Central Vertigo Research Articles

Evaluation of thiol / disulfide homeostasis and ischemia modified albumin levels in the differential diagnosis of central and peripheral vertigo

Evaluation of thiol / disulfide homeostasis and ischemia modified albumin levels in the differential diagnosis of central and peripheral vertigo

A Case Report of Korean Medicine Treatment of Lateral Medullary Infarction with Central Dizziness and Hypoesthesia

Objectives: The aim of this study was to report the effectiveness of Korean medicine treatment for a patient with lateral medullary infarction who presented with central dizziness and hypoesthesia.Methods: The patient was treated with Korean medicine treatment, including acupuncture, moxibustion, and herbal medicine. We measured the progress of the case using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).Results: After the treatment, the NRS scores for dizziness and hypoesthesia decreased.Conclusions: This study suggests that Korean medicine treatment might be effective for lateral medullary infarction in patients who present with central dizziness and hypoesthesia.

Peripheric smell regions in patients with semicircular canal dehiscence: An MRI evaluation

ObjectivesWe investigated the peripheric smell regions in patients with semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD) by cranial MRI. MethodsIn this retrospective study, cranial MRI images of 186 adult patients were included. Group 1 consisted of 83 adult patients with SCD. The control group (Group 2) consisted of 83 healthy subjects without central vertigo. Olfactory bulb (OB) volume and olfactory sulcus (OS) depth were measured in all groups. ResultsIn group 1, SCD was detected on the right (33.7%), left (26.5%) sides and bilateral (39.8%). Localization of dehiscence was at superior SC (75.9%), posterior SC (21.7%), lateral SC (1.2%), and posterior + superior SCs (1.2%). OB volumes of the SCD group were significantly lower than the control group bilaterally (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between OS depths of groups 1 and 2 (p > 0.05). In SCD group, there were positive correlations between OB volumes; OS depths; and OB volumes and OS depths (p < 0.05). In older patients, bilateral OS depth values got lower (p < 0.05). In females, left OB volume values were lower than males (p < 0.05). In right SCD (+) patients, left OS depth values got lower (p < 0.05). ConclusionWe concluded that possible changes in CSF dynamics may cause the development of SCD at thin bone segments; and a decrease in the OB volume. CSF leaks into the perineural sheet of the olfactory bulb (OB) maybe responsible for the decrease in the OB volume. In addition, minor trauma, infection, and inflammation may also be responsible for both coexistences of SCD development and OB volume decrease.

Central positional nystagmus: an update.

Clinically, central positional nystagmus (CPN) is often suspected when atypical forms of its peripheral counterpart, i.e., benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), are observed, namely a linear horizontal nystagmus as in horizontal canal BPPV or a downwardly and torsionally beating nystagmus as in anterior canal BPPV. Pathophysiologically, CPN is caused by cerebellar and/or brainstem dysfunction. Recent work has provided further insights into the different clinical phenotypes and the underlying pathomechanisms. We performed a PubMed review focused on the findings on CPN using the key words "Central Positional Nystagmus", "Central Positional Vertigo", "Positional Nystagmus" OR "Positioning Nystagmus" OR "Positional Vertigo" OR "Positioning Vertigo" AND "Central" from January 2015 to August 2021. CPN may account for up to 12% of patients with positional nystagmus. Clinical data on CPN are mostly based on case reports or small retrospective case series. CPN is frequently associated with cerebellar and/or brainstem structural lesions, namely stroke, tumours or demyelination, or diffuse involvement of these structures due to degenerative or autoimmune/paraneoplastic diseases; it is also found in patients with vestibular migraine. CPN can be paroxysmal or persistent. The direction of the nystagmus is often downward in head-hanging or apogeotropic in lateral supine positions; combinations of both forms also occur. Clinically it is important to note that CPN is often associated with other central, often cerebellar ocular motor or other neurological signs; typically, it is not improved by the therapeutic liberatory manoeuvres for BPPV. These additional features are also important for the diagnosis, in particular if no structural lesions are found. Pathophysiologically, CPN is believed to reflect an abnormal integration of semicircular canal-related signals by the cerebellar nodulus, uvula and/or tonsil, ultimately providing an erroneous estimation of the head tilt and/or eye position coordinates. The natural course of CPN remains, so far, largely unknown. Symptomatic treatment of CPN consists of pharmacotherapy, e.g., with 4-aminopyridine, and causative treatment of the underlying disease if known. CPN is an important differential diagnosis to BPPV and a clinically relevant entity with heterogenous clinical presentations and various pathomechanisms and etiologies. In particular, studies on the natural course and treatment of CPN are needed.

Association study between headache and dizziness according to age spectrum for patients

Patients with headache often experience various types of vertigo. And several studies have suggested an epidemiologic and physiologic association of headache and vertigo. Researchers have investigated the association between headache and vertigo. We investigate whether vertigo(peripheral vertigo or central vertigo) is correlated with clinical relevance in headache patients according to age spectrum.

Study of the relationship of the changes of cervical MRI ,Tran cranial duplex and Brain stem auditory evoked potential in patients with isolated vertigo

Background: Vertigo is an illusory sense of motion in the absence of real movement, either in the self or the environment. Vertigo is and has no positive indications of dysfunction of the central neurological system. Study aims at studying MRI, TCD and BAEP relationships and alterations in individuals with vertigo. Methods: Patient control research involves 50 patients with vertigo, 50 matched age and gender health controls, from Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Assuit, Egypt, neurology and audio vestibular hospitals, from May 2019 through to June 2021. Results: patient start age with vertigo (40-60), disease duration (2-3) years, 70% with peripheral vertigo,30% with central vertigo, 86% with abnormal and 70% with abnormal BAEP and 74% with vertigo with an abnormal TCD. Relationship and variations in cervical MRI, TCD and BAEP in 50 patients with isolated vertigo and 50 healthy controls respectively were examined. Results: A statistically significant differences between the two groups were found for total TCD, BAEP abnormalities and no significant differences between the two groups in cervical MRI abnormalities. The findings revealed strong associations between TCD and cervical MRI, TCD and BAEP in the vertigo group. And TCD PI analysis and certain BAEP items revealed positive linear relationships. In the control group, there were no statistical differences or relationships. Conclusions: TCD is a isolated vertigo screening sensitive technique. A combined cervical MRI, TCD and BAEP test regimen is suited to evaluate the isolated vertigo.

Medical Treatment of Nonvascular Central Vertigo

Central vertigo is the common symptom resulting from abnormalities in the central nervous system, caused by various diseases, which include neurodegenerative, vascular, inflammation, infection, tumor, paraneoplastic, toxic, or metabolic disorders. Since the treatment of central vertigo depends on the causes, an accurate diagnosis should be preceded the treatment through a detailed neurotologic examination and laboratory evaluation. Also, it is important to identify and document the neurologic findings accompanied by central vertigo, because some medication focuses on the ocular motor abnormalities as nystagmus or saccadic intrusion. Here, we will review the medical treatment for central vertigo.

Results of subjective visual vertical tests in patients with vertigo/dizziness

ObjectiveWe previously established the head-tilt subjective visual vertical (HT-SVV) test to evaluate head-tilt perception gain (HTPG) in addition to the original head-upright SVV (HU-SVV) test (Wada-Y et al.: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol, 2020). In this study, we aimed to investigate the HU-SVV and HT-SVV abnormality rates among patients with vertigo/dizziness. MethodsBetween July 2014 and December 2020, 357 patients were hospitalized for examining the HU-SVV and HT-SVV at our vertigo/dizziness center. Among these patients, 120 had Meniere's disease (MD), 99 had unilateral vestibular disease (UVD), 76 had benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), 14 had vestibular migraine (VM), 13 had orthostatic dysfunction (OD), 12 had bilateral vestibular disease (BVD), 12 had central dizziness (CD), 7 had vestibular schwannoma (VS), and 4 had psychogenic dizziness (PD). We determined the reference values of the absolute HU-SVV (<2.5°) and HTPG (0.80–1.25) for the sitting position and used these for calculating the HU-SVV and HT-SVV abnormality rates in each type of vertigo/dizziness. ResultsAmong the 357 patients, 111 had abnormal HU-SVV results (31.1%), 132 had abnormal HT-SVV results (37.0%), and 185 had abnormal HU-SVV and/or HT-SVV results (51.8%). The modified HT-SVV test in combination with the original HU-SVV test could detect gravity perception disturbance in patients with vertigo/dizziness significantly better than the original test alone (chi-square: p=0.00019). The HU-SVV, HT-SVV, and HU-SVV and/or HT-SVV abnormality rates were significantly higher in patients with peripheral vestibular diseases, i.e., MD, UVD, BPPV, and BVD than in those with other types of vertigo/dizziness, i.e., VM, OD, CD, VS, and PD (chi-square: p=0.010, p=0.020, and p=0.0025, respectively). ConclusionThese findings suggest that the combined HT-SVV and HU-SVV test could be a powerful neuro-otologic examination for detecting pathologies in the vestibular otolithic pathway.

CENTRAL VERTIGO

Central vertigo is a symptom characterized by a feeling of changes in body position or environment as a result of diseases originating from the central nervous system. Central vertigo is caused by a disease that extend from vestibular nuclei in medulla oblongata to ocular motor nuclei and integration system in mesencephalon to vestibulocerebellum, thalamus and vestibular cortex in temporoparietal and the neuronal pathway which mediate VOR (vestibulo-ocular reflex). The diseases can be vestibular migrain, TIA (Transient Ischemic Attack), Vertebrobasilar ischemic stroke, multiple sclerosis, tumor in cerebelopontine angle and congenital malformation like Dandy Walker Syndrome. Central vertigo can be diagnosed by performing several special tests. This examination can also distinguish central vertigo from its differential diagnosis, namely peripheral vertigo. Management of central vertigo can be in the form of acute attack management and specific management according to the cause.

Age-Associated Characteristics of Patients With Chronic Dizziness and Vertigo.

Objective:The incidence of dizziness and vertigo is increasing with age, and symptoms lead to significant limitations in daily living and to disability in older patients.Method:Data of 1,752 patients with chronic dizziness/vertigo subjected to a tertiary care, specialized interdisciplinary vertigo center were analyzed. Age, gender, symptoms, medical diagnosis, and Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) were collected based on a questionnaire and analysis of associated patient records. The patients were assigned to 3 age groups (< 41, 41-65, and > 65 years).Results:33.7% of the patients were older than 65 years. Frequency of symptoms and DHI score increased with age. Older patients reported less frequently about coexisting symptoms such as nausea, headache, tinnitus, ear pressure, and visual impairment. Multisensory deficit, central vertigo, bilateral vestibulopathy, and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo were diagnosed increasingly with age, while persistent postural–perceptual dizziness and vestibular migraine were diagnosed in the younger age groups.Conclusion:In the diagnostic work-up of older patients age-specific characteristics of dizziness/vertigo have to be considered. The older patient generally is more impaired by the symptoms but possibly will not report typical diagnosis-defining symptoms.

Differentiating central from peripheral causes of acute vertigo in an emergency setting with the HINTS, STANDING, and ABCD2 tests: A diagnostic cohort study.

Diagnosing stroke in dizzy patients remains a challenge in emergency medicine. The accuracy of the neuroophthalmologic examination HINTS performed by emergency physicians (EPs) is unknown. Our objective was to determine the accuracy of the HINTS examination performed by trained EPs for diagnosing central cause of acute vertigo and unsteadiness and to compare it with another bedside clinical tool, STANDING, and with the history-based score ABCD2. This was a prospective diagnostic cohort study among patients with isolated vertigo and unsteadiness seen in a single emergency department (ED). Trained EPs performed HINTS and STANDING tests blinded to attending physicians. ABCD2≥4 was used as the threshold and was calculated retrospectively. The criterion standard was diffusion-weighted brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Peripheral diagnoses were established by a normal MRI, and etiologies were further refined by an otologic examination. We included 300 patients of whom 62 had a central lesion on neuroimaging including 49 strokes (79%). Of the 238 peripheral diagnoses, 159 were vestibulopathies, mainly benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (40%). HINTS and STANDING tests reached high sensitivities at 97% and 94% and NPVs at 99% and 98%, respectively. The ABCD2 score failed to predict half of central vertigo cases and had a sensitivity of 55% and a NPV of 87%. The STANDING test was more specific and had a better positive predictive value (PPV; 75% and 49%, respectively; positive likelihood ratio [LR+]= 3.71, negative likelihood ratio [LR-]= 0.09) than the HINTS test (67% and 44%, respectively; LR+= 2.96, LR-= 0.04). The ABCD2 score was specific (82%, LR+= 3.04, LR-= 0.56) but had a very low PPV (44%). In the hands of EPs, HINTS and STANDING tests outperformed ABCD2 in identifying central causes of vertigo. For diagnosing peripheral disorders, the STANDING algorithm is more specific than the HINTS test. HINTS and STANDING could be useful tools saving both time and costs related to unnecessary neuroimaging use.

Diagnosis of Acute Central Dizziness With Simple Clinical Information Using Machine Learning.

Background: Acute dizziness is a common symptom among patients visiting emergency medical centers. Extensive neurological examinations aimed at delineating the cause of dizziness often require experience and specialized training. We tried to diagnose central dizziness by machine learning using only basic clinical information.Methods: Patients were enrolled who had visited an emergency medical center with acute dizziness and underwent diffusion-weighted imaging. The enrolled patients were dichotomized as either having central (with a corresponding central lesion) or non-central dizziness. We obtained patient demographics, risk factors, vital signs, and presentation (non-whirling type dizziness or vertigo). Various machine learning algorithms were used to predict central dizziness. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was measured to evaluate diagnostic accuracy. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) value was used to explain the importance of each factor.Results: Of the 4,481 visits, 414 (9.2%) were determined as central dizziness. Central dizziness patients were more often older and male and had more risk factors and higher systolic blood pressure. They also presented more frequently with non-whirling type dizziness (79 vs. 54.4%) than non-central dizziness. Catboost model showed the highest AUROC (0.738) with a 94.4% sensitivity and 31.9% specificity in the test set (n = 1,317). The SHAP value was highest for previous stroke presence (mean; 0.74), followed by male (0.33), presentation as non-whirling type dizziness (0.30), and age (0.25).Conclusions: Machine learning is feasible for classifying central dizziness using demographics, risk factors, vital signs, and clinical dizziness presentation, which are obtainable at the triage.

A case report of central vertigo and diabetic neuropathy treated as vestibular neuritis for long years

A case report of central vertigo and diabetic neuropathy treated as vestibular neuritis for long years

Clinical Prevalence of Enhanced Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Responses on Video Head Impulse Test.

To measure and analyze the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients and healthy controls with enhanced eye velocity responses as well as evaluate their relationship with endolymphatic hydrops related diseases. Cross-sectional clinical study. Tertiary hospital. Three hundred sixty three participants allocated to patients (310) and healthy control (53) groups were collected on first time visit to neurotology unit. Diagnostic. Video head impulse test records, clinical diagnose, and variables and demographic data were used to get cross tables, a general linear model, diagnostic epidemiological parameters, and machine learning variable importance evaluation methods. All the statistical tests revealed a significant association between enhanced vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and diagnostic categories (p < 0.001). Chi-squared residual and machine learning analyses showed Menière's disease as the main associated diagnostic category, whereas the lowest residuals and gain values were found in the control group. Enhanced VOR as a diagnostic sign of Menière's disease had a sensitivity of 42.59% and a specificity of 86.32%, with an odds ratio of 4.68 (p < 0.001). There is a significantly higher prevalence of enhanced VOR responses in patients with Menière's disease, central origin vertigo, otosclerosis, and vestibular migraine than in those with other neurotologic diseases and controls. Our study found that enhanced VOR are not pathognomonic of hydrops-related diseases and the diagnosis should not solely be based on these and instead take into context other clinical and examination findings.

Unraveling the Etiology of Pediatric Vertigo and Dizziness: A Tertiary Pediatric Center Experience.

Background and Objectives: Numerous authors have reported that the commonest type of vertigo in children is migraine-associated vertigo (vestibular migraine and benign paroxysmal vertigo of childhood—BPV). We aimed to provide the possible etiological background of vertigo and dizziness in Slovenian children. Materials and Methods: A retrospective case series of pediatric vertigo and dizziness children referred to the tertiary pediatric otorhinolaryngology center from 2015 to 2020. Children received a complete audiological and vestibular workup and were referred to pediatric specialists depending on the clinical presentation. Results: Of 257 children (42% male, 58% female) aged 1–17 years (M = 10.9, SD = 4.3 years) in 19.1% vertigo and dizziness were classified as central, in 12.4% as a peripheral vestibular, in 10.9% as a hemodynamic, in 5.8% as a psychological and none as visual by pediatric neurologists, otorhinolaryngologists, cardiologists, psychologists or ophthalmologists, respectively. 40.8% (20) children with central vertigo had BPV (7.8% of all children) and 8.2% (4) migrainous vertigo. In 43.6% (112 children), the etiology remained unclassified. Conclusions: After a thorough multidisciplinary workup, the etiology of vertigo and dizziness was unraveled in the majority of children referred to our tertiary otorhinolaryngology center. The most common cause was central; however, in a considerable number, the etiology remained unclassified. The latter could be attributed to the self-limiting nature of vertigo spells. Hence, a child presenting with dizziness and vertigo requires a multidisciplinary approach, in which referral to a neurologist is, in most cases, essential.

Clinical Diagnosis of Central Vertigo in Patients With Dizziness in Emergency Practice.

Life-threatening diseases should be promptly identified to provide appropriate medical care for emergency outpatients experiencing dizziness. However, dizziness is associated with various medical conditions; thus, a definitive diagnosis is challenging. To accurately diagnose vertigo in an emergency outpatient, we conducted a survey on the need to identify vertigo patients in the current outpatient departments. The participants included 509 patients who visited the outpatient department at our hospital from February 2014 to May 2017. Overall, 12 characteristics were retrospectively extracted from the patients' medical records: age, sex, visit method, medical history (diabetes, hypertension, cardiac, or cerebrovascular disease), dizziness history, vertigo characteristics, concomitant symptoms, systolic blood pressure, nystagmus, imaging history, diagnosis, and hospitalization department. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors related to central vertigo. The diagnosis of central vertigo was confirmed when intracranial lesions were detected through imaging. In multivariate analysis, the presence/absence of a history of headache and cardiovascular disease were significantly correlated with central vertigo (P=0.002 and 0.006, respectively), with odds ratios of 5.18 and 4.38, respectively. To avoid missing central dizziness in a patient, diagnostic abilities should be improved by including careful interviews and confirmation of the presence/absence of accompanying symptoms. Furthermore, collaboration with neurology and neurosurgery departments is important for improving the diagnosis in suspected cases.

Vestibular disorders in children: A retrospective analysis of vestibular function test findings

ObjectiveThis study was designed to describe the most common vestibular disorders in children and their associated findings on vestibular function testing. MethodData from 203 children with a mean age of 11.16 ± 3.87 (range, 1–17) years were collected from among 3400 patients who underwent vestibular assessment at a vertigo center in a tertiary hospital over a 3-year period. A retrospective data analysis was performed for 203 children. ResultsVestibular disorders were diagnosed in 78.3% (n = 159) of 203 children among 3400 patients, which revealed a 3-year incidence of 4.67% in our study. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) was the most common diagnosis in our group of children (49%; n = 100), which involved both primary BPPV, and secondary BPPV that was associated with other vestibular pathologies. Vestibular migraine (VM) was the second most common diagnosis (41%; n = 83) followed by benign paroxysmal vertigo of childhood (BPVC; 4.5%, n = 9), vestibular neuritis (VN; 4.5%, n = 9), and psychogenic vertigo (4.5%, n = 9). Our study showed that Meniere's Disease (MD; 1.5%, n = 3) and central vertigo (1.5%, n = 3) were less commonly diagnosed in children. Perilymphatic fistula (PLF) was diagnosed and surgically confirmed in only one child. ConclusionBPPV and VM were the most common pediatric vestibular disorders in our study. Clinicians should be aware of the prevalence, signs, and symptoms of the most common vestibular disorders in children to enable diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation. Vestibular function testing with age-appropriate adaptations results in improved differential diagnosis, which guides medical treatment and rehabilitation.

Vertigo Related to Central Nervous System Disorders.

This article provides an overview of the numerous causes of vertigo and dizziness that are due to central nervous system (CNS) pathology and guides clinicians in formulating a differential diagnosis and treating patients with CNS causes of vertigo. Specific autoimmune vestibulocerebellar syndromes may now be tested for, and this article discusses the antibodies known to cause such syndromes. Superficial siderosis can be more accurately diagnosed with imaging studies, and treatment using iron chelation has recently been studied but has not yet been established as an effective treatment. Central autonomic network damage in the brain can cause central orthostatic hypotension in some neurodegenerative diseases, and medication has been approved for treatment. CNS causes of vertigo are numerous and important for clinicians to recognize. Examination findings are still an extremely valuable way to diagnose central vertigo; therefore, learning how to differentiate central from peripheral vertigo based on examination is an important skill. CNS causes of vertigo often have available treatments.

Effectiveness of Brandt Daroff, Semont and Epley maneuvers in the treatment of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

The aim was to compare the effectiveness of Brandt-Daroff, Semont and Epley maneuver in BPPV resolution.A Single Blind RCT in a Secondary Care Center was performed. Inclusion criteria were: patients with unilateral rotatory nystagmus on Dix-Hallpike Maneuver (DHM). Exclusion criteria: other causes of peripheral or central vertigo. Patients were randomized into 4 groups: Brandt-Daroff, "sham", Semont and Epley. Patients underwent allocation, 1st visit (at 1week with reprise of original maneuver if persistent nystagmus) and 2nd visit (2 to 4weeks) with repetitions of both DHM and DHI. Main Outcome Measures: Absence of nystagmus on DHM at 1st and 2nd visit evaluations and DHI score. Resolution was defined as the abscence of nystagmus. We included 34 patients (25 females, 9 males). Patients were randomized to Brandt-Daroff (n = 9), "sham" (n = 7), Semont (n = 9) and Epley (n = 9) group. Overall mean age was 59.85years (SD ± 13.10). A total of 47.06% patients (n = 16) had negative DHM at 1st visit. Resolution for Brandt-Daroff was 22.22%, "sham" 28.57%, Semont 44.44% and Epley 88.88% (p = 0.024); at 2nd visit follow up, Epley achieved 100% resolution (other maneuvers: 42.86%, 16.67%, 44.44%, respectively. P = 0.006). The DHI improvement at 2nd visit for Brandt-Daroff was 21.17 points, "sham" 8.05, Semont 14.67 and Epley 61.78 (p = 0.001).Epley maneuver was superior to Brandt Daroff, "sham" and Semont maneuvers on nystagmus resolution and DHI improvement in patients with BPPV.

The use and misuse of the Dix-Hallpike test in the emergency department

A simple bedside test, the Dix-Hallpike test (DHT), can reliably diagnose benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) in patients with acute onset dizziness or vertigo. We evaluated patterns of DHT use by emergency physicians in patients presenting with dizziness and vertigo. Our objective was to assess the frequency and clinically appropriate use of the DHT in an emergency department. A health records review was performed using data from patients who presented to a tertiary care emergency department between September 2014 and March 2018 with a primary complaint of vertigo or dizziness. Patient records were reviewed for documentation of symptoms consistent with BPPV and DHT usage. A total of 2309 patients met inclusion criteria. Of all dizzy patients who had complete documentation of signs and symptoms consistent with BPPV, 53% were assessed with a DHT. Of 469 patients who received a DHT, 134 (29%) of tests were done on patients who had documentation of at least one characteristic that was inconsistent with a diagnosis of BPPV. Eight patients who received a DHT were ultimately diagnosed with a central cause for their vertigo. The DHT is both underutilized and frequently applied to patients whose symptoms are not consistent with BPPV. This may result in prolonged patient discomfort and increased resource utilization, as well as increasing the risk of misdiagnosing central vertigo.