The positioning accuracy of rectal radiotherapy patients was greatly affected by the immobilization gadget, breathing motion, bladder volume etc. Prone is one of the common treatment positions for rectum radiotherapy patients as it can displace the small bowels to reduce side effects. Our team would like to further enhance positioning accuracy by evaluating different positioning approaches. A total of 16 patients from each group were selected retrospectively. All patients fulfilled the bladder (±20% of CT-sim bladder volume) and bowel (empty bowel before the treatment) protocol before entering the treatment unit. Group A patients were positioned using commercial prone pelvic board (Orfit, Belgium) combined with thermoplastic membrane and skin markings; Group B patients were fixed with innovative prone pelvic board and vac-bag which positioned using skin markings. First three fractions and once weekly CBCT images were retrieved for data analysis. Group C patients were fixed the same as Group B and positioned using skin markings during the first fraction. New reference surface for the SGRT system (Vision RT Ltd, UK) was captured after CBCT shifts applied. The subsequent treatment, patient was aligned to ±0.1 cm and ±1.5° according to the new reference surface. CBCT shifts that were taken at fraction 2, 3, 4 and once weekly were recorded in 6 degrees of freedom. A total of 112 sets of data were retrieved from each groups respectively. The results were compared using nonparametric tests based on the normal distribution of the data. PTV margins (M) were calculated using the formula M = 2.5Σ+0.7σ. Positioning errors were shown in Table 1. The median positioning errors was statistically significant in lateral, vertical, roll and yaw for Group A and B. Whereas, Group C positioning errors was superior to Group B in all axes (p<0.05) except roll and yaw directions. The margins of Group A, B and C were 0.68cm, 1.17cm and 0.62cm; 0.56cm, 0.99cm and 0.75cm; 0.39cm, 0.36cm and 0.34cm in lateral, longitudinal and vertical directions. The results shown that Group B margins was smaller than Group A in lateral and longitudinal directions. Group C required the least margins. Positioning prone rectum patients using innovative pelvic board with the aid of surface guidance resulted in higher accuracy and smaller margins especially in longitudinal direction. Accurate positioning and good reproducibility could potentially reduce the margins from 6mm to 4mm for our prone rectum radiotherapy patients.