Abstract
BackgroundPrior authorization (PA) is a utilization management strategy used by health plans to ensure affordable, cost-effective care; however, PA may lead to therapy delay/abandonment and exacerbate health disparities. The purpose of this observational study was to assess the clinical outcomes and any health disparities associated with PA for diabetes mellitus (DM) medications. Materials and methodsThis was a cohort study of US adult patients from health plans with integrated and non-integrated system providers who were prescribed a DM medication that required a PA. Patients were categorized into three groups: received the requested DM medication (PA Med) or a new, alternative DM medication (DM Med), or did not receive the requested or new DM medication (No Med). The primary outcome was change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Adjusted and unadjusted analyses were performed. Patient characteristics associated with the No Med group were identified, also, with multivariable logistic regression modeling. Results6305 patients were included: 2434, 1323, and 2548 in the PA Med, DM Med, and No Med groups, respectively. Patients in the PA Med (−0.9 %) and DM Med (−1.0 %) groups had statistically significantly greater reductions in HbA1c compared to the No Med group (−0.4 %) in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses (all p < 0.05). Patients who were Hispanic/Latino, had a non-integrated system prescriber, and had a higher burden of chronic disease were statistically significantly associated with the No Med group. ConclusionsReceiving a new DM medication following PA was associated with better clinical outcomes but health disparities were present in the PA process.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.