Cementless Revision Research Articles

Case Report: Osteosynthesis-associated infection with Ochrobactrum intermedium after acetabular fracture

Ochrobactrum intermedium (O. intermedium) is a gram-negative, non-fermenting bacterium closely related to Brucella genus. O. intermedium resembles an emergent human pathogen that has rarely been detected in both immunocompetent and immunodeficient patients. A musculoskeletal infection with O. intermedium has not been described in the literature. We present the first case of an osteosynthesis-associated infection (OAI) with O. intermedium in an 80-year-old female patient after osteosynthesis of an acetabular fracture. The patient was admitted to the emergency department 6 months after osteosynthesis of a posterior column acetabular fracture treated via open reduction and internal plate fixation of the posterior column. The patient demonstrated tenderness, redness and swelling at the insertion site as well as a fistula. The radiological controls showed femoral head necrosis and partial protrusion of the head into the pelvis. The laboratory parameters showed no pathological findings. OAI was assumed and a two-stage revision with implant removal and resection arthroplasty in the first stage and hip arthroplasty in the second stage was performed. All microbiological specimens taken at the osteosynthesis site and the hip joint grew O. intermedium. The pathogen was determined using the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) method. Antibiotic regime consisted of intravenous (IV) meropenem for two weeks followed by oral ciprofloxacin and cotrimoxazole. Implantation of the hip prosthesis was performed 6 weeks after the index surgery using a cementless revision cup and a cemented stem. Meropenem and vancomycin IV were given for one week followed by ciprofloxacin and doxycycline for another 5 weeks. 24 months after the surgery, the patient is infection free and satisfied with the result. With this case report we would like to increase awareness of possible implant-associated bacterial infections caused by O. intermedium.

Elevated Blood Tantalum Concentrations in Patients Following Reconstruction of Severe Acetabular Defects in Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular Tantalum Augments in Combination With Uncemented Tantalum Cups

IntroductionThe reconstruction of acetabular defects in total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be challenging. An option to treat uncontained acetabular defects is to use modular tantalum augments in combination with cementless press-fit cups. However, modularity is associated with an increased risk of debonding and mechanical failure. In addition, metal wear particles can be released due to micromotions at the implant interface. Clinical data on the long-term results of this treatment strategy is limited. The purposes of this study were: (1) to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of complex THA using modular trabecular metal augments and uncemented revision cups; (2) to investigate the blood tantalum concentrations in these patients at mid-term (mean 4.5 year) follow-up; and (3) to report complications and mechanisms of failure related to this procedure. Materials and MethodsIn this single-center study, we retrospectively reviewed data from a consecutive cohort of 27 patients who underwent complex acetabular defect reconstruction using a modular tantalum acetabular augment in combination with an uncemented tantalum cup. We evaluated the implant survival, and the radiological and clinical outcomes after a mean follow-up of 4.5 years (SD 2.1; range 2.5 to 10.6 years) using patient-reported outcome scores (PROMs). Blood samples were analyzed regarding tantalum concentration and compared with a control group. ResultsThe cumulative survival rate at 4.5 years with the endpoint “revision of the acetabular component for aseptic loosening” was 94.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 71.6 to 99.2) and 82.9% (95 % CI 60.5 to 93.3) for the endpoint “revision for any reason.” The PROMs improved significantly up to the latest follow-up, and radiographic data showed no signs of loosening or implant migration. Median blood tantalum concentrations were significantly higher in the study group (0.15 μg/L) compared to the control group (0.002 μg/L) (P < 0.001). ConclusionsThis study demonstrated acceptable clinical and radiological results of cementless revision THA using modular trabecular metal implants for the reconstruction of large acetabular defects. Tantalum concentrations were significantly higher in patients who had tantalum implants compared to the control group, however, the systemic and local effects of an increased tantalum exposure are not yet fully understood and have to be further investigated.

Revision total hip arthroplasty using a modular fluted, tapered revision femoral component and interlocking screws in Vancouver B3 periprosthetic fractures with insufficient bone at the isthmus.

Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with Vancouver type B3 fractures with Paprosky type IIIA, IIIB, and IV femoral defects are difficult to treat. One option for Paprovsky type IIIB and IV defects involves modular cementless, tapered, revision femoral components in conjunction with distal interlocking screws. The aim of this study was to analyze the rate of reoperations and complications and union of the fracture, subsidence of the stem, mortality, and the clinical outcomes in these patients. A total of 46 femoral components in patients with Vancouver B3 fractures (23 with Paprosky type IIIA, 19 with type IIIB, and four with type IV defects) in 46 patients were revised with a transfemoral approach using a modular, tapered, cementless revision Revitan curved femoral component with distal cone-in-cone fixation and prospectively followed for a mean of 48.8 months (SD 23.9; 24 to 112). The mean age of the patients was 80.4 years (66 to 100). Additional distal interlocking was also used in 23 fractures in which distal cone-in-cone fixation in the isthmus was < 3 cm. One patient (2.2%) died during the first postoperative year. After six months, 43 patients (93.5%) had osseous, and three had fibrous consolidation of the fracture and the bony flap, 42 (91.3%) had bony ingrowth and four had stable fibrous fixation of the stem. No patient had radiolucency around the interlocking screws and no screw broke. One patient had non-progressive subsidence and two had a dislocation. The mean Harris Hip Score increased from of 57.8 points (SD 7.9) three months postoperatively to 76.1 points (SD 10.7) 24 months postoperatively. The 2° tapered, fluted revision femoral component with distal cone-in-cone-fixation, combined with additional distal interlocking in patients with bony deficiency at the isthmus, led to reproducibly good results in patients with a Vancouver B3 fracture and Paprosky type IIIA, IIIB, and IV defects with regard to union of the fracture, subsidence or loosening of the stem, and clinical outcomes.

Point-of-Care Coating of Revision Femoral Stems With Antibiotic-Loaded Calcium Sulfate: Reduction in Infection After 2nd Stage Reimplantation but Not With Aseptic Revisions

BackgroundInfection rates in revision total hip arthroplasty are lower when antibiotic loaded cemented stems are utilized. Inspired by this technique, a point-of-care coating of antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate (CaSO4) was applied to cementless revision stems in aseptic revision and 2nd stage reimplantation total hip arthroplasty. MethodsOne hundred eleven consecutive femoral stems were coated. Just prior to insertion, 10 cc of CaSO4 was mixed with 1 g vancomycin and 240 mg tobramycin with the paste applied to the stem. The results were compared to a matched cohort (N = 104) performed across the previous 5 years. The surgical methods were comparable, but for the stem coating. The study group was followed for a minimum of 3 years. ResultsIn the study cohort of 111 patients, there were 69 aseptic revisions with one periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (1.4%) and 42 second-stage reimplantations with 2 PJIs (4.8%). In the control cohort of 104 patients, there were 74 aseptic revisions with one PJI (1.4%) and 30 second-stage reimplantations with 7 PJIs (23.3%). There was no significant reduction in PJI rate in the aseptic revision subgroup (1.4% study vs 1.4% control group), P = 1.000. Antibiotic stem coating reduced PJI rate in the 2nd stage reimplantation subgroup (23.3% control vs 4.8% study group), P = .028. In both groups, there were no cases of aseptic stem loosening. ConclusionsPoint-of-care antibiotic coating of cementless revision femoral stems reduces PJI infection rate in 2nd stage reimplantations only. We theorize that microbes persist in the endosteal cortices after resection and may contribute to infection recurrence.

Uncemented hip revision cup as an alternative for T-type acetabular fractures: A cadaveric study

BackgroundThe current rise in elderly patients with compromised bone quality complicates the surgical treatment of acetabular T-type fractures (AO type 62B2 fractures). There is on ongoing discussion about the treatment options, mostly consisting of an open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with or without primary or secondary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Yet, these patients are oftentimes unable to fulfil weight-bearing restrictions and mostly present with an unavailability of a stable anchor site. Consequently, this study investigates the feasibility of a cementless hip revision cup for acetabular T-type fractures and compares its biomechanical properties to ORIF. HypothesisThe cementless hip revision cup provides sufficient biomechanical stability under the simulation of full weight-bearing. Patients and methodsThe study compared two groups of human cadaveric hip bones with T-type fractures, of whom 6 subjects were treated with ORIF (6 male; mean age: 62±17years; mean body weight: 75±15) versus 6 subjects treated with a cementless hip revision cup (2 male; 69±12 years; 73±15kg). The group-assignment was controlled for comparable BMD results (mean BMD: ORIF 110±37 mg Ca-Ha/mL versus hip revision cup 134±32 mg Ca-Ha/mL). To compare for biomechanical stability cyclic loading was applied measuring the force and dislocation of the fracture gap at standardized bone loci using an all-electric testing machine and a 3D-ultrasound measuring system. ResultsComparing superior pubic ramus versus iliac wing (cementless hip revision cup versus ORIF [mean±standard deviation]: 5.8±2.0 versus 7.0±3.2; p=0.032) as well as sacral ala versus iliac wing (4.6±2.2 versus 6.4±3.7; p=0.002), the cementless revision cup achieved a significantly higher stability than the plate osteosynthesis. ConclusionRevision cup and ORIF withstood biomechanical loading forces exceeding full weight-bearing in this biomechanical study. The results of our study suggest that the cementless hip revision cup might be promising alternative to the current standard care of ORIF with or without primary THA. Level of evidenceIII; case control experimental study.

Femoral revision in total hip arthroplasty using a cementless modular stem: clinical and radiological results with a 8-year follow-up.

Modular femoral components allow for patient-specific restoration of hip joint geometry and the reconstruction of extensive bone defects in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, potential problems of modular implants such as taper corrosion and the risk of implant fracture continue to be of concern. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of a cementless modular revision stem following revision surgery due to aseptic loosening and periprosthetic fracture and to assess patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in these patients at mid-term follow-up. In this study, a consecutive cohort of 75 patients who underwent primary revision THA at our institution using a modular cementless stem design (MRP-TITAN stem) was retrospectively evaluated at a mean follow-up of 7.7 years. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analyses were performed with revision of the femoral component for any reason as the end point. The Harris-Hip Score, the UCLA Activity Score, the Forgotten Joint Score and the SF-12 Score were used for clinical assessment. We used the Wilcoxon signed rank test to compare pre- and postoperative clinical scores. Overall stem survival with the endpoint stem re-revision for any reason was 85.4% at a mean follow-up of 7.7 years (range 2.4-14 years). Stem survival was 89.5% in the aseptic loosening group and 78.3% in the periprosthetic fracture group with no statistically significant difference between both groups (p = 0.107). One patient had to be revised due to taper fracture. PROMs improved significantly up to the latest follow-up, and radiographic evaluation showed full osseointegration of all stems in this cohort. Revision THA using a modular cementless titanium revision stem demonstrated adequate clinical and radiological results at mid- to long-term follow-up in this cohort. Cementless revision stems are a useful treatment option to restore the anatomy, especially in deformed hips and in complex revision hip arthroplasty. However, there are some significant disadvantages related to an increased risk of mechanical failure such as corrosion/fretting damage and implant fracture. Future high-quality prospective studies with longer follow-up are necessary to confirm the supposed advantages.

Modular uncemented revision total hip arthroplasty in young versus elderly patients: a good alternative?

For revision hip arthroplasty, both cemented and cementless techniques have been described for implantation of modular and non-modular implants. Although many articles have been published on non-modular prosthesis, there is a dearth of data on cementless, modular revision arthroplasty in young patients. This study aims to analyze the complication rate of modular tapered stems in young patients below 65 years of age as compared to elderly patients older than 85 years old, in order to predict the complication rate. A retrospective study was performed using a major revision hip arthroplasty center database. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients undergoing modular, cementless revision total hip arthroplasties. Data on demographics, functional outcome, intraoperative, early and medium term complications were assessed. In total, 42 patients met inclusion criteria (<65 years old: 25 patients; >85 years old: 17 patients). For the <65 years old cohort, the mean age and follow-up time was 55.4 ± 9.3 years old and 13.3 ± 13.2 months, respectively. For the >85 years old cohort, the mean age and follow-up time was 87.6 ± 2.1 years old and 4.3±8.8 years, respectively. For intraoperative and short-term complications, no significant differences were observed. Medium term complication is noted in 23.8% (n=10/42) overall, preferentially affecting the elderly group at 41.2% (only 12.0% in the younger cohort; p=0.029). To our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the complication rate and implant survival for modular revision hip arthroplasty based on age group. It shows that the complication rate is significantly lower in young patients and age should be a consideration in surgical decision making.

Influence of bone morphology and femur preparation method on the primary stability of hip revision stems.

Aseptic loosening is one of the major reasons for re-revisions of cementless revision stems. Insufficient primary stability is associated with bone characteristics and the surgical process. This study aimed to investigate how femur morphology and preparation methods influence the primary stability of revision stems. The Femur morphology was described by the upper femoral curvature (UFC) and an individualized Dorr type classification based on the ratio between the canal-to-calcar ratio (CCR*) and the cortical index (CI*) introduced as the cortical-canal shape (CCS). Manual and powered reaming in combination with helical and straight reamers were used to prepare the bone cavity of 10 cadaveric human femur pairs. Forces during stem impaction were recorded (Reclaim, Depuy Synthes). Micromotion at the bone-implant interface during cyclic axial loading and torsional load to failure was determined. The CCS and impaction forces (R2 = 0.817, p < 0.001) or torsional strength (R2 = 0.577, p < 0.001) are inversely related. CCS did not correlate with micromotion during axial loading (R2 = 0.001, p > 0.999), but proximal femoral curvature did (R2 = 0.462, p = 0.015). Powered reaming and straight reamers led to an improved torsional strength (both: p = 0.043). The Individualized Dorr classification CCS and UFC allows a good estimation of the primary stability of revision stems. For severely curved Dorr type-C femurs, an alternative anchorage method should be considered clinically.

A bone-conserving revision stem for unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the geriatric osteoporotic population

PurposePrimary hemiarthroplasty is gaining popularity for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in geriatric patients with severe osteoporosis. This study evaluated early clinical and radiographic outcomes by using a bone-conserving revision stem for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the geriatric osteoporotic population.MethodsA retrospective study involving 31 patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures was conducted. The patients were aged 82.1 years on average. All patients underwent primary hemiarthroplasty using bone-conserving, fully porous-coated revision stem. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospitalization, and need for blood transfusion were noted during the hospital stay. Postoperative complications, including dislocations, deep venous thrombosis, infections, peri-prosthetic fractures, and frontal thigh pain were also recorded. Koval's category was used to quantify activity level, and Harris hip score (HHS) was used for functional assessment. Radiographic outcomes, including osteolysis, bone ingrowth, subsidence of the femoral component, lower limb length discrepancy, and heterotopic ossification, were collected at each follow-up.ResultsThe 31 patients were followed for an average time of 23 months postoperatively. The average operative time lasted for 74.2 min, while the mean intraoperative blood loss was 200.1 ml, with an average hemoglobin decrease of 11.1 g/L after the procedure. The mean visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain dropped from 7.4 preoperatively to 2.4 at the 4-week follow-up. At the latest follow-up, the mean Harris hip score was 82.1, and the VAS was 1.7. No intraoperative or postoperative peri-prosthetic fractures were noted. Postoperative complications included one case of thrombosis formation in the posterior tibial vein and one case of congestive heart failure. Both patients were discharged uneventfully after treatment. Radiographically, none of the hips had evidence of stem loosening or osteolysis. Within the follow-up period of 23 months, the mortality rate was 3.2% (1/31), and no revision surgeries were required.ConclusionPrimary hemiarthroplasty using a bone-conserving, cementless revision stem could serve as a reliable alternative for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the geriatric population with osteoporosis.

Revision total hip arthroplasty for aseptic loosening compared with primary total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: long-term clinical, functional and quality of life outcome data.

The aim of this study was the comparative assessment of long-term clinical (subjective and objective), functional and quality of life outcome data between primary and revision THA. 122 patients (130 hips) who underwent cementless revision THA of both components (TMT cup, Wagner SL stem, Zimmer Biomet) for aseptic loosening only (Group A) were compared to a matched group of 100 patients (100 hips) who underwent cementless primary THA for osteoarthritis (Synergy stem, R3 cup, Smith & Nephew) (Group B). Outcomes were evaluated with survival analysis curves, Harris Hip Score (HHS), WOMAC, Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) and EQ-5D-5L scales. Mobility was assessed with walking speed, Timed Up And Go Test (TUG), Parker Mobility Score, Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and UCLA scores. At a mean follow-up of 11.1 (8-17) years a cumulative success rate of 96% (95% CI, 96-99%) in Group A and 98% (95% CI, 97-99%) in Group B with operation for any reason as an endpoint was recorded. Statistically significant differences between groups were developed for WOMAC (Mann-Whitney U-test, p = 0.014), OHS (Mann-Whitney U-test, p = 0.020) and physical component of SF-12 scores (Mann-Whitney U-test, p = 0.029) only. Group A had less improvement in function as compared with group B. In Group A, in multiple regression analysis, patients' cognition (p = 0.001), BMI (p = 0.007) and pain (p = 0.022) were found to be independent factors influencing functional recovery (WOMAC). Similarly, pain (p = 0.03) was found to influence quality of life (EQ-5D-5). In the long term, revision THA shows satisfactory but inferior clinical, functional, and quality of life outcomes when compared to primary THA. Residual pain, BMI and cognitive impairment independently affect functional outcomes.

Primary or revision arthroplasty with an integrated acetabular cup—MUTARS® RS cup system

IntroductionThe aim of this article is to show a new concept of indication and application of the MUTARS® RS Cup System in primary and revision hip arthroplasty. This integrated system is applicable for different acetabular cup replacements in patients with acetabular fractures or instable defects, as well as periprosthetic acetabular fractures. The MUTARS® RS Cup System is a cementless revision cup for insertion into the acetabulum with an integrated polyethylene cup, which fits to a regular or bipolar head. This system replaces the conventional approach for acetabular revision with a Burch-Schneider ring, in which a normal polyethylene cup is cemented. This interface with its complications is avoided with this system of a titanium revision cup with integrated polyethylene cup. Steps of preoperative planning and the intraoperative implementation will be highlighted in this article.Material and methodsThis system was applied in 49 patients with 52 MUTARS® RS Cup Implantations in 30 males, 22 females, with an average age of 76,1 years (36,9–94,4 years). Results and discussionThe system shows a good operative feasibility, as well as a reliable handling and safe method for stable treatment of non-reconstructable acetabular fractures or acetabular incongruencies and instabilities.

Is there a role for cementless primary stem in hip arthroplasty for early or late fixation failures of intertrochanteric fractures?

BackgroundThe choice of femur stems during the hip arthroplasty procedures for patients with treatment failure of intertrochanteric fractures (ITF) remains controversial. We aimed to compare the surgical complication and reoperation rates between cementless primary and revision stems in the early (≤3 months) and late (> 3 months) fixation failures of ITF.MethodsThis was a retrospective, cohort study conducted in a single, tertiary referral hospital of Taipei, Taiwan. We included hip arthroplasty procedures for failed ITF using cementless primary or revision stems. There were 40 and 35 patients who had early and late fixation failure of ITF, respectively. The patient demographics, time to fixation failure, surgical complications and medical complications were recorded for analysis.ResultsWe included 75 patients that underwent hip arthroplasty procedure for failed ITF using cementless primary (n = 38) or revision (n = 37) stems. The mean age was 79.3 years and 56% of the patients were female. In the early fixation failure group, the complication rate was similar between the primary and revision stems (44% vs. 29%, p = 0.343). However, there was a trend toward a higher reoperation rate (31% vs. 8%, p = 0.061) of using the primary stem, compared with the revision stem. In the late fixation failure group, the rate of complication and reoperation was similar between the two stem types.ConclusionFor early fixation failures of ITFs, we caution against the use of cementless primary stems due to a trend towards an increased risk of reoperations compared to the use of cementless revision stems. However, in late fixation failures of ITFs, there is a role for cementless primary stems.Level of evidenceIII, retrospective cohort study.

Early periprosthetic hip joint infection managed by cementless one-stage revision - a case series.

Background: Early periprosthetic hip joint infection (PJI) is traditionally treated with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR). However, infection control rates after DAIR-treated periprosthetic hip joint infection do not exceed 77 %. Cementless one-stage revision of chronic PJI by the Cementless One-stage Revision of Infected Hip Arthroplasty (CORIHA) protocol has been evaluated positively with a 91 % success rate. We wanted to evaluate the effectiveness of cementless one-stage revision following the CORIHA protocol for early PJI in elective primary total hip arthroplasty, regarding risk of re-operation with exchange of implants. Methods: We identified 18 patients in our center with early (-week postoperative) PJI after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) treated with one-stage cementless revision in the period January 2012–March 2018. Treatment followed the CORIHA protocol. Primary outcome was retention of implants at the most recent follow-up. Patients were followed for a minimum of 3 years. Results: Mean follow-up time was 60 months (39–105). All patients retained their implants, but two required superficial soft tissue debridement due to persistent wound seepage. Conclusion: Cementless one-stage revision appears to be an effective treatment of early PJI after primary THA and at least an equal choice of treatment compared with DAIR. Whether the potential benefit of a lower re-revision rate for postoperative PJI outweighs the increased surgical complexity of the CORIHA procedure needs further evaluation.

Long-term outcomes of cementless femoral stem revision with the Wagner cone prosthesis

BackgroundThe procedure of femoral stem revision is challenging, and bone conservation with less stress shielding is a mandatory effort in these cases. Although there are several reports of stem revision with stems designed for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), there is no report on stem revision with the Wagner cone prosthesis.MethodsBetween 1996 and 2008, 41 hips of 41 consecutive patients were subjected to femoral revision THA using the Wagner cone prosthesis. The mean age during revision surgery was 56.1 years, and the mean follow-up period was 14.8 years. The clinical results were evaluated, and the femoral component was assessed radiologically.ResultsThe results showed that the average period from the first operation to revision THA was 8.0 years. Additionally, the mean Harris hip score improved from 52 points preoperatively to 83 points at the final follow-up. All stems showed bone integration in the radiological evaluation. A subsidence of more than 5 mm was observed in 3 out of 28 (10.7%) femoral stems. Two patients needed an acetabular revision for acetabular cup loosening during the follow-up period. Furthermore, one patient had recurrent dislocation and had to undergo revision surgery for soft tissue augmentation.ConclusionsWe achieved favorable clinical and radiological long-term outcomes in femoral stem revision using the Wagner cone prosthesis. This cementless femoral stem could be an option for femoral stem revision in cases with relatively good bone stock.

Risk factors for failure after cementless femoral revision THA: a consecutive series of 105 cases.

Cementless femoral revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA) after periprosthetic fracture, aseptic loosening or infection is a challenging surgical procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and reasons for failure after two-stage septic revision, periprosthetic fracture or aseptic loosening that may reveal a rationale for cementless RTHA in two-stage revisions. A consecutive series of 105 cases using cementless femoral revision prostheses were evaluated retrospectively. Indications for revision were 39 two-stage revisions after infection, 49 aseptic loosenings, and 17 periprosthetic fractures. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed using infection with or without removal of the implant as an endpoint. Incidence of infection with or without implant removal was significantly higher in patients treated for periprosthetic fractures compared to two-stage revisions or aseptic loosening (log-rank P < 0.0001). The mean follow-up period was 6.4 (2.0-13.7) years. Using infection with or without implant removal as the endpoint, 12 patients were diagnosed after the index operation resulting in a cumulative risk after 13.7years of 29.9% (95% CI 0-61.2). Cementless revision using a modular tapered device is reliable with respect to reinfection risk in two-stage procedures.

A novel micromotion measurement method to gain instructive insight into the acetabular bone-implant interface

In total hip arthroplasty insufficient primary stability with excessive bone-implant micromotion is a major reason for aseptic loosening at the acetabular cup implant. In the literature, several methods were proposed for in vitro micromotion measurement, but none is capable of six degrees of freedom measurement at a large number of measuring points over the entire acetabular bone-implant interface, which was the aim of the current scientific work.A pin-sleeve sensor system was developed and an appropriate installing technique was incorporated. Micromotions were transmitted from the internal interface to the accessible periphery. Motion data of the sensors were optically tracked. A calculation algorithm was conceived, discretizing superimposed rotational and translational components. The method was tested and subsequently applied to a cementless revision cup implanted into an artificial hemipelvic bone featuring a typical bone defect.Using eighteen sensors in positions across the acetabular bone-implant interface, micromotion magnitudes from 59 µm ± 2 µm to 222 µm ± 5 µm were detected. Allocation of micromotion complied with case specific anticipations.The novel pin-sleeve sensors transmitted interface micromotion to the accessible periphery as desired. The measurement method enables instructive insights into three-dimensional bone-implant micromotion and may prospectively be used to evaluate different implant systems.

Results of extensively coated femoral stem in revision hip replacement

Introduction: Revision hip replacement following failed previous hip arthroplasty or internal fixation (dynamic hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures) presents a major surgical challenge. Proximal fitting revision stems do not achieve adequate fixation. Distal fixation with long-stemmed extensively coated cementless implants (like the Solution™ system) affords a suitable alternative. We present our results of 25 patients treated with extensively coated cementless revision stems. Materials and Methods: Twenty five patients with severely compromised proximal femora following either failed hip arthroplasty or failed internal fixation (dynamic hip screw fixation for intertrochanteric fractures) were operated by the senior author over a two-year period. six patients had aseptic loosening of their femoral stems following cemented hip replacements, with severe thinning of their proximal cortices and impending stress fractures. Ten patients had secondary hip arthritis following failure of implants for comminuted intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Nine patients had peri-implant fracture following previous primary hip replacement. All patients were treated by removal of implant (cemented or uncemented stems/DHS implants) and insertion of long-stemmed extensively coated cementless revision (‘Solution™ DePuy, Warsaw (IN), US’) stems along with press-fit acetabular component (Duraloc Cup, DePuy, Warsaw (IN), US). Nine patient with peri-implant fracture and five having compromised proximal femora after inter trochanteric fracture needed osteotomy and undergone encerclage wiring. One patient had protrusion of acetabular cup with deficient acetabular wall in which anti protrusion cage was used. Results: All patients were primarily kept in bed on physiotherapy for six weeks and then gradually progressed to weight-bearing walking over the next six to eight weeks. The Harris Hip Scores and patient satisfaction were used for final evaluation. We achieved good results in the two years duration of study. Out of 25 patients, cerclage wiring was done for peri-implant fractures and osteotomy in 14 patients. One patient had a intraoperative fracture extending into subtrochantric area while hammering in the stem. Post cerclage wiring, she was put on a long knee brace and her mobilization was delayed to 12 weeks. Conclusions: The extensively coated cementless (‘Solution™’) femoral stem provides a reasonable ‘solution’ to the deficient femur in hip revision. The proximal femoral deficiences can be relatively easily adressed and distal fixation can be achieved with this stem. Extreme care needs to be taken to avoid fractures and penetration of the femoral shaft, which can, however, be managed by cerclage wiring. successful outcome can be assured by preservation of the functional continuity of the abduction apparatus, care to recognize and prevent distal extension of fracture while inserting the stem and supervised gradual rehabilitation post operatively.

Femoral stem fractures after primary and revision hip replacements: A single-center experience.

Objectives This study aims to present our experience in the management of fractured femoral stems after primary and revision hip replacements by evaluating the clinical and radiographic characteristics and determining the effectiveness of the extraction methods.Patients and methods A total of 15 patients (5 males, 10 females; mean age 65.9 years; range, 49 to 87 years) who underwent revision hip replacement due to a fractured femoral stem between January 2005 and December 2019 were included in this retrospective study. The mechanisms and risk factors for failure as well as methods applied to extract fractured stem were analyzed through clinical and radiographic data.Results Nine patients had fractured cemented femoral stems, while six patients had fractured fully porous coated cementless revision stems. Lack of proximal buttress in distally fixed femoral stems was detected in 11 patients and identified as the predominant mechanism resulting in fracture. The proximal extraction method with conventional revision instrumentation, the cortical window technique, and extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) were used in three, seven, and five cases, respectively.ConclusionOur results demonstrated that the lack of proximal buttress is the most common reason for femoral stem fracture. Moreover, the proximal extraction method was mostly ineffective in fully porous femoral stems. A step-by-step approach should be considered for the extraction of a broken stem. The cortical window method can be considered as the second step if proximal extraction methods fail, and ETO should be considered at the last step if all techniques fail.

Reverse augmentation technique in hip revision arthroplasty: a new strategy for the management of acetabular reconstruction

BackgroundThe principle of acetabular total hip revision (THR) is based on acetabular reconstruction and restoration of the center of rotation. The use of augmentation in high cranial acetabular defects combined with a cementless revision shell was studied sufficiently. This study aimed to report a case with the use of an augment inside a cementless revision shell as a reverse augmentation technique.MethodsWe describe the case of an 86-year-old female patient with a massive acetabular defect during second revision for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Two problems occurred: (1) a fixed cemented stem with a nonmodular head size of 33 mm and (2) a high acetabular defect with an elevated rotation center.ResultsWith the distraction technique, allograft filling was used to reconstruct the acetabular defect. A cementless revision shell (REDAPT, Smith and Nephew) with a size of 78 mm was used to stabilize the defect. Locking screws placed cranially and distally were used to stabilize the cup for secondary osseointegration. An augment was placed inside the cup to reconstruct the rotation center. A customized polyethylene liner (outer diameter, 54 mm/inner diameter, 33 mm) was positioned below the augment in the revision cup to reconstruct the center of rotation. An 18-month postoperative X-ray analysis showed a stable construct with full secondary osseointegration.ConclusionThis is the first report of an augment used for a reverse technique inside a cementless shell to restore the center of rotation with the use of a customized polyethylene liner. This might be a reliable option for reconstruction of the center of rotation in large cementless revision cups in acetabular Paprosky type III defects. This technical note shows the possibility of using an augment as a reverse technique in a cementless revision cup.

Mid-Term Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Long Cementless Monobloc Stem for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundFor the past 2 decades, the authors have been using a long tapered cementless stem made of titanium and fully coated with hydroxyapatite for revision total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this multicentric study is to assess clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes, re-revision rates, and survival rates of this revision stem at a minimum 5-year follow-up. MethodsThe records of a multicentric continuous series of 335 adults undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty using the Corail revision stem (DePuy, Leeds, UK) between 2000 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. The Harris Hip Score, Oxford Hip Score, and Engh score were recorded. Survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and cumulative incidence function. ResultsSeventy-seven patients died with their revision stem in place, 47 could not be contacted, and 22 had stem re-revisions. This left a final cohort of 201 patients, aged 70 ± 12 years at revision surgery, with a body mass index of 26 ± 4. The Kaplan-Meier survival was 93.9% for re-revision of any component for any reason, 96.7% for re-revision of the stem for any reason, and 99.3% for re-revision of the stem for aseptic reasons. At last follow-up, the Harris Hip Score was 84.8 ± 13.1, the Oxford Hip Score was 21.0 ± 7.8, and the Engh score was 16.4 ± 6.7. ConclusionThe long tapered cementless revision stem had excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes at a minimum follow-up of 5 years. The revision stem enabled restoration of bone stock in femurs with pre-revision bone defects, confirming that the hydroxyapatite coating promotes osseointegration, even in femurs with extensive bone loss. Level of EvidenceLevel IV, retrospective cohort study.