Carotid Disease Research Articles

External carotid artery to ophthalmic artery flow associated with internal carotid artery stenosis

ABSTRACT Purpose One of the most devastating complications of facial filler injection is sudden ischemic blindness. However, its mechanisms and predisposing factors are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of external carotid artery (ECA) to ophthalmic artery (OA) anterograde flow in patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis and in a control population without carotid disease. Methods In this cross-sectional cohort study, two groups of patients who underwent catheter cerebral angiography over a 5-year period were identified: patients with symptomatic ICA stenosis and a control group of patients with refractory epistaxis undergoing embolization. Angiograms were reviewed by an interventional neuroradiologist. The primary outcome measure was the presence of ECA to OA flow, defined as choroidal blush before filling of the circle of Willis. Secondary outcome measures included the percentage and location of ICA stenosis and ECA anastomotic branches involved. Results The study included 149 patients with ICA stenosis and 69 control patients. ECA to OA flow was more prevalent in patients with ICA stenosis (34.9%) compared to controls (2.9%) (p < .001). Logistic regression demonstrated that for each 10% increase in ICA stenosis over 70%, there was 2.8 times increased risk of ECA to OA flow (p < .001). Conclusions ECA to ICA anterograde flow can be demonstrated in approximately 3% of control patients and in over 1/3 of patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. This provides a plausible pathway for small filler particles to pass with blood flow from the facial to the ophthalmic circulation.

Carotid intima media thickening is associated with higher future amyloid‐ß burden

AbstractBackgroundCarotid atherosclerosis is associated with cognitive impairment and dementia, though there is limited evidence of a direct link between carotid disease and amyloid‐ß (Aß) burden. We studied the association of baseline and progressive carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) with Aß on 11C‐Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) to determine if those with carotid atherosclerosis would have higher Aß burden.MethodWe studied 47 participants from the Framingham Offspring cohort with carotid ultrasounds measuring CIMT at their 6th clinic examination (aged 49.5± 5.7 years) and an average of 9.6 years later at exam 8, and PiB imaging measuring Aß on average 22.1 years post baseline. We used multivariate linear regression analyses to relate baseline, follow‐up, mean, and progression of internal carotid artery (ICA) and common carotid artery (CCA) CIMT to Aß in brain regions associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related dementias (ADRD), adjusting for age, sex, and other vascular risk factors.ResultParticipants with higher mean ICA IMT had more Aß in the precuneus (beta ± standard error [SE]: 0.264 ± 0.12, p = 0.034) and the FLR regions (SE: 0.155 ± 0.071, p = 0.034), after adjusting for age, sex, and vascular risk factors. We did not find an association between any CCA IMT measures and Aß or progression of ICA or CCA IMT and Aß.ConclusionCarotid atherosclerosis, as measured by ICA IMT, is associated with increased Aß burden later in life. These findings support a link between vascular disease and AD/ADRD.

Maybe asymptomatic carotid disease is not as benign as we think.

In this issue of JVS, Turner et al1Turner A.D. Zhu J. Rao A. Ting W. Han D. Tadros R. et al.Carotid stenosis patients with a remote history of cerebrovascular events have increased risk of major adverse events over asymptomatic patients.J Vasc Surg. 2022; 76: 1625-1632Google Scholar provide some additional insight into the impact of a remote history of cerebrovascular events as a marker for increased periprocedural adverse events after carotid stenting. The default definition of “asymptomatic” extracranial carotid disease is the absence of clinical signs and symptoms of a transient ischemic attack or stroke. As this report shows, although most asymptomatic patients are truly asymptomatic, a subset do indeed have a prior history of a neurologic event that occurred more than 180 days before an intervention but are still typically categorized as asymptomatic. This current report demonstrates that at least among patients treated with carotid stenting (transfemoral vs transcarotid), the periprocedural outcomes more closely resemble the symptomatic rather than the asymptomatic patient population. For years, we have tried a variety of imaging techniques to identify the unstable asymptomatic plaque including computed tomographic evaluation, magnetic resonance plaque characterization, ultrasound gray scale median, and transcranial Doppler.2Kakkos S.K. Griffin M.B. Nicolaides A.N. Kyriacou E. Sabetai M.M. Tegos T. et al.Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis and Risk of Stroke (ACSRS) study group. The size of juxtaluminal hypoechoic area in ultrasound images of asymptomatic carotid plaques predicts the occurrence of stroke.J Vasc Surg. 2013; 57 (discussion: 617-8): 609-618.e1Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (127) Google Scholar,3Saba L. Antignani P.L. Gupta A. Cau R. Paraskevas K.I. Poredos P. et al.International Union of Angiology (IUA) consensus paper on imaging strategies in atherosclerotic carotid artery imaging: from basic strategies to advanced approaches.Atherosclerosis. 2022; 354: 23-40Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar Unfortunately, none are broadly recognized as an accurate predictor. In my institution, transcranial Doppler is used quite frequently by the stroke neurologists, yet it has not made a noticeable impact on the current treatment algorithm for most patients. Hopefully, upcoming prospective studies such as the Carotid Artery Multimodality imaging Prognostic study may provide more valuable insight of the unstable asymptomatic plaque with contemporary imaging techniques.4Gargani L. Baldini M. Berchiolli R. Bort I.R. Casolo G. Chiappino D. et al.Detecting the vulnerable carotid plaque: the Carotid Artery Multimodality imaging Prognostic study design.J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2022; 23: 466-473Crossref Scopus (1) Google Scholar Although the current report demonstrates improved outcomes among the transcarotid treated patient population vs transfemoral stenting using the Vascular Quality Initiative database, some concerns exist in regard to the data quality and sample size. Important unknowns include adherence and implementation of currently accepted optimal medical therapy, operator expertise, and objective neurologic assessment before and after the procedure. Nevertheless, the important message is that asymptomatic patients with any prior history of a remote neurologic event tend to have less favorable outcomes as compared those with no prior history of a neurologic event, and this information should be taken into consideration as part of the treatment algorithm. The opinions or views expressed in this commentary are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or recommendations of the Journal of Vascular Surgery or the Society for Vascular Surgery. Carotid stenosis patients with a remote history of cerebrovascular events have increased risk of major adverse events over asymptomatic patientsJournal of Vascular SurgeryVol. 76Issue 6PreviewAsymptomatic patients with a remote history of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke are not well studied as a separate population from asymptomatic patients with no prior history of TIA or stroke. We compared in-hospital outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) among symptomatic patients, patients with a remote history of neurologic symptoms, and asymptomatic patients. Full-Text PDF

Updated research priorities of the Society for Vascular Surgery.

In 2011, the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) prepared a set of clinical research priorities through a survey of its membership. These priorities were developed with the goal of enhancing clinical research to improve care for vascular patients. In the subsequent decade, several of these priorities served as the focus of clinical trials and significant research efforts. It was understood from the outset that this list of priorities represented a starting point with the intention that they be reevaluated at suitable intervals. In 2021, the SVS Research Council set out to update the research priorities by surveying the SVS membership and engaged a panel of subject matter experts. This process resulted in an updated set of vascular research priorities that more clearly align with current areas of emphasis. Our priorities remain focused on basic areas including aortic disease, carotid disease, lower extremity arterial disease, venous disease, dialysis access, and medical management of vascular disease, along with the topic of health care disparities. The 10 updated priorities reported herein reflect our increasing awareness of the need to understand vascular disease pathogenesis and prevention in the context of a diverse patient population. Importantly, patient-centered outcomes and personalized vascular care are at the core of these updated priorities. Similar to the aims of the original 2011 clinical research priorities, our hope is that this updated list will help to drive large-scale investigations that will improve how we care for our vascular patients.

Carotid artery stenting: still burdened by early trial results

The early randomized trial experience (CAVATAS, SPACE, EVA-3S, ICSS) comparing carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been burdened by the limited experience of the interventionalists performing CAS. The periprocedural stroke excess with CAS observed in those trials has ever since affected carotid revascularization, especially in symptomatic carotid disease. Accordingly, no trial dedicated to this patient population has followed. In asymptomatic carotid disease, CREST, ACT-1 and ACST-2 have shown an equivalence in terms of combined periprocedural events as well as long-term protection from ipsilateral stroke or repeat revascularization between the two techniques. The management of patients with carotid stenosis should be multidisciplinary and decision to pursue medical management or proceed to revascularization in an individual patient should be based on his estimated stroke risk on medical management and his suitability for CEA and CAS. Since the majority of patients with carotid stenosis may qualify for both techniques, patient's perspective should be central in decision making.

DYNAMIC CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW CHANGES ASSOCIATED WITH OFF PUMP CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING (OPCAB) ASSESSED BY A NOVEL, ROBOTIC ASSISTED, AUTONOMOUS, CONTINUOUS AND BILATERAL TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER (TCD)

<h3>Background and Objectives</h3> There is ongoing controversy regarding the clinical and physiological benefit of OPCAB. While we have reported reduced perioperative mortality, neurological outcomes have not improved. Thus, further insights are needed to fully delineate the impact of OPCAB on the cerebral circulation. Here we present a novel strategy for continuous monitoring of mid cerebral artery (MCA) blood flow using the NovaGuide Robotic TCD system (NovaSignal Corp., Los Angeles CA USA) (figure 1). We have also employed cerebral tissue oximetry (Foresight, Edwards Lifesciences) to evaluate overall tissue oxygenation. <h3>Methods</h3> 7 elective OPCAB patients with no evidence of significant carotid disease were enrolled as part of our initial service evaluation. After anaesthesia induction, the patient head was stabilised in a specific cradle and robotic TCD probes were placed onto the patient's temporal region. The NovaGuide autonomously identified a transtemporal window, located the MCA vessels bilaterally and optimised the TCD signal. Baseline mean MCA flow was established prior to surgical manipulations and subsequent signals were automatically acquired for the entire duration of surgery. Data are reported as SEM +/- STD and group comparison was performed by ANOVA or t tests, as appropriate. <h3>Results</h3> There were no adverse events related to head positioning or access to central lines or placement of transoesophageal echo probes and routine monitoring. The device did not interfere with surgical conduct. Mean MCA flows at baseline were 43 +/-12 and 42 +/-13 cm/s for left and right MCA respectively. Pre-grafting events such as skin incision, sternotomy, and pericardiotomy increased LMCA flow by 14 +/- 35 24 +/- 27 and 17 +/- 20% with similar changes in RMCA flows. Mild Trendelenburg position and graded increase in MAP as pre-optimisation measures increased cerebral blood flow. While lifting and positioning the heart for grafting and placing the Octopus stabiliser generally reduced TCD levels, they remained higher than preoperative values (14+/-20; 31 +/- 36 and 9+/- 9 % increase for LAD, OM and PDA grafts, respectively). No significant changes were observed by clamping or anastomosing or reperfusing the respective coronary arteries. There was a transient increase in TCD signals upon replacing the heart in the pericardium after completing the anastomoses (28+/-7; 20 +/- 26 and 22 +/-29 % increase for LAD, OM and PDA positions, respectively). There were minor changes upon conducting the aortic anastomoses, but rare singular embolic events were noted occasionally upon releasing the aortic side clamp. Baseline left and right cerebral StO2 was identical (67+/-4 and 67+/-2) and showed little variation throughout surgery (<5%). <h3>Conclusion</h3> Continuous monitoring of bilateral TCD using the robotic TCD system is feasible during OPCAB. There are characteristic changes in TCD values at various phases of the operation, but our current optimisation strategy appears to preserve cerebral blood flow. Future validation studies are required which should address clinical correlates in high-risk patients including those with cerebrovascular disease.

Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Early Clinical Outcome and Stent Restenosis after Carotid Artery Stenting

BackgroundDiabetes mellitus is closely related to both the severity of carotid disease and its outcome after revascularization. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has emerged as a viable alternative to surgical endarterectomy but little is known about the impact of diabetes after CAS. MethodsA consecutive cohort of 1940 patients undergoing CAS in two institutions were divided into two groups, diabetics and non-diabetics and major cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) were analyzed at 30 days post-CAS and at 1 year follow-up. ResultsThere were 730 diabetic patients, with significantly higher BMI, hypertension, chronic dialysis and dyslipidemia frequency (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of early and late MACCEs (composite of transient ischemic attack, major stroke, myocardial infarction and death), with an early rate of 3.5 % non-diabetics vs 5.3 %, p = 0.08 and 2.4 non-diabetics vs 2.3% diabetics, p=0.1 at 12-months. Overall stroke/death rate in the asymptomatic patients was 2.4% and the restenosis rate was higher in the diabetes population (2.3% vs 1%, p = 0.04). Further analysis (inverse probability treatment weighting) showed no difference between the two groups in terms of stent design (restenosis rate for Wallstent 54% vs Roadsaver stent 46%, p=0.1). ConclusionThe presence of diabetes was associated with an acceptable increased periprocedural risk for CAS, but no further additional risk emerged during longer term follow-up. Diabetes may precipitate the rate of early in-stent restenosis.

Déjà vu: Plaque morphology revisited.

The impact of plaque morphology on the risk of stroke in patients with atherosclerosis of the carotid bifurcation has been a matter of interest for more than 40 years…. nearly as long as carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been in existence!1 In the era of modern medical therapy for atherosclerosis, there are some who continue to believe that asymptomatic carotid disease should always be treated with optimal medical management as opposed to any carotid artery intervention. Although most vascular surgeons would agree that plaque morphology is exceedingly important, we continue to make our decisions regarding carotid artery intervention primarily based on the degree of stenosis.

The Safety and Long-Term Efficacy of Carotid Artery Stenting: An All-Comers Registry.

Background Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has emerged as a less invasive alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the prevention of future cerebrovascular events in patients with carotid artery stenosis. Despite multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CAS and CEA for carotid disease, real-world data outside the rigorous environment of trials is scarce. Methods The present study is a prospectiveobservational study conducted at a tertiary care center, wherein all patients who underwent CAS between January 2007 and December 2019 were included. All patients were followed up for one year of the last enrolled patient at an interval of one, six, and 12 months and then yearly thereafter. The primary composite outcome was defined as a combination of periprocedural (until 30 days of procedure) major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and the long-term incidence of ipsilateralstroke. The secondary outcome included the rate of restenosis. Results A total of 115 patients (86 males and 29females) (147 lesions) who underwent CAS between 2007 and 2019 were followed up for a median of 80.5 months. Seventy-seven (67.27%) patients were symptomatic, and 38/115 (33%) were asymptomatic. PeriproceduralMACCEs were noted in six patients, and four patients had ipsilateral stroke on long-term follow-up; hence, the primary composite outcome was observed in 10 (8.7%) patients. Higher age was found to be significantly associated with the primary composite outcome (p-value = 0.005). Five (4.34%) patients were lost to follow-up, while four (3.48%) patients developed restenosis. Conclusion CAS is a safe and less invasive intervention in patients with significant carotid artery stenosis and is equally effective in preventing future strokes. The incidence of primary outcome rises with an increase in age.

Carotid disease, cognition, and aging: time to redefine asymptomatic disease?

There is an increasing appreciation of the vascular contributions in the development of age-related cognitive impairment and dementia1,2. Identifying risk and maintaining cognitive health for successful aging is ever relevant in our aging population. Carotid disease, a well-established risk factor for stroke and often a harbinger of other vascular disease states, is also emerging as another vascular risk factor for age-related cognitive decline. When combined with vascular risk factors, the incidence of age-related carotid disease can be as high as 70%3,4. Historically, carotid disease has been dichotomized into two large groups in trial design, outcome measurements, and treatment decisions: symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. The dichotomous distinction between asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis based on existing definitions may be limiting the care we are able to provide for patients classified as "asymptomatic" from their carotid disease. Medically, we now know that these patients should be treated with the same intensive medical therapy as those with "symptomatic" carotid disease. Emerging data also shows that hypoperfusion from asymptomatic disease may lead to significant cognitive impairment in the aging population, and it is plausible that most "age-related" cognitive changes may be reflective of vascular impairment and neurovascular dysfunction. While over the past 30years medical, surgical, and radiological advances have pushed the field of neurovascular disease to significantly reduce the number of ischemic strokes, we are far from any meaningful interventions to prevent vascular cognitive impairment. In addition to including cognitive outcome measures, future studies of carotid disease will also benefit from including advanced neuroimaging modalities not currently utilized in standard clinical imaging protocols, such as perfusion imaging and/or functional connectivity mapping, which may provide novel data to better assess for hypoxic-ischemic changes and neurovascular dysfunction across diffuse cognitive networks. While current recommendations advise against widespread population screening for asymptomatic carotid stenosis, emerging evidence linking carotid stenosis to cognitive impairment prompts us to re-consider our approach for older patients with vascular risk factors who are at risk for cognitive decline.

Abstract 9588: Intraplaque Myeloperoxidase Activity is a Hallmark of Vulnerable Atherosclerosis and Correlates With Clinical Outcomes

Introduction: There remains limited means by which to detect unstable atherosclerosis in patients at risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. Myeloperoxidase (MPO) is increased in unstable plaque and causally linked to plaque destabilization and rupture in pre-clinical models. We sought to assess whether MPO activity is greater in vulnerable human carotid and coronary atheroma, and how this relates to adverse cardiovascular events and non-invasive imaging parameters. Methods: Carotid endarterectomy specimens (CEA) were collected from 31 patients. Coronary trees were collected from 12 patients undergoing heart transplantation for ischemic cardiomyopathy. MPO activity was assessed through the conversion of hydroethidine added to tissue sections to the MPO-specific adduct 2-chloroethidium (2-Cl-E + ) and quantified by mass spectrometry. MPO activity was then compared with histologic determination of plaque phenotype and clinical outcomes. MPO activity was additionally assessed in high and low attenuation plaques derived by computed tomography, as well as perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT). Results: Unstable CEA had higher MPO activity when compared with stable CEA plaques (n = 26, 4.2 ± 3.1 vs. 0.2 ± 0.3 μmol/mgp; p &lt; 0.0001). Similar results were seen in coronary segments with unstable compared to stable plaque (n = 17, 0.6 ± 0.5 vs. 0.0 ± 0.0 μmol/mgp; p = 0.0006). When comparing MPO activity in CEA to clinical outcomes, asymptomatic and stroke-free patients had lower MPO activity compared to those with symptoms or ipsilateral stroke on neuroimaging (n = 12, 3.7 ± 2.1 vs. 0.1 ± 0.2 μmol/mgp; p = 0.002). CT-determined plaque attenuation did not identify plaque MPO activity (n = 30, 0.1 ± 0.1 vs. 0.2 ± 0.3 μmol/mgp; p = 0.23) and enzymatically active MPO was not found in PVAT. Conclusion: MPO is active within unstable human carotid and coronary plaques and correlates with symptomatic carotid disease and stroke. In addition, current non-invasive imaging parameters do not selectively identify plaques enriched with active MPO. As intraplaque MPO appears to be a hallmark of unstable atherosclerosis and can potentially be imaged non-invasively, further investigation into its potential utility as a diagnostic tool for high-risk atherosclerosis is warranted.

Patients with Polyvascular Disease: A Very High-risk Group.

Polyvascular disease (PolyvascDis) with atherosclerosis occurring in >2 vascular beds (coronary, carotid, aortic, visceral and/or peripheral arteries) is encountered in 15-30% of patients who experience greater rates of major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events. Every patient with multiple CV risk factors or presenting with CV disease in one arterial bed should be assessed for PolyvascDis clinically and noninvasively prior to invasive angiography. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) can be readily diagnosed in routine practice by measuring the ankle-brachial index. Carotid disease can be diagnosed by duplex ultrasound showing % stenosis and/or presence of plaques. Coronary artery disease (CAD) can be screened by determining coronary artery calcium score using coronary computed tomography angiography; further, non-invasive testing includes exercise stress and/or myocardial perfusion imaging or dobutamine stress test, prior to coronary angiography. Abdominal ultrasound can reveal an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Computed tomography angiography will be needed in patients with suspected mesenteric ischemia to assess the mesenteric arteries. Patients with the acute coronary syndrome and concomitant other arterial diseases have more extensive CAD and poorer CV outcomes. Similarly, PolyvascDis in patients with carotid disease and/or other PAD is independently associated with an increased risk for all-cause and CV mortality during long-term follow-up. Treatment of patients with PolyvascDis should include aggressive management of all modifiable risk factors by lifestyle changes and drug therapy, with particular attention to patients who are commonly undertreated, such as those with PAD. Revascularization should be reserved for symptomatic vascular beds, using the least aggressive strategy in a multidisciplinary vascular team approach.

Localized Elevation of Wall Shear Stress Is Linked to Recent Symptoms in Patients with Carotid Stenosis

Background: Estimation of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis differences can be the basis for prevention and management of carotid artery stenosis disease. In clinical practice, carotid plaque vulnerability is assessed only on the basis of luminal stenosis. However, the evolution of carotid plaque from an asymptomatic state to a symptomatic one is a complex process and the underlying hemodynamic mechanisms are unknown. We aimed to investigate the differences in hemodynamic parameters between patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis and asymptomatic ones. Methods: Hemodynamic simulations were performed on 26 carotid plaques from 25 patients with carotid artery stenosis ≥50%, 16 of whom had recent cerebrovascular ischemic events. Using human-specific flow parameters and 3D reconstruction of carotid computed tomography angiography images, we assessed hemodynamic characteristics such as wall shear stress (WSS), time-averaged WSS (TAWSS), oscillatory shear index, and relative residence time (RRT) during the cardiac cycle in patients with and without symptoms. Results: We found that symptomatic carotid stenosis patients had greater local TAWSS (99.59 ± 26.29 vs. 60.40 ± 20.46 dyn/cm², p = 0.0007) and maximal WSS (116.65 ± 39.11 vs. 68.28 ± 23.67 dyn/cm², p = 0.003), but lower RRT (0.019 ± 0.006 vs. 0.013 ± 0.069 s, p = 0.049), than asymptomatic patients, but this hemodynamic difference was not associated with carotid stenosis severity (p = 0.70). Patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke had higher local TAWSS and WSSmax than patients with asymptomatic stenosis (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that there was no statistical difference in local hemodynamic variables between TIA and stroke patients with carotid artery stenosis. Conclusions: Patients with carotid artery stenosis are more likely to experience acute ischemic cerebrovascular accidents if they have higher WSS. Simultaneous assessment with hemodynamic parameters like WSS along with stenosis severity may aid risk stratification in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

Telemedicine and Digital Health Applications in Vascular Surgery.

Background: Telemedicine has the potential to revolutionize healthcare. While the development of digital health technologies for the management of patients with cardiovascular diseases has been increasingly reported, applications in vascular surgery have been far less specifically investigated. The aim of this review is to summarize applications related to telemedicine in vascular surgery, highlighting expected benefits, current limits and future directions. Methods: The MEDLINE database was searched using a combination of keywords to identify studies related to telehealth/telemedicine in three main pathologies, including aortic, peripheral artery and carotid disease. A comprehensive literature review was performed to identify the type of digital application, intended use, expected benefits, strengths and limitations. Results: Telemedicine can improve the management of patients through digital platforms allowing teleconsultation, telemonitoring or telecoaching. Intended use involved remote consultation with a vascular surgeon, applications to enhance education, self-management, follow-up or adherence to treatment or lifestyle changes. Conclusion: Telemedicine offers innovative perspectives to improve access to care in distant locations and optimize care through patients’ empowerment and personalized follow-up, contributing to the development of precision medicine. Huge efforts remain necessary for its implementation in daily clinical practice and involve ethical, legal, technical, economic and cultural considerations.

Risks of Carotid Artery Stenosis and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Calcium Kidney Stone: Assessment of Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers.

(1) Background: To assess the clinical significance of preoperative inflammatory biomarkers combined with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score to evaluate carotid artery stenosis in patients with calcium kidney stones; (2) Methods: We conducted a prospective observational case-control study, enrolling 74 patients with calcium kidney stones and 66 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. We calculated the inflammatory biomarkers including the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI). An ultrasound of the carotid arteries was performed on all participants to identify the severity of the stenosis; (3) Results: All inflammatory biomarkers and the severity of carotid artery stenosis were higher in the calcium kidney stone group than in controls. After stratification of ASCVD, inflammatory biomarkers and carotid artery stenosis severity were still significantly higher in the calcium kidney stone group. Multivariate analyses showed that calcium kidney stones significantly increased the risk of ASCVD and carotid artery stenosis. In multivariate linear logistic regression analyses, calcium kidney stone and ASCVD score had a significant association with carotid artery occlusion, but SIRI did not; (4) Conclusions: Calcium kidney stone is associated with higher levels of inflammatory biomarkers and carotid artery stenosis. Calcium kidney stone is associated with higher levels of inflammatory biomarkers and carotid artery stenosis.

Prevalence of Symptomatic Nonstenotic Carotid Disease Using Simultaneous Non-Contrast Angiography and Intraplaque Hemorrhage Imaging for MR Screen Protocol.

Background: To determine the prevalence of symptomatic nonstenotic carotid disease (SyNC) using simultaneous non-contrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) imaging for patients with acute stroke as an MR screen protocol and to assess imaging findings of carotid plaques. Patients and Methods: From May 2020 to October 2021, 2459 patients with suspected acute neurological symptoms were evaluated with brain diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and carotid SNAP imaging. We analyzed the degree of stenosis and intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) using SNAP imaging. Prevalence of SyNC and risk factors for stroke in patients with SyNC were determined. We performed subgroup multivariate analysis between SyNC and other etiologies of stroke (non-SyNC). Results: Of 4608 carotid arteries in 2304 patients enrolled in this study, 454 (9.9%) plaques (both lesions in 128 patients) were found on SNAP imaging. Of these plaques, 353 (77.8%) showed stenosis of <50%. Of plaques with <50% stenosis, 47 (13.3%) patients had a territorial acute focal infarction. Seventeen (36.2%) were classified with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) and SyNC. High maximal wall thickness and carotid IPH were identified as influencing factors for SyNC. Conclusion: For patients with <50% stenosis and territorial infarction, SyNC is a relatively important source of stroke. Especially, high maximal wall thickness and carotid IPH are important risk factors for SyNC.

Dual Institutional Experience with Transcarotid Artery Revascularization.

Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is a hybrid open and endovascular technique to treat carotid stenosis. The purpose of this study is to present a large cohort of patients who underwent TCAR at 2 high-volume TCAR health systems. This study was a retrospective chart review of all instances of TCAR within the Memorial Hermann Health System and Indiana University Health, from December 2015-January 2022, using the ENROUTE Neuroprotection Device (Silk Road Medical, Sunnyvale, CA). We report patient demographics, intraoperative metrics, 30-day results and long-term results. In all, 750 patients underwent TCAR in the designated time period. Average patient age was 73 years, with 68% being male. Overall, 53.9% of patients had coronary artery disease, 45.4% had diabetes, and 36.9% were symptomatic. Technical success was achieved in 98.8% of patients with conversion to open endarterectomy in 1.1%. Average reverse flow time was 9.1 minutes with length of stay greater than 1 day 38%. Ipsilateral stroke rate within 30 days was 2.3% and long-term cumulative stroke rate was 3.0%. Death within 30 days occurred in 1.2% of patients and in 5.9% over long-term follow up. In all, 1% of patients required reintervention. TCAR is a safe and effective treatment modality for carotid artery stenotic disease. Its outcomes are similar to historical results associated with carotid endarterectomy, long considered the gold standard.

Hypothermia and Prolonged Time From Procedure End to Extubation After Endovascular Thoracic Aortic Surgery

Perioperative hypothermia (core temperature <36°C) occurs in 50%-to-80% of patients recovering from thoracic aortic surgery, though its effects have not been described fully in this context. The authors, therefore, sought to characterize the incidence of perioperative hypothermia and its association with time from procedure end to extubation in endovascular aortic surgical patients. A retrospective cohort study. At a single academic tertiary center. Patients recovering from thoracic aortic surgery with lumbar drains. None. A total of 196 patients were included in this study, 55 of whom were hypothermic with temperatures <35.0°C at the end of surgery. Though the unadjusted time to extubation was not statistically different in the hypothermic group (median 8 minutes, IQR 5-13.5 minutes) compared to the normothermic group (median 7 minutes, IQR 4-12 minutes; p=0.062), multivariate predictors of increased time from procedure end to extubation included hypothermia (p=0.011), age (p=0.009), diabetes (p=0.015), history of carotid disease (p=0.040), and crystalloid volume (p=0.019). Hypothermia in patients recovering from endovascular aortic surgery was associated with prolonged time from procedure end to extubation. Because of the retrospective observational nature of the authors' analysis, it was not possible to determine the extent to which prolonged mechanical ventilation was influenced by low temperature.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Early Neurological Deterioration after Endovascular Treatment in Patients with Ischemic Stroke.

The worsening of neurological status that occurs early after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains a serious issue, and the inflammatory response plays a key role in stroke pathobiology. Recently, endovascular treatment (EVT) has revolutionized the management and outcome of patients with AIS due to either extracranial carotid disease or intracranial disease. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) represents an easily available inflammatory biomarker. The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between the NLR at admission and the occurrence of early neurological deterioration (END) in patients with AIS who underwent EVT. Patients with AIS and proximal arterial occlusion in the anterior circulation undergoing EVT were retrospectively identified. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) were collected from admission blood work to calculate the NLR. The study outcome was END defined as an increase in at least 4 points in NIHSS score or death between baseline and 24 h after the ischemic event. Patients included were 211, and END occurred in 30 (14.2%). Patients with older age (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02–1.13), higher serum glucose (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.01–1.02), and higher NLR (OR = 1.011, 95% CI: 1.04–1.18) had an increased risk of END. The best predictive cut-off value of NLR was 6.4, and END occurred in 24.1% and 3.9% of the patients with NLR ≥ 6.4 and <6.4, respectively (p < 0.001). In patients with AIS undergoing EVT, higher NLR values predicted a higher risk of END. Biomarkers able to identify inflammatory mechanisms might identify novel treatment targets and enhance proof-of-concept trials of immunomodulation in stroke.

Long-term results after simultaneous carotid and coronary revascularisation.

The revascularisation strategy for concomitant carotid and coronary disease is unknown. Simultaneous or stage coronary artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy are the most common revascularisation approach in the CABG population. This study aimed to evaluate long-term results after simultaneous carotid artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery. This is a prospective cohort non-randomised single-institution study. During the period from 2012 to 2015, sixty consecutive patients (65.9 ± 7.41 mean) underwent simultaneous carotid artery stenting and coronary artery bypass surgery (n = 30) or simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass surgery (n = 30). The primary endpoints were short- and long-term rates of adverse events (transient ischemic attack, stroke, myocardial infarction, and death). The mean follow-up was 62.05 ± 11.12 months. In-hospital mortality was insignificantly higher in the carotid endarterectomy, and coronary artery bypass surgery group (6.6% vs. 0%), the rate of stroke and myocardial infarction was similar (13.3% and 0% in the carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass surgery group vs. 6.6% and 3.3% in the carotid artery stenting and coronary artery bypass surgery group, respectively). The intensive care unit readmission was significantly higher in the surgical revascularisation approach; it was an independent predictor of hospital mortality. The overall mortality during the follow-up period was 14.28% in both groups. Freedom of the composite adverse outcomes (stroke, myocardial infarction, and death) was 78.55%. Comparing two revascularisation strategies is not straightforward due to different anatomical indications for carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy. We consider that each technique has an essential role in carotid revascularisation. Good selection of patients, according to indications, contributes to satisfactory short- and long-term results.