveTo extend the use of geospatial methods and tools to NHSN data, and in turn to promote and inspire new uses of the rendered data for analysis and prevention purposes, we developed a web-enabled system that enables integrated visualization of HAI metrics and supporting data.MethodsWe leveraged geocoding and visualization technologies that are readily available and in current use to develop a web-enabled system designed to support visualization and interpretation of data submitted to the NHSN from geographically dispersed sites. The server–client model–based system enables users to access the application via a web browser.ResultsWe integrated multiple data sets into a single-page dashboard designed to enable users to navigate across different HAI event types, choose specific health care facility or geographic locations for data displays, and scale across time units within identified periods. We launched the system for internal CDC use in January 2019.ConclusionsCDC NHSN statisticians, data analysts, and subject matter experts identified opportunities to extend the use of geospatial methods and tools to NHSN data and provided the impetus to develop NHSNViz. The development effort proceeded iteratively, with the developer adding or enhancing functionality and including additional data sets in a series of prototype versions, each of which incorporated user feedback. The initial production version of NHSNViz provides a new geospatial analytic resource built in accordance with CDC user requirements and extensible to additional users and uses in subsequent versions.

Outpatient Prescription Practices in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (From the NCDR PINNACLE Registry)

This study sought to evaluate inappropriate prescribing practices in an atrial fibrillation (AF) population, as outlined by the 2016 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults with Atrial Fibrillation or Atrial Flutter document. The 2016 AF quality measures document specified medications to avoid in certain AF populations, including aspirin and anticoagulant combination therapy in patients without cardiovascular disease, and non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers in patients with reduced ejection fraction. Using data from the NCDR PINNACLE registry, a national outpatient cardiology practice registry, we assessed rates of inappropriate prescription of two types of medications among AF outpatients from 5/1/2008-5/1/2016. Overall rates of inappropriate prescription and variation by practice were calculated. Patient and practice factors associated with inappropriate prescription were assessed in adjusted analyses. A total of 107,759 of 658,250 (16.4%) patients without cardiovascular disease were inappropriately prescribed an antiplatelet and anticoagulant together, and 5,731 of 150,079 (3.8%) patients with reduced ejection fraction were inappropriately prescribed a non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker. Overall, 14.8% of AF patients were prescribed medications that were not recommended. Both patient and practice factors were associated with inappropriate prescribing, and the adjusted practice-level median odds ratio for inappropriate prescription was 1.70 (95% CI: 1.61-1.82), indicating a 70% likelihood that 2 random practices would treat identical AF patients differently. In a large registry of AF patients treated in cardiology practices, overall rates of inappropriate prescription practices, as defined by the 2016 AF quality measures, were relatively low, but significant practice variation was present.

Exploring the association of social determinants of health and clinical quality measures and performance in HRSA-funded health centres

ObjectiveThis paper explores the impact of service area-level social deprivation on health centre clinical quality measures.DesignCross-sectional data analysis of Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)-funded health centres. We created a...

Place Matters: Closing the Gap on Rural Primary Care Quality Improvement Capacity-the Healthy Hearts Northwest Study.

To compare rural independent and health system primary care practices with urban practices to external practice facilitation support in terms of recruitment, readiness, engagement, retention, and change in quality improvement (QI) capacity and quality metric performance. The setting consisted of 135 small or medium-sized primary care practices participating in the Healthy Hearts Northwest quality improvement initiative. The practices were stratified by geography, rural or urban, and by ownership (independent [physician-owned] or system-owned [health/hospital system]). The quality improvement capacity assessment (QICA) survey tool was used to measure QI at baseline and after 12 months of practice facilitation. Changes in 3 clinical quality measures (CQMs)-appropriate aspirin use, blood pressure (BP) control, and tobacco use screening and cessation-were measured at baseline in 2015 and follow-up in 2017. Rural practices were more likely to enroll in the study, with 1 out of 3.5 rural recruited practices enrolled, compared with 1 out of 7 urban practices enrolled. Rural independent practices had the lowest QI capacity at baseline, making the largest gain in establishing a regular QI process involving cross-functional teams. Rural independent practices made the greatest improvement in meeting the BP control CQM, from 55.5% to 66.1% (P ≤ .001) and the smoking cessation metric, from 72.3% to 86.7% (P ≤ .001). Investing practice facilitation and sustained QI strategies in rural independent practices, where the need is high and resources are low, will yield benefits that outweigh centrally prescribed models.

Exploratory clinical trial on the safety and capability of dMD-001 in lumbar disc herniation: Study protocol for a first-in-human pilot study

Herniated nucleus pulposus (NP), one of the most common diseases of the spine, is surgically treated by removing the sequestered NP. However, intervertebral disc (IVD) defects may remain after discectomy, leading to inadequate tissue healing and predisposing patients to IVD degeneration. An acellular, bioresorbable, ultra-purified alginate (UPAL) gel (dMD-001) implantation system can be used to fill any IVD defects in order to prevent IVD degeneration after discectomy. This first-in-human pilot study aims to determine the feasibility, safety, and perceived patient response to a combined treatment involving discectomy and UPAL gel implantation for herniated NP. We designed a one-arm, double-centre, open-label, pilot trial. The study started in November 2018 and will run until a sample of 40 suitable participants is established. Patients aged 20–49 years, diagnosed with isolated lumbar IVD herniation and scheduled for discectomy represent suitable candidates. All eligible participants who provide informed consent undergo standard discectomy followed by UPAL gel implantation. The primary outcomes of the trial will be the feasibility and safety of the procedure. Secondary outcomes will include self-assessed clinical scores and magnetic resonance imaging-based measures of morphological and compositional quality of the IVD tissue. Initial outcomes will be published at 24 weeks. Analysis of feasibility and safety will be performed using descriptive statistics. Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses of treatment trends of effectiveness will be conducted.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Hemophilia B Patients Treated with IB1001 [Coagulation Factor IX (recombinant)

INTRODUCTION. Hemophilia B is a rare bleeding disorder caused by missing or defective factor IX, a clotting protein in the coagulation cascade. Patients with hemophilia B are treated with infusion of concentrated factor IX to replace the deficiency. As a chronic disease, patient quality of life and treatment satisfaction is a fundamental component of overall patient care in hemophilia B. Anecdotal evidence has suggested that some patients experience improved clinical outcomes and increased satisfaction when treated with IB1001, approved in the US as IXINITY®, [coagulation factor IX (recombinant)] (current factor treatment) as compared to their previous treatment. The objective of this study was to undertake a systematic assessment of IB1001 patient responses to measures of clinical care and quality of life that are relevant in hemophilia B in order to provide a more comprehensive description. METHODS. This was a cross-sectional study of hemophilia B patients in the United States currently being treated with IB1001. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by a central IRB. A survey was developed to capture patient-reported responses to clinical and quality of life questions of interest, including demographic characteristics, disease status, bleeding events, treatment, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Where possible, patients were asked to compare responses on current factor treatment to those while on previous treatment with other available products. Patients were invited to complete the survey online. This was a pilot study to generate a descriptive analysis of patient experience. RESULTS. A total of 17 patients completed the survey. Most patients were male (76.5%) with a mean age of 43.8 years (range 16-73), and had been taking IB1001 for a mean 18 months at the time of this study. The elements most important for patient treatment choice were a high recovery rate, 24-hour half-life, no inhibitor development, and few side effects. Fewer annualized bleeding events were reported with the current factor treatment (mean 3.3 vs 6.7). Joint bleeds were most commonly reported, and most patients stated their bleed frequency was less (41%) or about the same (35%) on their current factor treatment compared to their previous treatment. Most patients reported their activity level as either ‘very active’ (23%), or ‘somewhat active’ (53%), and 47% of patients indicated they are more active now than on prior treatment. Overall, patients were either ‘very satisfied’ (76%) or ‘somewhat satisfied’ (12%) with their current factor treatment, compared with 12% and 23%, respectively, on prior treatment. Patients reported more mobility (29%), less pain (41%), and less anxiety or depression (18%) now than on prior treatment. CONCLUSIONS. In this study, we showed the utility of an online, survey-based instrument in characterizing patient experience with factor replacement products in hemophilia B. This study quantified the details of the patient experience that may have been driving the anecdotes of improved patient satisfaction and quality of life with IB1001. Overall, patients reported increased satisfaction, and improved clinical outcomes on their current factor treatment compared to products they had used in the past. While the data from this pilot study are encouraging, further study is warranted such as linking patient-reported outcomes to medical chart data to validate the clinical response and to better understand the variables that most influence patient satisfaction and quality of life. DisclosuresSchaaf:Aptevo Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lockhart:Aptevo Therapeutics: Consultancy. Fritz:Aptevo Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stromatt:Aptevo Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Will Improvements in Patient Experience With Care Impact Clinical and Quality of Care Outcomes?: A Systematic Review.

Patient experiences with health care have been widely used as benchmark indicators of quality for providers, health care practices, and health plans. The objective of this study was to summarize the literature regarding the associations between Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) patient experiences and clinical and quality outcomes. A systematic review of the literature was completed using PubMed, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature on December 14, 2019. Separate searches were conducted to query terms identifying CAHPS surveys with clinical and quality outcomes of care. Two reviewers completed all components of the search process. Studies investigating associations between CAHPS composite ratings and health care sensitive clinical outcomes or quality measures of care were included in this review. Studies were excluded if they did not investigate patient experiences using CAHPS composite ratings or if CAHPS composites were not treated as the independent variable. Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria, 10 investigating associations of CAHPS composite ratings with clinical outcomes and 9 investigating these associations with quality measures. Patient-provider communication was the most studied CAHPS composite rating and was significantly associated with self-reported physical and mental health, frequency of emergency room visits and inpatient hospital stays, hospitalization length, and CAHPS personal physician global ratings. Ratings of patient experience with care may influence clinical and quality outcomes of care. However, key inconsistencies between studies affirm that more research is needed to solidify this conclusion and investigate how patient experiences differentially relate to outcomes for various patient groups.

Routine CT evaluation of central vascular ligation in patients undergoing complete mesocolic excision for sigmoid colon cancer.

Objective and reproducible quality measures of complete mesocolic excision (CME) for colon cancer are not currently available. This study aimed to measure the inferior mesenteric stump length following CME for sigmoid colon cancer and explore surgical, pathological and oncological outcomes in patients with a stump length of <10mm vs. ≥10mm. This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort study including patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for sigmoid colon cancer between May 2013 and May 2015. Follow-up CT scans were reviewed, and a vascular stump cut-off of <10mm for adequate central ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery was applied. Differences in perioperative, histopathological and oncological outcome parameters (overall, disease-free and recurrence-free survival) were explored between <10mm vs. ≥10mm groups. A total of 127 patients (43% female) with a median age of 68years were included. The median follow-up time was 68months. CT measurements showed good interrater agreement (90% absolute agreement) and reliability among raters (kappa=0.77, 95% CI 0.53-1.00, p<0.001). A stump length ≥10mm was associated with longer operating time (150 vs. 180min, p=0.021), intramesocolic resection (p=0.008), and a shorter distance from the bowel wall to vascular tie (120 vs. 102mm, p=0.005). An arterial stump length ≥10mm in sigmoid resection for colon cancer was associated with key clinical quality measures. Measurement of arterial stump length using routine follow-up CT may serve as a quality indicator of vascular ligation in CME surgery.

Automated data abstraction for quality surveillance and outcome assessment in radiation oncology.

Rigorous radiotherapy quality surveillance and comprehensive outcome assessment require electronic capture and automatic abstraction of clinical, radiation treatment planning, and delivery data. We present the design and implementation framework of an integrated data abstraction, aggregation, and storage, curation, and analytics software: the Health Information Gateway and Exchange (HINGE), which collates data for cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. The HINGE software abstracts structured DICOM‐RT data from the treatment planning system (TPS), treatment data from the treatment management system (TMS), and clinical data from the electronic health records (EHRs). HINGE software has disease site‐specific “Smart” templates that facilitate the entry of relevant clinical information by physicians and clinical staff in a discrete manner as part of the routine clinical documentation. Radiotherapy data abstracted from these disparate sources and the smart templates are processed for quality and outcome assessment. The predictive data analyses are done on using well‐defined clinical and dosimetry quality measures defined by disease site experts in radiation oncology. HINGE application software connects seamlessly to the local IT/medical infrastructure via interfaces and cloud services and performs data extraction and aggregation functions without human intervention. It provides tools to assess variations in radiation oncology practices and outcomes and determines gaps in radiotherapy quality delivered by each provider.

ID: 3523918 A CORE CURRICULUM FOR BASIC EUS SKILLS - AN INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS USING THE DELPHI METHODOLOGY

Background and Objectives: During recent years, the demand for EUS has increased. The range of EUS procedures is expanding, leading to an increasing demand for skilled clinicians as well as the need to develop and implement extensive training programs to cater to this need and ensure competency. However, standardized training programs and assessments of clinical quality measures are lacking. We therefore aimed to establish a basic curriculum for EUS fellows that includes a prioritized list of interpretational capabilities and technical skills.

Patient-reported outcomes in hemodialysis vascular access: A call to action.

While access-related dysfunction is a clear driver of clinical outcomes and costs, the full impact of vascular access dysfunction on patient experience and quality of life is not fully characterized in the literature. One way to more comprehensively characterize the patient experience from the patient perspective is through patient reported outcomes (PROs). However, the limited implementation of PROs in clinical trials, patient registries, quality measurement, and other research settings has significantly constrained the patient voice in evaluation of vascular access outcomes and vascular access decision-making. To address these issues, the Kidney Health Initiative, a public-private partnership between the American Society of Nephrology and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, assembled an interdisciplinary workgroup to enhance uptake of access-related PROs with the aims of: (1) reviewing the domains of HRQOL that are affected by vascular access, collect information on existing instruments that measure access-specific HRQOL in hemodialysis, and identify gaps in existing measures; (2) identifying and critically assessing barriers to widespread use of access-specific PRO measures; and (3) defining initiatives to overcome barriers and make recommendations for strategies to improve the use and utility of access-specific PRO measures. A consensus group process identified potential barriers to use of PRO measures in six categories: (1) PRO misperceptions, (2) patient factors, (3) regulators and payers, (4) instrument factors, (5) study design, and (6) physicians. The workgroup provided recommendations for actions to promote the widespread utilization of vascular access-related PRO measures in five categories: (1) development of vascular access-specific PRO measures, (2) ensuring comprehensive assessment when using vascular access PRO measures, (3) ensuring accessibility and applicability of vascular access PRO measures to all end stage kidney disease populations, (4) establishing universal guidelines and accepted vascular access PRO measures, and (5) engaging stakeholders across all facets.

Are Online Patient Reviews Associated With Health Care Outcomes? A Systematic Review of the Literature

Although online patient reviews (OPRs) are ubiquitous, there has been debate about whether OPRs are associated with measures of health care outcomes. The majority of patients search for online information about a hospital or provider before scheduling an encounter, therefore, the extent to which OPRs are valid information is important. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to examine the extent to which OPRs are associated with measures of patient experience, clinical quality, and other outcomes. We searched Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycInfo, which yielded 32 studies. There were consistent positive correlations between OPRs and patient experience at both the organization and individual provider levels of analysis. However, associations between OPRs and quality measures were mixed. Organizational level OPRs may be more reliable than individual provider OPRs. In addition, the strength of association could be affected by the type of encounter setting, specialty, and specific measures.

Using Registry Data to Support National Quality Forum Endorsement of Quality Measures for Home-Based Medical Care.

Homebound older adults receiving home-based medical care (HBMC) are high-need, high-cost patients. National Quality Forum (NQF)-endorsed quality measures for this population are lacking. The objective is to describe the reliability and validity testing of 2 new quality measures for such patients to support NQF endorsement. The authors developed 2 new clinical quality measures for HBMC: evaluation of (1) functional status and (2) cognitive function. Data from a large multistate HBMC practice in a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services-approved qualified clinical data registry were used to test both measures for reliability and validity. In 63 000 patient encounters, provider performance rates were 68% for evaluation of functional status and 40% for cognitive function. Reliability and validity were high for both. This article describes a replicable approach to leverage registry-type data to systematically address quality gaps for high-need, high-cost populations that will raise the profile of HBMC with measure developers and payers.

Clinical Quality Measure Exchange is Not Easy.

The Trial of Aggregate Data Exchange for Maintenance of Certification and Raising Quality was a randomized controlled trial which first had to test whether quality reporting could be a by-product of clinical care. We report on the initial descriptive study of the capacity for and quality of exchange of whole-panel, standardized quality measures from health systems. Family physicians were recruited from 4 health systems with mature quality measurement programs and agreed to submit standardized, physician-level quality measures for consenting physicians. Identified measure or transfer errors were captured and evaluated for root-cause problems. The health systems varied considerably by patient demographics and payer mix. From the 4 systems, 256 family physicians elected to participate. Of 19 measures negotiated for use, 5 were used by all systems. There were more than 15 types of identified errors including breaks in data delivery, changes in measures, and nonsensical measure results. Only 1 system had no identified errors. The secure transfer of standardized, physician-level quality measures from 4 health systems with mature measure processes proved difficult. There were many errors that required human intervention and manual repair, precluding full automation. This study reconfirms an important problem, namely, that despite widespread health information technology adoption and federal meaningful use policies, we remain far from goals to make clinical quality reporting a reliable by-product of care.

Improving Smoking and Blood Pressure Outcomes: The Interplay Between Operational Changes and Local Context.

We undertook a study to identify conditions and operational changes linked to improvements in smoking and blood pressure (BP) outcomes in primary care. We purposively sampled and interviewed practice staff (eg, office managers, clinicians) from a subset of 104 practices participating in EvidenceNOW-a multisite cardiovascular disease prevention initiative. We calculated Clinical Quality Measure improvements, with targets of 10-point or greater absolute improvements in the proportion of patients with smoking screening and, if relevant, counseling and in the proportion of hypertensive patients with adequately controlled BP. We analyzed interview data to identify operational changes, transforming these into numeric data. We used Configurational Comparative Methods to assess the joint effects of multiple factors on outcomes. In clinician-owned practices, implementing a workflow to routinely screen, counsel, and connect patients to smoking cessation resources, or implementing a documentation change or a referral to a resource alone led to an improvement of at least 10 points in the smoking outcome with a moderate level of facilitation support. These patterns did not manifest in health- or hospital system-owned practices or in Federally Qualified Health Centers, however. The BP outcome improved by at least 10 points among solo practices after medical assistants were trained to take an accurate BP. Among larger, clinician-owned practices, BP outcomes improved when practices implemented a second BP measurement when the first was elevated, and when staff learned where to document this information in the electronic health record. With 50 hours or more of facilitation, BP outcomes improved among larger and health- and hospital system-owned practices that implemented these operational changes. There was no magic bullet for improving smoking or BP outcomes. Multiple combinations of operational changes led to improvements, but only in specific contexts of practice size and ownership, or dose of external facilitation.

Current Interventional Radiology-Related Benchmarked Clinical Quality Measures Are Less Likely to be “Capped” Than Diagnostic Radiology Clinical Quality Measures

In the merit-based incentive payment system (MIPS), quality measures are considered topped out if national median performance rates are ≥95%. Quality measures worth 10 points can be capped at 7 points if topped out for ≥2 years. This report compares the availability of diagnostic radiology (DR)-related and interventional radiology (IR)-related measures worth 10 points. A total of 196 MIPS clinical quality measures were reviewed on the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services MIPS website. There are significantly more IR-related measures worth 10 points than DR measures (2/9 DR measures vs 9/12 IR measures; P = .03), demonstrating that clinical IR services can help mixed IR/DR groups maximize their Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services payment adjustment.

The Effect of Financial Incentives on Quality Measures in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: a Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundFinancial incentives are often used to improve quality of care in chronic care patients. However, the evidence concerning the effect of financial incentives is still inconclusive.ObjectiveTo test the effect of financial incentives on quality measures (QMs) in the treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus in primary care. We incentivized a clinical QM and a process QM to test the effect of financial incentives on different types of QMs and to investigate the spill-over effect on non-incentivized QMs.Design/ParticipantsParallel cluster randomized controlled trial based on electronic medical records database involving Swiss general practitioners (GPs). Practices were randomly allocated.InterventionAll participants received a bimonthly feedback report. The intervention group additionally received potential financial incentives on GP level depending on their performance.Main MeasuresBetween-group differences in proportions of patients fulfilling incentivized QM (process QM of annual HbA1c measurement and clinical QM of blood pressure level below 140/95 mmHg) after 12 months.Key ResultsSeventy-one GPs (median age 52 years, 72% male) from 43 different practices and subsequently 3838 patients with diabetes mellitus (median age 70 years, 57% male) were included. Proportions of patients with annual HbA1c measurements remained unchanged (intervention group decreased from 79.0 to 78.3%, control group from 81.5 to 81.0%, OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.90–1.32, p = 0.39). Proportions of patients with blood pressure below 140/95 improved from 49.9 to 52.5% in the intervention group and decreased from 51.2 to 49.0% in the control group (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.99–1.36, p = 0.06). Proportions of non-incentivized process QMs increased significantly in the intervention group.ConclusionGP level financial incentives did not result in more frequent HbA1c measurements or in improved blood pressure control. Interestingly, we could confirm a spill-over effect on non-incentivized process QMs. Yet, the mechanism of spill-over effects of financial incentives is largely unclear.Trial RegistrationISRCTN13305645

Comparison of Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis versus Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for the Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: Measures of Long-Term Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life

BackgroundWe studied the occurrence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in patients with either Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (hereafter “pharmacomechanical thrombolysis”; PT) or Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (CDT) for the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). MethodsThis retrospective study of data archived between September 2013 and September 2015 was surveyed. Two separate patient populations were identified and analyzed: patients were separated into PT group or CDT group. For up to 5 years post-treatment, the incidence, severity of PTS, and chronic venous insufficiency questionnaire (CIVIQ) score difference were compared. ResultsThe study identified 131 patients divided into PT group (65) and CDT group (66). Within the 5-year follow-up period, there was no significant difference in the incidence of PTS (45.0% PT vs. 57.6% CDT; odds ratio (OR) = 0.602; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.291–1.242; P = 0.201), but there was reduced severe PTS in the PT group (Villalta scale ≥15 or ulcer:11.7% PT vs. 27.1% CDT; OR 0.355; 95%CI 0.134–0.941, P = 0.039; and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) ≥8: 13.3%PT vs. 28.8% CDT; OR 0.380; 95% CI 0.149–0.967, P = 0.045). There was also a larger improvement of venous disease-specific quality of life (QOL) in the PT group at 5 years [(62.89 ± 14.19) vs (56.39 ±15.62), P = 0.036] compared to the CDT group. ConclusionIn patients with acute iliofemoral DVT treated with PT, PT significantly reduced PTS severity scores, and resulted in greater improvement in venous disease-specific QOL. However, the incidence of was not significantly different from that measured in the CDT.

Assessment of Variation in Electronic Health Record Capabilities and Reported Clinical Quality Performance in Ambulatory Care Clinics, 2014-2017

Electronic health records (EHRs) are widely promoted to improve the quality of health care, but information about the association of multifunctional EHRs with broad measures of quality in ambulatory settings is scarce. To assess the association between EHRs with different degrees of capabilities and publicly reported ambulatory quality measures in at least 3 clinical domains of care. This cross-sectional and longitudinal study was conducted using survey responses from 1141 ambulatory clinics in Minnesota, Washington, and Wisconsin affiliated with a health system that responded to the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Annual Survey and reported performance measures in 2014 to 2017. Statistical analysis was performed from July 10, 2019, through February 26, 2021. A composite measure of EHR capability that considered 50 EHR capabilities in 7 functional domains, grouped into the following ordered categories: no functional EHR, EHR underuser, EHR, neither underuser or superuser, EHR superuser; as well as a standardized composite of ambulatory clinical performance measures that included 3 to 25 individual measures (median, 13 individual measures). In 2014, 381 of 746 clinics (51%) were EHR superusers; this proportion increased in each subsequent year (457 of 846 clinics [54%] in 2015, 510 of 881 clinics [58%] in 2016, and 566 of 932 clinics [61%] in 2017). In each cross-sectional analysis year, EHR superusers had better clinical quality performance than other clinics (adjusted difference in score: 0.39 [95% CI, 0.12-0.65] in 2014; 0.29 [95% CI, -0.01 to 0.59] in 2015; 0.26 [95% CI, -0.05 to 0.56] in 2016; and 0.20 [95% CI, -0.04 to 0.45] in 2017). This difference in scores translates into an approximately 9% difference in a clinic's rank order in clinical quality. In longitudinal analyses, clinics that progressed to EHR superuser status had only slightly better gains in clinical quality between 2014 and 2017 compared with the gains in clinical quality of clinics that were static in terms of their EHR status (0.10 [95% CI, -0.13 to 0.32]). In an exploratory analysis, different types of EHR capability progressions had different degrees of associated improvements in ambulatory clinical quality (eg, progression from no functional EHR to a status short of superuser, 0.06 [95% CI, -0.40 to 0.52]; progression from EHR underuser to EHR superuser, 0.18 [95% CI, -0.14 to 0.50]). Between 2014 and 2017, ambulatory clinics in Minnesota, Washington, and Wisconsin with EHRs having greater capabilities had better composite measures of clinical quality than other clinics, but clinics that gained EHR capabilities during this time had smaller increases in clinical quality that were not statistically significant.

A Quality Improvement Education Pilot Project to Increase Recommendations for Physical Activity in Cancer Survivors.

Physical activity can provide benefits for cancer survivors. A nurse-provided physical activity recommendation is strongly supported by evidence-based symptom interventions developed by the Oncology Nursing Society. This pilot project aimed to evaluate whether a focused quality improvement education (QIE) intervention could increase the frequency with which oncology nurses provide a physical activity recommendation to patients. Using The Expanded Learning Model for Systems to structure the project, the project team provided a multipronged educational approach with coaching through quality improvement activities to guide practice change. Oncology-focused clinical quality measures (CQMs) related to assessment for cancer-related fatigue and recommendation for physical activity provided the primary data used to evaluate the impact of the QIE intervention. CQM data demonstrated substantial increases in the frequency with which patients were assessed for fatigue and provided with a physical activity recommendation. This pilot project provides preliminary evidence that a QIE intervention supported by coaching can help facilitate evidence-based practice change. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2021;52(4):184-191.].