Chaperonin-mediated Folding Research Articles

Reconciling theories of chaperonin accelerated folding with experimental evidence.

For the last 20 years, a large volume of experimental and theoretical work has been undertaken to understand how chaperones like GroEL can assist protein folding in the cell. The most accepted explanation appears to be the simplest: GroEL, like most other chaperones, helps proteins fold by preventing aggregation. However, evidence suggests that, under some conditions, GroEL can play a more active role by accelerating protein folding. A large number of models have been proposed to explain how this could occur. Focused experiments have been designed and carried out using different protein substrates with conclusions that support many different mechanisms. In the current article, we attempt to see the forest through the trees. We review all suggested mechanisms for chaperonin-mediated folding and weigh the plausibility of each in light of what we now know about the most stringent, essential, GroEL-dependent protein substrates.

Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: using a central cavity to kinetically assist polypeptide chain folding

The chaperonin ring assembly GroEL provides kinetic assistance to protein folding in the cell by binding non-native protein in the hydrophobic central cavity of an open ring and subsequently, upon binding ATP and the co-chaperonin GroES to the same ring, releasing polypeptide into a now hydrophilic encapsulated cavity where productive folding occurs in isolation. The fate of polypeptide during binding, encapsulation, and folding in the chamber has been the subject of recent experimental studies and is reviewed and considered here. We conclude that GroEL, in general, behaves passively with respect to its substrate proteins during these steps. While binding appears to be able to rescue non-native polypeptides from kinetic traps, such rescue is most likely exerted at the level of maximizing hydrophobic contact, effecting alteration of the topology of weakly structured states. Encapsulation does not appear to involve 'forced unfolding', and if anything, polypeptide topology is compacted during this step. Finally, chamber-mediated folding appears to resemble folding in solution, except that major kinetic complications of multimolecular association are prevented.

Below the Convergence

Below the Convergence

Monitoring Protein Conformation along the Pathway of Chaperonin-Assisted Folding

The GroEL/GroES chaperonin system mediates protein folding in the bacterial cytosol. Newly synthesized proteins reach GroEL via transfer from upstream chaperones such as DnaK/DnaJ (Hsp70). Here we employed single molecule and ensemble FRET to monitor the conformational transitions of a model substrate as it proceeds along this chaperone pathway. We find that DnaK/DnaJ stabilizes the protein in collapsed states that fold exceedingly slowly. Transfer to GroEL results in unfolding, with a fraction of molecules reaching locally highly expanded conformations. ATP-induced domain movements in GroEL cause transient further unfolding and rapid mobilization of protein segments with moderate hydrophobicity, allowing partial compaction on the GroEL surface. The more hydrophobic regions are released upon subsequent protein encapsulation in the central GroEL cavity by GroES, completing compaction and allowing rapid folding. Segmental chain release and compaction may be important in avoiding misfolding by proteins that fail to fold efficiently through spontaneous hydrophobic collapse.

Co-translational Binding of GroEL to Nascent Polypeptides Is Followed by Post-translational Encapsulation by GroES to Mediate Protein Folding

The eubacterial chaperonins GroEL and GroES are essential chaperones and primarily assist protein folding in the cell. Although the molecular mechanism of the GroEL system has been examined previously, the mechanism by which GroEL and GroES assist folding of nascent polypeptides during translation is still poorly understood. We previously demonstrated a co-translational involvement of the Escherichia coli GroEL in folding of newly synthesized polypeptides using a reconstituted cell-free translation system (Ying, B. W., Taguchi, H., Kondo, M., and Ueda, T. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 12035-12040). Employing the same system here, we further characterized the mechanism by which GroEL assists folding of translated proteins via encapsulation into the GroEL-GroES cavity. The stable co-translational association between GroEL and the newly synthesized polypeptide is dependent on the length of the nascent chain. Furthermore, GroES is capable of interacting with the GroEL-nascent peptide-ribosome complex, and experiments using a single-ring variant of GroEL clearly indicate that GroES association occurs only at the trans-ring, not the cis-ring, of GroEL. GroEL holds the nascent chain on the ribosome in a polypeptide length-dependent manner and post-translationally encapsulates the polypeptide using the GroES cap to accomplish the chaperonin-mediated folding process.

Allostery in chaperonins

Chaperonins mediate protein folding in an ATP-dependent manner. ATP binding and hydrolysis by chaperonins are subject to both homotropic and heterotropic allosteric regulation. In the case of GroEL and CCT, homotropic regulation by ATP is manifested in nested cooperativity, which involves positive intra-ring cooperativity and negative inter-ring cooperativity in ATP binding. Both types of cooperativity are modulated by various heterotropic allosteric effectors, which include nonfolded proteins, ADP, Mg2+, monovalent ions such as K+, and cochaperonins in the case of type I chaperonins such as GroEL. Here, the allosteric properties of chaperonins are reviewed and new results of ours are presented with regard to allosteric effects of ADP. The role of allostery in the reaction cycle and folding function of chaperonins is discussed.

GroEL Walks the Fine Line: The Subtle Balance of Substrate and Co-chaperonin Binding by GroEL. A Combinatorial Investigation by Design, Selection and Screening

While support in protein folding by molecular chaperones is extremely efficient for endogenous polypeptides, it often fails for recombinant proteins in a bacterial host, thus constituting a major hurdle for protein research and biotechnology. To understand the reasons for this difference and to answer the question of whether it is feasible to design tailor-made chaperones, we investigated one of the most prominent bacterial chaperones, the GroEL/ES ring complex. On the basis of structural data, we designed and constructed a combinatorial GroEL library, where the substrate-binding site was randomized. Screening and selection experiments with this library demonstrated that substrate binding and release is supported by many variants, but the majority of the library members failed to assist in chaperonin-mediated protein folding under conditions where spontaneous folding is suppressed. These findings revealed a conflict between binding of substrate and binding of the co-chaperonin GroES. As a consequence, the window of mutational freedom in that region of GroEL is very small. In screening experiments, we could identify GroEL variants slightly improved for a given substrate, which were still promiscuous. As the substrate-binding site of the GroEL molecule overlaps strongly with the site of cofactor binding, the outcome of our experiments suggests that maintenance of cofactor binding affinity is more critical for chaperonin-mediated protein folding than energetically optimized substrate recognition.

Folding behavior of chaperonin‐mediated substrate protein

Chaperonin-mediated protein folding is complex. There have been diverse results on folding behavior, and the chaperonin molecules have been investigated as enhancing or retarding the folding rate. To understand the diversity of chaperonin-mediated protein folding, we report a study based on simulations using a simplified Gō-type model. By considering effects of affinity between the substrate protein and the chaperonin wall and spatial confinement of the chaperonin cavity, we study the thermodynamics and kinetics of folding of an unfrustrated substrate protein encapsulated in a chaperonin cavity. The affinity makes the hydrophobic residues of the protein bind to the chaperonin wall, and a strong (or weak) affinity results in a large (or small) effect of binding. Compared with the folding in bulk, the folding in chaperonin cavity with different strengths of affinity shows two kinds of behaviors: one with less dependence on the affinity but more reliance on the spatial confinement effect and the other relying strongly on the affinity. It is found that the enhancement or retardation of the folding rate depends on the competition between the spatial confinement and the affinity due to the chaperonin cavity, and a strong affinity produces a slow folding while a weak affinity induces a fast folding. The crossover between two kinds of folding behaviors happens in the case that the favorable effect of confinement is balanced by the unfavorable effect of the affinity, and a critical affinity strength is roughly defined. By analyzing the contacts formed between the residues of the protein and the chaperonin wall and between the residues of the protein themselves, the role of the affinity in the folding processes is studied. The binding of the residues with the chaperonin wall reduces the formation of both native contacts and nonnative contact or mis-contacts, providing a loose structure for further folding after allosteric change of the chaperonin cavity. In addition, 15 single-site-mutated mutants are simulated in order to test the validity of our model and to investigate the importance of affinity. Inspiringly, our results of the folding rates have a good correlation with those obtained from experiments. The folding rates are inversely correlated with the strength of the binding interactions, i.e., the weaker the binding, the faster the folding. We also find that the inner hydrophobic residues have larger effects on the folding kinetics than those of the exterior hydrophobic residues. We suggest that, besides the confinement effect, the affinity acts as another important factor to affect the folding of the substrate proteins in chaperonin systems, providing an understanding of the folding mechanism of the molecular chaperonin systems.

RNA and Protein Folding: Common Themes and Variations

Visualizing the navigation of an ensemble of unfolded molecules through the bumpy energy landscape in search of the native state gives a pictorial view of biomolecular folding. This picture, when combined with concepts in polymer theory, provides a unified theory of RNA and protein folding. Just as for proteins, the major folding free energy barrier for RNA scales sublinearly with the number of nucleotides, which allows us to extract the elusive prefactor for RNA folding. Several folding scenarios can be anticipated by considering variations in the energy landscape that depend on sequence, native topology, and external conditions. RNA and protein folding mechanism can be described by the kinetic partitioning mechanism (KPM) according to which a fraction (Phi) of molecules reaches the native state directly, whereas the remaining fraction gets kinetically trapped in metastable conformations. For two-state folders Phi approximately 1. Molecular chaperones are recruited to assist protein folding whenever Phi is small. We show that the iterative annealing mechanism, introduced to describe chaperonin-mediated folding, can be generalized to understand protein-assisted RNA folding. The major differences between the folding of proteins and RNA arise in the early stages of folding. For RNA, folding can only begin after the polyelectrolyte problem is solved, whereas protein collapse requires burial of hydrophobic residues. Cross-fertilization of ideas between the two fields should lead to an understanding of how RNA and proteins solve their folding problems.

Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: fate of substrate polypeptide.

Chaperonins are megadalton ring assemblies that mediate essential ATP-dependent assistance of protein folding to the native state in a variety of cellular compartments, including the mitochondrial matrix, the eukaryotic cytosol, and the bacterial cytoplasm. Structural studies of the bacterial chaperonin, GroEL, both alone and in complex with its co-chaperonin, GroES, have resolved the states of chaperonin that bind and fold non-native polypeptides. Functional studies have resolved the action of ATP binding and hydrolysis in driving the GroEL-GroES machine through its folding-active and binding-active states, respectively. Yet the exact fate of substrate polypeptide during these steps is only poorly understood. For example, while binding involves multivalent interactions between hydrophobic side-chains facing the central cavity of GroEL and exposed hydrophobic surfaces of the non-native protein, the structure of any polypeptide substrate while bound to GroEL remains unknown. It is also unclear whether binding to an open GroEL ring is accompanied by structural changes in the non-native substrate, in particular whether there is an unfolding action. As a polypeptide-bound ring becomes associated with GroES, do the large rigid-body movements of the GroEL apical domains serve as another source of a potential unfolding action? Regarding the encapsulated folding-active state, how does the central cavity itself influence the folding trajectory of a substrate? Finally, how do GroEL and GroES serve, as recently recognized, to assist the folding of substrates too large to be encapsulated inside the machine? Here, such questions are addressed with the findings available to date, and means of further resolving the states of chaperonin-associated polypeptide are discussed.

Type I chaperonins: not all are created equal

Type I chaperonins play an essential role in the folding of newly translated and stress-denatured proteins in eubacteria, mitochondria and chloroplasts. Since their discovery, the bacterial chaperonins have provided an excellent model system for investigating the mechanism by which chaperonins mediate protein folding. Due to the high conservation of the primary sequence among Type I chaperonins, it is generally accepted that organellar chaperonins function similar to the bacterial ones. However, recent studies indicate that the chloroplast and mitochondrial chaperonins possess unique structural and functional properties that distinguish them from their bacterial homologs. This review focuses on the unique properties of organellar chaperonins.

Nucleotide specificity of an archaeal group II chaperonin from Thermococcus strain KS-1 with reference to the ATP-dependent protein folding cycle

The archaeal chaperonin-mediated folding of green fluorescent protein (GFP) was examined in the presence of various nucleotides. The recombinant α- and β-subunit homo-oligomers and natural chaperonin oligomer from Thermococcus strain KS-1 exhibited folding activity with not only ATP but also with CTP, GTP, or UTP. The ADP-bound form of both recombinant and natural chaperonin had the ability to capture non-native GFP, but could not refold it in the presence of CTP, GTP or UTP until ATP was supplied. The archaeal chaperonin thus utilized ATP, but could not use other nucleoside triphosphates in the cytoplasm where ADP was present.

Chaperonin-mediated folding of bacteriophage T4 major capsid protein. II. Production of gene product 23 deletion mutants.

Folding of bacteriophage T4 major capsid protein, gene product 23 (534 a.a.), is aided by two proteins: E. coli GroEL chaperonin and viral gp31 co-chaperonin. In the present work a set of mutants with extensive deletions inside gene 23 using controlled digestion with Bal31 nuclease has been constructed. Proteins with deletions were co-expressed from plasmid vectors with phage gp31 co-chaperonin. Deletions from 8 to 33 a.a. in the N-terminal region of the gp23 molecule covering the protein proteolytic cleavage site during capsid maturation have no influence on the mutants' ability to produce in E. coli cells proteins which form regular structures--polyheads. Deletions in other regions of the polypeptide chain (187-203 and 367-476 a.a.) disturb the correct folding and subsequent assembly of gp23 into polyheads.

Chaperonin-mediated protein folding.

Molecular chaperones are required to assist folding of a subset of proteins in Escherichia coli. We describe a conceptual framework for understanding how the GroEL-GroES system assists misfolded proteins to reach their native states. The architecture of GroEL consists of double toroids stacked back-to-back. However, most of the fundamentals of the GroEL action can be described in terms of the single ring. A key idea in our framework is that, with coordinated ATP hydrolysis and GroES binding, GroEL participates actively by repeatedly unfolding the substrate protein (SP), provided that it is trapped in one of the misfolded states. We conjecture that the unfolding of SP becomes possible because a stretching force is transmitted to the SP when the GroEL particle undergoes allosteric transitions. Force-induced unfolding of the SP puts it on a higher free-energy point in the multidimensional energy landscape from which the SP can either reach the native conformation with some probability or be trapped in one of the competing basins of attraction (i.e., the SP undergoes kinetic partitioning). The model shows, in a natural way, that the time scales in the dynamics of the allosteric transitions are intimately coupled to folding rates of the SP. Several scenarios for chaperonin-assisted folding emerge depending on the interplay of the time scales governing the cycle. Further refinement of this framework may be necessary because single molecule experiments indicate that there is a great dispersion in the time scales governing the dynamics of the chaperonin cycle.

Aggregation of creatine kinase during refolding and chaperonin-mediated folding of creatine kinase

The course of refolding and reactivation of urea-denatured creatine kinase (ATP; creatine N-phosphotransferase, EC 2.7.3.2) has been studied in the absence and presence of molecular chaperonin GroEL. The enzyme was denatured in Tris–HCl buffer containing 6 M urea for 1 h. In the refolding studies, the denatured enzyme was diluted 60-fold into the same buffer containing GroEL or not for activity, turbidity, fluorescence measurements and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The results show that the reactivation process is dependent of creatine kinase concentration in the concentration range 2.5–4 μM. The levels of activity recovery decrease with increasing enzyme concentration because of the formation of wrong aggregates. The molecular chaperonin GroEL can bind the refolding intermediate of creatine kinase and thus prevent the formation of wrong aggregates. This intermediate is an inactive dimeric form that is in a conformation resembling the ‘molten globule’ state.

Effects of macromolecular crowding on protein folding and aggregation.

We have studied the effects of polysaccharide and protein crowding agents on the refolding of oxidized and reduced hen lysozyme in order to test the prediction that association constants of interacting macromolecules in living cells are greatly increased by macromolecular crowding relative to their values in dilute solutions. We demonstrate that whereas refolding of oxidized lysozyme is hardly affected by crowding, correct refolding of the reduced protein is essentially abolished due to aggregation at high concentrations of crowding agents. The results show that the protein folding catalyst protein disulfide isomerase is particularly effective in preventing lysozyme aggregation under crowded conditions, suggesting that crowding enhances its chaperone activity. Our findings suggest that the effects of macromolecular crowding could have major implications for our understanding of how protein folding occurs inside cells.

Exploring the kinetic requirements for enhancement of protein folding rates in the GroEL cavity

The chaperonin system, GroEL and GroES of Escherichia coli enable certain proteins to fold under conditions when spontaneous folding is prohibitively slow as to compete with other non-productive channels such as aggregation. We investigated the plausible mechanisms of GroEL-mediated folding using simple lattice models. In particular, we have investigated protein folding in a confined environment, such as those offered by the GroEL, to decipher whether rate and yield enhancement can occur when the substrate protein is allowed to fold within the cavity of the chaperonins. The GroEL cavity is modeled as a cubic box and a simple bead model is used to represent the substrate chain. We consider three distinct characteristic of the confining environment. First, the cavity is taken to be a passive Anfinsen cage in which the walls merely reduce the available conformation space. We find that at temperatures when the native conformation is stable, the folding rate is retarded in the Anfinsen cage. We then assumed that the interior of the wall is hydrophobic. In this case the folding times exhibit a complex behavior. When the strength of the interaction between the polypeptide chain and the cavity is too strong or too weak we find that the rates of folding are retarded compared to spontaneous folding. There is an optimum range of the interaction strength that enhances the rates. Thus, above this value there is an inverse correlation between the folding rates and the strength of the substrate-cavity interactions. The optimal hydrophobic walls essentially pull the kinetically trapped states which leads to a smoother the energy landscape. It is known that upon addition of ATP and GroES the interior cavity of GroEL offers a hydrophilic-like environment to the substrate protein. In order to mimic this within the context of the dynamic Anfinsen cage model, we allow for changes in the hydrophobicity of the walls of the cavity. The duration for which the walls remain hydrophobic during one cycle of ATP hydrolysis is allowed to vary. These calculations show that frequent cycling of the wall hydrophobicity can dramatically reduce the folding times and increase the yield as well under non-permissive conditions. Examination of the structures of the substrate proteins before and after the change in hydrophobicity indicates that there is global unfolding involved. In addition, it is found that a fraction of the molecules kinetically partition to the native state in accordabce with the iterative annealing mechanism. Thus, frequent “unfoldase” activity of chaperonins leading to global unfolding of the polypeptide chain results in enhancement of the folding rates and yield of the folded protein. We suggest that chaperonin efficiency can be greatly enhanced if the cycling time is reduced. The calculations are used to interpret a few experiments on chaperonin-mediated protein folding.

Chloroplast Cpn20 forms a tetrameric structure in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Chloroplast chaperonin 20 (Cpn20) in higher plants is a functional homologue of the Escherichia coli GroES, which is a critical regulator of chaperonin-mediated protein folding. The cDNA for a Cpn20 homologue of Arabidopsis thaliana was isolated. It was 958 bp long, encoding a protein of 253 amino acids. The protein was composed of an N-terminal chloroplast transit peptide, and the predicted mature region comprised two distinct GroES domains that showed 42% amino acid identity to each other. The isolated cDNA was constitutively expressed in transgenic tobacco. Immunogold labelling showed that Cpn20 is accumulated in chloroplasts of transgenic tobacco. A Northern blot analysis revealed that mRNA for the chloroplast Cpn20 is abundant in leaves and is increased by heat treatment. To examine the oligomeric structure of Cpn20, a histidine-tagged construct lacking the transit peptide was expressed in E. coli and purified by affinity chromatography. Gel-filtration and cross-linking analyses showed that the expressed products formed a tetramer. The expressed products could substitute for GroES to assist the refolding of citrate synthase under non-permissive conditions. The analysis on the subunit stoichiometry of the GroEL-Cpn20 complex also revealed that the functional complex is composed of a GroEL tetradecamer and a Cpn20 tetramer.

Minimal and optimal mechanisms for GroE-mediated protein folding.

We have analyzed the effects of different components of the GroE chaperonin system on protein folding by using a nonpermissive substrate (i.e., one that has very low spontaneous refolding yield) for which rate data can be acquired. In the absence of GroES and nucleotides, the rate of GroEL-mediated refolding of heat- and DTT-denatured mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase was extremely low, but some three times higher than the spontaneous rate. This GroEL-mediated rate was increased 17-fold by saturating concentrations of ATP, 11-fold by ADP and GroES, and 465-fold by ATP and GroES. Optimal refolding activity was observed when the dissociation of GroES from the chaperonin complex was dramatically reduced. Although GroEL minichaperones were able to bind denatured mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase, they were ineffective in enhancing the refolding rate. The spectrum of mechanisms for GroE-mediated protein folding depends on the nature of the substrate. The minimal mechanism for permissive substrates (i.e., having significant yields of spontaneous refolding), requires only binding to the apical domain of GroEL. Slow folding rates of nonpermissive substrates are limited by the transitions between high- and low-affinity states of GroEL alone. The optimal mechanism, which requires holoGroEL, physiological amounts of GroES, and ATP hydrolysis, is necessary for the chaperonin-mediated folding of nonpermissive substrates at physiologically relevant rates under conditions in which retention of bound GroES prevents the premature release of aggregation-prone folding intermediates from the chaperonin complex. The different mechanisms are described in terms of the structural features of mini- and holo-chaperones.

A Single Ring Is Sufficient for Productive Chaperonin-Mediated Folding In Vivo

Facilitated protein folding by the double toroidal bacterial chaperonin, GroEL/GroES, proceeds by a “two-stroke engine” mechanism in which an allosteric interaction between the two rings synchronizes the reaction cycle by controlling the binding and release of cochaperonin. Using chimeric chaperonin molecules assembled by fusing equatorial and apical domains derived from GroEL and its mammalian mitochondrial homolog, Hsp60, we show that productive folding by Hsp60 and its cognate cochaperonin, Hsp10, proceeds in vitro and in vivo without the formation of a two-ring structure. This simpler “one-stroke” engine works because Hsp60 has a different mechanism for the release of its cochaperonin cap and bound target protein.