BACKGROUND: In a complete cleft lip and palate, a defect exists in the alveolar segment of the maxilla. In order to achieve successful restoration of the maxillary arch, several techniques have been employed with the ultimate goal of achieving continuity and adequate bone stock across the alveolus. Passive orthodontic appliances (POA) and gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) are adjuncts utilized by some surgeons with primary cleft lip repair. POA aligns the alveolar segments prior to cleft lip repair, and GPP is utilized to achieve bony union across the cleft at the time of primary lip repair. The use of these treatments remains controversial. Along with the surgical technique of the cleft lip and palate repair, they have the possibility of impacting midface growth. Here, we present our protocol for cleft lip and palate repair utilizing GPP and POA for complete unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients. We also report preliminary treatment results in complete unilateral and bilateral cleft patients, evaluating midface growth at mixed dentition. METHODS: Ten consecutive complete unilateral and 10 consecutive complete bilateral cleft lip and palate patients were recruited. All presurgical molding was performed by a single individual, and all surgical treatments were performed by the senior author. Patients underwent POA treatment (initiated at 7 days) for 35 weeks. The nasal component was incorporated after 6 weeks. GPP was performed by elevating flaps in the subperiosteal or supraperiosteal plane and closing the alveolar defect. Unilateral cleft patients underwent rotation advancement repair at approximately 6 months, whereas bilateral cleft patients underwent staged repair with a similar technique at approximately 6 and 9 months of age. Cephalometric analysis of lateral radiographs of patients at mixed dentition was performed to evaluate maxillary and mandibular growth (SNA, SNB, ANB) and facial growth relative to the facial axis (facial axis angle). RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent POA, cleft lip closure with GPP and cephalometric analysis. Mean age at time of surgery for all patients was 6.8 months ± 2.6 months of GE with a range of 5–14 months of age. Mean cephalometric values were within age-specific normal values for SNA (80° ± 3.7°), SNB (74° ± 3.4°), ANB (4° ± 1.4°), and the facial axis angle (90° ± 3.5°). One unilateral patient and zero bilateral patients exhibited skeletal Class III malocclusion. CONCLUSION: Although controversy exists regarding the impact of GPP and POA on midface growth in cleft patients, our results demonstrate that GPP and POA do not interfere with maxillary grow or cause a Class III malocclusion at mixed dentition in most patients. POA, combined with GPP at the time of cleft lip repair, leads to normal maxillary development in unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients at mixed dentition. We feel that the normal maxillary growth justifies continuing the use of GPP and POA, especially when considering the potential advantageous that they can afford at the time of primary cleft lip repair, such as allowing for closure of the alveolus and anterior palate and achieving bony union across the cleft.
Read full abstract