Thegreat new fact of our time, as Archbishop William Temple termed it, has been apparent for at least two generations; namely, the Christian church is established on all continents and in virtually all countries. Even now, however, the ramifications of this development are only imperfectly appreci ated. In this essay I wish to explore the implications of the geographic extension of the church over the past two centuries for the way we write the history of the church. In the West, the history of the churches in Asia, Africa, and Latin America is generally assumed to be a subcategory of Western mission history. The development of the non-Western churches is indeed intertwined with the modern mission move ment. However, the empirical reality of the Christian ecumene at the end of the twentieth century cannot be comprehended ad equately through the category of mission history per se-it is considerably more than that. We must recognize that the global extension of the church represents a different kind of history from what church historians in the West usually write and teach. Typically, they produce studies of the settled life of the church in a so-called Christian culture or where the church has existed for a long time. Such studies are predicated on a parochial and institutional view. We must move beyond the conventional framework, which is governed by the assumption that what happened in the course of Western Christendom is universally normative for Christian history. This assumption has been reinforced by what Theodore
Read full abstract