associated withfamiliar objects. He named thisdefect 'amnestic colourblindness' andregarded itas 'related toaphasia'. Lewandowsky (1908) described another case, andexplained thedefect asresulting froma'dissociation oftheideaofthecolour from thatoftheobject'. Sittig (1921) presented afuller casestudy ofa patient whohadsustained a left temporo-occipital shrapnel wound,resulting ina slight receptive butmarkedexpressive aphasia, as wellasaninability topick outcoloured woolsto correspond tonamedobjects ortonameappropriate objects whenshownacolour. Yethewasnotcolour blind andcould recognize colours previously shown tohim.He coulddetect pictures whichhadbeen deliberately wrongly coloured. A similar, though milder case appears tohavebeenthat ofHeilbronner (1906), whosepatient misnamed colours butwould correctly allocate objects tocolours, and'usually' colours toobjects. Goldstein andGelb(1918) saw intheir caseofcolour agnosia an'impairment ofthe categorical attitude' inrelation tocolours. Their patient wasreported only tobeabletoattach the exactly correct colour toanobject andnotonethat merely fell intotheright colour category. Lange (1936), reviewing thesubject, wasunable todecide whether colour agnosia isanaphasic manifestation oratruerecognition defect. Hedid, however, point outthatGoldstein andGelb's explanation would seemtobeapplicable tonocaseother thantheir own. Stengel (1948) reported twofurther cases, the first ofwhich hestudied ingreat detail. Thefurther casepresented belowresembles Stengel's case1in manyrespects. CASEREPORT
Read full abstract