Bromate Control Research Articles

Reinvestigation on the UV/sulfite oxidation of organic pollutants: The overlooked role of excited states and bromate control

In recent years, the UV/sulfite (S(IV)) has been proposed as a promising advanced oxidation process for water treatment in the presence of oxygen. However, the mechanism of S(IV) activation is not fully understood, as the interaction between S(IV) and photo-excited pollutants has been underexplored. In this work, an aerated UV/S(IV) system was established, and propranolol (PRO) was selected as a target pollutant. Under the irradiation at 254 nm, this system could degrade 95.6 % of PRO with 2 mM S(IV) in 60 min. The removal of PRO was positively related to the S(IV) dose, while an increasing pH exhibited a negative effect. Direct photolysis, SO4•−, and HO• collaboratively contributed to PRO removal, with SO4•− playing a primary role. Laser flash photolysis reveals that both radical cation of PRO (product of biphotonic process) and the triplet state (T1PRO) can react with HSO3− at rate constants of 5.2 × 108 M−1 s−1 and 2.1 × 107 M−1 s−1, accordingly. These reactions may offset the deficient photoactivation of S(IV) under acidic conditions. Apart from PRO, other organic pollutants could also be effectively degraded. Furthermore, this system has a great advantage over UV/persulfate due to the absence of transformation of background bromide ions to hazardous bromate. Our study significantly updates the decontaminating mechanism of organic pollutants in the aerated UV/sulfite system.

Drinking Water Quality in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

The production and transmission system of the Saudi Water Authority (SWA) faces a number of challenges in maintaining the high quality of potable water. Produced desalinated water is transmitted for long distances and is mixed with ground and surface waters of varying quality. The SWA is also in the process of converting from thermal desalination to seawater reverse osmosis which typically gives higher total dissolved solids, requiring better control of species with possible impacts on system integrity or human health. The results of monitoring across the desalination plants and transmission systems of the SWA in 2020–2022 confirm an overall high quality of water, with levels of disinfection by-products and heavy metals low in comparison to public water supplies in high-income countries dependent on surface and groundwater rather than seawater desalination. The results also indicate that continued operational improvements are required with the transition from thermal desalination technologies to reverse osmosis in order to maintain chloride at a level to avoid corrosion in the distribution system and to maintain boron and bromate within acceptable regulatory limits. Significant improvement in bromate control was observed over the course of the study, and recent innovations in post-treatment suggest that this will improve further.

Quantifying drought-driven temperature impacts on ozone disinfection credit and bromate control

Climate change and drought can lead to unprecedented changes in surface water temperature requiring utilities to examine their ozone system's disinfection capability while minimizing bromate production.

Optimizing Ozone Disinfection in Water Reuse: Controlling Bromate Formation and Enhancing Trace Organic Contaminant Oxidation.

The use of ozone/biofiltration advanced treatment has become more prevalent in recent years, with many utilities seeking an alternative to membrane/RO based treatment for water reuse. Ensuring efficient pathogen reduction while controlling disinfection byproducts and maximizing oxidation of trace organic contaminants remains a major barrier to implementing ozone in reuse applications. Navigating these challenges is imperative in order to allow for the more widespread application of ozonation. Here, we demonstrate the effectiveness of ozone for virus, coliform bacteria, and spore forming bacteria inactivation in unfiltered secondary effluent, all the while controlling the disinfection byproduct bromate. A greater than 6-log reduction of both male specific and somatic coliphages was seen at specific ozone doses as low as 0.75 O3:TOC. This study compared monochloramine and hydrogen peroxide as chemical bromate control measures in high bromide water (Br- = 0.35 ± 0.07 mg/L). On average, monochloramine and hydrogen peroxide resulted in an 80% and 36% decrease of bromate formation, respectively. Neither bromate control method had any appreciable impact on virus or coliform bacteria disinfection by ozone; however, the use of hydrogen peroxide would require a non-Ct disinfection framework. Maintaining ozone residual was shown to be critical for achieving disinfection of more resilient microorganisms, such as spore forming bacteria. While extremely effective at controlling bromate, monochloramine was shown to inhibit TrOC oxidation, whereas hydrogen peroxide enhanced TrOC oxidation.

Critical Review on Bromate Formation during Ozonation and Control Options for Its Minimization.

Ozone is a commonly applied disinfectant and oxidant in drinking water and has more recently been implemented for enhanced municipal wastewater treatment for potable reuse and ecosystem protection. One drawback is the potential formation of bromate, a possible human carcinogen with a strict drinking water standard of 10 μg/L. The formation of bromate from bromide during ozonation is complex and involves reactions with both ozone and secondary oxidants formed from ozone decomposition, i.e., hydroxyl radical. The underlying mechanism has been elucidated over the past several decades, and the extent of many parallel reactions occurring with either ozone or hydroxyl radicals depends strongly on the concentration, type of dissolved organic matter (DOM), and carbonate. On the basis of mechanistic considerations, several approaches minimizing bromate formation during ozonation can be applied. Removal of bromate after ozonation is less feasible. We recommend that bromate control strategies be prioritized in the following order: (1) control bromide discharge at the source and ensure optimal ozone mass-transfer design to minimize bromate formation, (2) minimize bromate formation during ozonation by chemical control strategies, such as ammonium with or without chlorine addition or hydrogen peroxide addition, which interfere with specific bromate formation steps and/or mask bromide, (3) implement a pretreatment strategy to reduce bromide and/or DOM prior to ozonation, and (4) assess the suitability of ozonation altogether or utilize a downstream treatment process that may already be in place, such as reverse osmosis, for post-ozone bromate abatement. A one-size-fits-all approach to bromate control does not exist, and treatment objectives, such as disinfection and micropollutant abatement, must also be considered.

A novel strategy using sulfite for bromate control during UV/persulfate oxidation of bromide-containing waters

The ultraviolet/persulfate (UV/PS) process has attracted more and more attention for water treatment. However, it runs the risk of producing bromate in the presence of bromide ions. In this work, we propose a new strategy using sulfite to inhibit bromate formation. The results show that the addition of sulfite significantly reduced the formed bromate in the UV/PS system by 61.2% and 24.5% in 30 min and 120 min, respectively. Increasing sulfite dosage or pH could enhance bromate control. From the standpoint of reaction kinetics, sulfite is likely to inhibit bromate formation by reducing bromine radicals (Br) back to bromide ions, the energy profile of which was quantified by density functional theory (DFT) calculations. In the UV/PS/sulfite system, the conversion of SO3− to HO was observed, indicating that sulfite also served as a source of reactive radicals. Moreover, sulfite apparently promoted the degradation of benzoic acid and phenol in a UV/PS system, showing advantages over other inorganic reductants. As a result, we discovered that sulfite could not only help control bromate formation in UV/PS but also improve the system’s oxidation capacity.

Empirical Modeling of Bromate Formation and Chemical Control Strategies at Multiple Water Reuse Facilities Using Ozone

ABSTRACT As an increasing number of potable water reuse projects consider feasibility of implementing ozonation for achieving disinfection goals and removal of trace organic compounds, bromate formation presents a practical barrier. In this study, data received from five potable water reuse facilities showed that ozone dissolution method such as fine bubble diffusion resulted in lower concentrations of bromate compared to side-stream addition. When using multipoint ozone dissolution some reduction in bromate formation was also observed. Data from these facilities displayed a positive correlation between ozone (as a function of O3:TOC ratio) and bromate formation (as molar ratio of bromide converted to bromate) with lower formation as monochloramine or hydrogen peroxide concentrations increase. This study provides an empirical model with four equations which can be used to estimate the bromate formation and the required monochloramine or hydrogen peroxide dose to achieve adequate bromate control, i.e. below MCL of 10 µg/L, if a desired O3:TOC ratio and initial bromide concentration are known. The empirical model estimates for monochloramine and hydrogen peroxide were found to be in good agreement with experimental data (R2 = 0.96 and R2 = 0.87, respectively) while within a set of boundary conditions expressed by range of concentrations of typical water quality parameters.

Evaluation of preformed monochloramine for bromate control in ozonation for potable reuse

Bromate, a regulated disinfection byproduct, forms during the ozonation of bromide through reactions with both ozone and hydroxyl radical. In this study, preformed monochloramine was evaluated for use as a bromate suppression method in pilot testing of wastewater reuse with an average bromide concentration of 422±20 µg/L. A dose of 3 mg/L NH2Cl-Cl2 decreased bromate formation by an average of 82% and was sufficient to keep bromate below the MCL at ozone doses up to 8.6 mg/L (1.2 O3:TOC). Removal of 1,4-dioxane through ozonation decreased with increasing NH2Cl dose, confirming that monochloramine suppresses bromate formation, at least in part, by acting as a hydroxyl radical scavenger. This may negatively impact oxidation objectives of ozonation in reuse applications. Increasing monochloramine contact time did not improve bromate suppression, indicating that monochloramine probably did not mask bromide as NHBrCl or other haloamines prior to ozonation. However, NHBrCl and NH2Br may be formed from reactions between HOBr and NH2Cl and excess free ammonia during ozonation. NDMA was formed by ozonation at concentrations up to 79 ng/L and was not enhanced by NH2Cl addition.

Effects of organic matter, ammonia, bromide, and hydrogen peroxide on bromate formation during water ozonation

Ozone is widely applied for disinfection in drinking water treatment and the disinfection by-product bromate would be produced during the ozonation of bromide-bearing water. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) addition could effectively control the formation of bromate. However, the bromate depression performance would be impacted by water qualities. In this study, typical source water containing bromide in eastern China was selected to investigate bromate depression effect under different organic matter, ammonia and bromide concentrations during the H2O2–O3 process. The results display that organic matter, ammonia and bromide concentration could influence the formation of bromate significantly. As tyrosine was applied to increase the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration of source water by 2.0 and 3.0 mg/L, the total concentration of bromate produced decreased gradually as the H2O2/O3 (g/g) doses increased from 0 to 1.0 and bromate concentration could be controlled below 10 μg/L as H2O2/O3 (g/g) was 0.5 and 1.0. As ammonia concentration increased by 0.1 and 0.5 mg/L, lower H2O2/O3 (g/g) doses would lead to an increase in bromate generation. As more H2O2 was added in water, the bromate formation would be suppressed. The increase of bromide concentration induced higher bromate formation. When the bromide concentration increased by 50 and 200 μg/L, bromate concentration was 10.7 μg/L and 41.2 μg/L respectively at the H2O2/O3 (g/g) of 1.0, higher than the standard level. As 200 μg/L of bromide was added to the water, bromate concentration increased significantly and then decreased as H2O2/O3 (g/g) increased and more H2O2 would be needed for bromate control.

Formation control of bromate and trihalomethanes during ozonation of bromide-containing water with chemical addition: Hydrogen peroxide or ammonia?

To ensure the safety of drinking water, ozone (O3) has been extensively applied in drinking water treatment plants to further remove natural organic matter (NOM). However, the surface water and groundwater near the coastal areas often contain high concentrations of bromide ion (Br−). Considering the risk of bromate (BrO3−) formation in ozonation of the sand-filtered water, the inhibitory efficiencies of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and ammonia (NH3) on BrO3− formation during ozonation process were compared. The addition of H2O2 effectively inhibited BrO3− formation at an initial Br− concentration amended to 350 µg/L. The inhibition efficiencies reached 59.6 and 100% when the mass ratio of H2O2/O3 was 0.25 and > 0.5, respectively. The UV254 and total organic carbon (TOC) also decreased after adding H2O2, while the formation potential of trihalomethanes (THMsFP) increased especially in subsequent chlorination process at a low dose of H2O2. To control the formation of both BrO3− and THMs, a relatively large dose of O3 and a high ratio of H2O2/O3were generally needed. NH3 addition inhibited BrO3− formation when the background ammonia nitrogen (NH3N) concentration was low. There was no significant correlation between BrO3− inhibition efficiency and NH3 dose, and a small amount of NH3N (0.2 mg/L) could obviously inhibit BrO3− formation. The oxidation of NOM seemed unaffected by NH3 addition, and the structure of NOM reflected by synchronous fluorescence (SF) scanning remained almost unchanged before and after adding NH3. Considering the formation of BrO3− and THMs, the optimal dose of NH3 was suggested to be 0.5 mg/L.

Efficient catalytic activity and bromate minimization over lattice oxygen-rich MnOOH nanorods in catalytic ozonation of bromide-containing organic pollutants: Lattice oxygen-directed redox cycle and bromate reduction

The inhibition of bromate formation is a challenge for the application of ozonation in water treatment due to the carcinogenicity and nephrotoxicity of bromate. In this study, the high-mobility lattice oxygen-rich MnOOH nanorods were synthesized successfully and applied for the bromate inhibition during catalytic ozonation in bromide and organic pollutants-containing wastewater treatment. The catalytic ozonation system using lattice oxygen-rich MnOOH nanorods exhibited an excellent performance in bromate control with an inhibition efficiency of 54.1% compared with the sole ozonation process. Furthermore, with the coexistence of 4-nitrophenol, the catalytic ozonation process using lattice oxygen-rich MnOOH nanorods could inhibit the bromate formation and boost the degradation of 4-nitrophenol simultaneously. Based on the experiments of ozone decomposition, surface manganese inactivation and reactive oxygen species detection, the inhibition of bromate could be attributed to the effective decomposition of ozone with generating more ·O2- and the reduction of bromate into bromide by lattice oxygen-rich MnOOH. The existed surface Mn(IV) on lattice oxygen-rich MnOOH can accept electrons from lattice oxygen and ·O2- to generate surface transient Mn(II)/Mn(III), in which Mn(II)/Mn(III) can promote the reduction of bromate into bromide during catalytic ozonation. This study provides a promising strategy for the development of bromate-controlling technologies in water treatment.

Ammonia-Mediated Bromate Inhibition during Ozonation Promotes the Toxicity Due to Organic Byproduct Transformation.

Ammonia (NH4+) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) have been widely used to inhibit bromate formation during ozonation. However, organic byproducts can also pose a risk under these conditions. During bromate inhibition, the influence of NH4+ and H2O2 on organic byproducts and their toxicity should be elucidated. Our study found that NH4+ suppressed organic bromine, but might result in increased toxicity. Adding 0.5 mg/L of NH4+-N substantially increased both the formation of cytotoxicity and genotoxicity (DNA double-strand breaks) of organic byproducts from 0.6 to 1.6 mg-phenol/L, and from 0.3 to 0.8 μg-4-NQO/L (0.5 mg/L Br-, 5 mg/L O3). NH4+ decreased bromate, but increased the overall toxicity of the integrated byproducts (organic byproducts and bromate). Organic nitrogen measurements and 15N isotope analysis showed enhanced incorporation of nitrogen into organic matter when NH4+ and Br- coexisted during ozonation. NH4+ decreased the formation of brominated acetonitriles, but enhanced the formation of brominated nitromethanes and brominated acetamides. These brominated nitrogenous byproducts were partially responsible for this increase in toxicity. Different from ammonia, H2O2 could reduce both bromate and the toxicity of organic byproducts. In the presence of 0.5 mg/L Br- and 10 mg/L O3, adding H2O2 (0.5 mM) substantially suppressed bromate, cytotoxicity formation and genotoxicity formation by 88%, 63% and 67%. This study highlights that focusing on bromate control with NH4+ addition might result in higher toxicity. Efforts are needed to effectively control the toxicities of bromate and organic byproducts simultaneously.

Implications of bromate depression from H2O2 addition during ozonation of different bromide-bearing source waters

Minimizing bromate formation by adding H2O2 is one major option for bromide-containing source water when applying ozone in drinking water. However, difference in background water quality can have a significant influence on bromate depression. In this study, three bromide-bearing source waters (YZ, HR and HP) were selected to investigate bromate depression during the H2O2-ozonation process. The results showed that there was strong correlation between bromate formation and molecular ozone consumption during ozonation process for the three waters. Compared to YZ and HR, ozone was consumed quickly within about 10 min for HP water, inducing lower bromate formation during ozonation process. In the initial step of bromide oxidation, molecular ozone oxidation was responsible for more than 80% of oxidation, much higher than that by hydroxyl radicals. Specifically, 94% of the oxidation of bromide occurred with ozone for YZ water, which might be attributed to the low concentration of organic matter in the water. The residual molecular ozone would be a restrictive factor and affect the bromate formation significantly. For YZ and HP water, as H2O2/O3 (g/g) increased to 0.5, the ozone decomposition rate increased 61 times and 7.2 times respectively, which resulted in difference in bromate depression performance when applying H2O2. Humic acid and tyrosine in water were confirmed to have effects on bromate formation and depression after H2O2 addition. This study could elucidate the different bromate depression effects occurring in different source waters when adding H2O2, which will provide an informative guide for bromate control in drinking water treatment.

Comparison of emerging contaminant abatement by conventional ozonation, catalytic ozonation, O3/H2O2 and electro-peroxone processes

The abatement of several emerging contaminants (ECs) in groundwater by conventional ozonation and three ozone-based advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) - catalytic ozonation with manganese dioxide (MnO2), conventional peroxone (O3/H2O2), and electro-peroxone (EP) - was compared in this study. The addition of MnO2, H2O2, or electro-generation of H2O2 during ozonation enhanced ozone transformation to hydroxyl radicals to different extent. These changes did not considerably influence the abatement of ECs with moderate to high ozone reactivities (kO3≥500 M-1s-1), whose abatements were similar with >90 % during all four processes. In comparison, the abatements of ozone-refractory ECs (kO3< 15 M-1s-1) were lower during conventional ozonation (∼40–85 % abatement), but could be enhanced by ∼10–40 % during the three ozone-based AOPs. Besides enhancing ozone-refractory EC abatement, the three AOPs, especially the O3/H2O2 and EP processes, reduced considerably bromate formation compared to conventional ozonation. These results demonstrate that the EP process performs similarly as catalytic ozonation and O3/H2O2 processes in terms of EC abatement and bromate control. Considering its more convenient, flexible, and safer way of operation, the EP process may provide an attractive alternative to the two more traditional AOPs for water treatment.

Bromate control during ozonation by ammonia-chlorine and chlorine-ammonia pretreatment: Roles of bromine-containing haloamines

The ammonia-chlorine (NH3-Cl2) and chlorine-ammonia (Cl2-NH3) pretreatment strategies are commonly used for controlling bromate formation during the ozonation of bromide-containing waters. In this study, the roles of bromine-containing haloamines in ozonation after both strategies are identified at different pHs and initial bromide dosages. Bromide is primarily masked as bromochloramine (NHBrCl) and monobromamine (NH2Br) in the NH3-Cl2 and Cl2-NH3 strategies, respectively, and partially masked as dibromamine (NHBr2) with similar concentrations (p > 0.05) in both strategies. NHBrCl and NHBr2 are 4 times more stable than NH2Br in the presence of ozone, while they are all recalcitrant to HO, and thus make the NH3-Cl2 strategy control the bromate formation better than the Cl2-NH3 strategy. At pH 6, the Cl2-NH3 strategy reduces 15–36% of the bromate formation comparing with those at pHs 7 and 8, because more NH2Br is transformed to stable NHBr2, while the NH3-Cl2 strategy is less pH-dependent, because the NHBrCl concentrations remain the same at different pHs (p > 0.05). At initial bromide concentrations of 6.25–18.75 µM, the Cl2-NH3 strategy shows no difference in controlling the bromate formation (p > 0.05). However, ~2.5-time more bromate is formed at the bromide concentration of 18.75 µM comparing with those at 6.25 and 12.5 µM, in the NH3-Cl2 strategy, because the 6-min NH3-Cl2 pretreatment is insufficient to mask all bromide at high concentrations as NHBrCl. This study demonstrates that the masking of larger amount of bromide as NHBrCl and NHBr2 in ozonation after either strategy is essential in controlling the bromate formation.

Pilot-scale UV/H2O2-BAC process for drinking water treatment – Analysis and comparison of different activated carbon columns

An UV/H2O2-BAC combination process was developed and the effects of activated carbon columns with carbon of different ages and particle sizes were compared and inspected under long-term operation conditions. In addition, differences in the microbial community structure of the biological membrane on the surface of the activated carbons was explored by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and high-throughput sequencing. Furthermore, the removal efficiency of organic matter and the microbial community structure were compared between UV/H2O2-BAC and O3-BAC processes under the same treatment conditions. The results showed that younger carbon age and smaller particle size were associated with higher organic matter removal rates. Additionally, Actinobacteria and Legionella were the main microorganisms for BAC to degrade hydrogen peroxide, and the microbial species of the four activated carbons were basically the same, differing only in abundance. When compared with the O3-BAC process, the UV/H2O2-BAC process had higher removal efficiency for organic matter and higher effluent safety. Overall, the results indicate the UV/H2O2-BAC process can be used as an alternative to the O3-BAC process for control of bromate.

Optimization of ozonation and peroxone process for simultaneous control of micropollutants and bromate in wastewater.

The study aims to simultaneously control micropollutants and bromate formations by using ozonation and peroxone process. The batch experiments were run with variations in specific ozone dose (SOD) and hydrogen peroxide-to-ozone (H2O2/O3) ratio. Based on the removal by ozonation and peroxone, micropollutants were categorized into three groups: non-reactive compounds (i.e. amidotrizoate), moderately reactive compounds (i.e. metoprolol, acesulfame potassium, bezafibrate, and benzotriazole), and highly reactive compounds (i.e. carbamazepine and diclofenac). For ozonation and peroxone process, the removals for highly reactive compounds and moderately reactive compounds were 82-99% and 29-99%, respectively. The removal of amidotrizoate was not observed in this study. The effect of ozonation on micropollutant removals was similar to the peroxone process. However, differences in bromate formation were observed. Bromate formation depended on the SOD, while addition of hydrogen peroxide suppressed the bromate formation. The peroxone process at the H2O2/O3 ratio of 0.3 was recommended to bromide-containing water below 100 µg·L-1 for simultaneous control of micropollutants and bromate. Enhancement in micropollutant removals, except for the non-reactive groups, was achieved with either higher SOD or the addition of hydrogen peroxide to ozonation. The micropollutant removal predicted from the second-order kinetic reaction with ozone and •OH exposures was higher than the observed data.

Pilot-scale evaluation of micropollutant abatements by conventional ozonation, UV/O3, and an electro-peroxone process

The electro-peroxone (E-peroxone) process is an emerging ozone-based advanced oxidation process (AOP) that has shown large potential for micropollutant abatement in water treatment. To evaluate its performance under more realistic conditions of water treatment, a continuous-flow pilot E-peroxone system was developed and compared with conventional ozonation and a UV/O3 process for micropollutant abatements in various water matrices (groundwater, surface water, and secondary wastewater effluent) in this study. With a specific ozone dose of 1.5 mg O3/mg DOC, micropollutants that have high and moderate reactivity with ozone (O3) (diclofenac, naproxen, gemfibrozil, and bezafibrate) could be sufficiently abated (>90% abatement) in the various waters by all three processes. However, ozone-resistant micropollutants (ibuprofen, clofibric acid, and chloramphenicol) were abated only by ∼32–68%, 68–91%, and 73–90% during conventional ozonation of the selected groundwater, surface water, and secondary wastewater effluent, respectively. By electro-generating H2O2 or applying UV irradiation to enhance O3 transformation to •OH during ozonation, the E-peroxone and UV/O3 processes similarly enhanced the abatement efficiencies of ozone-resistant micropollutants by ∼15–43%, ∼5–15%, and ∼5–10% in the groundwater, surface water, and secondary wastewater effluent, respectively. In addition, the E-peroxone and UV/O3 processes significantly reduced bromate formation during the treatment of the three waters compared to conventional ozonation. Due to its higher efficiency, the E-peroxone process reduced ∼10–53% of the energy consumption required to abate the concentration of chloramphenicol (the most ozone-resistant micropollutant spiked in the waters) by 1 order of magnitude in the three waters compared to conventional ozonation. In contrast, the UV/O3 process consumed approximately 4–10 times higher energy than conventional ozonation. This pilot-scale study demonstrates that the E-peroxone process can provide a feasible, effective, and energy-efficient alternative for micropollutant abatement and bromate control in water and wastewater treatment.

Options and limitations for bromate control during ozonation of wastewater

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are important point sources for micropollutants, which are harmful to freshwater organisms. Ozonation of wastewater is a powerful option to abate micropollutants, but may result in the formation of the potentially toxic oxidation by-product bromate in bromide-containing wastewaters. This study investigates options to reduce bromate formation during wastewater ozonation by (i) reducing the bromide concentration of the wastewater, (ii) lowering the ozone dose during wastewater treatment and (iii) adding hydrogen peroxide to limit the lifetime of ozone and quench the intermediates of the bromate formation pathway. Two examples demonstrate that a high share of bromide in wastewater can originate from single point sources (e.g., municipal waste incinerators or landfills). The identification of major point sources requires laborious sampling campaigns, but may facilitate the reduction of the bromide load significantly. To reduce the bromate formation by lowering the ozone dose interferes with the aim to abate micropollutants. Therefore, an additional treatment is necessary to ensure the elimination of micropollutants. Experiments at a pilot-plant illustrate that a combined treatment (ozone/powdered activated carbon) allows to eliminate micropollutants with low bromate yields. Furthermore, the addition of hydrogen peroxide was investigated at bench-scale. The bromate yields could be reduced by ∼50% and 65% for a hydrogen peroxide dose of 5 and 10 mg L−1, respectively. In conclusion, there are options to reduce the bromate formation during wastewater ozonation, however, they are not simple with sometimes limited efficiency.

Unlocking the Mysteries of Ozonation: the Interplay between TOC Removal, Pathogen Inactivation and Bromate Control through Pilot- and Bench-scale Investigation

Unlocking the Mysteries of Ozonation: the Interplay between TOC Removal, Pathogen Inactivation and Bromate Control through Pilot- and Bench-scale Investigation