The principal spring staging areas of the midcontinent population of sandhill cranes (Grus can- adensis) are along the Platte and North Platte rivers in south-central Nebraska. Most of these lands are privately owned and managed for corn and cattle production. Diurnal habitat use by radio-tagged cranes was primarily in cropland (55%), native grassland (28%), and tame hayland (15%). Ninety-nine percent of the cropland use was in cornfields; 55% as grazed stubble, 36% as disced, cultivated, and plowed stubble, 7% as ungrazed stubble, and 1% unclassified. Grazed pastures accounted for 93% of the grassland locations and mowed alfalfa fields 77% of the tame hayland locations. Other habitats were seldom used. Time budget analyses indicated that cranes, while in croplands, grasslands, and haylands, spent 35, 36, and 50% of the time foraging, respectively Cranes roosted in the shallows and on nearby sandbars of about 111 km of river channel. Cranes usuallv roosted where the channel was at least 150 m wide and avoided stretches narrower than 50 m. Height of woody vegetation along shorelines and on islands influenced where cranes roosted when unobstructed channel width was less than 150 m; bridges or roads adjacent to the channel also reduced use by about half. Management recommendations are made for maintaining suitable habitat for sandhill cranes on their staging areas in Nebraska. J. WILDL. MANAGE. 48(2):407-4 17 Approximately one-half million sand- hill cranes (four-fifths of the continental population) gather annually along the Platte and North Platte rivers in Nebraska during March and early April while en route to their breeding grounds in central and arctic Canada, Alaska, and Siberia (US. Fish and Wildl. Serv., unpubl. data). Water developments in the upper Platte River Basin during this century have dras- tically reduced flows, causing major changes in channel width in the Big Bend reach (Williams 1978) where most of the cranes gather. Extensive encroachment by woody vegetation has accompanied chan- nel shrinkage (Currier 1982), and pro- posed developments would cause addi- tional habitat degradation and loss (Krapu et al. 1982), raising concern for the well-