Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of Cervical Spine Research Articles

Deep learning reconstruction for the evaluation of neuroforaminal stenosis using 1.5T cervical spine MRI: comparison with 3T MRI without deep learning reconstruction.

To compare image quality and interobserver agreement in evaluations of neuroforaminal stenosis between 1.5T cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and 3T MRI without DLR. In this prospective study, 21 volunteers (mean age: 42.4 ± 11.9 years; 17 males) underwent cervical spine T2-weighted sagittal 1.5T and 3T MRI on the same day. The 1.5T and 3T MRI data were used to reconstruct images with (1.5T-DLR) and without (3T-nonDLR) DLR, respectively. Regions of interest were marked on the spinal cord to calculate non-uniformity (NU; standard deviation/signal intensity × 100), as an indicator of image noise. Two blinded radiologists evaluated the images in terms of the depiction of structures, artifacts, noise, overall image quality, and neuroforaminal stenosis. The NU value and the subjective image quality scores were compared between 1.5T-DLR and 3T-nonDLR using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Interobserver agreement in evaluations of neuroforaminal stenosis for 1.5T-DLR and 3T-nonDLR was evaluated using Cohen's weighted kappa analysis. The NU value for 1.5T-DLR was 8.4, which was significantly better than that for 3T-nonDLR (10.3; p < 0.001). Subjective image scores were significantly better for 1.5T-DLR than 3T-nonDLR images (p < 0.037). Interobserver agreement (95% confidence intervals) in the evaluations of neuroforaminal stenosis was significantly superior for 1.5T-DLR (0.920 [0.916-0.924]) than 3T-nonDLR (0.894 [0.889-0.898]). By using DLR, image quality and interobserver agreement in evaluations of neuroforaminal stenosis on 1.5T cervical spine MRI could be improved compared to 3T MRI without DLR.

Proposing a Framework to Understand the Role of Imaging in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Enhancement of MRI Protocols Needed for Accurate Diagnosis and Evaluation.

Proposing a Framework to Understand the Role of Imaging in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Enhancement of MRI Protocols Needed for Accurate Diagnosis and Evaluation.

Image Segmentation-Based Cervical Spine MRI Images to Evaluate the Treatment of Patients with Chronic Pain.

The objective of this research was to investigate the application effect of cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image segmentation algorithm guidance in the treatment of chronic pain with cervical epidural puncture. A total of 72 patients with chronic pain were selected and divided into a cervical spine MRI image-guided group (group A) and a blind puncture group with traditional experience (group B). The results showed that the puncture time of group A was 9.9 ± 8.2 (min), while that of group B was 15.2 ± 8.9 (min), so the puncture time of patients in group A was significantly shorter than that of group B (P < 0.05). The incidences of pain at the puncture site of patients in group A and group B were 6% and 10%, respectively. The incidence of pain at the puncture site in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (P < 0.05). The success rate of the first puncture in group A was 78%, and that in group B was 54%. The success rate of the first puncture in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (P < 0.05). The complication rate of group A was 22.22%, and that of group B was 80.56%. The incidence of complications in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (P < 0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in the puncture depth between the two groups (P > 0.05). In summary, the guidance of cervical spine MRI image segmentation algorithm can reduce the time and times of puncture and improve the success rate of puncture, thereby reducing the incidence of postoperative complications.

Evaluation of Dynamic Foraminal Stenosis with Positional MRI in Patients with C6 Radiculopathy-Mimicking Pain: A Prospective Radiologic Cohort Study.

Objective Patients with a C6 radiculopathy-mimicking complaint are always in the gray zone if the diagnosis is not clear. The aim of the study is to make the diagnosis clear if the neck and shoulder pain is caused by a dynamic stenosis of the neural foramen at the C5-C6 level. Methods Patients with a C6 radiculopathy-mimicking complaint were included in the study. Patients had a cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the normal limits, or a minimal protrusion at the C5-C6 level underwent a dynamic MRI procedure. We measured the foraminal area and spinal cord diameter (SCD) at the C5-C6 level by using the PACS system ROI irregular are determination integral embedded to PACS. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of measurements was evaluated. Results were analyzed statistically, and a p value< 0.05 was accepted as statistically meaningful. Results A total of 23 patients between January 2019 and June 2019 were included in the study. There were 10 men and 13 women, and the mean age was 41.3 (range 33-53). Foraminal area decrease at C5-C6 in extension and increase in flexion when compared with the neutral position was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Foraminal area changes between the complaint side and the opposite side was not statistically different (p > 0.05). Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of measurements were classified as in almost perfect agreement. Conclusions Our present work presented dynamic and positional foraminal changes in MRI with radiculopathy-mimicking patients. Soever, we did not find a difference between the clinical complaint side and the opposite side in radiculopathy-mimicking patients. Cervical radiculopathy pain should not be attributed only to foraminal sizes. PACS embedded irregular area measurement integral allows the easy measure of a big number of patients without additional set-up and digital work requirements.

Association between Occupation and Cervical Disc Degeneration in 1211 Asymptomatic Subjects.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system has frequently observed degenerative changes in the cervical discs of healthy subjects. Although there are concerns regarding the link between an individual’s occupation and intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) in the cervical spine, whether the occupation affects IDD is still not clear. This study aimed to evaluate the occupation and IDD interplay using cervical spine MRI among a cohort of healthy individuals, and to evaluate any association between the type of labor and IDD. Using MRI, we prospectively measured at every level, the anteroposterior (AP) intervertebral disc diameter and disc height, in a cohort of 1211 healthy volunteers (606 (50%) male; mean age, 49.5 years). Using a minimum of 100 male and female each from the third to eighth decades of age (20–79 years), IDD was evaluated based on the modified Pfirrmann classification system to derive a disc degeneration score (DDS). We also measured the AP diameters of disc protrusion and of the dural sac as well as the spinal cord. The overall DDS and number of disc protrusions increased with age. Among 11 occupations, there were no significant differences in AP diameter of the dural sac as well as the spinal cord. For the four labor types (heavy object handling, same position maintenance, cervical extension position, and cervical flexion position), there were no significant differences in overall DDS and number of disc protrusions, with or without work. Also, among the four labor types, there were no significant differences in the AP diameter of the dural sac as well as the spinal cord. In this cross-sectional survey of cervical spine MRI data among healthy adult volunteers, occupation and type of labor might have no effect on IDD in the cervical spine.

Clinical evaluation versus magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with radicular arm pain-A pragmatic study.

ObjectivesCervical nerve root compression can lead to radiculopathy in the arm. Some studies have reported low accuracy in determining the responsible nerve root in both cervical and lumbar regions. This prospective, observational, pragmatic study aimed to determine the accuracy of the clinical evaluation relative to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with arm radiculopathy.MethodsPatients with neck pain and neck‐related arm pain referred to a spine unit underwent a standard clinical neurological examination and cervical spine MRI. The clinical examination required a judgment of the most likely cervical root involved, including the side. The Interobserver reproducibility was tested. Using MRI, the most likely nerve root involved according to radiology was assessed.ResultsEighty‐three patients met the inclusion criteria. The Interobserver reproducibility between clinical evaluators was 58%, with a modest κ coefficient (0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18–0.47) classified only as "fair agreement.” Only 31% (95% CI: 22–42) of the 83 patients exhibited full agreement regarding the suspected cervical root as assessed via the clinical evaluation and MRI. In another 28% (95% CI: 18–39), the clinical evaluation identified an adjacent level to that identified on MRI.ConclusionsIn cervical radiculopathy, the clinical‐neurological examination diagnosed the same in 31% or an adjacent cervical root in 28% of the patients in relation to the most affected cervical root on MRI.

Cocaine-related cervical spinal cord infarction: a\xa0case report and review of the\xa0literature

Study designCase report.ObjectivesTo report a clinical case of spinal cord infarction due to cocaine use.SettingSpinal Center, IRCCS Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome (Italy).Case presentationTwo days after recreational use of cocaine, a 27-year-old Caucasic man was admitted to the emergency department for acute cervical pain, weakness in all four limbs, and urinary retention. A cervical spinal magnetic resonance imaging scan, performed after 2 days, showed a “pencil-like” lesion extending from C4 to T1 metamer, compatible with acute ischemia in the anterior spinal artery territory. Other causes of vascular disorders, as well as inflammatory and infectious disorders were ruled out. At admission in our department, the patient had an incomplete tetraplegia at level C6, an indwelling catheter, and was unable to stand and walk. After 3 months of rehabilitation, he had an AIS score D tetraplegia at level C7, was able to stand and walk using parallel bars, and indwelling catheter was replaced by intermittent catheterization.Discussion and conclusionsThe etiology of medullary infarction may remain unexplained in nearly 30–40% of cases. Even if rare, cocaine-induced ischemic myelopathy should be considered and ruled out in the differential diagnosis of any acute nontraumatic myelopathy, especially in young patients.

Factors Associated with Treatment Success After Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection for Cervical Radicular Pain.

To investigate the demographic, clinical and radiological findings associated with treatment success after interlaminar epidural steroid injection (ILESI) in radicular pain induced by cervical disc herniation. In this retrospective study, the data of patients who received cervical ILESI between January 2017 and June 2021 were screened. Of 223 patients, 92 with unilateral radicular neck pain due to cervical disc herniation were included. Demographic data, symptom duration, and numerical rating scale scores at baseline, at three weeks, three months, and six months after treatment were collected from the medical records of the patients. Disc herniation level, cervical axis, disc height, presence and degree of spinal canal and neural foraminal stenosis, vertebral endplate signal change, and definitive presence of uncovertebral and facet osteoarthritis were evaluated using cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging. Treatment success was determined as ?50% reduction in pain scores at six months compared to baseline. Data of 92 patients (27 men, 65 women) were included. The mean age was 50.82 ± 10.22 years, and the median symptom duration was 12 (4.25 to 20) months. At six months after ILESI, treatment was successful in 58 (58.7%) patients and unsuccessful in 34 (41.3%) patients. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with treatment success at six months post-injection. In the final model, neural foraminal stenosis (non-severe vs. severe) and spinal canal stenosis (non-severe vs. severe) were significantly associated with the treatment success (OR=3.02, 95% CI=1.40?10.95, p=0.009; OR=5.31, 95% CI=1.77?15.85, p=0.003). Treatment success of cervical ILESI at six months is favorable. However, the presence of severe neural foraminal and spinal canal stenosis is associated with a reduced likelihood of treatment success.

CLINICAL AND NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL PARALLELS OF THE BRACHIAL PLEXOPATHY IN THE STRUCTURE OF NEUROGENIC THORACIC OUTLET SYNDROME

The aim: Was assessment of the neurophysiological data and features of clinical picture in patients with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). Materials and methods: 103 patients with upper extremity pain and/or paresthesia or hypotrophy, or a combination of these symptoms were examined. The examination algorithm included: cervical spine radiography, cervical spine and brachial plexuses magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), upper extremity soft tissues and vessels ultrasonic examination, stimulation electroneuromiography with F-waves registration. Results: Neurogenic TOS was diagnosed in 29 patients. A significant relationship between the following complaints and neurophysiological parameters was observed: pain, numbness during physical activity and decreased medial anrebrachial cutaneous nerve response amplitude by ≥25% compared to the contralateral side; hypothenar hypotrophy and decrease of ulnar nerve motor/sensory response amplitude; the 4-5th fingers hypoesthesia and decrease of ulnar nerve sensory response amplitude. Conclusions: Medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve amplitudes asymmetry indices of ≥25% or lack of response may be considered to be a marker of true neurogenic TOS.

Cervical facet joint effusion: A sign of instability in cervical degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Aims:The aim of this study was to trace the association between cervical facet joint effusion and cervical degenerative spondylolisthesis (CDS). CDS has not received as much attention as its lumbar counterpart. Identification of features of instability on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial to avoid missing presence of CDS.Materials and Methods:The authors retrospectively reviewed cervical spine MRI scans and upright lateral flexion-extension radiographs of 17 consecutive patients at a single institution between January 2017 and June 2018 that revealed CDS. Presence of cervical facet joint effusion and CDS was recorded. Data were analyzed to deduce possibility of an association between cervical facet joint effusion and CDS.Results:Seventeen patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria of cervical spondylotic myelopathy associated with CDS. Out of these, 10 patients revealed facet joint effusion at C3-C4 (4 patients) and C4-C5 (6 patients) levels. The mean age of patients was 65.8 years (49–79) and M:F was 2.2:1. Amount of facet joint effusion varied and ranged from 1.6 mm to 4.7 mm on the axial images. Ten patients (58.82%) demonstrated facet joint effusion associated with mobile CDS. Seven patients (41.17%) with CDS and without facet effusion did not demonstrate mobility of more than 0.5 mm in flexion-extension radiographs.Conclusion:The current study acknowledges the association of “cervical facet effusion” and CDS. Clinically measurable facet joint effusion on MRI suggests the need for further attempts to diagnose CDS.

An Adverse Case of Spinal Tumor Embolization with Gelfoam in a Patient Whose Vertebral Artery Has Shared Origin with Ipsilateral Costocervical Trunk

Tumor embolization is performed before surgical excision. The Gelfoam temporarily occludes the vessels supplying the tumor by facilitating thrombus formation. We report an adverse case of Gelfoam embolization in a patient with a certain vascular anatomy. A 75-year-old man previously diagnosed with lung cancer in 2015 was admitted to Korea University Guro Hospital. He had bilateral arm paresthesia and lower extremity weakness that had progressed for 2 weeks. Cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging revealed a metastatic pathologic fracture of the C6 vertebral body and subsequent cord compression. A C6 corpectomy was scheduled, and preoperative spinal tumor embolization was planned. Angiography revealed that the left deep cervical artery (DCA) and the ipsilateral vertebral artery shared origin. Two Nester coils were positioned at the right distal DCA, one at the left DCA, and two at the left proximal DCA. Gelfoam was infused in each location. However, the patient’s mental status worsened after the left DCA embolization. A diffusion-weighted image showed diffuse cytotoxic edema in the posterior circulation without significant lesions on magnetic resonance angiography. In Gelfoam embolization, special attention is required with neurological monitoring when maneuvering DCA if it has a nearby entrance with a vertebral artery.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Cervical Spine: Frequency of Abnormal Findings with Relation to Age.

Background: Patients with neck pain are frequently encountered in cervical spine (C-spine) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) practice. However, the exact distribution and prevalence of cervical abnormalities are not known. Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between age, gender, and prevalence of abnormal cervical MRI findings. Methods: Records of 111 cervical MRIs were collected in 12 months from January to December 2019 from adults aged 20–89 years who were referred from neurosurgery, neurology, and orthopedic clinics. Findings were classified and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS), version 24.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The chi-square test was used to determine the association between demographics and abnormalities using a significance of p = 0.05. Results: The majority of patients were female (72.1%). The number of abnormal incidences increased with age until it reached a peak at ages 50–59. Spondylodegenerative changes were the most frequent finding, which was present in 52.2% of the total sample, and was followed by disc bulge (25.2%). Incidences increased in lower discs, with C5–C6 being the most frequent in 65% of the total sample. Younger males in their 20s had more injuries than females of the same age. However, this rate was reversed in patients over 40, as women were the dominant gender among patients in their 40s with cervical injuries, with a rate of 81.5%. Conclusion: In our study, we found that older patients developed more C-spine injuries. Gender may play a role in the rate of incidents. However, we did not find any significant differences between men and women or between different types of abnormalities.

Safety of 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Auditory Brainstem Implants.

To evaluate the safety of 3 Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with auditory brainstem implants (ABI) with the magnet removed at implantation and report incidence of complications. Retrospective chart review. Tertiary neurotology ambulatory practice. Patients with diagnosis of Neurofibromatosis, type 2 (NF2) with functional ABIs. Observational recordings. Of the 89 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 7 patients underwent 3T MRI, with a total of 39 scans done. Three patients had 1 scan each, one patient had 4 scans, one patient had 5 scans, one patient had 6 scans, and one patient had 21 scans. The mean time between ABI placement and first 3 T scan was 118 ± 73 months. The most common indication for imaging was surveillance of NF2 lesions. The most frequent scans were MRI brain (25.6%), followed by MRI of cervical (15%), thoracic (15%) and lumbar (15%) spine, and MRI IAC (8%). There were no reported complications for any of the scans. No scans were interrupted due to patient discomfort. There were no device malfunctions. 3 T MRIs are safe in patients with ABIs as long as the magnet is removed. It is recommended that the magnet be removed at the time of implantation in all NF2 patients, who require frequent surveillance.

Magnetic resonance imaging cervical spine in trauma: A retrospective single-centre audit of patient outcomes.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used in practice to investigate for cord or discoligamentous injury following blunt trauma and a normal computed tomography (CT). This study investigates the MRI findings and surgical outcomes of patients in this cohort. Retrospective analysis of patients following trauma with suspected cervical spine injury from 2016 to 2019. Inclusion criteria included patients receiving a normal CT of the cervical spine and subsequent MRI due to cervical spine injury symptomatology (persistent tenderness and/or neurology). Inclusion criteria included: age ≥16 years, alert and <72 h from CT to MRI. Mann-Whitney and χ2 statistical analysis techniques were employed. Two hundred and twenty-eight patients with persistent midline tenderness and/or persistent neurology following blunt trauma and negative CT report were included. One hundred and eighty-one patients received an MRI for persistent tenderness of which 35 revealed abnormal MRI findings. Twenty-one cases required no treatment, 14 cases were treated with a rigid collar with no patients requiring operative management. Forty-seven patients received an MRI for neurological symptoms following blunt trauma and negative CT, with 11 abnormal MRI findings. Management included no treatment (three cases), application of rigid collar (six cases) and operative management (two cases). No alert neurologically intact patient with 'persistent tenderness only' received operative management following a normal CT examination. While MRI is sensitive for detecting soft tissue injuries, the prevalence for detecting clinically significant cervical spine injury in blunt trauma patients in the absence of neurology is low. The utility of MRI in this cohort is questionable considering prolonged spinal immobilisation is not without harm.

A Retrospective Analysis on Cervical Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Patients with Neck Pain in a Tertiary Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Neck pain is a common health problem throughout the world causing significant individual disability and economic burden on health care facility. Many factors are mentioned as a cause or association in relation to neck pain, of which degenerative and posttraumatic cause are the main ones. The aim of this study is to assess cervical spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) patterns in patients presented with neck pain. A retrospective analysis of 160 patients who had cervical spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for evaluation of a neck pain was done. The study was conducted between February to August 2018 at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital. The patients' clinical history and magnetic resonance imaging reports were reviewed from their medical records. All patients who have cervical spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for a neck pain were included in the study. Those patients with acute traumatic neck pain were excluded. From a total of 160 patients, 71(44.4%) were males and 89(55.6%) were females. Degenerative cervical spine findings such as intervertebral disc degenerations were seen in 127(79.4%) patients. Non-degenerative imaging findings such as neoplasm and infection were seen in 10(6.3%) patients only. The MRI was normal in 23(14.4%) of them. The most common cause of neck pain from this study is degenerative changes of the cervical spine, which was predominant in the older age groups. Non-degenerative causes such as neoplasm and infection were less common findings.

Cervical Spine Injuries in Older Patients with Falls Found on Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Computed Tomography.

IntroductionIn this study we aimed to determine the rate of traumatic abnormalities on cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after a normal cervical spine computed tomography (CT) in older patients with ground-level falls. We hypothesized that MRI is low yield following a normal physical examination and normal CT after a ground-level fall.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of patients 65 years and older evaluated with a cervical spine MRI following a ground-level fall. Inclusion criteria included age 65 years and older, ground-level fall, normal cervical spine CT followed by a cervical spine MRI. We abstracted data following accepted methodologic guidelines. Patients with any focal neurological finding were considered to have an abnormal neurological examination. Imaging studies were considered to be abnormal if there was a report of an acute traumatic injury. The primary outcome was a traumatic abnormality identified on MRI. We described data with simple descriptive statistics.ResultsEighty-seven patients with a median age of 74 (interquartile range [IQR] 69, 83]) years had an MRI following a normal cervical spine CT. Median emergency department length of stay was 8.2 hours (IQR 5.3, 13.5). Sixty-four (73.6%) patients had a normal neurological examination on arrival; eight of these patients (12.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.6–23.2%) had an abnormal cervical spine MRI. Twenty-three patients (26.4%) had an abnormal neurological examination on arrival; two of these patients (8.7%, 95% CI, 1.1–28%) had an abnormal cervical spine MRI. Overall, 10 patients (11.5%) had an abnormal cervical spine MRI. One patient underwent operative intervention due to an unstable injury. Of the remaining nine patients with acute findings on cervical spine MRI, there were no other unstable injuries; two patients were managed with cervical orthosis, and seven patients had no additional management.ConclusionIn this study of older patients with ground-level falls and normal, atraumatic, cervical spine CT, a small portion had traumatic abnormalities on MRI, with few requiring further intervention. Further study is required to identify criteria to determine when MRI should be performed in older patients after a ground-level fall.

Prognostic value of cervical ligamentum flavum thickness as a morphological parameter to predict cervical stenosis.

One of major causes of cervical central stenosis (CCS) is thickened change of cervical ligament flavum (CLF). The association of a morphological parameter called cervical ligament flavum thickness (CLFT) with CCS has not been reported yet. Thus, the purpose of this research was to investigate the relationship between CCS and CFJT.Data were obtained from 88 patients with CCS. A total of 87 normal controls also underwent cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (CSMRI). All subjects underwent axial T2-weighted CSMRI. Using our picture archiving and communications system, thickness of ligament flavum of the cervical spine at C6/7 level was analyzed.The mean CLFT was 1.41 ± 0.24 mm in normal subjects and 2.09 ± 0.39 mm in patients with CCS. The CCS group was found to have significantly (P < .001) higher rate of CLFT than normal subjects. ROC curves were used to assess the usefulness of CLFT as a predictor of CCS. In the CCS group, the best practical cut off-point of CLFT was 1.71 mm (sensitivity = 90.9%; specificity = 90.8%), with AUC of 0.94 (95% confidence interval: 0.90--0.98).Greater CLFT values were associated with greater possibility of CCS. Thus, treating physician should carefully examine CLFT, as it can help diagnose CCS.

Dural sac shrinkage signs on magnetic resonance imaging at the thoracic level in spontaneous intracranial hypotension-its clinical significance.

Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) is secondary to a cerebrospinal fluid leak at the spinal level without obvious causative events. Several signs on brain and cervical spine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI) have been associated with SIH but can be equivocal or negative. This retrospective study sought to identify characteristic SIH signs on thoracic spinal MRI. Cranial and spinal MR images of 27 consecutive patients with classic SIH symptoms, who eventually received epidural autologous blood patches (EBPs), were analyzed. The most prevalent findings on T2-weighted MRI at the thoracic level were anterior shift of the spinal cord (96.3%) and dorsal dura mater (81.5%), probably caused by dural sac shrinkage. These dural sac shrinkage signs (DSSS) were frequently accompanied by cerebrospinal fluid collection in the posterior epidural space (77.8%) and a prominent epidural venous plexus (77.8%). These findings disappeared in all six patients who underwent post-EBP spinal MRI. Dural enhancement and brain sagging were minimum or absent on the cranial MR images of seven patients, although DSSS were obvious in these seven patients. For 23 patients with SIH and 28 healthy volunteers, a diagnostic test using thoracic MRI was performed by 13 experts to validate the usefulness of DSSS. The median sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, negative-predictive value, and accuracy of the DSSS were high (range, 0.913-0.931). Detection of DSSS on thoracic MRI facilitates an SIH diagnosis without the use of invasive imaging modalities. The DSSS were positive even in patients in whom classic cranial MRI signs for SIH were equivocal or minimal.

P43. Magnetic resonance imaging is inadequate to assess cervical sagittal alignment parameters

<h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3> Cervical sagittal alignment (CSA) parameters are helpful in determining the surgical technique used to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Upright lateral radiographs are routinely used to measure CSA parameters, but obtaining adequate imaging is difficult. Utilizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate sagittal parameters has been explored; however, the impact of positional changes on these parameters has not been elucidated. <h3>PURPOSE</h3> To evaluate CSA parameter measurement reliability and correlation between XR and MRI modalities in patients undergoing posterior decompressive procedures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. <h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3> Retrospective cohort study. <h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3> We evaluated adult patients who had undergone laminoplasty or laminectomy and fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy between 2017 and 2019 and who had cervical spine XR and MRI within a 6-month timespan of one another. <h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3> Outcomes of interest included intra- and interobserver reliability assessment of C2-C7 sagittal angle, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and T1 tilt measurements as well as correlations in these parameters between imaging modalities. <h3>METHODS</h3> Two clinicians completed two independent rounds of C2-C7 sagittal angle, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and T1 tilt measurements; intra- and interobserver reliability were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Correlations between imaging modalities were analyzed using parametric and nonparametric statistical tests. <h3>RESULTS</h3> Intra- and interobserver reliabilities were highly correlated with correlations greater than 0.85 across all permutations; ICCs were highest with MRI measurements. The C2-C7 sagittal angle was highly correlated between XR and MRI at 0.76 with no significant difference (p = 0.46). Weaker correlations existed for C2-C7 SVA (0.48) and T1 tilt (0.62) measurements with significant differences observed in the mean values between the two imaging modalities (p < 0.01). <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> The C2-C7 sagittal angle is highly correlated and not significantly different between upright XR and supine MR images. However, cervical SVA and T1 tilt change with patient position. As MRI does not accurately reflect the CSA in the upright position, upright lateral radiographs should be obtained to assess global sagittal alignment when planning posterior based cervical fusions. <h3>FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS</h3> This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

Patient Characteristics, Injury Types, and Costs Associated with Secondary Over-Triage of Isolated Cervical Spine Fractures.

Retrospective cohort. To aim of this study was to identify patient variables, injury characteristics, and costs associated with operative and non-operative treatment following inter-facility transfer of patients with isolated cervical spine fractures. Patients with isolated cervical spine fractures are subject to inter-facility transfer for surgical assessment, yet are often treated nonoperatively. The American College of Surgeons' benchmark rate of "secondary over-triage" is <50%. Identifying patient and injury characteristics as well as costs associated with treatment following transfer of patients with isolated cervical spine fractures may help reduce rates of secondary over-triage and healthcare expenditures. Patients transferred to a Level-1 trauma center with isolated cervical spine fractures between January 2015 and September 2020 were identified. Patient demographics, comorbidities, insurance data, injury characteristics, imaging workup, treatment, and financial data were collected for all patients. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to identify patient and injury characteristics associated with surgical treatment. Nearly 75% of patients were treated non-operatively. Over 97% of transfers were accepted by the general surgery trauma service. Multivariable modeling found that higher BMI, presence of any neurologic deficit including spinal cord or isolated spinal nerve root injuries, present smoking status, or cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging obtained post-transfer, were associated with surgical treatment for isolated cervical spine fractures. Among patients with type II dens fractures, increased fracture displacement was associated with surgical treatment. Median charges to patients treated operatively and nonoperatively were $380,890 and $90,734, respectively. Median hospital expenditures for patients treated operatively and nonoperatively were $55,115 and $12,131, respectively. A large proportion of patients with isolated cervical spine fractures are subject to over-triage. Injury characteristics are important for determining need for surgical treatment, and therefore interfacility transfer. Improving communication with spine surgeons when deciding to transfer patients may significantly reduce health care costs and resource use.Level of Evidence: 4.