Chemotherapy-induced Nausea Research Articles

Prevalence of anticipatory nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients undergoing highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

Anticipatory nausea and vomiting are unpleasant symptoms observed before undergoing chemotherapy sessions. Less is known about the occurrence of symptoms since the advent of the new neurokinin-1 antagonist. This prospective cohort study was performed at a single Brazilian Institution. This study included breast cancer patients who received doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy and an appropriate antiemetic regimen (dexamethasone 10 mg, palonosetron 0.56 mg, and netupitant 300 mg in the D1 followed by dexamethasone 10 mg 12/12 h in D2 and D4). Patients used a diary to record nausea, vomiting, and use of rescue medication in the first two cycles of treatment. The prevalence of anticipatory nausea and vomiting was assessed before chemotherapy on day 1 of C2. From August 4, 2020, to August 12, 2021, 60 patients were screened, and 52 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 50.8 (28-69) years, most had stage III (53.8%), and most received chemotherapy with curative intent (94%). During the first cycle, the frequency of overall nausea and vomiting was 67.31%, and that of severe nausea and vomiting (defined as grade>4 on a 10-point visual scale or use of rescue medication) was 55.77%. Ten patients had anticipatory nausea and vomiting (19.23%). The occurrence of nausea and vomiting during C1 was the only statistically significant predictor of anticipatory nausea and vomiting (OR=16, 95%CI 2.4-670.9, p=0.0003). The prevalence of anticipatory nausea is still high in the era of neurokinin-1 antagonists, and failure of antiemetic control in C1 remains the main risk factor. All efforts should be made to control chemotherapy-induced nausea or nausea and vomiting on C1 to avoid anticipatory nausea.

Discovering different acupoint combinations of manual or electro-acupuncture to treat chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting based on the complex networks analysis.

The aim of this research was to find the acupoint combinations of manual and electro-acupuncture to treat chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting via the complex networks analysis. We conducted searches using PubMed, ScienceDirect, MEDLINE, Ovid, spring, Wiley, EMBASE, the Chinese biomedicine database, VIP information network, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure from the establishment of the databases to the August, 2023. Information about titles, journals, interventions, and main acupoints was extracted using the self-established "acupoint for prevention CINV data base" powered by EpiData. According to the level of literature evidence and sample size, the clinical trials and weights of the outcome indicators including nausea/vomiting efficiency were combined. After identifying articles, literature processing and complex network analysis were conducted. The degree distribution of each node, the probability distribution of node degree, the node clustering coefficient, and the distance matrix are calculated by software. Of the 4001 screened publications, 489 were eligible after careful selection. Our result showed the acupoints ST36 and PC6 were the most common combination acupoints in both electro and manual acupuncture. In terms of efficiency, ST36, PC6, and CV12 are significantly effective acupoints for manual acupuncture, and the PC6 and ST36 are effective acupoint for electro-acupuncture. We found that the near-far collocation method has been commonly used for different types of acupuncture treatment in CINV. Zhongwan, Shangwan, and Liangmen have been mainly used as local acupoints, while Neiguan, Hegu, Quchi, Zusanli, Gongsun, TaiChong, and Neiguan have been mainly used as distal acupoints. From the effect analysis, acupuncture treatment of nausea manual acupuncture effect is better; acupuncture treatment of vomiting or electro-acupuncture effect is better.

Comparison of oral aprepitant and intravenous fosaprepitant for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in pediatric oncology patients: a randomized phase III trial.

Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists have improved the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), but to date there has been no prospective comparison between oral aprepitant and intravenous fosaprepitant in pediatric oncology patients. Our study was a double-parallel study, and the distribution ratio was 1:1. Children aged 2-12 years who were undergoing moderate or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC or HEC) were randomly assigned to receive ondansetron and dexamethasone combined with either a single dose of intravenous fosaprepitant (arm A), or 3 days of oral aprepitant (arm B). The primary outcome measure was the rate of complete response (CR) of CINV within the acute phase, defined as from the start through 24 hours after the last chemotherapy dose. Response during the delayed phase, overall response, and use of rescue antiemetics were also assessed. We prospectively evaluated 108 eligible patients, including 55 receiving fosaprepitant. Study observations were made during a single cycle for each patient. The occurrence of CR in the acute phase was statistically higher for patients receiving fosaprepitant (95% vs. 79%, P=0.018<0.05). Modest differences were seen in CR rates during the delayed phase (71% vs. 66%, P=0.586), and overall response rate (69% vs. 57%, P=0.179). The use of antiemetic rescue medicines was similar between arms A (11%) and B (7%). Fosaprepitant produced more CRs of CINV in the acute phase than did aprepitant, although there were no statistical differences in delayed phase response, overall response, or use of rescue antiemetics. This study confirms the safety, efficacy, and potential advantages of fosaprepitant in reducing CINV in pediatric oncology patients. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04873284.

Explore Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis Patterns and Patient-Reported Events to Suggest Improvements in Patient Care in Oncology-Specialized Hospitals in Vietnam

Explore Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis Patterns and Patient-Reported Events to Suggest Improvements in Patient Care in Oncology-Specialized Hospitals in Vietnam

Evaluation of aprepitant as an add-on therapy for prevention of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting in children

Background: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), represents a common and distressing side effect associated with antineoplastic treatment in pediatric patients. Aprepitant, a selective neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, is recommended for preventing CINV in combination with a standard antiemetic regimen in children undergoing chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of aprepitant as an add-on therapy to the standard antiemetic regimen for the prevention of CINV in children. Methods: This randomized control study was conducted in the BSMMU, Dhaka, Bangladesh from February 2020 to October 2020. Forty-six children with malignancy undergoing chemotherapy were divided into two arms: the Aprepitant arm (23 patients receiving granisetron, dexamethasone, and aprepitant) and the control arm (23 patients receiving Granisetron and Dexamethasone). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22.0. Results: The complete response rates for the aprepitant versus control arm during the acute and overall phase were 82% vs. 40% (p=0.003) and 65% vs. 26% (p=0.008), respectively. However, a higher percentage of patients who achieved complete response in the delayed phase was also observed, though statistically not significant (65% vs 40%, p=0.077). In the acute phase, there was a significant reduction in mild to moderate vomiting in the Aprepitant arm as compared to the control arm (p=0.01). In the overall phase, 35% of patients in the Aprepitant arm had mild to moderate vomiting as compared to 74% in the control group (p=0.027). No major adverse effects were reported by patients or caregivers. Conclusions: Adding Aprepitant to the standard antiemetic regimen was effective and safe in preventing CINV, especially in the acute phase, in pediatric patients receiving the moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).

Palonosetron for prevention of delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are common adverse events in patients undergoing emetogenic chemotherapy. Palonosetron, a second-generation 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist (5-HT3 RA), has demonstrated non-inferiority to first-generation 5-HT3 RAs for CINV in pediatric patients. Although palonosetron has a long half-life and prolonged antiemetic action, its efficacy against delayed CINV in pediatric patients is not well understood. Therefore, this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to evaluate the efficacy of palonosetron for delayed CINV in pediatric patients. A literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was performed. A meta-analysis was performed using forest plots, and risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A funnel plot was constructed to explore publication bias. The literature search retrieved 842 records, of which 23 full-text articles were assessed, including six RCTs. Meta-analysis of four RCTs that reported on the complete response (CR: defined as no emesis and no rescue medication) rate for delayed CINV revealed that palonosetron was statistically superior to first-generation 5-HT3 RAs (RR =1.21 [95% CI 1.09-1.35]; p < 0.01). Although the number of studies included was small, no publication bias was observed in the funnel plots. In addition, the CR rate for overall and acute CINV was also significantly higher for palonosetron (RR = 1.25 [95% CI 1.01-1.54]; p = 0.04 and RR = 1.06 [95% CI 1.01-1.12]; p = 0.03, respectively). Palonosetron is effective in the prophylaxis of delayed CINV in pediatric patients.

Cannabis use in the United States and its impact on gastrointestinal health.

In recent years, the legalization and social acceptability of cannabis use have increased in the United States. Concurrently, the prevalence of cannabis use has continued to rise, and cannabis products have diversified. There are growing concerns regarding the health effects of regular and high-potency cannabis use, and new research has shed light on its potentially negative effects. Here, we review evidence of the gastrointestinal (GI) effects of cannabis and cannabinoids. Dysregulation of the endocannabinoid system might contribute to various GI disorders, including irritable bowel syndrome and cyclic vomiting syndrome, and endocannabinoids have been found to regulate visceral sensation, nausea, vomiting, and the gut microbiome. Cannabis has been shown to have antiemetic properties, and the US Food and Drug Administration has approved cannabis-based medications for treating chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Yet, chronic heavy cannabis use has been linked to recurrent episodes of severe nausea and intractable vomiting (cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome). Given the considerable heterogeneity in the scientific literature, it is unclear if cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome is truly a distinct entity or a subtype of cyclic vomiting that is unmasked by heavy cannabis use and the associated dysregulation of the endocannabinoid system. The changes in cannabis legalization, availability, and public risk perceptions have outpaced research in this area and there is a need for robust, prospective, large-scale studies to understand the effects of cannabis use on GI health.

Cannabinoids in Treating Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting, Cancer-Associated Pain, and Tumor Growth.

Cannabis has been used as an herbal remedy for thousands of years, and recent research indicates promising new uses in medicine. So far, some studies have shown cannabinoids to be safe in helping mitigate some cancer-associated complications, including chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, cancer-associated pain, and tumor growth. Researchers have been particularly interested in the potential uses of cannabinoids in treating cancer due to their ability to regulate cancer-related cell cycle pathways, prompting many beneficial effects, such as tumor growth prevention, cell cycle obstruction, and cell death. Cannabinoids have been found to affect tumors of the brain, prostate, colon and rectum, breast, uterus, cervix, thyroid, skin, pancreas, and lymph. However, the full potential of cannabinoids is yet to be understood. This review discusses current knowledge on the promising applications of cannabinoids in treating three different side effects of cancer-chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, cancer-associated pain, and tumor development. The findings suggest that cannabinoids can be used to address some side effects of cancer and to limit the growth of tumors, though a lack of supporting clinical trials presents a challenge for use on actual patients. An additional challenge will be examining whether any of the over one hundred naturally occurring cannabinoids or dozens of synthetic compounds also exhibit useful clinical properties. Currently, clinical trials are underway; however, no regulatory agencies have approved cannabinoid use for any cancer symptoms beyond antinausea.

Clinical features of acute attacks, chronic symptoms, and long-term complications among patients with acute hepatic porphyria in Japan: a real-world claims database study

BackgroundAcute hepatic porphyria (AHP) is a family of rare genetic diseases, including acute intermittent porphyria, variegate porphyria, hereditary coproporphyria, and delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase-deficient porphyria. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to provide information on the clinical features of AHP in Japan—including acute attacks, chronic symptoms, and long-term complications.MethodsPatients with AHP between April 2008 and June 2020 were selected from Japan’s Medical Data Vision claims database. Patients with AHP were matched 1:10, by sex and age, to patients without AHP. The outcomes were evaluated overall, for patients age ≥ 55 years, and for the matched population.ResultsA total of 391 patients with AHP were included from the Japanese Medical Data Vision database. During the observation period (April 2008–June 2020), 18.2% (71/391) of patients experienced 1 acute attack and 10.5% (41/391) experienced ≥ 2 attacks. Chronic symptoms with rates ~ 10% or higher in the AHP population compared with the matched population included neurotic, stress-related, and somatoform disorders (21.7% vs. 6.7% [15.0% difference]); sleep disorders (23.0% vs. 9.9% [13.1% difference]); other and unspecified abdominal pain (13.6% vs. 3.7% [9.9% difference]); and nausea and vomiting, excluding chemotherapy-induced emesis (17.9% vs. 8.1% [9.8% difference]). Long-term complications with higher incidence rates in the AHP population compared with the matched population included fibrosis and cirrhosis of liver (15.9% vs. 3.0% [12.9% difference]), polyneuropathies and other disorders of the peripheral nervous system (20.5% vs. 7.9% [12.6% difference]), liver cancer (16.9% vs. 4.7% [12.2% difference]), renal failure (16.4% vs. 4.3% [12.1% difference]), and hypertension (26.1% vs. 18.8% [7.3% difference]). Among AHP patients age ≥ 55 years, the most common long-term complications were hypertension, kidney failure, and liver cancer.ConclusionsIn Japan, patients with AHP experience a high clinical burden in terms of acute attacks, chronic symptoms, and long-term complications. The clinical burden related to chronic symptoms and long-term complications was substantially higher in Japanese patients with AHP compared with a matched population without AHP. Recognizing these signs and symptoms of AHP may aid physicians in making an earlier diagnosis, which may help patients avoid attack triggers, implement disease management, and reduce lifetime disease burden.

Gamification as an Educational Approach for Oncological Patients: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Education plays a pivotal role in the care of oncological patients, reducing health costs, hospital readmission, and disease relapses. Education can be supportive in achieving multiple outcomes, improving symptom control and quality of life. A new approach is emerging in patient education: gamification. Gamification was defined as the "use of game elements in non-game contexts", including the application of games in serious contexts. The aim of this review is to explore the use of gamification in the oncology setting. A systematic scoping review was conducted in the MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases using the JBI guidelines. The 13 included reports were critically appraised by two reviewers independently. It seems that gamification could be effective both in prevention and cancer treatments. Gamification also seems to improve chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting management, quality of life, and reduced anxiety levels in different cancer groups. Moreover, gamification seems effective in improving self-care in cancer patients, regardless of gender, age, and ethnicity. Gamification improves patient engagement and biopsychosocial outcomes and could represent a valid approach to cancer patient education; however, it is not a substitute for healthcare professionals, who remain the leaders in the education process.

Abstract B029: Genetic changes &amp; polymorphisms of neurotransmitter receptors associated with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in cancer patients

Abstract Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) affect cancer patients’ survival and quality of life, despite antiemetic intervention. Polymorphisms in genes involved in nausea and vomiting pathways may influence the risk of CINV response in most cancer patients, who still present with acute and delayed CINV. Hence, this study aimed at profiling Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) of three clinically significant neurotransmitter-receptor encoding genes in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. This is a prospective cross-sectional study of 299 cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, ages 18-75 years, who were selected across three tertiary healthcare institutions in South-west, Nigeria. Socio-demographic, clinical data and CINV occurrence responses were obtained using a self-designed questionnaire and patient interview post-chemotherapy. Target genes from genomic DNA extracted in collected blood samples were amplified by multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Nucleotide sequences were identified by Next Generation Sequencing and analyzed using bioinformatics software. P&amp;lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant for the association between identified SNPs and CINV. The majority of participants presented with advanced-stage cancer (stage 3) as compared to that early-stage 1. Cancer patients who experienced CINV were highly prevalent in breast cancer [84(62.9%); 41(30.60%)] and cervical cancer [33(50%); 33(45.46%)]. SNPs alongside their positions and frequencies were identified in the participants; HTR3A [(5’UTR; rs1062613(C&amp;gt;T), 9(45%)], DRD2 [Exon7; rs6277(G&amp;gt;A), 16(80%), intron 6; rs1076560 (C&amp;gt;A), 16(80%)], COMT [Exon 4; rs4680(G&amp;gt;A), 19(95%)] and TACR1 [Exon2; Y192H(T&amp;gt;C), 11(55%) and Exon 4; (rs17838409 (G&amp;gt;A)] respectively. None of the SNPs was significantly (P&amp;gt;0.05) associated with CINV occurrence. However, rs1062613, rs6277, and rs4680 were significantly (P&amp;lt;0.05) associated with vomiting grade, while rs4680 was found to be significantly associated with nausea severity. The identified neurotransmitter receptors SNPs exert influence on CINV response in cancer patients. Citation Format: John Abiodun Obadipe, Titilola Aderonke Samuel, Oluyemi Akinloye, Mutiu Alani Jimoh, Adewunmi Olabimpe Alabi, Babatunde M. Alabi, Oluwabanke Temitope Adewusi, Valerie Odero-marah. Genetic changes &amp; polymorphisms of neurotransmitter receptors associated with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr B029.

CO92 Clinician-Reported Outcome Measure for Palonosetron Versus Standard of Care in Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Egypt

CO92 Clinician-Reported Outcome Measure for Palonosetron Versus Standard of Care in Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Egypt

Retrospective Evaluation of a Dexamethasone Sparing Antiemetic Regimen: An Antiemetic Prophylaxis Study on NEPA (Netupitant Plus Palonosetron) for Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV) in Cancer Patients.

Background Corticosteroids, specifically dexamethasone (DEX), have been extensively utilized for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). However, their usage is associated with a range of adverse events. In contrast, the combination of NetupitantPlus Palonosetron (NEPA) with a single dose of DEX provides comparable efficacy in preventing CINV over a five-day period following chemotherapy administration. This regimen offers the advantage of reducing the need for additional doses of DEX, particularly in the high-risk setting of HEC (Highly emetic chemotherapy). Objective To evaluate dexamethasone sparing anti-emetic regimen (single dose dexamethasone with NEPA) for prophylaxis of CINV in patients receiving HEC. Methodology This is a retrospective, observational, real-world, single-center study including data of 69 patients who received high-dose emetogenic chemotherapy and were administered DEX (8 or 12 mg) on day 1, with no dose ofDEX on days 2, 3, and 4, combined with an oral combination of tablet netupitant 300 mg and palonosetron 0.5 mg. NEPA was taken orally an hour prior to the start of the HEC cycle. The primary efficacy endpoint was complete response (CR) which is defined as no nausea, emesis, or no rescue medication during the Acute (< 24 hours) and Delayed Phase (25-120 hours) of chemotherapy. Results The overall CR achieved in the acute and delayed phase for vomiting is 100% at all four follow-ups. The CR achieved in the acute phase is 95.7% whereas 98.6% of patients showed CR in the delayed phase respectively. No patient required any rescue medication. No acute and delayed phase of vomiting was reported. Conclusion A simplified regimen of NEPA plus single-dose DEX offers effective CINV prevention throughout five days post-chemotherapy with the advantage of sparing patients additional doses of DEX in the high-emetic-risk setting chemotherapy.

Efficacy of 3-day versus 5-day aprepitant regimens for long-delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy

ABSTRACT Background Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is an ongoing problem. While effectiveness of triplet antiemetic regimens in the delayed CINV phase (24–120 hours after administration of chemotherapy) has been studied, their effectiveness in the long-delayed phase (120–168 hours post-administration) is unknown. We compared the efficacy of 3- and 5-day courses of a triplet antiemetic prophylaxis containing aprepitant (APR) in controlling long-delayed CINV after cisplatin (CDDP)-based chemotherapy. Research design and methods We obtained patient-level data from a nationwide, multicenter, prospective observational study in Japan. The incidence and timing of CINV after 3- and 5-day APR-containing regimens were compared using inverse probability treatment weighting. Results: The analysis included 380 patients. The incidence rates of long-delayed nausea and vomiting were significantly reduced for the 5-day compared with the 3-day regimen (29.1% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.0042; 6.7% vs. 0%, p < 0.0001, respectively). Among those without CINV, vomiting was not reported after day 2 in the 5-day APR group but increased after day 4 in the 3-day APR group. Conclusion A 5-day regimen triplet antiemetic prophylaxis with APR decreased long-delayed vomiting compared with a 3-day regimen in patients receiving CDDP-based chemotherapy. However, the 5-day regimen showed no advantage over the 3-day regimen against long-delayed nausea.

Evaluation of palonosetron, fosaprepitant, and olanzapine as antiemetic prophylaxis for fludarabine and melphalan-based conditioning regimens prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants

BackgroundLimited data are available regarding efficacious antiemetic regimens to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). In patients aged 60 years or older, allogeneic HSCT is associated with improved survival, but tolerability of the transplant is a significant barrier. Fludarabine and melphalan (Flu–Mel) is a frequently utilized multi-day reduced intensity conditioning regimen for allogeneic HSCT. However, the optimal CINV prevention regimen is unknown. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a novel CINV prophylaxis regimen prior to allogeneic HSCT with Flu–Mel compared to a historical control group. Study designThis was a retrospective, single-center, cohort review of 123 patients who received a Flu–Mel preparative regimen prior to allogeneic HSCT from January 1, 2019, to September 30, 2022. Fifty-nine patients received high dose ondansetron (HDO) for CINV prevention, while sixty-four patients received a combination of palonosetron, fosaprepitant, and olanzapine (PFO). The primary outcome was average number of rescue antiemetic doses administered per day. A key secondary outcome was time to first rescue antiemetic. ResultsThe median number of antiemetic doses used per day was significantly lower in patients who received PFO compared to HDO (1.94 doses [0.31–3.60] vs 3.31 doses [1.61–4.92]; p = 0.002). In addition, use of PFO significantly prolonged the median time to first rescue antiemetic compared to HDO (41.3 h [24.3–122.7] vs 26.2 h [14.7–48.1]; p = 0.016). ConclusionThe combination of palonosetron, fosaprepitant, and olanzapine is an effective antiemetic regimen for patients receiving a Flu–Mel-based preparative regimen.

Using Follow-Up Telephone Calls to Identify Obstacles to Prevention and Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting.

Despite advances in antiemetic regimens, uncontrolled chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains a problem for patients receiving oncology treatment, leading to decreased quality of life and worse treatment outcomes. The purpose of this pilot project was to use follow-up telephone calls to identify barriers related to successful management and prevention of CINV on a single-center outpatient chemotherapy infusion unit. A mixed-methods descriptive design was used for this project. Quantitative data were used to assess barriers to management and prevention of CINV. Secondary multiple regression analysis was used to determine whether barriers could predict CINV. Qualitative data were used to analyze common barriers and themes. Of the patients called (N = 132), 50% identified a barrier to managing and treating CINV, with the most common barrier being knowledge gaps related to proper use of antiemetics.

Efficacy and safety of Aprepitant-containing triple therapy for the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: A meta-analysis.

Most cancer patients suffer from the pain of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a regimen consisting of aprepitant, dexamethasone, and 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in the prevention and treatment of CINV. A systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, HEED, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of triple therapy (aprepitant, 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, and dexamethasone) to prevent and treat CINV. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 and Stata17 software, employing either a fixed-effect or random-effect model based on statistical heterogeneity. A meta-analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 7956 patients was conducted. Efficacy: Results showed significantly improved complete responses (CRs) for CINV in the test group versus the control group in the overall, acute, and delayed phases. Furthermore, in the test group, substantial alleviation of nausea symptoms was observed in the delayed and overall phases but not in the acute phase. Safety: There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of febrile neutropenia, diarrhea, anorexia, and headache between the 2 groups. The incidence of fatigue and hiccups in the test group was higher than that in the control group; however, the incidence of constipation was significantly lower. Aprepitant-containing triple therapy is highly effective in the prevention and treatment of CINV, with reliable medication safety.

Cannabigerolic Acid (CBGA) Inhibits the TRPM7 Ion Channel Through its Kinase Domain.

Cannabinoids are a major class of compounds produced by the plant Cannabis sativa. Previous work has demonstrated that the main cannabinoids cannabidiol (CBD) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) can have some beneficial effects on pain, inflammation, epilepsy, and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. While CBD and THC represent the two major plant cannabinoids, some hemp varieties with enzymatic deficiencies produce mainly cannabigerolic acid (CBGA). We recently reported that CBGA has a potent inhibitory effect on both Store-Operated Calcium Entry (SOCE) via inhibition of Calcium Release-Activated Calcium (CRAC) channels as well as currents carried by the channel-kinase TRPM7. Importantly, CBGA prevented kidney damage and suppressed mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokines through inhibition of these mechanisms in an acute nephropathic mouse model. In the present study, we investigate the most common major and minor cannabinoids to determine their potential efficacy on TRPM7 channel function. We find that approximately half of the tested cannabinoids suppress TRPM7 currents to some degree, with CBGA having the strongest inhibitory effect on TRPM7. We determined that the CBGA-mediated inhibition of TRPM7 requires a functional kinase domain, is sensitized by both intracellular Mg⋅ATP and free Mg2+ and reduced by increases in intracellular Ca2+. Finally, we demonstrate that CBGA inhibits native TRPM7 channels in a B lymphocyte cell line. In conclusion, we demonstrate that CBGA is the most potent cannabinoid in suppressing TRPM7 activity and possesses therapeutic potential for diseases in which TRPM7 is known to play an important role such as cancer, stroke, and kidney disease.

The preventive effects of ondansetron on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in adult cancer patients: systematic review from ClinicalTrials.gov

The preventive effects of ondansetron on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in adult cancer patients: systematic review from ClinicalTrials.gov

Comparison of netupitant/palonosetron with 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist in preventing of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Comparison of netupitant/palonosetron with 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist in preventing of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation