Fluoroscopy is apparently becoming of great medicolegal importance because of the augmentation of the number in the field of radiology, through the entrance into this specialty of many physicians who made use of the fluoroscope in the Army and Navy during the Second World War. As an old timer in this field of medicine, I consider it both my duty and privilege to warn my younger colleagues against the indiscriminate use of fluoroscopy in civil practice. During the past few months, I have seen several cases of roentgen dermatitis following and unquestionably due to fluoroscopy, all the result of overexposure and all produced by recently returned veterans who had had little experience with x-rays before their induction into the Armed Services. Because of the limitations of fluoroscopy and the dangers incident to its careless use, its medicolegal status demands careful consideration. With the present methods, perfected apparatus, and advanced knowledge of the effects of the roentgen rays, there is little or no excuse for accidental overdosage during a series of fluoroscopic or film examinations sufficient for complete study of the human body. No qualified radiologist will deny that such examinations may be made with safety if the operator knows his apparatus and technic. That every physician, when he enters the practice of medicine, shall possess an ordinary and reasonable degree of knowledge and skill, and apply that knowledge and skill with ordinary care and diligence, is the rightful expectation of the public, and the courts of our country have learned to demand this. Physicians in smaller towns and cities, away from the larger centers of population and medical education, are not expected to possess and exercise as high a degree of knowledge and skill as specialists from the large cities or centers of medical education. Indeed, it is pretty well established that the degree of knowledge and skill which practitioners of medicine are required by law to possess and apply is that degree of knowledge and skill ordinarily possessed and applied by members of their profession in the same line of practice, in the same or similar locations and at the same time. While we as physicians are not expected to be guarantors of results from our ministrations, we do guarantee that we possess the ordinary degree of knowledge and skill and that we will exercise ordinary care and dihgence in the appUcation of that knowledge and skill as applied under similar circumstances and conditions in the same or similar localities. But, it should be indelibly impressed upon us that, while knowledge and skill may vary somewhat in different geographical localities, the amount of radiation which may properly and safely he applied does not vary with the locality.
Read full abstract