ABSTRACT Background Anomia has been extensively researched within the aphasia literature and a dissociation in naming nouns and verbs has been used in diagnostic classifications and related to lesion location. However, there is evidence that action naming is more difficult for many clinical populations as well as for healthy speakers. Confrontation naming tests have often been used to evaluate anomia, but static depiction has been considered a potential source of error in evaluations of verb naming, since actions are dynamic. Aims The first aim of this study was to examine the ability to name objects and actions in a stroke population and non-brain damaged controls and to explore naming ability in relation to lesion location and aphasia type (fluent or non-fluent). A second aim was to determine if action naming is facilitated by using dynamic rather than static stimuli. Methods & Procedures A cross-sectional study was carried out, where 19 participants with aphasia after stroke and 19 matched controls were included. Type of aphasia was based on connected speech samples. Naming performance was compared on two Swedish naming tests consisting of line drawings of high frequency nouns and verbs respectively, and a subset of action pictures was compared to a test using video depictions of actions as verb stimuli. Outcomes & Results There was a significant difference between nouns and verbs in 11 of 19 participants with aphasia. Only one participant, with a temporo-occipital lesion, had a substantial noun-verb difference (≥30%). Individual results showed some agreement with the fluent-nonfluent classification. However, at group level, there was no significant difference between scores on action and object naming for participants with aphasia. While only the control group achieved significantly higher scores on object than action naming, response latencies were longer for action than object naming for both groups. There was no difference in action naming performance that could be related to the use of dynamic or static stimuli. Conclusions The results suggest that a dissociation in naming nouns and verbs is common in aphasia. This finding underscores the importance of testing action as well as object naming. Even though there was some agreement with aphasia type, the relationship between noun-verb dissociation, lesion location and aphasia type is not straight forward. The study adds to previous findings suggesting that action naming is more difficult than object naming. The question whether action naming is facilitated by using dynamic stimuli needs to be further investigated.
Read full abstract