Cardiac Devices Research Articles

Guide to identify specific characteristics in cardiac pacing devices by radiological figure

Guide to identify specific characteristics in cardiac pacing devices by radiological figure

Artificial intelligence to detect noise events in remote monitoring data

AbstractBackgroundRemote monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs) can detect various events early. However, the diagnostic ability of CIEDs has not been sufficient, especially for lead failure. The first notification of lead failure was almost noise events, which were detected as arrhythmia by the CIED. A human must analyze the intracardiac electrogram to accurately detect lead failure. However, the number of arrhythmic events is too large for human analysis. Artificial intelligence (AI) seems to be helpful in the early and accurate detection of lead failure before human analysis.ObjectiveTo test whether a neural network can be trained to precisely identify noise events in the intracardiac electrogram of RM data.MethodsWe analyzed 21 918 RM data consisting of 12 925 and 1884 Medtronic and Boston Scientific data, respectively. Among these, 153 and 52 Medtronic and Boston Scientific data, respectively, were diagnosed as noise events by human analysis. In Medtronic, 306 events, including 153 noise events and randomly selected 153 out of 12 692 nonnoise events, were analyzed in a five‐fold cross‐validation with a convolutional neural network. The Boston Scientific data were analyzed similarly.ResultsThe precision rate, recall rate, F1 score, accuracy rate, and the area under the curve were 85.8 ± 4.0%, 91.6 ± 6.7%, 88.4 ± 2.0%, 88.0 ± 2.0%, and 0.958 ± 0.021 in Medtronic and 88.4 ± 12.8%, 81.0 ± 9.3%, 84.1 ± 8.3%, 84.2 ± 8.3% and 0.928 ± 0.041 in Boston Scientific. Five‐fold cross‐validation with a weighted loss function could increase the recall rate.ConclusionsAI can accurately detect noise events. AI analysis may be helpful for detecting lead failure events early and accurately.

Efficacy of the Electrocardiographic P-Wave Indices (PWIs) in Predicting Atrial High-Rate Episodes (AHREs) With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs)

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that increases the risk of stroke and mortality. Patients with AF who have cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are at risk of developing atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs), which can lead to adverse outcomes. Several electrocardiographic P-wave indices have been studied as potential predictors of AHREs, including P-wave duration (PWD), P-wave dispersion (PWDIS), P-wave peak time (PWPT), and PR interval. This review aimed to assess the efficacy of these P-wave indices in predicting AHREs in patients with AF and CIEDs. The review included studies that found that PWD and PWDIS were significantly associated with AHREs. Additionally, studies have shown that P-wave peak time and PR interval may also predict AHREs. However, limitations such as variability in cut-off values and differences in patient populations and CIED types suggest the need for standardized diagnostic criteria. Overall, P-wave indices may be useful in identifying patients at risk for AHREs, but further research is needed to establish their clinical utility.

Comparison of infection and complication rates associated with transvenous vs. subcutaneous defibrillators in patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease: a multicenter long-term retrospective follow-up.

Patients with progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at higher risk of infections and complications from cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). In patients with a primary or secondary prophylactic indication, implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD) can prevent sudden cardiac deaths (SCD). We retrospectively compared transvenous-ICD (TV-ICD) and intermuscularly implanted subcutaneous-ICD (S-ICD) associated infections and complication rates together with hospitalizations in recipients with stage 4 kidney disease. We retrospectively analyzed 70 patients from six German centers with stage 4 CKD who received either a prophylactic TV-ICD with a single right ventricular lead, 49 patients, or a S-ICD, 21 patients. Follow-Ups (FU) were performed bi-annually. The TV-ICD patients were significantly older. This group had more patients with a history of atrial arrhythmias and more were prescribed anti-arrhythmic medication compared with the S-ICD group. There were no significant differences for other baseline characteristics. The median and interquartile range of FU durations were 55.2 (57.6-69.3) months. During FU, patients with a TV-ICD system experienced significantly more device associated infections (n = 8, 16.3% vs. n = 0; p < 0.05), device-associated complications (n = 13, 26.5% vs. n = 1, 4.8%; p < 0.05) and device associated hospitalizations (n = 10, 20.4% vs. n = 1, 4.8%; p < 0.05). In this long-term FU of patients with stage 4 CKD and an indication for a prophylactic ICD, the S-ICD was associated with significantly fewer device associated infections, complications and hospitalizations compared with TV-ICDs.

Risk of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection after Early versus Delayed Lead Repositioning.

(1) Background: Early reintervention increases the risk of infection of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Some operators therefore delay lead repositioning in the case of dislocation by weeks; however, there is no evidence to support this practice. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of the timing of reoperation on infection risk. (2) Methods: The data from consecutive patients undergoing lead repositioning in two European referral centers were retrospectively analyzed. The odds ratio (OR) of CIED infection in the first year was compared among patients undergoing early (≤1 week) vs. delayed (>1 week to 1 year) reoperation. (3) Results: Out of 249 patients requiring CIED reintervention, 85 patients (34%) underwent an early (median 2 days) and 164 (66%) underwent a delayed lead revision (median 53 days). A total of nine (3.6%) wound/device infections were identified. The risk of infection was numerically lower in the early (1.2%) vs. delayed (4.9%) intervention group yielding no statistically significant difference, even after adjustment for typical risk factors for CIED infection (adjusted OR = 0.264, 95% CI 0.032-2.179, p = 0.216). System explantation/extraction was necessary in seven cases, all being revised in the delayed group. (4) Conclusions: In this bicentric, international study, delayed lead repositioning did not reduce the risk of CIED infection.

National Tunisian Study of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Design and Protocol for a Nationwide Multicenter Prospective Observational Study.

In Tunisia, the number of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is increasing, owing to the increase in patient life expectancy and expanding indications. Despite their life-saving potential and a significant reduction in population morbidity and mortality, their increased numbers have been associated with the development of multiple early and late complications related to vascular access, pockets, leads, or patient characteristics. The study aims to identify the rate, type, and predictors of complications occurring within the first year after CIED implantation. It also aims to describe the demographic and epidemiological characteristics of a nationwide sample of patients with CIED in Tunisia. Additionally, the study will evaluate the extent to which Tunisian electrophysiologists follow international guidelines for cardiac pacing and sudden cardiac death prevention. The Tunisian National Study of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (NATURE-CIED) is a national, multicenter, prospectively monitored study that includes consecutive patients who underwent primary CIED implantation, generator replacement, and upgrade procedure. Patients were enrolled between January 18, 2021, and February 18, 2022, at all Tunisian public and private CIED implantation centers that agreed to participate in the study. All enrolled patients entered a 1-year follow-up period, with 4 consecutive visits at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after CIED implantation. The collected data are recorded electronically on the clinical suite platform (DACIMA Clinical Suite). The study started on January 18, 2021, and concluded on February 18, 2023. In total, 27 cardiologists actively participated in data collection. Over this period, 1500 patients were enrolled in the study consecutively. The mean age of the patients was 70.1 (SD 15.2) years, with a sex ratio of 1:15. Nine hundred (60%) patients were from the public sector, while 600 (40%) patients were from the private sector. A total of 1298 (86.3%) patients received a conventional pacemaker and 75 (5%) patients received a biventricular pacemaker (CRT-P). Implantable cardioverter defibrillators were implanted in 127 (8.5%) patients. Of these patients, 45 (3%) underwent CRT-D implantation. This study will establish the most extensive contemporary longitudinal cohort of patients undergoing CIED implantation in Tunisia, presenting a significant opportunity for real-world clinical epidemiology. It will address a crucial gap in the management of patients during the perioperative phase and follow-up, enabling the identification of individuals at particularly high risk of complications for optimal care. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05361759; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05361759. RR1-10.2196/47525.

Arrhythmic manifestations and outcomes of definite and probable cardiac sarcoidosis

BackgroundThe 2014 Heart Rhythm Society consensus statement defines histological (definite) and clinical (probable) diagnostic categories of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), but few studies have compared their arrhythmic phenotypes and outcomes. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the electrophysiological/arrhythmic phenotype and outcomes of patients with definite and probable CS. MethodsWe analyzed the arrhythmic/electrophysiological phenotype in a single-center North American cohort of 388 patients (median age 56 years; 39% female, n = 151) diagnosed with definite (n = 58) or probable (n = 330) CS (2000–2022). The primary composite outcome was survival to first ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) event or sudden cardiac death. Key secondary outcomes were also assessed. ResultsAt index evaluation, in situ cardiac implantable electronic devices and antiarrhythmic drug use were more common in definite CS. At a median follow-up of 3.1 years, the primary outcome occurred in 22 patients with definite CS (38%) and 127 patients with probable CS (38%) (log-rank, P = .55). In multivariable analysis, only a higher ratio of the 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose maximum standardized uptake value of the myocardium to the maximum standardized uptake value of the blood pool (hazard ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval 1.03–1.15; P = .003, per 1 unit increase) was associated with the primary outcome. During follow-up, patients with definite CS had a higher burden of device-treated VT/VF events (mean 2.86 events per patient-year vs 1.56 events per patient-year) and a higher rate of progression to heart transplant/left ventricular assist device implantation but no difference in all-cause mortality compared with patients with probable CS. ConclusionPatients with definite and probable CS had similarly high risks of first sustained VT/VF/sudden cardiac death and all-cause mortality, though patients with definite CS had a higher overall arrhythmia burden. Both CS diagnostic groups as defined by the 2014 Heart Rhythm Society criteria require an aggressive approach to prevent arrhythmic complications.

Risk of infection and vascular complications with cardiac implantable electronic device implantation in patients with a history of mastectomy

Risk of infection and vascular complications with cardiac implantable electronic device implantation in patients with a history of mastectomy

Studying Adipose Endothelial Cell/Adipocyte Cross-Talk in Human Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue.

Microvascular endothelial cells (MVECs) have many critical roles, including control of vascular tone, regulation of thrombosis, and angiogenesis. Significant heterogeneity in endothelial cell (EC) genotype and phenotype depends on their vascular bed and host disease state. The ability to isolate MVECs from tissue-specific vascular beds and individual patient groups offers the opportunity to directly compare MVEC function in different disease states. Here, using subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) taken at the time of insertion of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), we describe a method for the isolation of a pure population of functional human subcutaneous adipose tissue MVEC (hSATMVEC) and an experimental model of hSATMVEC-adipocyte cross-talk. hSATMVEC were isolated following enzymatic digestion of SAT by incubation with anti-CD31 antibody-coated magnetic beads and passage through magnetic columns. hSATMVEC were grown and passaged on gelatin-coated plates. Experiments used cells at passages 2-4. Cells maintained classic features of EC morphology until at least passage 5. Flow cytometric assessment showed 99.5% purity of isolated hSATMVEC, defined as CD31+/CD144+/CD45-. Isolated hSATMVEC from controls had a population doubling time of approximately 57 h, and active proliferation was confirmed using a cell proliferation imaging kit. Isolated hSATMVEC function was assessed using their response to insulin stimulation and angiogenic tube-forming potential. We then established an hSATMVEC-subcutaneous adipocyte co-culture model to study cellular cross-talk and demonstrated a downstream effect of hSATMVEC on adipocyte function. hSATMVEC can be isolated from SAT taken at the time of CIED insertion and are of sufficient purity to both experimentally phenotype and study hSATMVEC-adipocyte cross-talk.

A rare case of isolated persistent left superior vena cava diagnosed by echocardiography

BackgroundThe persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is an infrequent vascular variant. PLSVC with absent right superior vena cava, also known as isolated PLSVC, is an exceptionally rare entity. In this case we present a patient with isolated PLSVC draining to coronary sinus, diagnosed incidentally during echocardiography.Case presentationA 35-year-old man underwent a transthoracic echocardiography which showed an enormously dilated coronary sinus. Hand-agitated saline was injected via peripheral intravenous cannulas. The contrast appeared firstly in the coronary sinus before it opacified the right atrium. Since this was also visible by the right antecubital saline injection, it indicated an extremely rare case of PLSVC with the absence of right superior vena cava which was confirmed by cardiac magnetic resonance.ConclusionsThe finding of a distinctively dilated coronary sinus in echocardiography led us to further investigation using agitated saline that revealed an infrequent anomaly termed isolated PLSVC. The in-depth diagnosis of this vascular variant is crucial considering that it may lead to important clinical implications, such as difficulties with central venous access, especially in the current era of a rapid development of cardiac device therapies.

Update on endocarditis 2024

Infective endocarditis (IE) is alife-threatening disease with an increasing incidence despite improved preventive measures. The revision of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on infective endocarditis in 2023 brings significant innovations in prevention, diagnostics, and treatment. Many measures for prophylaxis and prevention have been more clearly defined and given higher recommendation levels. In the diagnostics of IE the use of other imaging modalities besides echocardiography, such as cardiac computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET)/CT or single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT with radioactively labeled leukocytes was more strongly emphasized. The diagnostics and treatment of IE associated with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) were also revised. An essential innovation is also the possibility of an outpatient antibiotic treatment for certain patients after initial treatment in hospital. The indications for surgery have also been revised and, in particular, the timing of surgery has been more clearly defined. This article provides an overview of the most important changes.

Juxtaposed Atrial Appendages: Implications for Cardiac Electronic Device Implants

Juxtaposed Atrial Appendages: Implications for Cardiac Electronic Device Implants

Clinical aspects and treatment of tricuspid valve regurgitation

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) leading to right heart failure is prevalent and associated with increased mortality. The significant under-recognition of the disease resulted from insufficient medical therapies and the high associated risk of surgical therapy. Over the last decade there has been a rapid development of interventional treatment options so that the disease has increasingly become the focus of attention of specialists in internal medicine and interventional cardiologists. The etiology of TR is differentiated into primary TR, secondary atrial TR, secondary ventricular TR and TR associated with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). The TR was identified as an independent predictor of mortality, independent of associated diseases such as atrial fibrillation, left-sided heart failure or pulmonary hypertension. Even patients with low to moderate TR have asignificantly increased risk of mortality. Early diagnostics and estimation of the severity by echocardiography as well as timely referral to atertiary heart valve center are decisive in order to evaluate possible treatment options before irreversible right ventricular damage and secondary organ dysfunction occur. For transcatheter edge-to-edge repair and transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement there is now first evidence from randomized controlled studies. While the understanding of TR is continuously improving, new tricuspid valve repair and replacement systems are in a state of steady progress. Whether the treatment has an effect on reduction of the mortality and stabilization of right ventricular failure with a reduction in hospitalization, will first be shown in future studies.

Management of atrial arrhythmias identified by cardiac devices.

Implantable cardiac devices have shown that atrial fibrillation (AF) is more frequent than previously assumed, with subclinical, asymptomatic, self-limiting manifestations called atrial high-rate events (AHREs) or subclinical AF. The clinical significance and correct therapeutic management of these episodes of subclinical AF is less well defined than in the case of clinically manifest AF. Two important randomized studies on the topic have recently been published, NOAH-AFNET 6 and ARTESIA, which, however, have not definitively clarified the topic. In patients with AHRE or subclinical AF, the average thrombo-embolic risk is lower than that in patients with clinically manifest AF and is ∼1%. For this reason, in these patients, the possibility that the benefit of anticoagulant therapy is overshadowed by the risk of bleeding is very high. Therefore, while waiting for new tools that allow a better stratification of low-risk patients, we must rely on individual clinical evaluation and overcome the qualitative dichotomy (AHRE yes vs. AHRE no), preferring instead an approach that is as quantitative as possible and takes into account the number of episodes, their duration, and the patient's CHADSVASC score, before deciding, in each individual case, whether or not to use anticoagulant therapy.

Navigating the Landscape of Medical Device Advisories: A Special Report From the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are often important for regulating cardiac rate and rhythm. Pacemakers and defibrillators are among the top 10 most implanted medical devices, with > 1.5 million devices implanted annually. Although millions of patients have benefited with improved quality of life and survival, CIED systems are becoming increasingly complex and do not always perform according to expectations. Advisory notices communicate important information about the safety and performance of a medical device to health care providers and patients. Medical device recalls are common, with > 35 unique device recalls in the past 5 years. From an ethical standpoint, CIED recalls highlight a range of considerations including the consent process, duty to report, how best to promote autonomous decision-making, trust in the health care system, as well as disproportionate effects of these considerations on equity-deserving groups. The purpose of the current article is to review and advise regarding the process around medical device advisory and recall, with a specific focus on clinicians caring for patients affected by these devices. We have sought the input of a lawyer, a patient advocacy group, and an ethicist to guide the clinical management of, and communications regarding, device recalls and advisories. Diligent surveillance and a clear, transparent patient consent process regarding these small but potentially serious device anomalies is paramount in ensuring patients believe they are safe and informed. Meaningful patient engagement helps to ensure optimal communication and disclosure mechanisms before implantation and throughout follow-up, accessibility of information in the initial implant and recall action process, and trust in health care systems and providers.

Optimizing Patient Selection for Physiological Pacing in Bradyarrhythmia: Factors Associated With High Ventricular Pacing Burden.

Right ventricular (RV) pacing is established as the most common ventricular pacing (VP) strategy for patients with symptomatic bradyarrhythmia. Some patients with high VP burden suffer deterioration of left ventricular (LV) function, termed pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). Patients who pace > 20% of the time from the RV apex are at increased risk of PICM, but independent predictors of increased RV pacing burden have not been elucidated in those who have a permanent pacemaker (PPM) inserted for bradyarrhythmia. We aimed to identify factors that are associated with increased VP burden > 20%, hence determining those at risk for resultant PICM. In this retrospective cohort study, we identified the most recent 300 consecutive cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implants in our center and collected past medical history, electrocardiogram (ECG), echo, medication and pacemaker check data. A total of 236 individuals met inclusion criteria. Of the patients, 35% had RV pacing burden < 20%, while 65% had VP burden ≥ 20%; 96.2% of patients with complete heart block (CHB) paced > 20% (P = 0.002). Utilization of DDD or VVI (75.2% and 89.2% of patients, respectively) without mode switch algorithms was associated with VP > 20% (P < 0.001). Male or previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients also statistically paced > 20%. Other factors trending towards significance included prolonged PR interval, atrial fibrillation or more advanced age. High-grade atrioventricular (AV) block was associated with an RV pacing burden > 20% over 3 years but this was not consistent in patients with only transient episodes of high-grade AV block. We found a significant association between high VP% and male sex, previous CABG and the absence of mode switching algorithms.

Short Registry of Terminal Forms of Chronic Heart Failure in the Samara Region.

To study the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with functional class (FC) III-IV chronic heart failure (CHF) who meet the criteria for inclusion in the palliative care program. A short registry of severe CHF forms was conducted at 60 outpatient and inpatient clinics in the Samara region for one month (16.05.2022-15.06.2022). The registry included patients with FC III-IV CHF who sought medical help during that period. Lethal outcomes were assessed at 90 days after the inclusion in the registry using the Mortality Information and Analytics system. 591 patients (median age, 71.0 [64.0; 80.0] years were enrolled, including 339 (57.4%) men, of which 149 (24.1%) were of working age (under 65 years). The main cause of CHF was ischemic heart disease (64.5%). 229 (38.7%) patients had left ventricular ejection fraction &lt;40%. During the past year, 513 (86.8%) patients had at least one hospitalization for decompensated CHF. 45.7% of patients had hydrothorax, and 11.3% of patients had ascites. Low systolic blood pressure was observed in more than 25% of patients; 14.2% required in-hospital inotropic support; and 9.1% received it on the outpatient basis. 4.2% of patients received outpatient oxygen support and 0.8% required the administration of narcotic analgesics. 12 (1.9%) patients were on the waiting list for heart transplantation. In this study, there was an inconsistency in the number of patients with ventricular tachycardia and/or left bundle branch block (LBBB) who were implanted with cardiac resynchronization therapy devices (CRTD) or an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), a total of 19 patients (11 patients with CRTD and 8 patients with ICD), while 58 (9.8%) patients had indications for CRTD/ICD implantation. Within 90 days from inclusion in the registry, 59 (10.0%) patients died. According to binary logistic regression analysis, the presence of LBBB, hydrothorax, the requirement for outpatient oxygen support, and a history of cardiac surgery were associated with a high risk of death. Patients with severe forms of CHF require not only adequate drug therapy, but also dynamic clinical observation supplemented with palliative care aimed at improving the quality of life, including the ethical principles of shared decision-making and advance care planning to identify the priorities and goals of patients in relation to their care.

Assessment of the Impact of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices on Patients' Quality of Life.

Assessing the quality of life serves as a crucial metric during various therapeutic or surgical procedures. The rise in cardiac electronic device implantations in recent years underscores the significance of evaluating the quality of life among such patients. We conducted a study focusing on the quality of life of 438 patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (cardiac pacemakers, cardioverter-defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization therapy devices). These patients were diagnosed with sick sinus syndrome, high-degree atrioventricular (AV) block, or severe heart failure (New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes III- IV (NYHA III-IV)), with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%, with/without complete left bundle branch block (QRS ≥ 130 μs), or with a history of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. The study utilized the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire and the EQ visual analog scale, which patients completed both prior to cardiac device implantation and during six post-implantation follow-up visits. The analysis of the research findings was conducted using the IBM SPSS Statistics software program (Armonk, NY). Cardiac pacemaker implantation in patients with sick sinus syndrome and high-grade AV block demonstrated significant and highly reliable positive effects on quality of life concerning mobility, self-care, and usual activity. Similarly, cardiac resynchronization device implantation in individuals with severe heart failure with reduced LVEF and wide QRS showed significant positive effects in these areas. However, cardioverter-defibrillator implantation did not yield positive effects on these modules.Regarding pain/discomfort, neither pacemaker nor cardiac resynchronization device implantation resulted in improved quality of life, while there was a somewhat positive effect observed in the cardioverter-defibrillator group. In terms of anxiety/depression, pacemaker implantation in patients with sick sinus syndrome and high-degree AV block had a significant and highly reliable positive impact on quality of life. Additionally, relatively positive impacts were noted at various periods following cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization device implantations. Cardiac implantable electronic devices play a crucial role not only in saving lives but also in positively impacting the quality of life of patients when appropriately selected.

Age-Stratified Clinical Outcome in Patients with Known Heart Failure Who Receive Pacemaker, Resynchronization Therapy, or Defibrillator Implants

Introduction: Patients with heart failure (HF) and bradycardia may be eligible for different types of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), depending on the presence of atrioventricular conduction disease, age, and comorbidities. We aimed to assess the prognosis for these patients, after CIED implantation, stratified for the type of CIED device. Methods: All patients with preexisting HF diagnosis who received a CIED with a right ventricular lead during the period 2005–2018 in Sweden were identified via the pacemaker registry. Data were crossmatched with the population registry and national disease registries. The outcome was 5-year risk of HF hospitalization and mortality. Results: A total of 37,745 patients were included in the study. Comparing demographics for implantable cardioverter defibrillator versus pacemaker implants, median age was 66 years versus 83 years, 20% versus 41% were female, 64% versus 50% had ischemic heart disease, and 35% versus 67% had atrial fibrillation (all p < 0.001). Five-year mortality was highest in single-chamber pacemaker recipients (61% compared to average 40%, p < 0.001), but the proportion of cardiovascular mortality was highest for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) recipients (68% vs. 63% p < 0.001). Adjusted mortality was higher for pacemaker patients in all age decile groups (ranging from <60 to >90 years old, all p < 0.001), HF hospitalization occurred in 28% (dual-chamber pacemaker) to 39% (CRT-P) of patients, and cause of death was HF in 15% (dual-chamber pacemaker) to 25% (CRT-D), all p < 0.001. Conclusion: In this large real-world cohort of CIED-treated patients with prior HF, demography and mortality data indicate that clinicians chose devices according to the overall status of the patient. HF-related events occurred in all groups but were more common in CRT-treated patients.

Impella Cardiac Power Device used in Patient with Cardiogenic Shock Due to Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Impella Cardiac Power Device used in Patient with Cardiogenic Shock Due to Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy