PurposeReport additional VA outcomes from VIBRANT.MethodsVIBRANT was a phase 3 study of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT‐AFL) vs laser for macular edema (ME) due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Patients received IVT‐AFL 2 mg every 4 weeks to week 24 (W24) and every 8 weeks thereafter or macular grid laser at BL. Eligible laser patients received IVT‐AFL rescue beginning at W24. Primary endpoint was the proportion of eyes gaining ≥15 letters in best corrected VA (BCVA) at W24. Retina was considered perfused for patients with ≤10 disc areas of capillary nonperfusion at baseline.ResultsThe proportion of eyes gaining ≥15 letters from BL to W24 and W52 was 52.7% vs 26.7% (P < 0.001) and 57.1% vs 41.1% (P < 0.03), for IVT‐AFL vs laser; 36.3% and 49.5% of eyes receiving IVT‐AFL gained ≥15 letters by W4 and W12. Overall mean BCVA gain from BL to W24 and W52 was 17.0 vs 6.9 letters (P < 0.0001) and 17.1 vs 12.2 letters (P < 0.004), for IVT‐AFL vs laser. W52 results for laser group include patients who received IVT‐AFL rescue. In the laser group, 80.7% received rescue IVT‐AFL between W24 and W48. In perfused patients, mean BCVA gain from BL to W24 and W52 was 14.3 vs 5.7 and 13.7 vs 11.9 letters; in nonperfused patients, it was 19.1 vs 11.3 and 20.0 vs 15.6 letters. The most common ocular AE, conjunctival hemorrhage, occurred in 24.2% (IVT‐AFL) and 15.2% (laser) of patients. Two APTC‐ATEs occurred, both in the laser group.ConclusionsHere, IVT‐AFL provided statistically and clinically significant VA benefits over laser at W24 that were maintained at W52. Benefits with AFL treatment were not dependent on baseline perfusion status.
Read full abstract