Charged Residue Model Research Articles

A brief overview of the present status of the mechanisms involved in electrospray mass spectrometry

A brief account of the mechanisms by which ions in solution are converted to ions in the gas phase is given on the basis of information available in the literature and the four companion articles on electrospray mass spectrometry (ESMS) in this issue. The following stages/phenomena are described: (a) production of the charged droplets at the ES capillary tip; (b) evolution of the charged droplets due to solvent evaporation and droplet fission caused by Coulombic repulsion of the charges on the droplets; production of the gas phase ion from very small charged droplets by the charge residue model (CRM) or the ion evaporation method (IEM); (c) dependence of the sensitivity in ESMS on the chemical nature of the analyte and its concentration as well as on the concentration of other electrolytes that are present in the solution; qualitative predictions on the sensitivity of the analyte based on the surface activity of the analyte ions; (d) relationship between ions produced in the gas phase and original ions present in the solution; and (e) globular proteins. Much of the information presented in (a)-(e) has been available for some time in the literature. However some significant advances are relatively recent. Recent results by de la Mora and co-workers, including their contribution in this Special Feature, provide very strong evidence that small ions (in distinction from macroions such as bio-macroions) are produced by IEM. On the other hand, macroions and particularly the polyprotonated globular proteins are produced by CRM. Also noteworthy is the development of an equation by Enke with which the observed relative ion signal intensities of the gas-phase ions produced can be predicted on the basis of the ion concentration in solution over a wide concentration range. The recognition that the sensitivity of organic analyte ions can be qualitatively predicted on the basis of the hydrophilicity or hydrophobicity of the part of the molecule that is not part of the charged (ionic) group and affects the surface activity of the ionic species is also noteworthy and a very useful relatively recent development.

Observation of triply charged metal ion clusters by electrospray and laser spray

Studies of the gas phase ion chemistry of triply charged metal ions, M(3+) = Sc(3+), Y(3+), La(3+), Ce(3+), and Yb(3+), were made by electrospray and laser spray. Triply charged ion ligand complexes, M(3+)(ligand)(n) were produced in the gas phase by electrospray and laser spray for the following ligands; glucose; sucrose; raffinose; cyclodextrin; ginsenoside Rb(1); dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and hexamethylphosphoramide (HMPA). The ion evaporation mechanism must be invoked to explain the transfer of more surface active ions (e.g., NH(4)(+)(H(2)O)(n)) in solution to the gas phase, while the transfer of low surface active ions (e.g., La(3+)(sucrose)(n)) may be explained by the charged residue model. In general, the laser spray gives stronger ion signals than electrospray for aqueous and water/methanol solutions. The laser spray is found to be more suitable for the observation of ions with larger solvation energies (e.g., Sc(3+)(DMSO)(n)). These results may be due to the enrichment of the sample concentration by the selective vaporization of the volatile solvent on the tip of the stainless steel capillary and also to the finer droplet formation caused by the laser irradiation. Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Solvation Energy and Gas-Phase Stability Influences on Alkali Metal Cluster Ion Formation in Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry

The ability to observe abundant gas-phase metal cluster ions in electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) is highly dependent on experimental conditions. Alkali halides (MX) and other alkali metal salts were used to investigate the formation of cluster ions in ESI-MS. All compounds were found to give cluster ions of the form (M(n)(+1)X(n))(+) and (M(n)X(n+1))(-), with only two alkali salts yielding doubly charged cluster ions. In homologous alkali halide series, the relative abundances of cluster ions increased with increasing size of either the cation (positive ion mode) or the anion (negative ion mode). Calculations using an electrostatic model show that the gas-phase stability of cluster ions is greater for smaller cations or anions when a fixed counterion is employed. This stability calculation goes in a direction just opposite to the trend in cluster ion abundances observed in ESI-MS. Studies of equimolar mixtures consisting of two alkali halides reveal two distinct trends. When the equimolar mixture was composed of differing ions that participate in the droplet charge excess with the same counterion, the less solvated ions were found to form more abundant cluster ions. When the ions participating in the charge excess were fixed, the preferred counterion in observed clusters was the one that is more solvated in solution and forms more stable clusters in the gas phase. These observations can be rationalized by an extended form of the charged residue model where the weakly solvated ions that are part of the charge excess are preferentially enriched in offspring droplets during uneven fission. By contrast, transfer of a particular counterion located in the bulk of the droplets to the offspring droplets is not disfavored when this counterion is strongly solvated.

Formation of Sodium Cluster Ions in Electrospray Mass Spectrometry

A series of sodium cluster ions, such as Na+(NaCl)n, Na+(HCOONa)n and Na+(HCOONa)n1(CH3COONa)n2, were observed in electrospray mass spectrometry. These results support the electrophoretic separation mechanism for excess ions at droplet surface, and the charged residue model for gas phase ion formation from highly-charged droplets.

Experiments on the kinetics of field evaporation of small ions from droplets

The phenomenon of ion evaporation from charged liquid surfaces is at the basis of electrospray ionization, a source of a stunning variety of gas phase ions. It is studied here by producing a monodisperse cloud of charged droplets and measuring the charge q and diameter dr of the residue particles left after complete evaporation of the solvent. When the droplets contain small monovalent dissolved ions, the electric field E on the surface of their solid residues is found to be independent of dr. One can thus argue that the source of small ions in electrospray ionization is field-emission, and not other proposed mechanisms such as Dole’s charged residue model. A consequence of the observed independence of E on dr is that the rate of ion ejection is simply related to the rate of solvent evaporation, estimated here as that for a clean surface of pure solvent. The reduction G(E) brought about by the electric field E in the activation energy for ion evaporation has thus been inferred as a function of the measured field E in the range 1.5<E(V/nm)<3.25. It agrees surprisingly well with the so-called Schottky hump from the image potential model (IPM), GIPM=(e3E/4πε0)1/2. This remarkably simple result is paradoxical in view of two major objections raised earlier against the use of the IPM for ion evaporation from liquids. However, the correct mechanism (first introduced by Iribarne and Thomson) leading to an attractive interaction between the liquid surface and the escaping ion is not the creation of an image charge, but the polarization of the dielectric liquid by the ion. In the limit of a large dielectric constant ε≫1, the image force and the polarization force coincide numerically, though the later sets in much faster and is apparently free from the paradox raised by Röllgen. Also, the dielectric nature of the liquid and its strong screening of the net charges near its surface resolves another paradox raised by Fenn regarding the discrete distribution of charges. This screening also introduces a correction in the model proposed by Iribarne and Thomson for G(E), making its predictions virtually indistinguishable from those of GIPM(E). In conclusion, small ions observed in electrospray ionization are produced by field-emission. Measured ionization rates are well represented by results from a ‘‘polarization potential model’’ which appears to be physically sound. These predictions coincide with those from the IPM in the limit ε≫1, the only case studied so far.

Observation and implications of high mass-to-charge ratio ions from electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

High mass-to-charge ratio ions (> 4000) from electrospray ionization (ESI) have been observed for several proteins, including bovine cytochrome c ( M r 12,231) and porcine pepsin ( M r 34,584), by using a quadrupole mass spectrometer with an m/z 45,000 range. The ESI mass spectrum for cytochrome c in an aqueous solution gives a charge state distribution that ranges from 12+ to 2+, with a broad, low-intensity peak in the mass-to-charge ratio region corresponding to the [M + H] + ion. The negative ion ESI mass spectrum for pepsin in 1% acetic acid solution shows a charge state distribution ranging from 7− to 2−. To observe the [M − H] − ion, harsher desolvation and interface conditions were required. Also observed was the abundant aggregation of the proteins with average charge states substantially lower than observed for their monomeric counterparts. The negative ion ESI mass spectrum for cytochrome c in 1–100 mM NH 4OAc solutions showed greater relative abundances for the higher mass-to-charge ratio ions than in acidic solutions, with an [M − H] − ion relative abundance approximately 50% that of the most abundant charge state peak. The observation that protein aggregates are formed with charge states comparable to monomeric species (at lower mass-to-charge ratios) suggests that the high mass-to-charge ratio monomers may be formed by the dissociation of aggregate species. The observation of low charge state and aggregate molecular ions concurrently with highly charged species may serve to support a variation of the charged residue model, originally described by Dole and co-workers (Dole, M., et al. J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 49, 2240; Mack, L. L., et al. J. Chem. Phys. 1970, 52, 4977), which involves the Coulombically driven formation of either very highly solvated molecular ions or lower nanometer-diameter droplets.