PurposeCapnocytophaga canimorsus (Cani) and Capnocytophaga cynodegmi (Cyno) are found in the oral cavities of dogs and cats. They can be transmitted to humans via licks or bites and cause wound infections as well as severe systemic infections. Cani is considered to be more pathogenic than Cyno, but the pathophysiological mechanisms are not elucidated. Cani has been suggested to be resistant to serum bactericidal effects. Thus, we hypothesized that the more invasive Cani would exhibit a higher degree of serum-resistance than the less pathogenic Cyno.MethodsWhole blood and serum bactericidal assays were performed against Cani- (n = 8) and Cyno-strains (n = 15) isolated from blood and wound-specimens, respectively. Analysis of complement-function was performed by heat-inactivation, EGTA-treatment and by using C1q-depleted serum. Serum and whole blood were collected from healthy individuals and from patients (n = 3) with a history of sepsis caused by Cani.ResultsBoth Cani and Cyno were equally susceptible to human whole blood and serum. Cani was preferentially killed by the classical pathway of the complement-system whereas Cyno was killed by a partly different mechanism. Serum from 2/3 Cani-infected patients were deficient in MBL-activity but still exhibited the same killing effect as control sera.ConclusionBoth Cani and Cyno were readily killed by human whole blood and serum in a complement-dependent way. Thus, it is not likely that serum bactericidal capacity is the key determinant for the clinical outcome in Cani or Cyno-infections.