BackgroundNumerous states have introduced cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training mandates for high school students and staff to prevent sudden cardiac death (SCD). However, the content and implementation of these mandates vary substantially. Furthermore, a comprehensive and objective assessment of these mandates and their impact is lacking. ObjectiveWe aimed to conduct a thorough evaluation of CPR training mandates across the United States. MethodsWe developed a novel scoring system based on proposed CPR standards, training and certification requirements, and legislative action to assess current mandates. This was used to rate the CPR mandates across all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Mandate scores were then compared with available real-world registry data as a surrogate for efficacy from 2018 to 2021. ResultsState CPR mandate scores ranged from 0 to 47, with a higher score indicating more robust mandates. The median and mean scores were 24 (interquartile range, 19.5–27) and 21.52 ± 8.61, respectively, with 35 being the highest score. Intraobserver variability was 0.986 (95% CI, 0.944–1.028; P < .001). The year of implementation did not influence the strength of the score (R2 = −0.173; 95% CI, −0.447 to 0.131; P = .262). Correlation with SCD rate (R2 = −0.76; 95% CI, −0.492 to 0.367; P = .742), bystander-initiated CPR (R2 = −0.006; 95% CI, −0.437 to 0.427; P = .978), automated external defibrillator use (R2 = −0.125; 95% CI, −0.528 to 0.324; P = .590), and cardiovascular death rate (R2 = −0.13; 95% CI, −0.379 to 0.21; P = .355) failed to reach statistical significance. ConclusionModest scoring consistency highlights the need for robust, standardized CPR requirements to potentially mitigate SCD. This study lays the groundwork for evidence-informed policy development in this area.
Read full abstract