Chronic Anticoagulation Research Articles

Anticoagulant monotherapy versus anticoagulant therapy in combination with single antiplatelet agent in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting - analysis of real-world data

Abstract Introduction Among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), in a significant group chronic anticoagulant treatment is indicated. Current recommendations from scientific societies do not clearly indicate the optimal antithrombotic treatment strategy in this group of patients. Addition of antiplatelet therapy recommended after CABG to chronic anticoagulant therapy increases the risk of bleeding complications, however, efficacy of antithrombotic treatment strategies has not been compared in large prospective studies. Purpose The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of post-CABG antithrombotic treatment strategies in patients after CABG with coexisting indications for chronic anticoagulant treatment, based on the analysis of the real-world database. Methods Real-world data from the THIN database were analyzed. The population included adult patients from France and Great Britain undergoing CABG between 2010 and 2022 who were treated with anticoagulants within a year after CABG and who were followed for at least one year after CABG or until death. The endpoints were compared between groups of patients treated with anticoagulants in monotherapy (VKA or NOAC) (MT) and patients treated with anticoagulants (VKA or NOAC) in combination with antiplatelet agent (ASA or oral P2Y12 inhibitor) (CT). The primary efficacy endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), the primary safety endpoint was major bleeding and the secondary safety endpoint was death from any cause. Results A database query obtained records of 3500 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, but due to missing data, 710 patients were included in the analysis. In this group, 193 (27.2%) patients were in MT group, and 517 (72.8%) in CT group. The majority (87.0%) were men, the mean age was 72.8 (9.4) years. The MACE occurred in 19.2% patients in the MT and in 19.3% in the CT. There was no significant effect of antithrombotic treatment strategy on time to event (log-rank test p=0.553) and on risk of MACE occurrence (HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.61 - 1.31) for CT vs. MT). The major bleeding occurred in 6.2% patients in the MT and in 10.3% in the CT and no significant effect of group was observed (log-rank test p=0.170, HR 1.55 [95% CI 0.83 - 2.90] for CT vs. MT). The death from any cause occurred in 10.9% patients in the MT and in 10.1% in the CT and no significant effect of group was observed (log-rank test p=0.174, HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.42 - 1.17] for CT vs. MT). Conclusions The results indicate the comparable efficacy and safety of both antithrombotic treatment strategies: anticoagulants in monotherapy versus anticoagulants in combination with antiplatelet agent in the group of patients after CABG with coexisting indications for chronic anticoagulation.

Comparison of interrupted and uninterrupted anticoagulation strategies for cardiac implantable electronic device insertion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Introduction Up to 35% of patients who are candidates for a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) receive chronic anticoagulation. However, guidelines on anticoagulant management in the perioperative period of CIED insertion differ worldwide. It is uncertain whether interrupting or continuing anticoagulation in these settings provides optimal outcomes. Purpose To assess the effects of interrupting versus continuing chronic anticoagulation with either warfarin or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in the perioperative setting of CIED insertion. Methods CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and two trial registries were searched from inception to 26 November 2021. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing interrupting chronic warfarin or DOAC therapy, with or without heparin bridging, versus continuing anticoagulation in adults undergoing CIED insertion were included. Comparisons were divided into two categories: interrupted versus uninterrupted warfarin and interrupted versus uninterrupted DOAC. Outcomes were expressed as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Inverse variance random-effects models were used for the meta-analyses. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool, and certainty of evidence (CoE) per outcome was assessed with GRADE methods. Results Ten RCTs (n=2221) were included: five RCTs (n=1267) used warfarin; four RCTs (n=954) used DOACs. One additional RCT using warfarin was ongoing without any outcome data available. Bleeding events included device-pocket haematoma, haemothorax, cardiac tamponade, and non-tamponade pericardial effusion. Interrupted versus uninterrupted warfarin: The evidence is very uncertain on the effect of interrupted warfarin on device-pocket haematoma (RR 1.89, 95%CI 0.85 to 4.20, 5 RCTs, very low CoE) and bleeding events (RR 1.94, 95%CI 0.86 to 4.41, 5 RCTs, very low CoE). Interrupted warfarin may result in little to no difference in thromboembolic events (RR 0.85, 95%CI 0.18 to 4.11, 5 RCTs, low CoE) and ischaemic stroke (RR 1.01, 95%CI 0.11 to 9.61, 2 RCTs, low CoE). Interrupted warfarin may reduce all-cause mortality (RR 0.35, 95%CI 0.04 to 2.93, 3 RCTs, low CoE). Interrupted versus uninterrupted DOAC: The evidence is very uncertain on the effect of interrupted DOAC on device-pocket haematoma (RR 1.15, 95%CI 0.58 to 2.28, 4 RCTs, very low CoE) and bleeding events (RR 1.14, 95%CI 0.58 to 2.21, 4 RCTs, very low CoE). Interrupted DOAC may result in little to no difference in thromboembolic events (RR 0.98, 95%CI 0.06 to 15.63, 3 RCT, low CoE) and ischaemic stroke (RR 0.98, 95%CI 0.06 to 15.63, 2 RCTs, low CoE). Interrupted DOAC may reduce all-cause mortality slightly (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.04 to 5.39, 2 RCTs, low CoE). Conclusion Interrupting anticoagulation with either warfarin or DOACs in patients undergoing CIED insertion produced similar outcomes as uninterrupted anticoagulation.Figure 1.Figure 2.

Pretreatment with dual antiplatelet therapy in acute myocardial infarction

Abstract Background Combined antithrombotic therapy prevents thrombus progression and its components embolization, and thus, it has an essential role in coronary microcirculation (re)perfusion in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Pretreatment with P2Y12 inhibitors, on top of aspirin, before primary angioplasty has not been satisfactorily studied in STEMI. Purpose To investigate the impact of combined antiplatelet therapy on-treatment on the outcome of patients with STEMI. Methods Patients who suffered STEMI during the 7 years (1/2016-12/2022) were included. The analysis is based on population data from the National Health Information System (NHIS). Information on AMIs from the Intervention Module of the Registry of Cardiovascular Operations and Interventions was combined with prescription data from the Registry of Reimbursed Health Services 6 months before MI and identification of deceased patients from the Registry of Death Records. Data from the NHIS covers almost 100% of all cases in the population. Standard descriptive statistics and test were applied in the analysis. Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for clinical and procedural characteristics was adopted to analyze the influence of pretreatment on the risk of 1) out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), 2) clinical condition at admission – need of mechanical ventilation and circulatory instability (Killip III,IV), 3) initial TIMI flow through the infarct-related coronary artery (IRA ), and 4) short term mortality. Results The study sample consisted of data from 40,383 STEMIs of which 1,601 patients were on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus iP2Y12 lasting 1 to 6 months before the event occurred. Patients on chronic oral anticoagulation (N 2101) were excluded. Patients on DAPT versus those without antiplatelet therapy or on aspirin at a daily dose of 100 mg were older, had higher comorbidity rates, and were at higher risk of mortality (Table). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients on DAPT at the time of MI onset and lasting for at least one month had a higher likelihood of preserved perfusion through the IRA (Odds ratio and 95% Confidence interval, OR (95% CI) 1. 193 (1.074; 1.326), p=0.001). However, the DAPT pretreatment did not reduce the risk of OHCA, the need for mechanical ventilation, or initial circulatory destabilization. It did not positively affect the prognosis of the patients (Figure ). Conclusion The significant benefit of the DAPT pretreatment on the preservation of infarct-related coronary artery flow did not translate into a positive effect on the prognosis of STEMI patients.

The prothrombotic state in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and ischemic heart failure: an association with endothelial dysfunction

Abstract Background Heart failure (HF) is associated with a substantial prothrombotic state and an increased risk of thromboembolism, regardless of the presence of atrial fibrillation (AF). Although oral anticoagulation in HF with known AF is recommended, there is no conclusive evidence supporting clinical benefits of chronic anticoagulation in HF subjects without AF. Other factors enhancing prothrombotic state, often concomitant with HF, are type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and coronary artery disease (CAD). T2D as well as CAD are independently associated with a hypercoaguability due to multiple mechanisms including endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress. Dysfunction of endothelium was observed in patients with HF, however a little is known about its influence on prothrombotic state in a very high risk HF population. Purpose This study aimed to investigate whether the prothrombotic state in patients with T2D, CAD, and HF, depends on the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) or endothelial function. Methods We assessed 54 patients with stable chronic HF, CAD, and T2D. Based on the echocardiography examination 28 of them were those with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and 26 of them were classified as HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) according to current guidelines. Fibrin clot density reflected by clot permeability (Ks) and thrombin generation were evaluated. Endothelial function was determined in flow-mediated (FMD) and nitroglycerin-mediated dilatation (NMD) tests of the brachial artery. Results Subjects in both groups were comparable in terms of cardiovascular risk factors except for lower glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by 18.1%. HFrEF patients had lower Ks by 20.3%, along with higher endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) by 18.9% and maximum thrombin level (Peak) by 24.1% as compared with HFpEF. While there were no differences in FMD and NMD between subjects, we found negative correlations of NMD with ETP and Peak (r=-0.448, P=0.001; r=-0.304, P=0.034, respectively). Moreover, the proportion of NMD and FMD along with GFR and LVEF were also significantly associated with both thrombogram parameters (<0.01 for all). By the multivariate analysis of the whole population, NMD, LVEF, low-density lipoprotein and GFR were independent predictors of ETP (R2=0.530, P<0.001) while NMD, LVEF, and GFR predicted Peak levels (R2=0.327, P=0.002). Conclusion We showed for the first time that patients with ischemic etiology of HFrEF and T2D presented altered fibrin clot properties and enhanced thrombin generation compared to HFpEF subjects. It might be hypothesized that endothelial dysfunction induced by T2D could intensify hypercoagulability in patients with HF.Figurę 1

Bilateral Adrenal Hemorrhage in a Patient Anticoagulated with Apixaban for Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS): A Rare Case Report

Context: Adrenal hemorrhage is a recognized yet rare complication associated with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), an autoimmune disorder characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies that increase the risk of thrombosis. The incidence of adrenal hemorrhage in patients with APS has a diagnostic yield of approximately one-third, indicating that it may often go unrecognized in clinical practice. Traditionally, the management of APS has relied on anti-vitamin K therapy, such as warfarin. However, the advent of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has prompted discussions about their use as an alternative. Recent clinical guidelines, however, strongly advise against the use of DOACs in patients with APS due to concerns over their safety and efficacy in preventing thromboembolic events. Case Presentation: This case study describes a 53-year-old woman with a history of venous thromboembolism who was treated with apixaban, a direct oral anticoagulant. She presented with acute abdominal pain and symptoms suggestive of adrenal insufficiency. Initial evaluations revealed significant changes in her clinical condition, leading to further diagnostic imaging. A CT scan demonstrated bilateral adrenal hemorrhage, which was a surprising finding given her anticoagulation therapy. Subsequent laboratory tests indicated a positive triple antibody profile, confirming a diagnosis of primary antiphospholipid syndrome. This case is particularly noteworthy as there have been limited documented instances of adrenal hemorrhage in patients receiving chronic anticoagulation with apixaban. The presentation of bilateral adrenal hemorrhage in the context of APS adds a crucial dimension to the understanding of the disease and its management. Conclusion: This case highlights the potential for serious complications, such as adrenal hemorrhage, in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome, particularly those treated with direct oral anticoagulants. It underscores the necessity for clinicians to remain vigilant for such rare yet significant events in the management of APS. Additionally, this case raises important questions regarding the appropriateness of DOACs in this patient population, especially given the latest recommendations against their use. Increased awareness and further investigation into the implications of anticoagulation strategies in APS patients are warranted to improve patient outcomes and safety.

Protocol-based treatment of spontaneous hemorrhage from varicose veins prevents recurrence of bleeding

BackgroundSpontaneous hemorrhage from erosion of varicose veins through the skin is a serious and occasionally fatal complication of varicose vein disease. Various treatments, both acute and delayed, have been advocated. Our two-step clinical protocol was designed to prevent further hemorrhage without delay and to provide durable freedom from recurrent bleeding. MethodsAll patients referred to our surgical vein practice with hemorrhage from varicose veins were entered into a prospective registry. On presentation, all patients underwent diagnostic duplex ultrasound for venous reflux. Immediate treatment consisted of ultrasound-guided polidocanol/CO2 foam sclerotherapy of the bleeding varicosity and adjacent veins. Subsequent endovenous ablation of underlying incompetent axial veins, with concurrent microphlebectomy when indicated, was scheduled and performed within 8 weeks. ResultsFifty-nine patients were referred with recent hemorrhage from varicose veins over a period of 4 years. Fifty-six (95%) had an ultrasound-identified tributary varicosity underlying the point of bleeding, and three had a skin-surface erosion only and no ultrasound-identified underlying tributary. Of the 59 study patients, 52 underwent prompt polidocanol/CO2 foam sclerotherapy, targeted to both the underlying tributary (when present) as well as the cutaneous bleeding varicosity. The remaining seven either declined sclerotherapy or were ineligible. Underlying incompetence of axial (great, small, or anterior saphenous) veins was found in 54 patients (92%). Of these patients with truncal vein incompetence, 48 underwent ablation—5 declined and 1 was too frail for any further intervention. There were no recurrent bleeds in the interval between immediate sclerotherapy and scheduled ablation. During a mean follow-up of 2.2 years, four patients (7%) had late, recurrent hemorrhage: one had failed to return for their scheduled ablation, two were on chronic anticoagulation, and one had severe right heart failure. All four were retreated without further recurrence. ConclusionsA two-step protocol of immediate ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy, followed within 8 weeks by endovenous ablation of incompetent axial veins and concurrent microphlebectomy, provided rapid and efficient treatment with durable freedom from subsequent hemorrhage.

TCT-188 Inpatient Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Patients on Chronic Anticoagulation: A Nationwide Analysis

TCT-188 Inpatient Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Patients on Chronic Anticoagulation: A Nationwide Analysis

Anticoagulant use before COVID-19 diagnosis prevent COVID-19 associated acute venous thromboembolism or not: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Coagulopathy and thromboembolic events are associated with poor outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. There is conflicting evidence on the effects of chronic anticoagulation on mortality and severity of COVID-19 disease. To summarize the body of evidence on the effects of pre-hospital anticoagulation on outcomes in COVID-19 patients. A Literature search was performed on LitCovid PubMed, WHO, and Scopus databases from inception (December 2019) till June 2023 for original studies reporting an association between prior use of anticoagulants and patient outcomes in adults with COVID-19. The primary outcome was the risk of thromboembolic events in COVID-19 patients taking anticoagulants. Secondary outcomes included COVID-19 disease severity, in terms of intensive care unit admission or invasive mechanical ventilation/intubation requirement in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection, and mortality. The random effects models were used to calculate crude and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs). Forty-six observational studies met our inclusion criteria. The unadjusted analysis found no association between prior anticoagulation and thromboembolic event risk [n = 43851, 9 studies, odds ratio (OR)= 0.67 (0.22, 2.07); P = 0.49; I 2 = 95%]. The association between prior anticoagulation and disease severity was non-significant [n = 186782; 22 studies, OR = 1.08 (0.78, 1.49); P = 0.64; I 2 = 89%]. However, pre-hospital anticoagulation significantly increased all-cause mortality risk [n = 207292; 35 studies, OR = 1.72 (1.37, 2.17); P < 0.00001; I 2 = 93%]. Pooling adjusted estimates revealed a statistically non-significant association between pre-hospital anticoagulation and thromboembolic event risk [aOR = 0.87 (0.42, 1.80); P = 0.71], mortality [aOR = 0.94 (0.84, 1.05); P = 0.31], and disease severity [aOR = 0.96 (0.72, 1.26); P = 0.76]. Prehospital anticoagulation was not significantly associated with reduced risk of thromboembolic events, improved survival, and lower disease severity in COVID-19 patients.

Evaluation of Long-term Antithrombotic Management for Atrial Fibrillation Patients with a History of Coronary Stent Implantation

Purpose: American expert consensus publications recommend discontinuation of antiplatelet agents 6 to 12 months after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) who require chronic anticoagulation, and use of oral anticoagulant monotherapy thereafter. This study aimed to assess real-world long-term antithrombotic therapy management practices and factors associated with the continuation of antiplatelet agents past 12 months post-PCI in patients with AF requiring chronic anticoagulation. Methods: Patients with AF and a history of PCI greater than 12 months before their most recent encounter with physicians at an outpatient electrophysiology clinic were identified by chart review. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and current antithrombotic regimen were collected from encounters that occurred between July 2019 and June 2022. The independent predictive factors associated with the continuation of antiplatelet agents were identified using univariate and regression analyses. Results: Out of 66 patients, 67% continued antiplatelet therapy for greater than 12 months post-PCI. Patients on antiplatelets were significantly less likely to have bare metal stents (p = 0.006), be greater than five years post-PCI (p = 0.002), and have a HASBLED score of two or less (p = 0.028) when compared to patients on oral anticoagulant monotherapy. Bare metal stent history (p = 0.045) and HASBLED score of two or less (p = 0.016) were also significant in regression analysis. Conclusion: This study found that most patients with AF and a history of PCI continued antiplatelet therapy longer than 12 months post-PCI, often despite the high bleeding risk.

Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus as a Marker of Disease Severity in 500 Patients with Atrial Fibrillation on Oral Anticoagulation: A 13-Year Follow-Up Study.

Background/Objective: Whether left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on chronic anticoagulation significantly increases cardiovascular risk is unknown. This study aimed to assess LAAT prevalence and its predictive role in cardiovascular events among consecutive anticoagulated patients with AF admitted for electrical cardioversion. Methods: This prospective study included 500 patients. The primary outcome was LAAT on transesophageal echocardiography. Patients were followed up for a median of 1927.5 (interquartile range 1004-2643) days to assess cardiovascular events. Results: LAAT was detected in 65 (13%) patients. No significant differences in stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic thromboembolic events, or myocardial infarction prevalence were observed between patients with AF with and without LAAT. Hospitalization for heart failure (HF) was more frequent in patients with LAAT than in those without LAAT; however, the effect of LAAT on HF hospitalization was not statistically significant. Patients with LAAT had a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular death than those without LAAT. LAAT and greater left atrial (LA) diameter were associated with higher rates of cardiovascular death. The independent HF hospitalization predictors were greater LA diameter, lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Conclusions: Patients with AF who received anticoagulation therapy showed a high prevalence of LAAT. LAAT and greater LA diameter were associated with significantly higher rates of cardiovascular death. LAAT, greater LA diameter, lower LVEF, and lower eGFR were associated with poor prognosis in anticoagulated patients with AF and were predictors of disease severity.

The effect of early surgery on clinical outcomes in proximal femoral fracture patients receiving chronic anticoagulation: A japanese nationwide database study

Introduction: Surgery is often delayed in patients with proximal femoral fractures who receive oral anticoagulants, to avoid complications related to perioperative bleeding. However, surgery delay may increase the risk of postoperative mortality. Our primary goal was to understand whether anticoagulated patients benefit from early surgery in terms of survival and perioperative complications.Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study of 581,189 patients with proximal femoral fractures. About 2.0 % (n = 11,385) received direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and 1.5 % (n = 8,726) received warfarin. Surgery was performed within 48 h in 37.6 % of DOAC patients, 27.6 % of warfarin patients and in 41.9 % of nonanticoagulated patients. Survival analysis was applied to compare mortality rate, blood transfusions, systemic complications and surgical complications during hospitalization between the study groups.Results: Patients receiving anticoagulation were older and had more comorbidities than patients without anticoagulation. There were overall similar rates of mortality (0.8 %, 1.1 % and 1.2 %) and surgical complications (2.1 %, 2.1 % and 2.2 %) in non-anticoagulated, DOAC and warfarin patients. Blood transfusions and systemic complications were higher in all anticoagulated patients regardless of surgery timing. There were comparable rates of early surgery (41.9 %, 37.6 % and 27.6 %, respectively). When operated early, DOAC patients had more surgical complications (OR=1.24, p = 0.04). Warfarin patients operated early had higher mortality (OR=1.48, p = 0.08) and higher risk of blood transfusions (OR=1.24, p < 0.001).Discussion: Age and comorbidities could explain higher rates of postoperative systemic complications in anticoagulated patients. Nevertheless, overall short-term mortality was similar between the groups. Early surgery was associated with higher rates of surgical complications in DOAC patients. When operated early, patients receiving warfarin were at an increased risk of mortality (p = 0.08) and perioperative blood transfusions.

Catheter ablation alone versus catheter ablation with combined percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Combined catheter ablation (CA) with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) may produce comprehensive treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) whereby rhythm control is achieved and stroke risk is reduced without the need for chronic oral anticoagulation. However, the efficacy and safety of this strategy is still controversial. This meta-analysis was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Cochrane risk of bias tool. Eligible studies reported outcomes in patients with AF who underwent combined CA and LAAC vs CA alone. Studies performing CA without pulmonary vein isolation were excluded. Eight studies comprising 1878 patients were included (2 RCT, 6 observational). When comparing combined CA and LAAC vs CA alone, pooled results showed no difference in arrhythmia recurrence (risk ratio (RR) 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-1.33), stroke or systemic embolism (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.27-2.22), or major periprocedural complications (RR 1.28; 95% CI 0.28-5.89). Total procedure time was shorter with CA alone (mean difference 48.45 min; 95% CI 23.06-74.62). Combined CA with LAAC for AF is associated with similar rates of arrhythmia-free survival, stroke, and major periprocedural complications when compared to CA alone. A combined strategy may be as safe and efficacious for patients at moderate to high risk for bleeding events to negate the need for chronic oral anticoagulation.

Chronic Anticoagulation in Patients Who Have Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Outpatient Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

BackgroundPatients who have atrial fibrillation frequently require long-term anticoagulation with warfarin or a direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC), such as apixaban or rivaroxaban, to avoid vascular complications. However, the impact of anticoagulant use on postoperative complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in an outpatient setting has not been thoroughly elucidated. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of anticoagulant use on early postoperative complications among atrial fibrillation patients undergoing outpatient TKA. MethodsAn insurance claims database was queried to identify all patients who underwent outpatient TKA between January 2010 and April 2022. There were two cohorts of patients, with associated 1:1 matched controls, who had atrial fibrillation and filled a prescription of either warfarin (N = 4,396) or DOAC (N = 5,383) for at least 30 days. The mean age was 70 years (range, 51 to 84), and 47.9% were women in the warfarin cohort, while the mean age was 70 years and 49.2% were women in the DOAC cohort. Postoperative 30-day medical and 90-day surgical complications were subsequently compared. ResultsPatients on warfarin had a higher incidence of pulmonary embolism (1.1 versus 0.2%, P < 0.001) and a lower incidence of TKA revision (0.1 versus 0.4%, P = 0.003) than matched controls. Similarly, patients on DOACs exhibited a higher incidence of pneumonia (1.4 versus 0.6%, P < 0.001) and myocardial infarction (3.2 versus 1.5%, P < 0.001) and a lower incidence of wound dehiscence (0.1 versus 0.5%, P < 0.001), joint infection (0.4 versus 0.9%, P = 0.002), and TKA revision (0.1 versus 0.4%, P = 0.002) than matched controls. ConclusionsAtrial fibrillation patients on long-term anticoagulants undergoing outpatient TKA experience higher rates of medical complications and lower rates of surgical complications than matched controls. Thus, patients on long-term anticoagulants may be considered for outpatient TKA but should be counseled appropriately on associated medical risks.

Outcomes among patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction on chronic anticoagulation: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample.

Chronic systemic anticoagulation use is prevalent for various thromboembolic conditions. Anticoagulation (usually through heparin products) is also recommended for the initial management of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). To evaluate the in-hospital outcomes of patients with NSTEMI who have been on chronic anticoagulation. Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) years 2016-2020, NSTEMI patients and patients with chronic anticoagulation were identified using the appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 10th version (ICD-10) appropriate codes. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality while the secondary outcomes included major bleeding, ischemic cerebrovascular accident (CVA), early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (i.e., within 24 h of admission), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) during hospitalization, length of stay (LOS), and total charges. Multivariate logistic or linear regression analyses were performed after adjusting for patient-level and hospital-level factors. Among 2,251,914 adult patients with NSTEMI, 190,540 (8.5%) were on chronic anticoagulation. Chronic anticoagulation use was associated with a lower incidence of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.73, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in major bleeding (aOR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.88-1.0, p = 0.15) or ischemic CVA (aOR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.03-1.69, p = 0.15). Chronic anticoagulation use was associated with a lower incidence of early PCI (aOR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.76-0.80, p < 0.001) and CABG (aOR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.41-0.45, p < 0.001). Chronic anticoagulation was also associated with decreased LOS and total charges (adjusted mean difference [aMD]: -0.8 days, 95% CI: -0.86 to -0.75, p < 0.001) and (aMD:$-19,340, 95% CI: -20,692 to -17,988, p < 0.001). Among patients admitted with NSTEMI, chronic anticoagulation use was associated with lower in-hospital mortality, LOS, and total charges, with no difference in the incidence of major bleeding.

Future Prospects of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.

The field of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is currently an expanding surgical field with constant refinements in techniques, outcomes, indications, and objectives. MBS has been effectively applied across diverse patient demographics, including varying ages, genders, body mass indexes, and comorbidity statuses. We performed a comprehensive literature review of published retrospective cohort studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and literature reviews from inception to 2024, reporting outcomes of MBS using databases such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Springer Link. MBS is a safe and efficient therapeutic option for patients with obesity and associated medical conditions (mortality rate 0.03-0.2%; complication rates 0.4-1%). The favorable safety profile of MBS in the short-, mid-, and long-term offers the potential to treat patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus, immunosuppression, chronic anticoagulation, neoplastic disease, and end-organ failure without increased morbidity and mortality. In conclusion, the future of MBS lies in the ongoing innovation and adapted therapeutic strategies along with the integration of a variety of other techniques for managing obesity. Careful preoperative assessments, coupled with a multidisciplinary approach, remain essential to ensure optimal surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction after MBS.

Persistent Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Aortic Valve Replacement in Heyde's Syndrome.

Heyde's syndrome (HS) represents an association between aortic stenosis and intestinal angiodysplasias, and it has been demonstrated that acquired von Willebrand disease plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of this syndrome. In patients with HS, von Willebrand factor deficiency represents an additional risk factor, further contributing to the risk of bleeding and anemia. We present the case of an 86-year-old patient diagnosed with HS and von Willebrand deficiency in 2018. Four years prior, the patient underwent surgical aortic valve replacement. Since then, she has been receiving chronic oral anticoagulation therapy with a vitamin K antagonist. The patient was admitted to the Internal Medicine Clinic due to semi-solid dark stools, diffuse abdominal pain, and asthenia. Upon examination, the patient presented with an altered general status and clinical signs suggestive of anemia. Laboratory findings revealed anemia with elevated INR and aPTT values. Colonic angiodysplasias were identified during a colonoscopy, although no sources of active bleeding were detected. On the 9th day of hospitalization, the patient experienced an episode of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. The pharmacological management was adjusted, and argon plasma coagulation was recommended. Following treatment of the angiodysplastic lesions, the patient's clinical evolution was favorable, with the correction of the anemia.

Management of apixaban anticoagulation in a patient requiring therapeutic plasma exchange: a case report and a literature review.

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is used as an effective treatment modality for a variety of autoimmune disorders. Apart from its desired effect of removing pathological blood components, it also can remove coagulation factors and drugs. Currently, there is an insufficient amount of information regarding the use of direct oral anticoagulants in this setting. In this article, we present a case report of a patient with myasthenia gravis and chronic anticoagulation with apixaban who underwent a series of TPE while continuing apixaban treatment. We observed that only 10% of daily dose was removed by the procedure and plasma levels of apixaban corresponded with expected range. TPE was not associated with shortened drug plasma half-life. We did not observe any significant alteration of apixaban pharmacokinetics during the period of TPE therapy, as well as no thrombotic or bleeding events. This case report supports the use of apixaban in patients treated by TPE, nevertheless, to firmly establish apixaban efficacy and safety profile in this clinical setting further research is needed.

Safety and efficacy of same-day discharge for premature ventricular complex ablations.

Patients undergoing catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are generally observed overnight in the hospital given the concern for complications. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of same-day discharge (SDD) of patients undergoing elective CA of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs). A retrospective evaluation of all patients undergoing elective VA ablation at Ascension St Vincent Hospital from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019 was undertaken. Of those, the patients undergoing PVC ablation were divided into SDD and non-SDD. Patients underwent SDD at the discretion of the operator. The primary safety outcome was the 30-day incidence of complications and death. The primary efficacy outcome was procedural success. Among 188 patients who underwent VA ablation, 98 (52.1%) were PVC ablations, and of those, 55 (56.1%) were SDD. There was no difference in age, gender, comorbidities, or ejection fraction between the two groups. Patients that were non-SDD were more likely to be on chronic anticoagulation (P = 0.03), have ablation in the LV (P = 0.04), have retrograde access (P = 0.03), and receive heparin during the procedure (P = 0.01). There were no complications in the SDD group compared with one (2.3%) in the non-SDD group. There was no difference in primary efficacy between the two groups with a 90.9% acute success in the SDD and 88.4% in the non-SDD (P = 0.68). Same-day discharge for CA of PVCs is feasible and could lower healthcare resource utilization without compromising outcomes in this unique population.

Outcomes of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension After Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Pulmonary Endarterectomy

BackgroundThe contemporary outcome of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) and pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) are unclear. ObjectivesThis study aimed to clarify the characteristics and outcomes of CTEPH patients treated with BPA and PEA in Japan. MethodsAmong 1,270 participants enrolled between 2018 and 2023 in the CTEPH AC (Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Anticoagulant) registry, a Japanese nationwide CTEPH registry, 369 treatment-naive patients (BPA strategy: n = 313; PEA strategy: n = 56) and 690 on-treatment patients (BPA strategy: n = 561; PEA strategy: n = 129) were classified according to the presence of prior reperfusion therapy. Morbidity and mortality events (all-cause death, rescue mechanical reperfusion therapy, and/or initiation of parenteral pulmonary vasodilators), pulmonary hemodynamics, exercise tolerance, and relevant laboratory test results were evaluated. ResultsThe BPA strategy was chosen in older patients than the PEA strategy (mean age, BPA vs PEA: 66.5 ± 12.6 years vs 62.5 ± 11.8 years; P = 0.028). Median follow-up period was 615 (Q1-Q3: 311-997) days in treatment-naive patients and 1,136 (Q1-Q3: 684-1,300) days in on-treatment patients. BPA strategy had as acceptable morbidity and mortality as PEA strategy (5-year morbidity and mortality event rate, BPA vs PEA: 10.2% [95% CI: 5.2%-19.5%] vs 16.1% [95% CI: 4.3%-50.6%] in treatment-naive patients; 9.7% [95% CI: 6.7%-13.8%] vs 6.9% [95% CI: 2.7%-17.3%] in on-treatment patients), with greater improvement of renal function; glomerular filtration rate in propensity score-matched population (difference between change: 4.9 [95% CI: 0.5-9.3] mL/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.030). ConclusionsBPA strategy was more frequently chosen in older patients compared with PEA strategy and showed acceptable outcomes for efficacy with greater advantage for improvement in renal function. (Multicenter registry of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in Japan; UMIN000033784)

Antithrombotics alter intracerebral hemorrhage presentation without affecting minimally invasive endoscopic evacuation

ObjectivesIntracerebral hemorrhages are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. While the ENRICH trial supports the efficacy of surgical evacuation for lobar hemorrhages, the impact of antithrombotic therapies on minimally invasive surgery outcomes remains unexplored. This study evaluates the effects of chronic anticoagulants and antiplatelets on the technical and longterm outcomes of minimally invasive intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation. Materials and MethodsA prospectively collected registry of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage from a single institution was analyzed (December 2015-September 2022). Data included key demographics, comorbidities, antithrombotic/reversal status, presenting clinical/radiographic characteristics, procedural metrics, and clinical outcomes. Patients were divided into control (neither therapy), antiplatelet-only, and anticoagulant-only groups, with antiplatelet/anticoagulant reversals conducted per current American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines. Variables significant in univariate analyses (p<0.05) were advanced to multivariable regression models. ResultsAmong 226 intracerebral hemorrhage patients treated with minimally invasive surgery, 41% (N=93) had antithrombotic medication history; 28% (N=64) received antiplatelets, and 9% (N=21) received anticoagulants. Patients on both therapies (N=6) were excluded. The antiplatelet group presented more frequently with lobar hemorrhages (56% vs. 37%; p=0.022), while patients on anticoagulants showed increased rates of intraventricular hemorrhage co-presentation (62% vs. 46%; p=0.011) compared to controls. Despite univariate analyses showing a higher postoperative hematoma volume (3.9 vs. 2.9 milliliters; p=0.020) and lower evacuation percentage (88% vs. 92%; p=0.019) for the antiplatelet group, and longer procedures for patients on anticoagulants (2.3 vs. 1.7 hours; p=0.042) compared to control, multivariable analyses indicated that antiplatelets and anticoagulants had no significant impact on these technical outcomes. Longitudinally, antithrombotics were not associated with increased rebleeding, less frequent discharge to home, lower 30-day mortality, or worse, 6-month Modified Rankin Scale scores. ConclusionsPatients on chronic antiplatelets and anticoagulants exhibited characteristic intracerebral hemorrhage phenotypes without worse technical or long-term outcomes after minimally invasive intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation, suggesting the procedure's safety for these patients.