Change In A1c Research Articles

Improving glycemic control in diabetes through virtual interdisciplinary rounds.

A team-based disease management approach that considers comorbid conditions, social drivers of health, and clinical guidelines improves diabetes care but can be costly and complex. Developing innovative models of care is crucial to improving diabetes outcomes. Theobjective of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of virtual interdisciplinary diabetes rounds in improving glycemiccontrol. Retrospective cohort study using observational data from July 2018 to December 2021. This study employed difference-in-differences analysis to compare change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in a group of patients whose providers received advice as part of virtual interdisciplinary rounds and a group of patients whose providers did not receive rounds advice. Patients with diabetes were identified for rounding (1) based on attribution to an accountable care organization along with an upcoming primary care appointment and an HbA1c between 8% and 9% or (2) via provider referral. The rounded group consisted of 481 patients and the comparison group included 1806 patients. There was a 0.3-point reduction in HbA1c (95% CI, 0.1-0.4) associated with rounds overall. In a subanalysis comparing provider adoption of recommendations among those rounded, provider adoption was associated with an HbA1c reduction of 0.5 points (95% CI, 0.1-0.9) at 6 months post rounds, although there was no significant difference in the full year post rounds. Interdisciplinary rounds can be an effective approach to proactively provide diabetes-focused recommendations. This modality allows for efficient, low-cost, and timely access to an endocrinologist and team to support primary care providers in diabetes management.

Pilot feasibility and efficacy of a strategy to sustain A1C improvement among diverse adults with type 2 diabetes completing a diabetes care management program

IntroductionEvidence-based strategies are needed to sustain improvements in outcomes following diabetes care management (DCM) programs. We examined the impact of Boot Camp-Plus (BC-Plus), an innovative sustaining strategy, on A1C among...

Self-Management Support Improves Diabetes Outcomes Without Exacerbating Inequities.

Previous research has found an association between low health literacy and poor clinical outcomes in type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients. We sought to determine if this association can be mitigated by a self-management support (SMS) program provided by trained health workers using a technology assisted menu driven program, called Connection to Health (CTH). This study is a secondary analysis from a randomized trial of 2 similar versions of CTH implemented in 12 Northern California community health centers. As part of this, each participant completed a single validated question to assess health literacy. We used unadjusted and adjusted linear regression analyses to determine the extent to which baseline health literacy was predictive of prepost changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Of 365 participants for whom prepost HbA1c data were available, HbA1c concentrations declined by an average of 0.76% (from 9.9% to 9.2%, 95% CI (0.53%-1.0%). Almost 114 (31.2%) of the participants had low health literacy, but there was no significant association between health literacy and the reduction in HbA1c concentrations in either the unadjusted or adjusted models, nor did baseline health literacy predict prepost changes in body mass index, medication adherence, exercise, or diet. The study found that implementing the CTH program in 2 versions via a randomized clinical trial improved HbA1c concentrations without increasing disparities between participants with high and low health literacy. This suggests CTH-like programs can enhance diabetes outcomes in community health centers without exacerbating inequities for those with low health literacy.

Efficacy and Safety of Omarigliptin, a Novel Once-Weekly Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor, in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

No recent meta-analysis has holistically analyzed and summarized the efficacy and safety of omarigliptin in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We conducted a meta-analysis to address this knowledge gap. Electronic databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included patients with T2DM who received omarigliptin in the intervention arm. The control arm consisted of either a placebo (passive control group [PCG]) or an active comparator (active control group [ACG]). The primary outcome assessed was changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), while secondary outcomes included variations in glucose levels, achievement of glycemic targets, adverse events (AEs), and hypoglycemic events. From 332 initially screened articles, data from 16 RCTs involving 8,804 subjects were analyzed. Omarigliptin demonstrated superiority over placebo in reducing HbA1c levels (mean difference, -0.58%; 95% confidence interval, -0.75 to -0.40; P<0.00001; I2=91%). Additionally, omarigliptin outperformed placebo in lowering fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour postprandial glucose, and in the percentage of participants achieving HbA1c levels below 7.0% and 6.5%. The glycemic efficacy of omarigliptin was similar to that of the ACG across all measures. Although the omarigliptin group experienced a higher incidence of hypoglycemic events compared to the PCG, the overall AEs, serious AEs, hypoglycemia, and severe hypoglycemia were comparable between the omarigliptin and control groups (PCG and ACG). Omarigliptin has a favorable glycemic efficacy and safety profile for managing T2DM.

The Changing Landscape of Treatment for Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes

ObjectivePatients with Cystic Fibrosis related diabetes [CFRD] are treated with insulin and high calorie diets to maintain body mass. The combined CFTR modulator elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor [ETI] decreases pulmonary exacerbations and improves nutritional status. We reviewed the effects of ETI on BMI, HbA1c and diabetes regimen in patients with CFRD over a period of three years. MethodsData of previously CFTR-modulator-naïve patients with CFRD and pancreatic insufficiency on ETI therapy were retrieved from an electronic health record database. Patients were followed for a mean duration of 2.7 ± 0.8 years after ETI initiation. Data pertaining to weight, BMI, HbA1c and diabetes regimen were collected at 6 months, 12 months, 2 years and at 3 years post-ETI initiation. Patients were then dichotomized based on their baseline BMI into a low BMI group and an “at target” BMI group. The effects of ETI on changes in weight, BMI, A1c and diabetes regimen were compared in both groups over a period of three years. ResultsTwenty-seven patients with CFRD (15 men/12 women), age 30.6 ± 11.5 (SD) years, BMI 22.4 ± 4.0 kg/m2, were included. Fifteen patients had low BMI (<22 kg/m2 for women, <23 kg/m2 for men) and 12 patients had at target BMI (≥22 kg/m2for women, ≥BMI 23 kg/m2 for men). Patients with low BMI had an increase in their BMI from 19.5 ± 1.7 to 21.4 ± 2.2 kg/m2 at one year (p = 0.002), and 21.8 ± 1.8 kg/m2 at three years (p = 0.004) after ETI initiation. Four patients (out of 15) in the low BMI group had achieved normal BMI by the end of study follow up. There was no change in weight in the at target BMI group. HbA1c and basal insulin requirements did not change in either group. Five patients started non-insulin therapies. ConclusionBMI increased after ETI therapy in CFRD patients with low BMI, but not in those with at target BMI. The use of non-insulin therapies is increasing in CFRD and should be evaluated in future studies.

Long-Term Outcomes of Medical Management vs Bariatric Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes

Randomized clinical trials of bariatric surgery have been limited in size, type of surgical procedure, and follow-up duration. To determine long-term glycemic control and safety of bariatric surgery compared with medical/lifestyle management of type 2 diabetes. ARMMS-T2D (Alliance of Randomized Trials of Medicine vs Metabolic Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes) is a pooled analysis from 4 US single-center randomized trials conducted between May 2007 and August 2013, with observational follow-up through July 2022. Participants were originally randomized to undergo either medical/lifestyle management or 1 of the following 3 bariatric surgical procedures: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, or adjustable gastric banding. The primary outcome was change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to 7 years for all participants. Data are reported for up to 12 years. A total of 262 of 305 eligible participants (86%) enrolled in long-term follow-up for this pooled analysis. The mean (SD) age of participants was 49.9 (8.3) years, mean (SD) body mass index was 36.4 (3.5), 68.3% were women, 31% were Black, and 67.2% were White. During follow-up, 25% of participants randomized to undergo medical/lifestyle management underwent bariatric surgery. The median follow-up was 11 years. At 7 years, HbA1c decreased by 0.2% (95% CI, -0.5% to 0.2%), from a baseline of 8.2%, in the medical/lifestyle group and by 1.6% (95% CI, -1.8% to -1.3%), from a baseline of 8.7%, in the bariatric surgery group. The between-group difference was -1.4% (95% CI, -1.8% to -1.0%; P < .001) at 7 years and -1.1% (95% CI, -1.7% to -0.5%; P = .002) at 12 years. Fewer antidiabetes medications were used in the bariatric surgery group. Diabetes remission was greater after bariatric surgery (6.2% in the medical/lifestyle group vs 18.2% in the bariatric surgery group; P = .02) at 7 years and at 12 years (0.0% in the medical/lifestyle group vs 12.7% in the bariatric surgery group; P < .001). There were 4 deaths (2.2%), 2 in each group, and no differences in major cardiovascular adverse events. Anemia, fractures, and gastrointestinal adverse events were more common after bariatric surgery. After 7 to 12 years of follow-up, individuals originally randomized to undergo bariatric surgery compared with medical/lifestyle intervention had superior glycemic control with less diabetes medication use and higher rates of diabetes remission. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02328599.

The impact of a statewide insulin copay cap policy for insured patients with diabetes in Utah.

Insulin affordability is a huge concern for patients with diabetes in the United States. On March 30, 2020, Utah signed House Bill 207 into law, aimed at capping copayments for insulin at $30 for a 30-day supply. The bill was enacted on January 1, 2021. To assess patient basal insulin adherence, out-of-pocket costs, health plan costs, total costs on insulin, and hemoglobin A1c (A1c) in prepolicy vs postpolicy periods. This study is a retrospective analysis using data from a regional health plan in Utah from October 1, 2019, to September 30, 2021. Inclusion criteria were fully enrolled members of all ages, under commercial insurance, with at least 1 fill for any type of insulin in both the preperiod and the postperiod. Adherence was measured by proportion of days covered (PDC). Paired t-tests and Wilcoxon sign rank tests were conducted to compare the health and economic outcomes. Out of 24,150 commercially insured individuals, a total of 244 patients were included. Across all 244 patients, there was a significant decline in monthly median out-of-pocket costs of insulin by 58.5% (P < 0.001), whereas the monthly median health plan costs of insulin increased by 22.0% (P < 0.001). The total monthly costs of insulin (the sum of out-of-pocket and health plan costs) were unchanged (P = 0.115). Only 74 patients with enough basal insulin fills in both periods were included in the analysis for PDC changes. PDC change was not statistically significant (P = 0.43). Among the 74 patients with PDC calculations, 29 patients had A1c recorded in both periods. The change in A1c was not statistically significant (P = 0.23). An insulin copayment max of $30 in Utah demonstrated lower patient out-of-pocket costs, subsidized by the health plan. PDC did not change, and HbA1c did not improve. An assessment of a longer period and on a larger population is needed.

Reducing or Discontinuing Insulin or Sulfonylurea When Initiating a Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Agonist.

Hypoglycemia and weight gain are well-known adverse effects of insulin and sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist monotherapy has a low incidence of hypoglycemia, but when combined with insulin or sulfonylureas, patients have higher rates of hypoglycemia. The primary study outcome was to determine the percentage of patients with dose reductions or discontinuation of insulin or a sulfonylurea at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Secondary outcomes included changes in hemoglobin A1c and body weight measured. This was a single-center, quality assurance, quality improvement, retrospective chart review of patients prescribed a GLP-1 agonist while on insulin and/or a sulfonylurea between January 1, 2019, and September 30, 2022, at a pharmacist-led patient aligned care team (PACT) clinic at the Wilkes-Barre Veterans Affairs Medical Center. This retrospective chart review included 136 patients. Throughout 12 months of following the pharmacist-led PACT clinic, 55 patients (57.3%) had ≥ 1 insulin dose reduction, 16 patients (29.6%) had ≥ 1 dose reduction of a sulfonylurea, 14 patients (14.6%) discontinued insulin, and 21 patients (38.9%) discontinued their sulfonylurea. Patients taking insulin and/or sulfonylurea in combination with a GLP-1 agonist may require a dose reduction or discontinuation of the diabetic agents. Patients on both insulin and sulfonylurea may need closer monitoring due to the higher incidences of discontinuations compared with patients on only 1 of these agents. Dose reductions or discontinuations of these diabetic agents can promote positive patient outcomes, such as preventing hypoglycemia, minimizing weight gain, increasing weight loss, and reducing hemoglobin A1c.

Prior authorization for diabetes medications: Clinical outcomes and health disparities

BackgroundPrior authorization (PA) is a utilization management strategy used by health plans to ensure affordable, cost-effective care; however, PA may lead to therapy delay/abandonment and exacerbate health disparities. The purpose of this observational study was to assess the clinical outcomes and any health disparities associated with PA for diabetes mellitus (DM) medications. Materials and methodsThis was a cohort study of US adult patients from health plans with integrated and non-integrated system providers who were prescribed a DM medication that required a PA. Patients were categorized into three groups: received the requested DM medication (PA Med) or a new, alternative DM medication (DM Med), or did not receive the requested or new DM medication (No Med). The primary outcome was change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Adjusted and unadjusted analyses were performed. Patient characteristics associated with the No Med group were identified, also, with multivariable logistic regression modeling. Results6305 patients were included: 2434, 1323, and 2548 in the PA Med, DM Med, and No Med groups, respectively. Patients in the PA Med (−0.9 %) and DM Med (−1.0 %) groups had statistically significantly greater reductions in HbA1c compared to the No Med group (−0.4 %) in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses (all p < 0.05). Patients who were Hispanic/Latino, had a non-integrated system prescriber, and had a higher burden of chronic disease were statistically significantly associated with the No Med group. ConclusionsReceiving a new DM medication following PA was associated with better clinical outcomes but health disparities were present in the PA process.

Trends in clinical characteristics, medication use, and glycemic control in insulin-treated patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in Finland in 2012-2019: Nationwide real-world evidence study.

To describe the clinical characteristics and medication purchases of insulin-treated adults in Finland at index (January 1, 2012 or first insulin purchase) and December 31, 2019. Additionally, to describe basal insulin (BI) treatment patterns and associated changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values. In this descriptive study using nationwide registries, we included adults with at least two reimbursed insulin purchases within 12 months of the first purchase between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2019. We formed four study groups: type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D)-diagnosed people who were further divided into prevalent or naïve users (start of insulin use before or after January 1, 2012). Insulin treatment patterns were estimated from medication purchase data and glycemic control from HbA1c results. Out of 145 020 people included, 34 359 had T1D and 110 661 T2D. By 2019, in parallel with the adaptation of new noninsulin medications, second-generation basal insulin (BI) analogues were adopted by 45.9% and 21.1% of prevalent T1D and T2D users. At index, HbA1c target (≤53 mmol/mol) was reached by 17% and 35% of T2D naïve and prevalent users, respectively, and by 17% of T1D prevalent users. At study end, the target was reached respectively by 41%, 34%, and 22% of insulin users. Insulin initiation improved and discontinuation worsened glycemic control in T2D, with lesser effects seen after treatment gaps or switches between BIs. Our study showed that glycemic control in insulin users has remained stable or improved between 2012 and 2019 despite aging population and in parallel with introduction of new treatment options, providing valuable insight into Finnish national diabetes care.

Efficacy and Safety of Omarigliptin, a Novel Once-Weekly Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor, in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

No recent meta-analysis has holistically analyzed and summarized the efficacy and safety of omarigliptin in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We conducted a meta-analysis to address this knowledge gap. Electronic databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included patients with T2DM who received omarigliptin in the intervention arm. The control arm consisted of either a placebo (passive control group [PCG]) or an active comparator (active control group [ACG]). The primary outcome assessed was changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), while secondary outcomes included variations in glucose levels, achievement of glycemic targets, adverse events (AEs), and hypoglycemic events. From 332 initially screened articles, data from 16 RCTs involving 8,804 subjects were analyzed. Omarigliptin demonstrated superiority over placebo in reducing HbA1c levels (mean difference, -0.58%; 95% confidence interval, -0.75 to -0.40; P<0.00001; I2=91%). Additionally, omarigliptin outperformed placebo in lowering fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour postprandial glucose, and in the percentage of participants achieving HbA1c levels below 7.0% and 6.5%. The glycemic efficacy of omarigliptin was similar to that of the ACG across all measures. Although the omarigliptin group experienced a higher incidence of hypoglycemic events compared to the PCG, the overall AEs, serious AEs, hypoglycemia, and severe hypoglycemia were comparable between the omarigliptin and control groups (PCG and ACG). Omarigliptin has a favorable glycemic efficacy and safety profile for managing T2DM.

Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Managed Diabetes Transitions of Care Medication Management Clinic.

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of a pharmacist-managed transitions of care (TOC) clinic on outcomes in a posthospitalization population with diabetes. A retrospective single center cohort study utilized electronic health records to identify discharged patients followed by the inpatient endocrinology team. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission rates in the target population. Secondary outcomes include 90-day readmission rates, time to first follow-up, emergency department/urgent care encounters, change in A1C, retention with endocrinology, referrals for diabetes education, and types of interventions. The control group included patients prior to the initiation of the TOC clinic compared to patients seen in the TOC clinic, evenly matched by A1C. Readmission rates and other clinical data were queried up to 4 months after discharge. Patients in the TOC cohort had similar 30-day readmission rates compared to the non-TOC cohort and were found to have lower A1C values within 120 days of discharge. Overall, patients in the TOC cohort were more likely to have a follow-up appointment and had closer follow-up after discharge. This study highlights that although there was no difference in readmission rates, a pharmacist-managed diabetes TOC clinic may decrease time to follow-up and improve long-term diabetes outcomes.

Pancreatosteatosis in patients with adrenal incidentaloma: A risk factor for impaired glucose metabolism

AimsPatients with adrenal incidentaloma (AI) are at increased risk of impaired glucose metabolism, which is known to be associated with pancreatosteatosis (PS). We aimed to investigate the risk of developing dysglycemia for patients with non-functioning AI (NFAI) versus those without, and whether the presence of PS predicts future dysglycemia in patients with NFAI. MethodIn 80 patients with NFAI and 127 controls matched for age, sex, and body mass index, changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c) were evaluated at 2 years. PS was evaluated with data obtained from non-contrast abdominal computed tomography (CT) performed at the initial evaluation. ResultsMean FPG levels increased significantly after 2 years in both groups (P < 0.001, for both), albeit significantly higher among patients than the controls (P = 0.002). The increases in HbA1c and FPG levels were significantly higher among patients with PS than without PS, in the adenoma group (p < 0.001, P = 0.00, respectively). The change in Hba1c levels was associated with the presence of PS in patients with NFAI (p < 0.001). ConclusionsOur findings suggest that the presence of PS may provide significant information in predicting newly developed dysglycemia in patients with NFAI.

Endocrinology/Primary Care Pharmacy Collaboration vs Endocrinology Care Alone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and A1c >9.

Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) requires close collaboration between patients and their care management team, often including endocrinology. Primary care pharmacist impact on diabetes management in collaboration with endocrinology is not well established. Objective: To assess if pharmacy and endocrinology collaboration results in a greater A1c reduction in patients with T2D vs endocrinology alone. Methods: This retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted in adult outpatients with T2D and baseline A1c >9% who saw endocrinology within 1 year preceding the study period (January 1, 2021 to January 1, 2022). Patients were included if they had a follow-up A1c 6 months (±90 days) from index date and completed at least 1 endocrinology visit during the study period. Patients managed by endocrinology/primary care pharmacist collaboration (Endo/PharmD) were compared with those who received endocrinology care alone (Endo). Primary outcome was change in A1c from baseline to 6 months. Secondary outcomes included total number of completed visits and percentage of patients achieving A1c <6.5%, <7%, <8%, and <9% between groups at 6 months. Results: A total of 418 patients were included (22 Endo/PharmD, 396 Endo). The change in follow-up A1c was not significantly different between groups, -0.481% (standard error [SE] = 0.396); P = 0.6179. Endo/PharmD patients had significantly more provider visits during the study period (5.3 ± 2.3 vs 2.3 ± 1.2; P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in odds of A1c goal attainment between groups at 6 months. Conclusion and Relevance: Endocrinology/primary care pharmacist collaboration occurred infrequently but was associated with a trend toward greater A1c reduction in patients with T2D and A1c >9%.

Risk of Urinary Infections in Veterans on Empagliflozin With Concurrent Catheter Use

There has been concern over whether to use sodium-glucose-cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors in patients that use catheters due to the concern for increased urinary tract infections (UTIs). The concern is that patients who use catheters are already at an increased risk for UTIs and that SGLT-2-inhibitors may promote bacterial growth due their mechanism of action, ie. increasing glycosuria. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether using empagliflozin, a SGLT-2-inhibitor, in patients who also use catheters, increases their risks for UTIs. A retrospective chart review of electronic health records at a single-center was completed of all Veterans who received an empagliflozin prescription and were also using catheters between October 1, 2015 and September 30, 2022. Veterans were included if they were using catheters for at least 2 months prior to starting empagliflozin and were on both therapies for at least 2 months concurrently. The primary outcome for this study is the number of UTIs occurring prior to and after beginning empagliflozin treatment. Additional secondary outcomes included change in A1c, change in body mass index (BMI), UTI-hospitalizations, and fungal infections. Of the 91 patients with concurrent empagliflozin and catheter-use, only 25 Veterans were included. There was an occurrence of .09 UTIs/month pre-empagliflozin compared to .07 post-empagliflozin (P = .61). There was an observed trend in Veterans with Type 2 Diabetes having an increased rate of UTIs. There was no statistically significant difference found in UTI rates when comparing catheters alone to concurrent catheter and empagliflozin-use.

Glycemic Control in Patients Living With HIV Initiated on Integrase Inhibitor-Based Three-Drug Antiretroviral Therapy.

Background: The increased risk of cardio-metabolic disorders associated with people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is of growing importance. Given the broad adoption of integrase strand-transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) as first-line therapy for HIV, additional data are needed regarding the metabolic effects of these regimens. Objective: The purpose of this study is to assess glycemic control in patients started on INSTI-based 3-drug regimens over a 2-year period. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients seen in the Brooklyn Hospital Center. Men and nonpregnant, nonlactating women aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of HIV who were initiated on or switched to an ART consisting of 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus an INSTI were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint is change in A1C from baseline (pre-INSTI initiation) to 2 years after initiation. Results: Two hundred fifty-one patients were eligible based on specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Overall, a statistically significant increase in A1C was seen in all patients started on INSTI-based regimen (95% CI, 0.10-0.36; P < 0.001). Primarily patients on both elvitegravir-based and bictegravir-based regimens saw the most significant increase in A1C: 0.16% (95% CI, 0.04-0.27; P = 0.006) and 0.39% (95% CI, 0.02-0.76; P = 0.038), respectively. Conclusion and Relevance: Integrase strand-transfer inhibitor-based 3-drug ART was associated with a small but statistically significant increase in A1C over a 2-year period, requiring additional monitoring by clinicians.

Long-Term Results of a Digital Diabetes Self-Management and Education Support Program Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The purpose of this study is to examine the long-term impact of a digital diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) program on A1C among adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Data analyzed were from a retrospective cohort of commercially insured members with T2DM enrolled in the Omada for Diabetes program between January 1, 2019, and January 31, 2022 (n = 1,322). Linear mixed models measured changes in A1C and weight across 12 months (collected at baseline and every 3 months over 1 year) overall and stratified by A1C at baseline (≥8% vs <8%). On average, members were 53.5 years old, 56.9% female, and 71.5% White, with a mean baseline body mass index (BMI) of 36.9 and A1C of 7.6%. Members with baseline A1C ≥8% demonstrated clinically and statistically significant adjusted mean reductions in A1C during follow-up, from 9.48% at baseline to 7.33%, 7.57%, 7.59%, and 7.47% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. Those with A1C <8% maintained glycemic stability (6.73%, 6.50%, 6.54%, 6.62%, and 6.51%, respectively). Collectively, members experienced a -1.17 kg/m2 mean reduction in BMI over 12 months. This study provides real-world evidence that members with elevated baseline A1C (≥8%) enrolled in a digital DSMES program experienced clinically meaningful and statistically significant reductions in A1C. Those with baseline A1C within goal treatment range (<8%) maintained glycemic stability over 1 year. The findings support existing evidence that scalable digital DSMES solutions can help individuals with T2DM manage their condition.

Effectiveness of insulin degludec/liraglutide versus insulin degludec/insulin aspart in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of once-daily insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) to that of once-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) after switching from basal insulin therapy at 6months by assessing changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), body weight, and insulin doses in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). A total of 91 patients with T2D with HbA1c levels exceeding 7.0% were included in this study. Adjusted least square mean changes in HbA1c, body weight, and total insulin doses were compared between the IDegLira group and IDegAsp group. Subgroup analyses were performed, stratified by median values of HbA1c (< 8.5 and ≥ 8.5%), obesity (body mass index < 25 and ≥ 25kg/m2), and basal insulin doses (< 14 and ≥ 14 units) at baseline to assess treatment interaction by subgroup. The IDegLira group showed a greater reduction in HbA1c levels than the IDegAsp group (-0.17 vs -0.79%, p = 0.003) with comparable body weight changes. The analyses of adjusted mean changes of total insulin doses showed that the IDegAsp group had a larger increase than the IDegLira group (3.64 vs 1.30 unis, p = 0.016). The effect of IDegLira on HbA1c levels was superior to that of IDegAsp in patients with high HbA1c. There were no inter-group differences in the rate of hypoglycemic episodes. Once-daily IDegLira had greater effects on HbA1c and a lesser increase in insulin doses than IDegAsp when patients are switched from basal insulin therapy. Moreover, the effect on HbA1c was enhanced in patients with high HbA1c levels at baseline.

Development of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring Service by Clinical Pharmacists in a Medically Underserved Population.

Background: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is an evolving technology that provides a wealth of information to aid in managing diabetes. Professional CGM (ProCGM) is recommended when personal CGM is not desired or available. Patients in medically underserved areas may have limited access to personal CGM devices, thus ProCGM devices can be used for short-term monitoring and medication adjustment. Clinical pharmacists are well-positioned to help set up and establish personal and professional CGM management services. Objectives: To determine the effect of ProCGM in patients with persistently uncontrolled type 2 diabetes in a medically underserved population (MUP). Methods: Pre-post intervention analysis of a single cohort of patients in a public health center. Patients with persistently uncontrolled (A1c > 9%) and taking at least one daily dose of insulin were included. Included participants wore a ProCGM sensor and met with the clinical pharmacist at least once for ProCGM data interpretation and education. The primary analysis evaluated patients who achieved an A1c <9% 1-6 months after intervention. The change in A1c was also evaluated. Participants completed a pre- and post-survey about their experience. Results: Twenty-two patients were included in the final analysis. Ten patients achieved an A1c <9% (45%). The mean A1c pre- and post-ProCGM was 11.0% and 9.8% respectively, with a decrease of -1.2% (p=0.055) overall and a decrease of -1.7% for patients who wore the sensor for at least 10 days (p=0.012; n=15). Using the CGM data 91% of participants had a change to their medication regimen and 45% achieved an A1c <9%. Six participants experienced hypoglycemia per the CGM report, but only two were aware of it. After reviewing their glucose report with the pharmacist, 95% of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed to feeling more knowledgeable about blood sugar patterns after reviewing the report with a pharmacist. Conclusion: Almost half of the patients in the study achieved an A1c <9%. This study demonstrated glycemic benefit in patients in a MUP who wore a ProCGM for at least 10 days and met with a clinical pharmacist. Data from ProCGM enabled patients to better understand glucose patterns in those with persistently uncontrolled type 2 diabetes.

Implementation of an Interprofessional Diabetes Management Clinic in the Rural Primary Care Setting.

Background: Access to a primary care provider is not guaranteed for many living in rural settings. Notably, rural populations experience a higher degree of burden from chronic diseases compared to urban-dwellers. For example, diabetes can go undiagnosed and undertreated with lack of primary care. To address these care gaps at a large, rural family medicine practice in western North Carolina, a multidisciplinary pharmacist-led diabetes clinic was developed. Objectives: This article describes the implementation, evolution, and impact of the diabetes management clinic and explores future directions for improving the experience of patients and health care providers. Practice Description and Innovation: The diabetes management clinic at Mountain Area Health Education Center (MAHEC) is a pharmacy resident-led interdisciplinary clinic incorporating nutrition and pharmacy learners to provide patient care in both telehealth and in-office settings. Since its inception in 2018, the clinic has facilitated meaningful learning opportunities for students and residents and helped patients manage their diabetes in a multifaceted approach. Evaluation Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study evaluated diabetes-related outcomes for 80 patients seen in the diabetes management clinic during twelve months of appointments. The primary outcome measure was change in A1c from baseline. Results: Among patients with a follow-up A1c during the study (n=64), there was a mean reduction in A1c by 0.79% from baseline. Additionally, among those with a second follow-up A1c available (n=32), there was a mean reduction from baseline in A1c of 1.42%. Conclusion: The utilization of pharmacy residents as part of an interdisciplinary diabetes management clinic can extend access to care for underserved patients. The clinic also serves as a structured teaching clinic for interdisciplinary learners, and it has contributed to positive clinical outcomes, strong interprofessional collaboration, and expansion of experiential education opportunities since its inception in 2018.