Implementation Of Bundle Research Articles

Implementation of nutritional care bundle is associated with improved growth in preterm infants born before 32 gestational weeks

Implementation of nutritional care bundle is associated with improved growth in preterm infants born before 32 gestational weeks

Sleep Hygiene for the Prevention of Hospital Delirium in Neurocritical Care Patients

Background Delirium is a state of altered level of consciousness often leading to confusion, inattention, and changes to levels of cognition. Delirium increases average length of stay in the hospital and costs the US health care system approximately $148 billion each year in associated medical costs. Sleep hygiene is an important factor in delirium prevention for all hospitalized patients. Objectives This quality improvement project was designed to increase implementation of an evidence-based sleep hygiene bundle in the neurocritical care population in order to decrease rates of hospital-acquired delirium. Methods This project followed the Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) framework to facilitate a continuous quality improvement intervention at a mid-Atlantic academic medical center in the neurocritical care population. The continuous quality improvement included the incorporation of “sleep” as a topic into the daily rounding checklist, thus optimizing the ability to improve adherence to a multicomponent sleep hygiene bundle. The intervention includes the preintervention-postintervention occurrences of delirium and use of the daily rounding checklist. Results Nursing adherence to documentation of delirium assessments was high at approximately 99%. Following the intervention, there was a 41% decrease in the number of patients who screened positive for hospital-acquired delirium. Discussion The improvement in cases of hospital-acquired delirium may be attributed to the project intervention. Recommendations for future interventions include analysis of training on sleep plans, focus on nursing education regarding delirium assessment tools, or a measure of staff and/or patient satisfaction related to the intervention.

Multifaceted Control Interventions for Healthcare-associated Infections in a Kidney Transplant Intensive Care Unit: Clinical Outcome Improvement and Bundle Adherence.

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are preventable complications that overwhelm the healthcare system. The implementation of multifaceted control intervention actions in the intensive care setting modifies clinical outcomes, but its effectiveness has not been specifically investigated for high-risk patients, such as kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). This observational retrospective natural experiment evaluated the effectiveness of multifaceted control interventions (bundles) in reducing HAIs in a KTR intensive care unit. We also measured the bundle adherence rate during 16 mo in the after era. We included 1257 KTRs, 684 before and 573 in the postintervention period. After the bundle implementation, the incidence density of device-associated HAIs decreased from 8.5 to 3.9 per 1000 patient-days (relative risk [RR] = 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.85; P = 0.01), primarily because of the reduction in central line-associated bloodstream infection from 8.0 to 3.4 events per 1000 catheter-days (RR = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22-0.83; P = 0.012). Reductions in catheter-associated urinary tract infection (2.5 versus 0.6 per 1000 catheter-days; RR = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.03-1.92; P = 0.17) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (3.4 versus 1.0 per 1000 ventilator-days; RR = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.03-2.63; P = 0.27) were not significant. Central venous (P = 0.53) and urinary catheter (P = 0.47) insertion adherence were stable during 16 mo, whereas central venous (P < 0.001) and urinary catheter (P = 0.004) maintenance gradually increased. Finally, ventilator-associated pneumonia prevention bundle adherence slightly decreased over time (P = 0.06). The implementation of comprehensive multifaceted control intervention actions in an intensive care unit dedicated to KTR care was effective in significantly reducing device-associated infections. The impact was in line with the reductions observed in populations that have not undergone transplantation, underscoring the effectiveness of these interventions across different patient groups.

74 Reducing unplanned extubations in a level 3 neonatal intensive care unit - the nuts and bolts of UE bundle implementation

Abstract Background Unplanned extubations (UEs) are preventable adverse events that may lead to short term consequences (e.g. cardiopulmonary collapse) and long term sequelae (e.g. acquired airway injury, brain injury) for patients admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). UE prevention care bundles have been demonstrated to reduce UE rates in NICUs; however, implementation of bundle elements is unit dependent. Objectives To describe the work of a UE Prevention Team in a Level 3 NICU with rising UE rates despite implementation of UE prevention bundle per Children’s Hospital Solutions for Patient Safety (SPS). Design/Methods A neonatologist / respiratory therapist pair was assembled in March 2022 to tackle rising UE rates in a 69 bed NICU. Contributing unit stressors included implementation of a new electronic health record, COVID-19 policies, and nursing shortages. Baseline UE rates were &amp;gt;3x the centerline for SPS network NICUs and likely underreported. Steps undertaken include: 1) daily audit to ensure reporting of all UEs, 2) structured post-event team debriefs, 3) unit education campaign to raise awareness of UE prevention and bundle elements, 4) prominent posting of last UE date and reporting on daily team huddle, 5) rapid UE case reviews and apparent cause analysis with reporting of findings unit-wide, 6) optimize endotracheal tube (ETT) securement methods, 6) enforce T2-T3 ETT tip position, 7) standardize x-ray frequencies and reporting, 8) trial of daily rounds ETT safety checklist. Results From rapid case reviews, apparent causes were determined to be incorrect ETT securement device sizing, taping method prone to loss of tape integrity in high humidity, high ETT positions, and inadequate ETT monitoring during high risk activities other than repositioning (invasive/painful procedures, diaper changes). Post-event structured debriefs and unit-wide vigilance increased reporting of UE events to 100%. UE rates fell from a peak of &amp;gt;4 UEs/month, &amp;gt;2.4/100 ventilation days to 1 UE/month, 0.465/100 ventilation days, a 80% reduction.(Figure 1) Most impactful interventions were standard x-ray reporting template in the electronic health record, reinforcing T2-T3 ETT tip positioning, correcting ETT holder sizing, and change in ETT method (Figure 2). Daily rounds checklist was not effective. UE reductions were achieved without changing patient ratios as nurse staffing shortages continued. Conclusion A nimble systems approach is needed to ensure success in implementation of UE prevention care bundles. Simple changes can be made to decrease UEs, guided by rapid case reviews.

Implementation of Evidence-Based International Recommendations Reduces Postoperative Delirium Rate in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery or Interventions: A System-Based Quality Improvement Study.

Delirium is a frequent and serious complication of cardiac procedures that can lead to serious long-term health restrictions. As primary prevention is more effective in reducing rate of delirium than the therapy itself, this study aimed to investigate the effect of a multidisciplinary delirium prevention bundle on the postoperative delirium rate in patients undergoing cardiac procedures. In this system-based quality improvement study, a four-component delirium prevention bundle was implemented in patients undergoing cardiac procedures at a single high-volume center. The program included preoperative delirium risk stratification, multidisciplinary education of consensus guidelines, written memory aids, and post-anesthetic visits with delirium screening until postoperative day three. Overall, 234 patients were included and analyzed during the 6-month study period. The overall delirium incidence rate was 12.4%. After the first 3-month baseline implementation period, the delirium rate was 17.2%, compared with 7.6% (p = 0.026) after implementation of the delirium prevention bundle. Multivariate analysis revealed independent risk factors such as age [adjusted odds ratio (OR): 1.046; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.002-1.092; p = 0.042], double valve surgery [adjusted OR: 13.1; 95% CI: 3.240-52.974; p < 0.0001], and peripheral artery disease [adjusted OR: 8.131; 95% CI: 2.336-28.306; p < 0.001]. Hospital stay was significantly longer in patients with delirium [median 13 (12-19.5) versus 12 (11-14) days, p = 0.009]. This multidisciplinary system-based quality improvement study demonstrated a beneficial effect on the delirium rate after the implementation of a four-component delirium prevention bundle in patients undergoing cardiac surgery or intervention. Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed important independent risk factors for delirium development. This might improve early risk stratification and strategies for this high-risk patient collective.

Community-engaged implementation of a safety bundle for pregnancy-related severe hypertension in the outpatient setting: protocol for a type 3 hybrid study with a multiple baseline design

BackgroundHypertensive disorders of pregnancy are among the leading causes of maternal mortality and morbidity in the U.S., with rates highest among birthing people who are Black, rural residents, and/or have low-income. Severe hypertension, in particular, increases risk of stroke and other serious pregnancy complications. To promote early detection and treatment of severe hypertension, the Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health developed the Severe Hypertension During Pregnancy and Postpartum Period Safety Bundle (HTN Bundle). Multiple studies have demonstrated the HTN Bundle’s effectiveness in the inpatient setting. With funding from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, we engaged community partners to adapt the HTN Bundle for the outpatient setting (i.e., O-HTN Bundle) and planned for its implementation. In this paper, we describe the protocol for a study evaluating O-HTN Bundle implementation in 20 outpatient clinics serving Black, rural, and/or low-income populations.MethodsThis study is a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial with a multiple baseline design. We will implement the O-HTN Bundle in three successive cohorts of clinics using a multicomponent implementation strategy to engage community partners (coalition, patient workgroup) and support clinics (training, facilitation, education materials, and simulations of severe hypertension events). To test the strategy, we will compare clinic fidelity to evidence-based guidelines for (a) patient education on hypertension and (b) blood pressure measurement technique, with repeated measures occurring before and after strategy receipt. We will also observe strategy effects on community- and clinic-level intermediate outcomes (community engagement, organizational readiness), implementation outcomes (reach, adoption, fidelity, maintenance), and effectiveness outcomes (receipt of guideline concordant care). Analyses will address whether outcomes are equitable across Black, rural, and/or low-income subgroups. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 2.0, we will use mixed methods to identify adaptations and other determinants of implementation success.DiscussionThis study integrates community engagement and implementation science to promote equitable and timely response to severe HTN in the outpatient setting during pregnancy and postpartum. This is one of the first studies to implement an outpatient HTN Bundle and to use simulation as a strategy to reinforce team-based delivery of guideline concordant care.Trial registrationThis study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as “Testing Implementation Strategies to Support Clinic Fidelity to an Outpatient Hypertension Bundle (AC3HIEVE).” Registration number NCT06002165, August 21, 2023: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06002165.

The Use Of Simulation To Develop, Test And Implement A Multidisciplinary Team Care Pathway Bundle For Inpatients With Parkinson’s Disease

Abstract Background Hospitalised PD patients experience poorer outcomes. Model-2 hospitals lack onsite subspecialty neurology services whilst frequently managing PD inpatients. Aiming to enhance care of PD inpatients our multidisciplinary team (MDT) utilise simulation to design and deliver a new PD care pathway bundle. Methods The developed care bundle aims to facilitate i) screening for causes of PD deterioration, ii) identification of time sensitive and contraindicated medications and iii) prioritisation of timely MDT referral within the first 24 hours of admission. Using simulation of the NPO PD patient, usability of the bundle was tested through correct medication conversion (via Parkinsons calculator) and MDT clinical review for NG tube insertion with patient inclusion. Results Simulation delivery and structured debrief thereafter, further enhanced development and improvement of the simulation. It reinforced how the care bundle initiated early MDT referral and highlighted the pros/cons of MDT discussion with and without the patient. Once deemed satisfactory by all team members, ward-based simulation facilitated staff education and awareness of the new tool. Conclusion Simulation in the test and clinical environment facilitated implementation of a new MDT care pathway bundle at hospital level. Evaluation of effectiveness of the new care pathway require future audits and additional simulation campaigns.

Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Care Bundle: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

The objective was to implement an evidence-based peri-partum care bundle for women sustaining obstetric anal sphincter injuries and to evaluate compliance with recommendations for antibiotics use, repair in the operating room, and follow-up before and after implementation. This project was reviewed by the Institutional Review Board and determined to be exempt. A clinical care bundle containing education and standardized orders in the electronic medical record was implemented. Characteristics of pre- (October 2017 to September 2019) and post-intervention (October 2019 to August 2021) cohorts were compared and compliance with recommendations for antibiotics use, surgical repair location, and follow-up were evaluated. Chi-squared, Fisher's exact, ANOVA F, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed, as indicated. Significance level was p < 0.05. A total of 185 cases were identified. Seventy-five percent of women were nulliparous. Mean gestational age was 39weeks. Pre- and post-intervention groups did not differ in age, BMI, race, parity, gestational age, comorbidities, birthweight, or delivery type. Ninety-eight cases were identified pre-implementation. Eighty-six (88%) had third-degree lacerations. Post-implementation, 87 cases were identified. Seventy (80%) had third-degree lacerations (p = 0.17). Recommended antibiotic-type use improved from 35% pre-implementation to 93% post-implementation (p < 0.001). Repair in the operating room was similar pre-implementation and post-implementation (16.0% vs 12.6%, p = 0.48). Post-partum follow-up within 2weeks improved from 16.3% pre-implementation to 52.8% post-implementation and mean time to follow-up was shorter post-implementation than pre-implementation (18 vs 33days; both p < 0.001). Implementation of an evidence-based peri-partum care bundle resulted in standardization of care in accordance with established recommendations. Compliance with recommendations for surgical repair in the operating room remained unchanged.

Impact of patient safety bundle and team-based training on obstetric hypertensive emergencies.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, defined as chronic (<20 weeks) or gestational (>20 weeks), are a leading cause of pregnancy related mortality in the United States1. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had increased prevalence from 13.3% to 15.9% among delivery hospitalizations between 2017 and 20191. The objective of this project was to increase the percentage of obstetric patients with hypertensive emergency who received evidence-based treatment within 60 minutes at a single academic center. Study Design Data was collected before and after the implementation of a hypertension patient safety bundle. Each occurrence of hypertensive emergency was assessed to determine if evidence-based intervention occurred within 60 minutes, and if the intervention steps were successfully followed. Bundle implementation included creation of a standardized order set and interdisciplinary team-based simulations. Baseline data compared 250 pre-implementation to 250 post-implementation interventions. The quality improvement interdisciplinary team reevaluated data monthly and incorporated process improvements through Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) cycles to achieve a goal of 80% of patients receiving evidence-based treatment within 60 minutes. Results A total of 1025 hypertensive emergencies were identified in 543 patients. Prior to the protocol on average 64% of patients received evidence-based, timely treatment. After implementation of this bundle and several PDSA cycles, we sustained >80% of patients receiving target treatment for the final six months of data collection. The leading deviations were "no medication given" and "incorrect medication". Improvements in order set accessibility and repeated team-based trainings led to improvement in these identified protocol deviations. Conclusion Implementation of a patient safety bundle led to a sustained 6 month improvement in the percentage of patients receiving appropriate treatment of obstetric hypertensive emergency within 60 minutes of the first severe hypertension measurement. Processes that may have helped achieve this outcome included standardized order sets, team awareness of institutional data and team-based simulations.

Impact of a care bundle on short peripheral catheter-associated complications in a resource-limited neonatal unit.

Short peripheral catheter (SPC)-associated complications occur frequently in hospitalised neonates. Few studies have reported the use of SPC care bundles in resource-limited neonatal units. To evaluate the impact of a SPC care bundle on SPC associated complications (infiltration, dislodgement, phlebitis) and catheter dwell time. We conducted a quasi-experimental study comparing neonatal SPC complications during a 2-month baseline and a 2-month intervention period, where a SPC care bundle was introduced including hand hygiene, insertion site antisepsis, nurse assistance during cannulation, IV insertion carts and IV securement dressings. A total of 459 SPC days were observed in 223 neonates: 111 pre-intervention and 112 post-intervention (after SPC bundle implementation). Most neonates were preterm (208, 93.3%) with very or extremely low birth weight (133, 59.6%). SPC care bundle compliance was 43.8% for five bundle elements and 83.9% for four bundle elements. Most SPCs had unplanned removal within 48 h of insertion owing to infiltration or dislodgement (89/111 pre-intervention (80.2%) vs 90/112 post-intervention (80.4%); 0.974). No phlebitis was documented. The mean SPC dwell time was unchanged following bundle implementation (32.9 vs 34.2 h; p = 0.376). Infiltration and dislodgement occurred frequently necessitating replacement of four of every five SPCs. Despite moderate compliance with the SPC care bundle, the high rates of unplanned SPC removal and short duration of catheter dwell time were unchanged. The SPC care bundle did not improve catheter dwell time; further research is needed to identify strategies to reduce unplanned SPC removal and extend catheter dwell time in hospitalised neonates.

Impact of an enterprise-wide ambulatory antibiotic stewardship bundle on patient satisfaction surveys.

An association between antibiotic prescribing in upper respiratory infection and improved patient satisfaction has been documented, though data are mixed. Following implementation of a multifaceted antimicrobial stewardship bundle, no difference in patient satisfaction was observed between groups, despite a reduction in antibiotic prescribing from 28.3% to 14.1%.

The Impact of Infection Prevention Bundles on Neurosurgical Outcomes and Healthcare Costs: A Systematic Review

Background: Post-operative infections represent a significant challenge in neurosurgery, leading to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. The implementation of infection prevention bundles, which encompass a set of evidence-based practices, has emerged as a potential solution to mitigate these adverse outcomes. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of infection prevention bundles in improving neurosurgical outcomes and reducing healthcare costs. Methods: A comprehensive search of electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) was conducted to identify studies published between 2010 and 2023 that evaluated the impact of infection prevention bundles on neurosurgical outcomes and healthcare costs. The search strategy included keywords such as "neurosurgery," "infection prevention," "surgical site infection," "bundle," "outcomes," and "healthcare costs." Studies were included if they reported on at least one clinical outcome (e.g., surgical site infection rates, mortality, length of stay) and/or healthcare costs. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Results: The search yielded 45 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The studies encompassed a variety of neurosurgical procedures, including craniotomies, spinal surgeries, and deep brain stimulation. The infection prevention bundles implemented varied across studies but commonly included preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, skin antisepsis, and intraoperative measures. The pooled analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in surgical site infection rates and length of stay associated with the use of infection prevention bundles. Moreover, several studies reported cost savings, primarily attributed to reduced complications and shorter hospital stays. Conclusion: The evidence suggests that infection prevention bundles are effective in improving neurosurgical outcomes and reducing healthcare costs. The implementation of these bundles should be considered a standard of care in neurosurgery to enhance patient safety and optimize resource utilization. Keywords: Neurosurgery, infection prevention, surgical site infection, healthcare costs, systematic review.

Assessment of the Level of Awareness and Degree of Implementation of Central Line Bundles for Prevention of Central Line-associated Blood Stream Infection: A Questionnaire-based Observational Study.

The objective of this study was to assess the extent of knowledge and application of central line bundles in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care hospital for the purpose of avoiding central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). This assessment was conducted through the use of a questionnaire. A cross-sectional study was conducted in the ICU, involving doctors and nurses. The study was observational in nature. The study employed a methodical validated questionnaire to evaluate the level of knowledge, attitude, and practice of central line bundles for the prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). The questionnaire was designed using preexisting awareness surveillance systems, infection control measures, and patient care practices that were specifically relevant to CLABSIs in the ICU. The data were analyzed utilizing SPSS. The research involved a total of 93 healthcare professionals, consisting of 67 physicians and 26 nurses. The mean knowledge score among participants was 82%, with higher scores reported in individuals who had training in central line bundles. Healthcare professionals exhibited robust compliance with hand cleanliness, antiseptic skin preparation prior to insertion, aseptic draping of the patient, utilization of utmost sterile barriers, verification of central venous catheter (CVC) tip placement using chest X-ray or fluoroscopy, and preservation of a sterile environment. The study emphasized the significance of training in enhancing understanding and adherence to central line bundling protocols in ICUs. Participants exhibited a high level of knowledge and commitment to recommended practices, indicating that this training can have a favorable effect on CLABSI rates. Singh S, Sharma A, Dhawan M, Sharma SP. Assessment of the Level of Awareness and Degree of Implementation of Central Line bundles for Prevention of Central Line-associated Blood Stream Infection: A Questionnaire-based Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(9):847-853.

CMQCC obstetric sepsis toolkit update: A patient-centered approach to quality improvement

Obstetric sepsis is a leading cause of maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity in the United States. However, it is uncommon, and diagnosis and treatment are often delayed. This report summarizes recent work to develop a patient-centered approach for the care of patients with obstetric sepsis. To support patients, educational materials to identify warning signs paired with advocacy tips are important. Following an adverse event, outlines and checklists for patient support are provided. These tools have been developed to address a variety of obstetric conditions and have utility beyond sepsis. On the clinical side, new data to establish a standardized approach to screening and diagnosis is covered in detail. This “two-step” approach has been supported by national obstetric organizations and has similarities to the algorithm used to screen neonates for term early onset sepsis. In addition, the approach for implementation of a sepsis care bundle by the California/Michigan Obstetric Sepsis Quality Collaborative is discussed.

Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy: Progress Made and Future Directions for Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, and Implementation of a Patient Safety Bundle.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy account for approximately 5% of pregnancy-related deaths in the United States and are one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity. Focus on improving patient outcomes in the setting of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy has increased in recent years, and quality improvement initiatives have been implemented across the United States. This paper discusses patient safety and quality initiatives for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, with an emphasis on progress made and a patient safety tool: the Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health's Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy patient safety bundle. Future patient safety and quality directions for the treatment of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy will be reviewed.

A pharmacist's guide to mitigating sleep dysfunction and promoting good sleep in the intensive care unit.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. To review causes, risk factors, and consequences of sleep disruption in critically ill patients; evaluate the role of nonpharmacological and pharmacological therapies for management of sleep in the intensive care unit (ICU); and discuss the role of pharmacists in implementation of sleep bundles. Critically ill patients often have disrupted sleep and circadian rhythm alterations that cause anxiety, stress, and traumatic memories. This can be caused by factors such as critical illness, environmental factors, mechanical ventilation, and medications. Methods to evaluate sleep, including polysomnography and questionnaires, have limitations that should be considered. Multicomponent sleep bundles with a focus on nonpharmacological therapy aiming to reduce nocturnal noise, light, and unnecessary patient care may improve sleep disorders in critically ill patients. While pharmacological agents are often used to facilitate sleep in critically ill patients, evidence supporting their use is often of low quality, which limits use to patients who have sleep disruption refractory to nonpharmacological therapy. Dedicated interprofessional teams are needed for implementation of sleep bundles in the ICU. Extensive pharmacotherapeutic training and participation in daily patient care rounds make pharmacists vital members of the team who can help with all components of the bundle. This narrative review discusses evidence for elements of the multicomponent sleep bundle and provides guidance on how pharmacists can help with implementation of nonpharmacological therapies and management of neuroactive medications to facilitate sleep. Sleep bundles are necessary for patients in the ICU, and dedicated interprofessional teams that include pharmacists are vital for their successful creation and implementation.

2192 Implementation of 4AT and delirium bundle in patient management—a quality improvement project

Abstract Introduction Delirium affects up to 50% of older individuals within hospital environments, with a notable occurrence in 30% of those aged 65 and above in emergency departments. This QIP aimed to enhance the early recognition of delirium by implementing the 4AT assessment and optimise assessments and investigations by implementing the Delirium Bundle. Method A survey involving 39 doctors was conducted to evaluate their comprehension of delirium and awareness of the Delirium Bundle. PDSA 1 involved retrospective data analysis of medical records for patients admitted with delirium and used as a preliminary baseline to evaluate how the delirium bundle is being utilised. PDSA 2 integrated multiple teaching sessions and the implementation of the Delirium Bundle, assessing the effectiveness of these interventions. Results In PDSA 1, twenty-nine patients were identified. None of the patients had a 4AT assessment done. Twenty patients (69%) had a haematological screen done, eight patients (27%) had an ECG done, twenty patients (69%) had a CXR done, eighteen patients (62%) had an MSU test done, eight patients (28%) had cultures done, and twenty-three (79%) had a CT head scan done. In PDSA 2, thirty patients were identified. Seven patients had a 4AT assessment done, sixteen patients (53%) had a haematological screen done, nineteen patients (63%) had an ECG done, twenty-two patients (73%) had a CXR done, fifteen patients (50%) had an MSU test done, fourteen patients (47%) had cultures done, and 20 patients (67%) had a CT head scan done. Conclusion The implemented changes showed effectiveness with increased 4AT assessments and enhanced confusion screening. Improvements in assessments and investigations for diagnosed delirium patients were evident. To further enhance efforts, future initiatives include incorporating the 4AT assessment in clerking booklets, conducting continuous teaching sessions, and displaying posters in relevant wards.

Preventing Hypothermia in Newborns With Congenital Anomalies in the Delivery Room.

Thermoregulation interventions in the delivery room have historically focused on preterm infants and studies often exclude term infants or those infants with known congenital anomalies. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to reduce the rate of admission hypothermia in neonates of all gestational ages born with congenital anomalies and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Utilizing the Institute for Healthcare Improvement model for improvement, implementation of plan, do study, act cycles focused on standardizing temperatures of the delivery room and resuscitation bed, recommendations for temperature monitoring, trialing polyethylene lined hats, and implementing a delivery room thermoregulation checklist. Overall, the mean rate of neonates admitted to the ICU hypothermic (<36.5°C) decreased from 27% to 9% over an 8-month period. The interventions significantly reduced the number of neonates admitted to the ICU with hypothermia. Implementation of thermoregulation bundles should apply to all neonates with congenital anomalies to decrease risks associated with hypothermia.

The Perception and Use of Dexmedetomidine Among Anesthesia Providers: A Quality Improvement Project

PurposeIntraoperative opioid use is associated with postoperative nausea and vomiting, respiratory depression, and persistent postoperative pain, all of which contribute to increased length of stay and health care costs. Although research shows adding dexmedetomidine as an adjunct leads to reduced opioid-related postoperative complications, many anesthesia providers are not using this medication. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to increase the use of dexmedetomidine among anesthesia providers to improve outcomes among spinal and orthopedic surgery patients. DesignQuality improvement study. MethodsThe project consisted of a preimplementation retrospective chart review, a preimplementation staff survey, the implementation of an anesthesia training bundle, a postimplementation staff survey, and a postimplementation retrospective chart review. The team provided ongoing support for the use of dexmedetomidine with resource flyers, a recorded presentation, and provider support. FindingsPreimplementation surveys indicated staff readiness for change and identified the lack of availability of dexmedetomidine within the operating rooms as the barrier to use. After receiving education, staff requested dexmedetomidine to be stocked within every operating room. Utilization increased by 67% after the implementation of the anesthesia training bundle. ConclusionsWhile there was no significant change in opioid-related complications as is found in the literature, the project education and support led to anesthesia provider interest in using dexmedetomidine, resulting in a significant increase in use. Similar projects should include education for postanesthesia care nurses.

Intensive Care Unit Sleep Promotion Bundle: Impact on Sleep Quality, Delirium, and Other Patient Outcomes.

High-quality sleep is important for optimal patient recovery. Sleep deprivation during hospitalization may lead to poor patient outcomes. To examine whether implementation of a sleep promotion bundle in the intensive care unit affects rates of delirium and agitation, restraint use, and length of stay. An evidence-based sleep promotion bundle was developed and implemented in 2 intensive care units in a 1025-bed level I trauma teaching hospital. Deidentified data from the electronic health record were obtained for patients hospitalized before and during the intervention. Data included scores on the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, and Glasgow Coma Scale; restraint use; and hospital and intensive care unit length of stay. A total of 137 patients during the preintervention period and 149 patients during the intervention period were hospitalized in the intensive care units and met inclusion criteria. A 9-percentage-point decrease in the incidence of delirium from before to during the intervention was found, although it was not statistically significant (P = .07). Significant reductions were found in both intensive care unit (P = .04) and hospital (P = .03) length of stay. A significant decrease was found in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale high scores for patients requiring mechanical ventilation (P = .03). No significant differences were found in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale low scores, Glasgow Coma Scale scores, or restraint use. Critical care nurses are in an optimal position to implement evidence-based sleep promotion measures. Further research on sleep promotion bundles is needed.