Before a decision is handed down, the judge's considerations must be truly convincing according to the law because if the judge does not have confidence or has doubts in deciding the case, then the judge is obliged to acquit the defendant. However, if the judge makes a mistake in handing down an acquittal or acquitting a guilty person, then the judge will be faced with juridical responsibility for having made a mistake in applying the law. One of the acquittal decisions handed down by the Panel of Judges in a criminal corruption case is the Decision of the Corruption Crime Court at the Palangka Raya District Court Number 20/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN.Plk. The type of research used is empirical legal research or field research, namely research carried out on actual or real conditions using primary data in the form of interviews and document studies. The research results show that the judge's consideration of acquittal decisions in corruption cases based on the Corruption Crime Court Decision at the Palangka Raya District Court Number 20/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN.Plk can be categorized as the correct court decision. The judge's consideration of the acquittal in the Corruption Crime Court Decision at the Palangka Raya District Court Number 20/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN.Plk reflects appropriate principles of justice because it emphasizes the importance of a fair process in determining court decisions.