Based on clinical and laboratory data, we analyzed the related factors leading to the resistance of topical treatment for BP patients. Totally 64 BP patients were enrolled in the study, and divided into two groups according to different methods of treatment. One of the groups contained 22 patients that showed effective to topical treatment. Another group contained 42 patients, who got more than 3 new blisters in the continuous 3 days during 4 weeks of the topical treatment, which showed resistant to topical treatment. The types of lesions, the BPDAI (Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index score, Bullous Pemphigoid Diseases Area Index) , the concentration of albumin, eosinophil counts, the titer of anti-BP180 and anti-BP230 IgG, the concentration of total IgE, the titer of anti-BP180 and anti- BP230 IgE of the two groups were analyzed by GraphPad Prism5 software, and Mann Whitney inspection methods were used for statistical analysis. The results of analysis will be helped to select the proper treatments for different BP patients. The results showed that the main lesion type of the group that showed effective to topical treatment was simple blister (68 %), and the type of erythema with blister (63%) was the major type of the patients that resistant to topical treatment. The BPDAI, EOS counts, the concentration of total IgE, the titer of anti-BP180 IgG, anti-BP230 IgG, and anti-BP230 IgE were significantly higher in the group of patients that effective to topical treatment (P < 0.05). There’s no difference of the concentration of albumin and the titer of anti-BP180 IgE between the two groups. So according to our study, in addition to BPDAI and anti-BP180 IgG titer, we can also select appropriate treatments for BP patients according to their lesion type, peripheral eosinophil counts, the concentration of total IgE, and the titer of anti-BP230 IgE.
Read full abstract