Professor Goldstein was born in 1926 in Kolomea, Poland. As a 15-year-old boy he escaped from a line-up in the Ghetto by running away under gun fire. He was then hidden by a Catholic family for a long period. He studied at the University in Berne, Switzerland, and from 1953 to 1956 worked as Research Assistant in their Department of Chemistry and received his PhD in Biochemistry in 1955. In 1956 he moved to the United States, initially the Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology in Shrewsbury, Massachusetts and the following year the New York University Medical Center, where he played an active role for the rest of his life. He became Assistant Professor in Biochemistry in 1960, Associate Pro- fessor in 1963 and was appointed to Professor in Neurochemistry in 1969. In fact, this was one of the first Professorships in neurochemistry in the United States. Menek Goldstein received several honours, including the Robert and Adele Blank Lectureship Award (1986) and the Sarah L. Poiley Memorial Award (1989) at the New York Academy of Sciences; he was also elected Honorary Doctor of the Karolinska Institute in 1982, where he also held the additional title of Foreign Adjunct Professor from 1992. He was a member of several Editorial and Advisory Boards including the American Parkinson Disease Foundation and National Parkinson Foundation.Menek Goldstein's first publications, together with I. Abelin, were entitled `Specific dynamic action of proteins' (1954) and `Determination of catecholamines and brenzcat- echines in urine' (1956). In fact, these were to be the main themes of his research throughout his life, his work being focused on catecholamines and their enzymes. During his career he published more than 350 original articles, numerous abstracts and co-authored more than 70 articles for books. One of his most important scientific contributions was to purify all four enzymes in the catecholamine synthetic pathway, that is tyrosine hydroxylase, aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase, dopamine β-hydroxylase and phenylethanolamine N-methyl transferase, three of which he achieved as the first. This pioneering work was rapidly followed by the production of powerful antisera which allowed central and peripheral catecholamine systems to be mapped. This work was the foundation of our collaboration with Menek, which resulted in the first mapping of the central adrenaline systems. His antisera also made possible the description of co-existence between classical transmitters and neuropeptides. Other important contributions include discoveries relating to the activation and regulation of the catecholamine biosynthesis and the role of cyclic nucleotides in dopamine synthesis control, which led to an extensive analysis of central dopamine receptors and their role in Parkinson's disease. He and his collaborators developed a monkey model with experimentally induced lesions mimicking the symptoms seen in Parkinson's disease, i.e. tremor and hypokinesia. In this way it was possible to test and develop new drugs for treatment of this disease. In the dopamine receptor field he is, among other things, well known for his analysis of the so- called receptor reserve for dopamine agonists, which are important for our understanding of how autoreceptors regulate dopamine synthesis and release. Finally, he also made important contributions in the Lesch–Nyhan syndrome, a biochemical abnormality involving dopamine D1 receptor dysfunction.We met Menek, together, for the first time in Basel in 1969, at the International Pharmacology Congress. This meeting turned out to have considerable consequences, not only for our professional, but also our personal, lives, and would result in a warm and life-long friendship and, eventually, in more than 200 publications together and inspiring encounters at many scientific and more personal meetings. Menek often visited Sweden where he was a dear guest and had many friends. Although he never married and had no children, Menek was surrounded by people who loved him, especially Mirra who was his loving companion for many years. We enjoyed spending time with him at the NYU Medical Center where he worked, or in the apartment house where he lived. It was a pleasure to see how he called a friendly `how are you?' to everyone and how their faces lit up when they returned Menek's greetings. The same happened at conferences – Menek knew so many, and so many knew and liked Menek. Visits to New York will not be the same without him: no planning of experiments, no steaks and Delicatessen, and no strolling around on the east side of Manhattan. Science without Menek will be much less fun but the warm memories of a wonderful friend will comfort us for years to come.
Read full abstract