Therapeutic proteins suffer from physical and chemical instability in aqueous solution. Polysorbates and poloxamers are often added for protection against interfacial stress to prevent protein aggregation and particle formation. Previous studies have revealed that the hydrolysis and oxidation of polysorbates in parenteral formulations can lead to the formation of free fatty acid particles, insufficient long-term stabilization, and protein oxidation. Poloxamers, on the other hand, are considered to be less effective against protein aggregation. Here we investigated two lyso-phosphatidylcholines (LPCs) as potential alternative surfactants for protein formulations, focusing on their physicochemical behavior and their ability to protect against the formation of monoclonal antibody particles during mechanical stress.The hemolytic activity of LPC was tested in varying ratios of plasma and buffer mixtures. LPC effectively stabilized mAb formulations when shaken at concentrations several orders of magnitude below the onset of hemolysis, indicating that the potential for erythrocyte damage by LPC is non-critical. LPC formulations subjected to mechanical stress through peristaltic pumping exhibited comparable protein particle formation to those containing polysorbate 80 or poloxamer 188. Profile analysis tensiometry and dilatational rheology indicated that the stabilizing effect likely arises from the formation of a viscoelastic film at approximately the CMC. Data gathered from concentration-gradient multi-angle light scattering and isothermal titration calorimetry support this finding. Surfactant desorption was evaluated through sub-phase exchange experiments. While LPCs readily desorbed from the interface, resorption occurred rapidly enough in the bulk solution to prevent protein adsorption. Overall, LPCs behave similarly to polysorbate with respect to interfacial stabilization and show promise as a potential substitute for polysorbate in parenteral protein formulations.