Nadine Attewell. Better Britons: Reproduction, National Identity, and Afterlife of Empire. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2014. 324 pp. $65.00. On 12 March 2016, Leilani Muir died at her home in Devon, Alberta, leaving no heirs. Muir came to national attention in 1995, when she sued government of Alberta for wrongful sterilization, forcing Canadians to acknowledge extent to which state actively intervened in reproductive lives of its citizens. Muir herself was sterilized in 1959, and Alberta Sexual Sterilization Act was not repealed until 1972, nearly five years after young Pierre Elliot Trudeau uttered his famous phrase, which has since become an integral part of Canada's self-image as of liberal toleration: there's no place for state in bedrooms of nation (There's no place). The frightening durability of eugenicist policies within putatively advanced Western liberal democracies is occasion for Nadine Attewell's Better Britons, which in five chapters evaluates imbrication of reproductive crises in cultural and political responses to Britain's imperial future beginning at fin de siecle. At this time, serious conversations began about imperial decline. Duncan Bell's The Idea of Greater Britain (2007) describes how many were attracted by idea of uniting United Kingdom and its settler colonies in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and South Africa into globe-spanning political community of Anglo-Saxons (see Bell). Better moves across this landscape--focusing mainly and New Zealand--reflecting on centrality of reproduction to settler and British projects of building (4). Skilfully weaving postcolonial with feminist, queer, and critical race theory, Attewell explains how decolonizing settler colonies felt a crisis of inheritance over shape of their postcolonial national identity. To understand that crisis, she assembles diversity of documents, including not only fiction and film but also official memoranda, speeches, photographs, and newspaper reports aimed at manufacturing better Britons worthy of inheriting postcolonial future. Chapter one identifies paradox: whilst fictions that explore eugenicist fantasies are still read--and read widely!--today for their prophetic relevance (36), contemporary state policies designed to manage reproduction are consigned to quiet section of history books. By returning literary texts to their historical contexts, Attewell brings key elements of both into sharper relief. Here attention rests upon Aldous Huxley's Brave New World (1932), H.G. Wells's The Island of Dr Moreau (1896), and Eleanor Dark's Prelude to Christopher (1934). For Attewell what unites these texts is their shared interest in representing crises of reproduction both within colony and across empire in utopian form. In each, the voyage out, to an insular site marked out ... for colonization, occasions voyage in, to an insular site marked as metropolitan (37). This places Attewell's book within scholarship that resists centre-periphery model of imperialism and rather views Empire as circuit, across which ideas, commodities, and bodies traffic with increasing ungovernability. Chapter two examines specific reproductive project of early twentieth century. The White Australia policy encompassed attempts by nascent Australian state to manage its population biopolitically, through legislation like Immigration Restriction Act of 1901 and rhetoric of politicians like James Deakin, prime minister who believed his was animated by the desire that we should be one people, and remain one people, without admixture of other races (84). These are instances of conservative biopolitics--that is, attempts to manage gene pool by reducing intercourse between races. Attewell approaches White Australia quite differently, by focusing its radical counterpart: so-called breeding out colour project practised in Australia's frontier jurisdictions. …