of thesis submitted in partial fulf/lllent of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, Department of Range and Forestry, Texas A. and M. College, January, 1955. During 1954 ranches in certain areas of Texas suffered substantial losses from sporadic outbreaks of photosensitization in cattle, a malady that ha? been a constant menace in Texas for over 40 years. The present study was a continuation of work initiated in 1952 with emphasis placed on investigating grasses in Southeast Texas as the possible cause of photosensi tization. Four conditions are necessary before manifestations of photosensitization occur: (1) sunlight, (2) animals with light colored or unpigmented skin, (3) grazing of resposible plants that supply the photodynamic principle, and (4) rainfall and a period of rising temperature following an unusually dry period. In this study climatic conditions were found to be intimately related to the periodicity of the disease. Photosensitization has been observed on many soil types, ranging from deep highly leached sands, to loams and fine textured alluvials. Grazing observations combined with plant composion studies were, made to determine the diet of animals subject to the disease. Experimental feeding of southern sandbur produced mild preliminary sympt,oms. A mixture of annual grasses fed in Wharton County gave negative results. The causative plant or plants were not finally deternined, but both observations and reactions obtained from feeding strongly indicate that grasses have a definite role in the outbreaks. In general the ability of the vegetation t,o produce rejuve,nated growth after a period of drouth-induced dormancy appears to be more important than a particular species. Since pastures with photosensitized cattle were in a relatively low stage of ecological succession, a range improvement program employing correct animal numbers, proper grazing distribution, weed and brush control, and proper season of utilization could be of measurable value in eliminating photosensitization.FRANK B. STROUD. REIATION SHIP OF CRESTED WHEATGRASS STANDS TO FORAGE PRODUCTION AND SAGEBRUSH RE-ESTABLISHMENT ON BURNED SAGEBRUSH RANGE Abstract of thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of $cience in Range Mana gement, eolorado A. and M. College, 1955.of thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of $cience in Range Mana gement, eolorado A. and M. College, 1955. Re-invasion by sagebrush has been quite general on reseeded ranges and has frequently lessened or nullified efforts at range improvements. Knowledge of rates of seeding and row spacings which will produce stands of crested wheatgrass controlling sagebrush reestablishment would aid in range improvement. This study attempted to determine the effects of density and dispersion of crested wheatgrass stands upon forage production and re-establishment of sagebrush. Data were obtained on the Great Divide Experimental Range in northwestern Colorado from an area in dense sagebrush cleared by controlled burning in 1946 and seeded to crested wheatgrass at rates of 5 and 10 pounds per acre at 6-, 8-, 12and 16-inch row spacings. Rates of seeding and row spacings had no significant effect upon numbers and vigor of re-invading sagebrush, or on basal density and forage production of crested wheatgrass, as determined by observations in 1947, 1949 and 1954. Row spacings had no significant effect upon numbers of crested wheatgrass plants established; however, areas seeded at the 10-pound rate had a significantly higher number of plants in 1947 and 1949. Dispersion of crested wheatgrass plants was generally not affected by rate of seeding. An economic analysis showed that the 10-pound seeding rate increased the cost, of seeding over that of the 5-pound rate by about 50 percent. Under conditions of this study, it appears that it would require 4.5 to 7 years of use to repay the cost of seeding at the 5-pound rate and 6.5 to 10 years to repay costs at the 10-pound rate. Reseeded stands of crested wheatgrass appeared most susceptible to re-establishment of sagebrush during early life. Once sagebrush is past the seedling stage, crested wheatgrass does not offer sufficient competition to i'educe the number of sagebrush plants.FRANCIS E. NoLL. This content downloaded from 207.46.13.60 on Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:35:28 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms