Repertoire Of Chemokine Receptors Research Articles

A role for chemokines in the induction of chondrocyte phenotype modulation

To extend the study of the chemokine receptor repertoire on human chondrocytes to receptors with reported housekeeping functions (CXCR3, CXCR4, CXCR5, and CCR6) and to evaluate whether ligands of these receptors play a role in chondrocyte phenotype modulation and proliferation. Chemokine receptor expression was determined by flow cytometry. Subcultures of chondrocytes were collected and fixed at confluence or during the exponential phase of growth and analyzed for chemokine receptor modulation. The effects of chemokines on isolated cells as well as chondrocytes cultured within an intact extracellular matrix were investigated. Isolated human chondrocytes were stimulated with 100 nM chemokines (monokine induced by interferon-gamma, stromal cell-derived factor 1alpha [SDF-1alpha], B cell-attracting chemokine 1 [BCA-1], or macrophage inflammatory protein 3alpha), and conditioned media were assessed for matrix-degrading enzyme contents (matrix metalloproteinases [MMPs] 1, 3, and 13, and N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase [NAG]). Cell proliferation and phenotype modulation were evaluated by bromodeoxyuridine incorporation and cathepsin B production. Induction of cell proliferation was assessed in cartilage explants by immunodetection of the proliferation-associated antigen S100A4. CXCR3, CXCR4, CXCR5, and CCR6 were detected on human chondrocytes. CXCR3 and CXCR4 expression was increased in exponentially growing chondrocyte subcultures. Ligands of all receptors enhanced the release of MMPs 1, 3, and 13. Release of NAG and cathepsin B was significantly higher in chemokine-stimulated cultures than in unstimulated cultures. SDF-1alpha and BCA-1 also induced DNA synthesis and chondrocyte proliferation, as was shown by the up-regulation of S100A4 in cartilage explants as well. Our findings extend the repertoire of functional responses elicited by the activity of chemokines on chondrocytes and open new avenues in our understanding of the control of chondrocyte differentiation status by chemokines and their receptors.

CXCL12 expression by invasive trophoblasts induces the specific migration of CD16– human natural killer cells

AbstractIn the maternal decidua, natural killer (NK) cells, characterized by lack of CD16, are found in direct contact with the fetal extravillous trophoblasts (EVTs). It is yet unknown which factors contribute to the specific homing of this unique NK subset to the decidua. In this study we analyze the chemokine receptor repertoire on various NK populations derived from the peripheral blood and decidua. We show that CXCR4 and CXCR3 receptors are preferentially expressed on CD16– NK subsets derived either from the peripheral blood or the decidua and that these receptors are involved in migration of all NK subsets to their ligands. We further demonstrate in vivo that invading EVTs that eventually perform endovascular invasion express CXCL12, the ligand for CXCR4, but not ligands for CXCR3. Indeed, specific accumulation of the CD16– NK cells at the expense of CD16+ cells was observed only when in vitro migration was performed with ligands for CXCR4. Finally, incubation of the peripheral blood CD16– NK cells with cytokines present in the decidua, especially interleukin 15 (IL-15), resulted in the expression of chemokine receptor repertoire similar to that observed on decidual NK cells, suggesting an additional important regulatory effect of local decidual cytokines.

G protein-coupled receptors in natural killer cells.

Natural killer (NK) cells are capable of killing tumor as well as virally infected cells. How these cells migrate toward the infected sites in the body is not completely understood. Chemokine receptors that belong to the heptahelical family of receptors and characteristically bind heterotrimeric G proteins are present in most NK cells. Recent results showed that resting NK cells highly express constitutive chemokine receptors (CCR4, CCR7, CXCR4, and CX(3)CR1) with low expression of a limited repertoire of inflammatory chemokine receptors (CCR1 and CXCR3). However, only a subset of these cells expressing the CD56(dim) and adhesion molecule(high) phenotype is capable of in vivo binding to vascular endothelium. Under pathological conditions where inflammatory cytokines are present, these cells are induced to express inflammatory chemokine receptors. Resting as well as activated NK cells also express receptors for another member of the heptahelical family of receptors that bind phosphorylated or glycosylated lysolipids. These include sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)(1), S1P(4), and S1P(5), the receptors for S1P; lysophosphatidic acid (LPA)(1), LPA(2), and LPA(3), the receptors for LPA; and T cell death-associated gene 8, the receptor for psychosine. Similar to chemokines, S1P, LPA, and psychosine induce the chemotaxis of NK cells through heterotrimeric G proteins. However, in contrast to chemokines, which enhance the cytotoxicity of NK cells, lysolipids inhibit this function. We hope that gaining knowledge regarding the distribution of activated NK cells toward the sites of tumor growth or virally infected sites will give an advantage in designing strategies using these cells as tools for the prevention and treatment of immunodeficiencies.

Cutting edge: profile of chemokine receptor expression on human plasma cells accounts for their efficient recruitment to target tissues.

We systematically examined the repertoire of chemokine receptors expressed by human plasma cells. Fresh bone marrow plasma cells and myeloma cells consistently expressed CXCR4, CXCR6, CCR10, and CCR3. Accordingly, plasma cells responded to their respective ligands in chemotaxis and very late Ag-4-dependent cell adhesion to fibronectin. Immobilized CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL)16, a novel transmembrane-type chemokine and CXCR6 ligand, also directly induced adhesion of plasma cells without requiring G(alpha i) signaling or divalent cations. Furthermore, we revealed consistent expression of CXCL12 (CXCR4 ligand), CXCL16 (CXCR6 ligand), and CC chemokine ligand 28 (CCR10 and CCR3 ligand) in tissues enriched with plasma cells including bone marrow, and constitutive expression of CXCL12, CXCL16, and CC chemokine ligand 28 by cultured human bone marrow stromal cells. Collectively, plasma cells are likely to be recruited to bone marrow and other target tissues via CXCR4, CXCR6, CCR10, and CCR3. CXCR6 may also contribute to tissue localization of plasma cells through its direct binding to membrane-anchored CXCL16.

T lymphocytes express B7 family molecules following interaction with dendritic cells and acquire bystander costimulatory properties.

Dendritic cells (DC) play a pivotal role in the initiation, maintenance and regulation of the immune response. Here we obtained the first evidence that DC, in the absence of any foreign antigens, induce the expression of B7 family costimulatory molecules, such as CD80, CD86, B7-H1, PD-L2, B7-H3, and B7RP-1, on autologous T lymphocytes. Cell-to-cell contact between DC and T cells was needed in order to obtain this expression on T cells. De novo expressed B7 molecules on T cells were functional since B7+ T cells were able to costimulate the proliferation of highly purified T cells. While both autologous and allogeneic DC were able to induce similar levels of costimulatory molecule expression, the chemokine receptor repertoire on B7+ T cells after interaction with DC varied depending on the presence of allo-antigens during the interaction (CCR7-, CCR5+) or the absence of antigens (CCR7+, CCR5-). In accordance with this different pattern of chemokine receptors in the two conditions, we propose that, after the encounter with DC in lymphoid organs, this peculiar T cell population should reside in the T cell areas of the lymph nodes or migrate to peripheral sites of inflammation, providing a second signal for activating or switching off, respectively, naive or peripheral effector T cells.

T-cells in the cerebrospinal fluid express a similar repertoire of inflammatory chemokine receptors in the absence or presence of CNS inflammation: implications for CNS trafficking.

It is believed that chemokines and their receptors are involved in trafficking of T-cells to the central nervous system (CNS). The aim of the current study was to define the expression on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) T-cells of six chemokine receptors associated with trafficking to sites of inflammation. Flow cytometry was used to detect chemokine receptor expression. We observed that CD3+T-cells in the CSF express a restricted array of inflammatory chemokine receptors, specifically CXCR3, CCR5 and CCR6, but little CCR1-3. This repertoire was independent of the presence of CNS inflammation, since comparable findings were obtained in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and individuals with non-inflammatory neurological diseases. The enrichment of CCR5+T-cells in the CSF could largely be explained by higher frequency of CD4+/CD45RO+T-cells in this compartment. In contrast, CD4+/CD45RO+T-cells expressing CXCR3 were significantly enriched in CSF as compared with blood. Similar levels of CCR6+/CD3+T-cells were observed in blood and CSF, while levels of CCR2+/CD3+T-cells were lower in CSF than in blood. The CSF was virtually devoid of CCR5+/CXCR3- T-cells, suggesting that the expression of CCR5 alone is not sufficient for the trafficking of CD3+T-cells to the CSF. We hypothesize that CXCR3 is the principal inflammatory chemokine receptor involved in intrathecal accumulation of T-cells in MS. Through interactions with its ligands, CXCR3 is proposed to mediate retention of T-cells in the inflamed CNS.

Cultured Kaposi's sarcoma tumor cells exhibit a chemokine receptor repertoire that does not allow infection by HIV-1.

BackgroundHIV-1 is known to play a critical role in the pathogenesis of AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma (KS). However, it remains controversial whether KS cells are target cells for HIV infection. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of chemokine receptors in KS cell cultures and to determine whether these cells can be infected by HIV-1.Material and MethodsKS-derived cells and KS-Y1 cells were investigated using RT-PCR for the expression of CD4, CCR3, CCR5, CCR8 and CXCR4 mRNA. HIV infectivity of these cells was determined by p24 antigen and HIV-1 RNA production, as well as by HIV-1 DNA integration.Results and DiscussionWith the exception of CCR8 which is expressed by KS-derived spindle cell cultures but not by KS-Y1 cells, unstimulated KS cells express no significant levels of CD4, CCR3, CCR5 or CXCR4 mRNA. HIV infectivity assays showed that KS cells were unpermissive to HTLVIIIB and JRFL strains. Although the expression of CXCR4 mRNA could be upregulated by interleukin-1β, stimulation of KS cells by this cytokine did not allow infection by HIV-1.ConclusionsThis shows that KS cells exhibit a chemokine receptor repertoire that does not allow infection by HIV-1. Other cell types making up KS lesions, such as inflammatory cells, are likely to represent the source of HIV-1 products cooperating to promote KS development and progression.

The Ligands of CXC Chemokine Receptor 3, I-TAC, Mig, and IP10, Are Natural Antagonists for CCR3

Th1 and Th2 lymphocytes express a different repertoire of chemokine receptors (CCRs). CXCR3, the receptor for I-TAC (interferon-inducible T cell alpha-chemoattractant), Mig (monokine induced by gamma-interferon), and IP10 (interferon-inducible protein 10), is expressed preferentially on Th1 cells, whereas CCR3, the receptor for eotaxin and several other CC chemokines, is characteristic of Th2 cells. While studying responses that are mediated by these two receptors, we found that the agonists for CXCR3 act as antagonists for CCR3. I-TAC, Mig, and IP10 compete for the binding of eotaxin to CCR3-bearing cells and inhibit migration and Ca(2+) changes induced in such cells by stimulation with eotaxin, eotaxin-2, MCP-2 (monocyte chemottractant protein-2), MCP-3, MCP-4, and RANTES (regulated on activation normal T cell expressed and secreted). A hybrid chemokine generated by substituting the first eight NH(2)-terminal residues of eotaxin with those of I-TAC bound CCR3 with higher affinity than eotaxin or I-TAC (3- and 10-fold, respectively). The hybrid was 5-fold more potent than I-TAC as an inhibitor of eotaxin activity and was effective at concentrations as low as 5 nm. None of the antagonists described induced the internalization of CCR3, indicating that they lack agonistic effects and thus qualify as pure antagonists. These results suggest that chemokines that attract Th1 cells via CXCR3 can concomitantly block the migration of Th2 cells in response to CCR3 ligands, thus enhancing the polarization of T cell recruitment.

Chemokine receptor expressions and responsiveness of cord blood T cells.

Chemokines and their receptors play a critical role in the selective attraction of various subsets of leukocytes. We examined the chemokine receptor expressions and responsiveness of cord blood (CB) T cells. Flow-cytometric analysis revealed that peripheral blood (PB) T cells expressed CCR-1, CCR-2, CCR-5, CCR-6, CXC chemokine receptor-3 (CXCR-3), and CXCR-4, while CB T cells expressed only CXCR-4 on their surface. Chemotactic migratory response of CB T cells to macrophage-inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, RANTES, MIP-3alpha, monokine induced by IFN-gamma, and IFN-gamma-inducible protein-10 was significantly impaired compared with those of PB T cells. In contrast, the ability of CB T cells to migrate to MIP-3beta, 6Ckine, and stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha was greater than that of PB T cells, and these events were correlated with the expression levels of CCR-7 and CXCR-4, respectively. Engagement of CD3 and CD28 specifically up-regulated CXCR-3 expression and chemotaxis to monokine induced by IFN-gamma and IFN-gamma-inducible protein-10, whereas this stimulation down-regulated CCR-7 expression and chemotaxis to MIP-3beta and 6Ckine in PB T cells, but not in CB T cells. These results suggest that PB T cells and CB T cells exhibit distinct chemokine responsiveness via different chemokine receptor repertoire.

Chemokine receptor expression and function in CD4+ T lymphocytes with regulatory activity.

We have investigated the chemokine receptor expression and migratory behavior of a new subset of nickel-specific skin-homing regulatory CD4(+) T cells (Th(IL-10)) releasing high levels of IL-10, low IFN-gamma, and undetectable IL-4. These cells inhibit in a IL-10-dependent manner the capacity of dendritic cells to activate nickel-specific Tc1 and Th1 lymphocytes. RNase protection assay and FACS analysis revealed the expression of a vast repertoire of chemokine receptors on resting Th(IL-10), including the Th1-associated CXCR3 and CCR5, and the Th2-associated CCR3, CCR4, and CCR8, the latter at higher levels compared with Th2 cells. The most active chemokines for resting Th(IL-10), in terms of calcium mobilization and in vitro migration, were in order of potency: CCL2 (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, CCR2 ligand), CCL4 (macrophage-inflammatory protein-1beta, CCR5 ligand), CCL3 (macrophage-inflammatory protein-1alpha, CCR1/5 ligand), CCL17 (thymus and activation-regulated chemokine, CCR4 ligand), CCL1 (I-309, CCR8 ligand), CXCL12 (stromal-derived factor-1, CXCR4), and CCL11 (eotaxin, CCR3 ligand). Consistent with receptor expression down-regulation, activated Th(IL-10) exhibited a reduced or absent response to most chemokines, but retained a significant migratory capacity to I-309, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and thymus and activation-regulated chemokine. I-309, which was ineffective on Th1 lymphocytes, attracted more efficiently Th(IL-10) than Th2 cells. I-309 and CCR8 mRNAs were not detected in unaffected skin and were up-regulated at the skin site of nickel-allergic reaction, with an earlier expression kinetics compared with IL-10 and IL-4. Results indicate that skin-homing regulatory Th(IL-10) lymphocytes coexpress functional Th1- and Th2-associated chemokine receptors, and that CCR8/I-309-driven recruitment of both resting and activated Th(IL-10) cells may be critically involved in the regulation of Th1-mediated skin allergic disorders.

Up-Regulation of CCR5 Expression in the Placenta Is Associated with Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Vertical Transmission

The role of placenta in vertical transmission is not yet fully understood. A protective role of the placenta during gestation is suggested by the finding that caesarian sections reduce the risk of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 from mother to child three- to fourfold. Here we investigated whether the immunological milieu of the placenta might be important in HIV-1 transmission. In situ imaging of immunohistochemically stained placenta sections and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction demonstrated a fourfold increase in CCR5:CXCR4 expression ratio in placentae from transmitting women compared to placentae from nontransmitting women. This chemokine receptor repertoire was consistent with an up-regulation of interleukin-4 and interleukin-10 expression in placentae from nontransmitting placentae compared to transmitting placentae. In situ imaging demonstrated that CCR5 and CXCR4 were expressed on placental macrophages and lymphocytes but not in trophoblasts. Simultaneous immunofluorescence/ultrasensitive in situ hybridization for HIV-1 gag-pol mRNA revealed that HIV-1 infects primarily CXCR4-expressing cells in placentae from nontransmitting women whereas predominantly CCR5-expressing cells were infected in placentae from transmitting women. These data are consistent with transmission of a homogeneous population of nonsyncytium-inducing HIV-1 isolates that use CCR5 as co-receptor.

The chemokine receptor switch paradigm and dendritic cell migration: its significance in tumor tissues.

Localization in tissues and migration to lymphoid organs are essential steps in the immunobiology of dendritic cells (DC). Chemokines play an important role in guiding the traffic of DC. Receptor expression and responsiveness to constitutively made chemokines account for the presence of DC in normal tissues. Inflammatory chemokines and non-chemokine attractants promote recruitment and localization of DC at sites of inflammation and infection. During maturation, DC undergo a profound and orderly rearrangement of their chemokine receptor repertoire. The chemokine receptor switch paradigm provides a conceptual framework for the complex migration of DC in vivo, including their recruitment and positioning in tumor tissues.

Macrophage inflammatory protein 3alpha is involved in the constitutive trafficking of epidermal langerhans cells.

Certain types of dendritic cells (DCs) appear in inflammatory lesions of various etiologies, whereas other DCs, e.g., Langerhans cells (LCs), populate peripheral organs constitutively. Until now, the molecular mechanism behind such differential behavior has not been elucidated. Here, we show that CD1a(+) LC precursors respond selectively and specifically to the CC chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-3alpha. In contrast, CD14(+) precursors of DC and monocytes are not attracted by MIP-3alpha. LCs lose the migratory responsiveness to MIP-3alpha during their maturation, and non-LC DCs do not acquire MIP-3alpha sensitivity. The notion that MIP-3alpha may be responsible for selective LC recruitment into the epidermis is further supported by the following observations: (a) MIP-3alpha is expressed by keratinocytes and venular endothelial cells in clinically normal appearing human skin; (b) LCs express CC chemokine receptor (CCR)6, the sole MIP-3alpha receptor both in situ and in vitro; and (c) non-LC DCs that are not found in normal epidermis lack CCR6. The mature forms of LCs and non-LC DCs display comparable sensitivity for MIP-3beta, a CCR7 ligand, suggesting that DC subtype-specific chemokine responses are restricted to the committed precursor stage. Although LC precursors express primarily CCR6, non-LC DC precursors display a broad chemokine receptor repertoire. These findings reflect a scenario where the differential expression of chemokine receptors by two different subpopulations of DCs determines their functional behavior. One type, the LC, responds to MIP-3alpha and enters skin to screen the epidermis constitutively, whereas the other type, the "inflammatory" DC, migrates in response to a wide array of different chemokines and is involved in the amplification and modulation of the inflammatory tissue response.

Dendritic cells in allergy.

Dendritic cells in allergy.

Chemokine receptor allelic polymorphisms: Relationships to HIV resistance and disease progression

It is now well established that an array of CC and CXC chemokine receptors, in association with the CD4 molecule, can interact with the HIV-1 gp120 protein to facilitate viral fusion. A 32bp deletion in the CC chemokine receptor CCR5, the major M-tropic viral co-receptor, provides considerable protection against HIV-1 transmission and has been associated with a delay in disease progression. The effects of the Δ32 allele appear to be mediated through the phenotype of CCR5 expression as opposed to genotype. Here we discuss the potential effects that the Δ32 allele and other polymorphisms in the chemokine receptor repertoire may have on both HIV-1 transmission and disease progression.

Promiscuous use of CC and CXC chemokine receptors in cell-to-cell fusion mediated by a human immunodeficiency virus type 2 envelope protein.

The CC chemokine receptors CCR5, CCR2, and CCR3 and the CXC chemokine receptor CXCR4 have been implicated as CD4-associated cofactors in the entry of primary and cell line-adapted human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) strains. CXCR4 is also a receptor for T-cell-line-adapted, CD4-independent strains of HIV-2. With the exception of this latter example, little has been reported on the entry cofactors used by HIV-2 strains. Here we show that a CD4-dependent, T-cell-line-adapted HIV-2 strain uses CXCR4 and, to a lesser extent, CCR3 for fusion with and infectious entry into cells. In a cell-to-cell fusion assay, the envelope protein of this virus can utilize a wider repertoire of chemokine receptors to induce fusion. These include CCR1, CCR2, CCR3, CCR4, CCR5, CXCR2, and CXCR4. Kinetic analysis indicated that cell lines expressing the receptors that support infection, CXCR4 and CCR3, form syncytia more rapidly than do cell lines expressing the other receptors. Nevertheless, although less efficient, fusion with CXCR2 expressing cells was specific, since it was inhibited by antibodies against CXCR2. The extensive use of chemokine receptors in cell-to-cell fusion has implications for understanding the molecular basis of CD4-chemokine receptor-induced lentivirus fusion and may have relevance for syncytium formation and the direct cell-to-cell transfer of virus in vivo.

Targeting tissue factor to tumor vasculature

Analysis of the chicken genome has shown that the chicken has a different repertoire of chemokines and chemokine receptors to those of mammals and other species. In this study, we report the sequencing and analysis of a bacterial artificial chromosome containing the entire chicken MIP family CC chemokine cluster. The gene duplication and divergence events that have taken place in mammals do not appear to have occurred as extensively in the avian lineage, as chickens possess fewer MIP family chemokine genes than humans or mice. We previously proposed that the four chicken MIP family members be named chicken (ch) CCLi1-4, according to their position on chicken chromosome 19, until such time as further analysis could determine if any of them were direct orthologues of mammalian MIP family members. Our analysis herein, combined with that of others, suggests that chCCLi4 is the orthologue of mammalian CCL5, and that chCCLi3 (K203) may be an orthologue of human CCL16. The other two chemokines do not have obvious orthologues, and thus we propose that they should still be called chCCLi1 and chCCLi2, until their biological function is further characterised. A similar pattern applies to the MIP family chemokine receptors, with only three receptor genes present at the relevant locus in the chicken genome, compared to four in man and mouse (CCR1, CCR2, CCR3 and CCR5). Of the three chicken receptor genes, only two look likely to be receptors for the MIP family chemokines, the third grouping with human, mouse and chicken CCR8 in phylogenetic analysis. The two chicken MIP CC receptors (CCRs) are not direct orthologues of the mammalian MIP CCRs.