Abstract Background The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends oseltamivir be given to children < 2 years old with confirmed or suspected influenza as they are at high risk for complications. We sought to analyze oseltamivir prescribing patterns and to describe factors associated with adherence and non-adherence to CDC guidelines. Methods We used a retrospective cohort of infants ≤ 12 months old born from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2019 within the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center health system in Southwestern Pennsylvania and who had ≥ 2 well-child visits during their first year. Infants with laboratory-confirmed influenza from January 1, 2011 to April 30, 2020 were included. Electronic health records were reviewed to describe oseltamivir prescriptions and influenza-related characteristics. Factors associated with adherence and non-adherence to CDC influenza treatment guidelines were assessed with univariate logistic regression. Results Of 422 infants with laboratory-confirmed influenza, 86% were prescribed oseltamivir. The proportion of infants prescribed oseltamivir increased from an average of 63% during 2011-2016 to 90% during 2016-2020 (OR:5.2; 95%CI: 2.9-9.5). 96% of prescriptions instructed twice daily dosing, 2% had once daily, and 2% were unknown frequency. 91% of prescriptions were for 5 days, 7% had no duration, and 2% were for > 5 days. Infants ≥ 6 months of age compared to < 6 months were less likely to be prescribed oseltamivir (83.3% vs. 100%; p< 0.001); tested for influenza in the emergency room/urgent care (OR: 0.3; 95%CI: 0.2-0.6), or admitted to the hospital (OR:0.5; 95%CI:0.2-0.9). Infants were more likely to be treated with oseltamivir if they had a known influenza positive contact (OR:2.3; 95%CI:1.0-5.2) or had fever ≥ 38.0C (OR:2.0; 95%CI:1.2-3.5). There was no difference in prescribing practices based on history of prematurity or chronic medical conditions. Conclusion Adherence to CDC influenza treatment guidelines for infants is high and has improved over time. However, targeted education at high-risk contact points may further improve guideline adherence. Disclosures John V. Williams, MD, GlaxoSmithKline (Advisor or Review Panel member, Independent Data Monitoring Committee)Quidel (Advisor or Review Panel member, Scientific Advisory Board) Judith M. Martin, MD, Merck Sharp and Dohme (Consultant)
Read full abstract