Abstract The concepts of interdependent resource management have roots in the mid-20th century, and, more recently, the term “nexus” has been used to describe the interconnected relationships among various resources, including food, energy, water, climate, and land. United States and European science foundations have shown a growing interest in the food-energy-water nexus, leading to increased research on their joint management. Concurrently, in response to the looming threats of climate change, many cities in the United States have addressed climate governance by developing climate action plans for both mitigation and adaptation. However, one major criticism of the food-energy-water nexus is the limited translation of the research into practical policies and implementation, such as climate action plans. To assess the incorporation of food-energy-water nexus principles into climate planning, we systematically evaluate 100 climate action plans from large U.S. cities (population over 100,000). We identified primary themes and objectives for each resource, examining explicit or implicit connections within the climate action plans. Our findings show that the energy sector is a central focus in nearly every climate action plan (98%), followed by water (75%), and food (66%). Within the food sector, we observed a significant emphasis on food waste reduction and composting (about 80%) compared to other food-related topics. Among water-related matters, drinking water receives the most attention, compared to wastewater and stormwater. Notably, the most discussed FEW links are those that involve energy, particularly the water-for-energy and food-for-energy connections, found in over half of the documents (56%). Our analysis promotes the integration of the food-energy-water nexus into climate action plans while addressing the barriers to its effective implementation.
Read full abstract