Butt-joint Connection Research Articles

Influence of eccentric cyclic loading on implant components: Comparison between external joint system and internal joint system.

The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the influence of eccentric loading on implant components by measuring screw loosening and observing these components under several load positions and magnitudes. The external and internal joint system implants with butt joint connection were subjected to cyclic loading tests according to the specifications of ISO 14801. Load position was set at 0, 4, or 8 mm, and load was set at 100 or 300 N. On the external joint system, the reverse torque values decreased with distal shift in the loading position and an increase in magnitude of load, and abrasion and deformation on the anti-rotation device were observed. On the internal joint system, no large decrease in reverse torque was observed even though increasing the load position and load, however, abrasion and deformation on the anti-rotation device as well as fracture at implant/abutment connection were observed.

Mode coupling at connectors in mode-division multiplexed transmission over few-mode fiber.

In mode-division multiplexed (MDM) transmission systems, mode coupling is responsible for inter-modal crosstalk. We consider the transmission of modulated signals over a few-mode fiber (FMF) having low mode coupling and large differential mode group delay in the presence of a non-ideal fiber connection responsible for extra mode coupling. In this context, we first analytically derive the coupling matrix of the multimode connector and we numerically study the dependence of the matrix coefficients as a function of the butt-joint connection characteristics. The numerical results are then validated through an experiment with a five-mode setup. Finally, through numerical simulations, we assess the impact of the connector on the signal quality investigating different receiver digital signal processing (DSP) schemes.

Bacterial Composition at the Implant-Abutment Connection under Loading in vivo.

Platform-switched implants have been demonstrated to prevent bone loss after loading. The present study evaluated bacterial composition of sites from implant-abutment connections of immediately loaded implants, which were placed in the anterior mandible. Ten patients participated in this study. A and B implant systems with two different prosthetic connections (Morse tapered vs internal polygonal butt-joint connections, respectively) were placed and loaded for 2 years. The abutments were removed (AB sample) after careful decontamination. Bacterial sampling of the abutments, inner part of the implants (before/visit 1 and after rinsing with chlorhexidine [CHX]/visit 2), and after new abutment connection and loading for 1 additional month, a new sampling (visit 3) was taken to compare the bacteria composition in association with the two connections. Bacterial profiles of samples were determined by using the human oral microbe identification microarray. A total of 240 samples were analyzed taken at different time intervals. Nonparametric statistical analysis (Wilcoxon Rank sum) with uncorrected alpha (p < .05) and after corrections (Benjamini-Hochberg) found no statistical significance between the two connections. No significant changes in the overall microbial profiles were detected at the different time intervals. However, there were trends toward presence of periodontitis-associated species at the B implants in all samples (AB, visit 1, even after CHX irrigation) and after decontamination, abutment replacement, and 1-month loading period. CHX irrigation does not seem to have any effect on decontamination of connections. As shown previously, there is significantly more bone loss around B implants compared with A implants. Although there was no statistical difference in the microbial profiles, there was indeed a trend for the presence of typical periodontal pathogens associated with the internal polygonal butt-joint connection. A possible scenario is that this connection tends to harbor the pathogens that may be involved in subsequent bone loss.

Impact of implant–abutment connection, positioning of the machined collar/microgap, and platform switching on crestal bone level changes. Camlog Foundation Consensus Report.

ObjectivesThe aim of this consensus meeting was to assess the impact of implant–abutment connection, positioning of the machined collar/microgap, and platform switching on crestal bone level changes.Materials and methodsTwo comprehensive systematic reviews were prepared in advance of the meeting. Consensus statements, practical recommendations, and implications for future research were based on within group as well as plenary scrutinization and discussions of these systematic reviews.ResultsPlacing the smooth part of the implant below the alveolar crest may lead to bone loss. Despite a more pronounced bone remodeling, the subcrestal positioning of the microgap may help to retain the bony coverage of the rough surface. Crestal bone remodeling has been observed for either internal and external, or conical and butt–joint connections. There was a trend favoring the platform switching concept to prevent or minimize peri-implant marginal bone loss.ConclusionsFuture research should consider an uniform and comparable study design, either excluding or exactly documenting possible confounding factors.

A three - dimensional finite element study on the stress distribution pattern of two prosthetic abutments for external hexagon implants

Objective:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical behavior of two different straight prosthetic abutments (one- and two-piece) for external hex butt-joint connection implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D-FEA).Materials and Methods:Two 3D-FEA models were designed, one for the two-piece prosthetic abutment (2 mm in height, two-piece mini-conical abutment, Neodent) and another one for the one-piece abutment (2 mm in height, Slim Fit one-piece mini-conical abutment, Neodent), with their corresponding screws and implants (Titamax Ti, 3.75 diameter by 13 mm in length, Neodent). The model simulated the single restoration of a lower premolar using data from a computerized tomography of a mandible. The preload (20 N) after torque application for installation of the abutment and an occlusal loading were simulated. The occlusal load was simulated using average physiological bite force and direction (114.6 N in the axial direction, 17.1 N in the lingual direction and 23.4 N toward the mesial at an angle of 75° to the occlusal plan).Results:The regions with the highest von Mises stress results were at the bottom of the initial two threads of both prosthetic abutments that were tested. The one-piece prosthetic abutment presented a more homogeneous behavior of stress distribution when compared with the two-piece abutment.Conclusions:Under the simulated chewing loads, the von Mises stresses for both tested prosthetic-abutments were within the tensile strength values of the materials analyzed which thus supports the clinical use of both prosthetic abutments.

Screw loading and gap formation in implant supported fixed restorations: Procera implant bridge vs. conventionally cast screw-retained restorations

It was the purpose of this finite element analysis to compare the implant-restoration connection created by Procera Implant Bridge (PIB) and conventional screw-retained prostheses with respect to screw loading and gap formation. Finite element models representing a conventional screw-retained restoration and a PIB were set up. A horizontal load of 200N was applied on the restorations while resulting gap formation and screw loading was recorded. Increasing the preload of the retaining screws led to a decrease in gap formation. Smaller gaps were observed in the conventional restorations. Loading of the screws was of comparable magnitudes in both cases. The use of screw-retained implant-supported restorations representing butt-joint connections at the restorative interface may result in increased gap formation.

Precision of fit between implant impression coping and implant replica pairs for three implant systems

The fabrication of an accurately fitting implant-supported fixed prosthesis requires multiple steps, the first of which is assembling the impression coping on the implant. An imprecise fit of the impression coping on the implant will cause errors that will be magnified in subsequent steps of prosthesis fabrication. The purpose of this study was to characterize the 3-dimensional (3D) precision of fit between impression coping and implant replica pairs for 3 implant systems. The selected implant systems represent the 3 main joint types used in implant dentistry: external hexagonal, internal trilobe, and internal conical. Ten impression copings and 10 implant replicas from each of the 3 systems, B (Brånemark System), R (NobelReplace Select), and A (NobelActive) were paired. A standardized aluminum test body was luted to each impression coping, and the corresponding implant replica was embedded in a stone base. A coordinate measuring machine was used to quantify the maximum range of displacement in a vertical direction as a function of the tightening force applied to the guide pin. Maximum angular displacement in a horizontal plane was measured as a function of manual clockwise or counterclockwise rotation. Vertical and rotational positioning was analyzed by using 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The Fisher protected least significant difference (PLSD) multiple comparisons test of the means was applied when the F-test in the ANOVA was significant (α=.05). The mean and standard deviation for change in the vertical positioning of impression copings was 4.3 ±2.1 μm for implant system B, 2.8 ±4.2 μm for implant system R, and 20.6 ±8.8 μm for implant system A. The mean and standard deviation for rotational positioning was 3.21 ±0.98 degrees for system B, 2.58 ±1.03 degrees for system R, and 5.30 ±0.79 degrees for system A. The P-value for vertical positioning between groups A and B and between groups A and R was <.001. No significant differences were found for vertical positioning between groups B and R. The P-value for rotational positioning between groups A and B and between groups A and R was <.001. No significant differences were found for rotational positioning between groups B and R. The results of the study confirmed that implant systems differ in precision of fit. Vertical precision between paired implant components is a function of joint type and the tightening force applied to the guide pin. The magnitude of vertical displacement with applied torque is greater for conical connections than for butt joint connections. The rotational freedom between paired components is unique to the implant system and is presumably related to the machining tolerances specified by the manufacturer.

Axial displacements in external and internal implant‐abutment connection

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the axial displacement of the abutments during clinical procedures by the tightening torque and cyclic loading. Two different implant-abutment connection systems were used (external butt joint connection [EXT]; internal tapered conical connection [INT]). The master casts with two implant replicas, angulated 10° from each other, were fabricated for each implant connection system. Four types of impression copings were assembled and tightened with the corresponding implants (hex transfer impression coping, non-hex transfer impression coping, hex pick-up impression coping, non-hex pick-up impression coping). Resin splinted abutments and final prosthesis were assembled. The axial displacement was measured from the length of each assembly, which was evaluated repeatedly, after 30 Ncm torque tightening. After 250 N cyclic loading of final prosthesis for 1,000,000 cycles, additional axial displacement was recorded. The mean axial displacement was statistically analyzed (repeated measured ANOVA). There was more axial displacement in the INT group than that of the EXT group in impression copings, resin splinted abutments, and final prosthesis. Less axial displacement was found at 1-piece non-hex transfer type impression coping than other type of impression copings in the INT group. There was more axial displacement at the final prosthesis than resin splinted abutments in the INT and the EXT groups. After 250 N cyclic loading of final prosthesis, the INT group showed more axial displacement than that of the EXT group. Internal tapered conical connection demonstrated a varying amount of axial displacement with tightening torque and cyclic loading.

Effects of Abutment Screw Coating on Implant Preload

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of tungsten carbide carbon (WC/CTa) screw surface coating on abutment screw preload in three implant connection systems in comparison to noncoated titanium alloy (Ta) screws. Preload of WC/CTa abutment screws was compared to noncoated Ta screws in three implant connection systems. The differences in preloads were measured in tightening rotational angle, compression force, initial screw removal torque, and postload screw removal torque after 1 million cyclic loads. Preload loss percent was calculated to determine the efficacy of maintaining the preload of two abutment screw types in relation to implant connection systems. WC/CTa screws provided 10 degrees higher tightening rotational angle than Ta screws in all three connection systems. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). External-hex butt joint implant connections had a higher compression force than the two internal conical implant connections. WC/CTa screws provided a statistically significantly higher compression force than Ta screws in all three implant connections (p < 0.05). Ta screws required statistically higher removal torque than WC/CTa screws in all three implant connections (p < 0.05); however, Ta screws needed statistically lower postload removal torque than WC/CTa screws in all three implant connections (p < 0.05). Ta screws had a statistically higher preload loss percent than WC/CTa screws in all three implant connections (p < 0.05), indicating that WC/CTa screws were superior in maintaining the preload than Ta screws. Within the limits of present study, the following conclusions were made: (1) WC/CTa screws provided higher preload than noncoated Ta screws in all three implant connection systems. (2) The initial removal torque for Ta screws required higher force than WC/CTa screws, whereas postload removal torque for Ta screws was lower than WC/CTa screws. Calculated Ta screw preload loss percent was higher than for WC/CTa screws, suggesting that WC/CTa screws were more effective in maintaining the preload than Ta screws. (3) Internal conical connections were more effective in maintaining the screw preload in cyclic loads than external-hex butt joint connections.

Bone Response to Loaded Implants With Non‐Matching Implant‐Abutment Diameters in the Canine Mandible

One way to evaluate various implant restorations is to measure the amount of bone change that occurs at the crestal bone. The objective of this study was to histologically evaluate the alveolar bone change around a bone-level, non-matching implant-abutment diameter configuration that incorporated a horizontal offset and a Morse taper internal connection. The study design included extraction of all mandibular premolars and first molars in five canines. After 3 months, 12 dental implants were placed at three levels in each dog: even with the alveolar crest, 1 mm above the alveolar crest, and 1 mm below the alveolar crest. The implants were submerged on one side of the mandible. On the other side, healing abutments were exposed to the oral cavity (non-submerged). Gold crowns were attached 2 months after implant placement. The dogs were sacrificed 6 months postloading, and specimens were processed for histologic and histometric analyses. Evaluation of the specimens indicated that the marginal bone remained near the top of the implants under submerged and non-submerged conditions. The amount of bone change for submerged implants placed even with, 1 mm below, and 1 mm above the alveolar crest was -0.34, -1.29, and 0.04 mm, respectively (negative values indicate bone loss). For non-submerged implants, the respective values were -0.38, -1.13, and 0.19 mm. For submerged and non-submerged implants, there were significant differences in the amount of bone change among the three groups (P <0.05). The percentage of bone-to-implant contact for submerged implants was 73.3%, 71.8%, and 71.5%. For non-submerged implants, the respective numbers were 73.2%, 74.5%, and 76%. No significant differences occurred with regard to the percentage of bone contact. Minimal histologic bone loss occurred when dental implants with non-matching implant-abutment diameters were placed at the bone crest and were loaded for 6 months in the canine. The bone loss was significantly less (five- to six-fold) than that reported for bone-level implants with matching implant-abutment diameters (butt-joint connections).

Influence of implant-abutment connection mode on stress distribution in peri-implant bone

To investigate the influence of butt joint connection and platform switching design of implant-abutment connection on the stress distribution in peri-implant bone. Three-dimensional finite element models of implant-supported mandibular first molar with different implant-abutment connections were computed by COSMOSM 2.85. Traditional butt joint connection was used in model A and platform switching design in model B. Loading conditions were a vertical load of 200 N and inclined load of the same magnitude at 45 degrees to the vertical axis of the implant. Stress distribution in peri-implant bone and von Mises stresses at the same point of buccal and lingual implant-bone interfaces in two models were compared. Stresses concentrated in peri-implant cortical bone at the neck of implants on the buccal and lingual sides; maximum von Mises stresses under inclined load were higher than those under vertical load. Maximum von Mises stress in bone was 11.61 MPa in model A and 7.15 MPa in model B under vertical load, and 22.07 MPa in model A and 11.87 MPa in model B under inclined load respectively. Von Mises stresses decreased as the distance from implant-abutment junction increased and the most obvious change occurred at the interface between cortical bone and spongy bone. Von Mises stresses at the same points of buccal and lingual implant-bone interfaces in model A were higher than those in model B. Compared with butt joint connection, platform switching design improved the stress distribution and decreased the maximum stresses in peri-implant bone around implant cervix.