Donation After Brain Death Research Articles

Benefits of Living Over Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation in Elderly Recipients. A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of a Large European Registry Cohort.

Although kidney transplantation from living donors (LD) offers better long-term results than from deceased donors (DD), elderly recipients are less likely to receive LD transplants than younger ones. We analyzed renal transplant outcomes from LD versus DD in elderly recipients with a propensity-matched score. This retrospective, observational study included the first single kidney transplants in recipients aged ≥65years from two European registry cohorts (2013-2020, n = 4,257). Recipients of LD (n = 408), brain death donors (BDD, n = 3,072), and controlled cardiocirculatory death donors (cDCD, n = 777) were matched for donor and recipient age, sex, dialysis time and recipient diabetes. Major graft and patient outcomes were investigated. Unmatched analyses showed that LD recipients were more likely to be transplanted preemptively and had shorter dialysis times than any DD type. The propensity score matched Cox's regression analysis between LD and BDD (387-pairs) and LD and cDCD (259-pairs) revealing a higher hazard ratio for graft failure with BDD (2.19 [95% CI: 1.16-4.15], p = 0.016) and cDCD (3.38 [95% CI: 1.79-6.39], p < 0.001). One-year eGFR was higher in LD transplants than in BDD and cDCD recipients. In elderly recipients, LD transplantation offers superior graft survival and renal function compared to BDD or cDCD. This strategy should be further promoted to improve transplant outcomes.

Impact of Warm Ischemia Time on Donation After Circulatory Death Kidney Transplant Outcomes.

Efforts to address the shortage of donor organs include increasing the use of renal allografts from donors after circulatory death (DCD). While warm ischemia time (WIT) is thought to be an important factor in DCD kidney evaluation, few studies have compared the relationship between WIT and DCD kidney outcomes, and WIT acceptance practices remain variable. We conducted a single-center retrospective review of all adult patients who underwent deceased donor kidney transplantation from 2000 to 2021. We evaluated the impact of varied functional warm ischemia time (fWIT) in controlled DCD donors by comparing donor and recipient characteristics and posttransplant outcomes between high fWIT (>60min), low fWIT (≤60min), and kidneys transplanted from donors after brain death (DBD). Two thousand eight hundred eleven patients were identified, 638 received low fWIT DCD, 93 received high fWIT DCD, and 2080 received DBD kidneys. There was no significant difference in 5-year graft survival between the DCD low fWIT, high fWIT, and DBD groups, with 84%, 83%, and 83% of grafts functioning, respectively. Five-year patient survival was 91% in the low fWIT group, 92% in the high fWIT group, and 90% in the DBD group. An increase in kidney donor risk index (KDRI) (HR 3.37, 95% CI=2.1-5.7) and high CIT compared to low CIT (HR 2.12, 95% CI=1.4-3.1) have higher hazard ratios for 1-year graft failure. Increased acceptance of kidneys from selected DCD donors with prolonged fWIT may present an opportunity to increase kidney utilization while preserving outcomes. Our group specifically prioritizes the use of kidneys from younger donors, with lower KDPI, and without acute kidney injury, or risk factors for underlying chronic kidney disease.

Coronary computed tomographic angiographic imaging of cardiac allograft preserved in Paragonix SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation is emerging as an alternative pathway to traditional donation after brain death (DBD) to expand the heart donor pool. Greater adoption of DCD heart allografts is hampered by the logistical and ethical constraints to perform invasive ante mortem testing, thus limiting the capacity for the standard donor organ quality evaluation. Identification of the absence of coronary artery disease in patients at risk is an essential prerequisite for organ acceptance by an implant institution. This case presents the novel approach to the examination of coronary arteries in a cardiac allograft. We demonstrated that the coronary computed tomographic angiographic (CTA) imaging of an ex-situ non-beating cardiac allograft preserved after recovery in SherpaPak® Cardiac Transport System (CTS) is technically feasible. The images are of good quality and allow for 3D reconstruction as well as quantification of coronary lesions.

Increasing Multiorgan Heart Transplantations From Donation After Circulatory Death Donors in the United States.

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors are becoming an important source of organs for heart-transplantation (HT), but there are limited data regarding their use in multiorgan-HT. Between January 2020 and June 2023, we identified 87 adult multiorgan-HTs performed using DCD-donors [77 heart-kidney, 6 heart-lung, 4 heart-liver] and 1494 multiorgan-HTs using donation after brain death (DBD) donors (1141 heart-kidney, 165 heart-lung, 188 heart-liver) in UNOS. For heart-kidney transplantations (the most common multiorgan-HT combination from DCD-donors), we also compared donor/recipient characteristics, and early outcomes, including 6-month mortality using Kaplan-Meier (KM) and Cox hazards-ratio (Cox-HR). Use of DCD-donors for multiorgan-HTs in the United States increased from 1% in January to June 2020 to 12% in January-June 2023 (p < 0.001); but there was a wide variation across UNOS regions and center volumes. Compared to recipients of DBD heart-kidney transplantations, recipients of DCD heart-kidney transplantations were less likely to be of UNOS Status 1/2 at transplant (35.06%vs. 69.59%) and had lower inotrope use (22.08%vs. 43.30%), lower IABP use (2.60%vs. 26.29%), but higher durable CF-LVAD use (19.48%vs. 12.97%), all p < 0.01. Compared to DBD-donors, DCD-donors used for heart-kidney transplantations were younger [28(22-34) vs. 32(25-39) years, p=0.004]. Recipients of heart-kidney transplantations from DCD-donors and DBD-donors had similar 6-month survival using both KM analysis, and unadjusted and adjusted Cox-HR models, including in propensity matched cohorts. Rates of PGF and in-hospital outcomes were also similar. Use of DCD-donors for multiorgan-HTs has increased rapidly in the United States and early outcomes of DCD heart-kidney transplantations are promising.

Extended Criteria Donor Use in Lung Transplants From Donation After Controlled Circulatory Death

BackgroundMost institutions apply the criteria for controlled donation after cardiac death (cDCD) lung retrieval identical to the criteria for donation after brain death (DBD). The availability of extended criteria donor (ECD) in lung transplants from cDCD remains unclear. MethodsThe United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for adult lung transplants from cDCD, from May 03, 2005, to March 15, 2022. ECDs were defined by one or more items at variance from standard criteria: age 55 years or more, PaO2:FiO2 300 or less, smoking 20 pack-years or more, diabetes, or purulent secretions upon bronchoscopy. Recipients were divided into the standard criteria donor (SCD) group and the ECD group, and assessed for short- and long-term survival and postoperative events. ResultsAmong 827 records, the SCD and ECD group showed no differences in 5-year (P = .56) survival. No significant differences were found in 30-day, 90-day, 1-year mortality and postoperative outcomes before discharge, whether in length of hospital stay, rate of ventilator support for >48 hours or reintubation, incidence of grade 3 PGD 72 hours posttransplant, acute rejection, or dialysis. None of the 5 donor factors used as criteria for lung retrieval was independently associated with cDCD recipient survival. ConclusionsUsing donor lungs that extend the DBD criteria may be a safe strategy in cDCD lung transplantation. However, the current criteria may not be a perfect fit for cDCD lung retrieval. The specific DCD criteria for standard lung retrieval need to be determined.

Graft Steatosis and Donor Diabetes Mellitus Additively Impact on Recipient Outcomes After Liver Transplantation-A European Registry Study.

Biopsy-proven severe graft steatosis is associated with adverse outcomes after liver transplantation. The concomitant presence of metabolic risk factors might further increase this risk. We studied the association between graft steatosis and metabolic risk factors in the donor, with recipient outcomes after liver transplantation. We analyzed data from all consecutive first adult full-graft donation after brain death (DBD) liver transplantations performed in the Eurotransplant region between 2010 and 2020. The presence of graft steatosis and metabolic risk factors was assessed through a review of donor (imaging) reports, and associations with recipient retransplantation-free survival were studied through survival analyses. Of 12174 transplantations, graft steatosis was detected in 2689 (22.1%), and donor diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, and dyslipidemia were present in 1245 (10.2%), 5056 (41.5%), and 524 (4.3%). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, graft steatosis (adjusted HR [aHR] 1.197, p<0.001) and donor DM (aHR 1.157, p=0.004) were independently associated with impaired retransplantation-free survival. Graft steatosis and donor DM conferred an additive risk of retransplantation or death (DM alone, aHR: 1.156 [p=0.0185]; steatosis alone, aHR: 1.200 [p<0.001]; both steatosis and DM, aHR: 1.381 [p<0.001]). Findings were consistent in sensitivity analyses focusing on retransplantation-free survival within 7 days. Graft steatosis and donor diabetes mellitus additively increase the risk of retransplantation or death in adult DBD liver transplantation. Future studies should focus on methods to assess and improve the quality of these high-risk grafts. Until such time, caution should be exercised when considering these grafts for transplantation.

Survival, function, and immune profiling after beating heart transplantation

ObjectiveEx vivo normothermic perfusion of cardiac allografts has expanded the donor pool for heart transplant. Using a beating heart implantation method avoids the second cardioplegic arrest and subsequent ischemia-reperfusion injury typically associated with ex vivo heart perfusion. We sought to describe our institutional experience with beating heart transplantation. MethodsThis was a single-institution retrospective study of adult patients who underwent heart transplantation using ex vivo heart perfusion (EVHP) and a beating heart implantation technique between October 2022 and March 2024. Primary outcomes of interest included survival, initiation of mechanical circulatory support, and rejection. A subanalysis of our institutional series of nonbeating deceased after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantations was performed as well. ResultsTwenty-four patients underwent isolated heart transplantation with the use of ex vivo heart perfusion and beating heart implantation between October 2022 and March 2024; 21 (87.5%) received hearts from DCD donors, and 3 (12.5%) received hearts from deceased after brain death (DBD) donors. The median duration of follow-up was 192 days (interquartile range [IQR], 124-253.5 days), and 23 out of 24 patients (95.8%) were alive at last follow-up. No patients required initiation of mechanical circulatory support. The majority of patients had pathologic grade 0 rejection at the time of biopsy (n = 16; 66.7%), and the median cell-free DNA percent was 0.04% (IQR, 0.04%-0.09%). The rate of mechanical circulatory support initiation in the 22-patient nonbeating DCD heart transplant cohort was significantly higher, at 36.4% (P < .005). ConclusionsA beating heart implantation technique can be used for transplantation of DCD and DBD hearts on EVHP and is associated with excellent survival and low levels of rejection.

Impact of Donor Warm Ischemia Time on Graft Survival for Donation After Circulatory Death Kidney Transplantation.

The utilization of kidneys donated after circulatory death (DCD) is an important strategy to address the ongoing shortage of organs suitable for transplantation in the United States. However, the nonuse rate of DCD kidneys remains high compared with kidneys donated after brain death (DBD) because of concerns regarding the injury incurred during donor warm ischemia time (DWIT). Therefore, we investigated the impact of DWIT on the risk of death-censored graft failure after DCD kidney transplantation (KT). Retrospective analysis was conducted on DCD KTs using the Standard Transplant Analysis and Research data set. The association of DWIT with death-censored graft failure was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression, with reference to DCD KTs with Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) of ≤0.78 and the median DWIT of 26 min. A total of 28 032 DCD kidney-alone transplants between January 2010 and December 2021 were studied. When stratified by KDRI, increasing DWIT was associated with a clinically significant increased risk for death-censored graft failure only in the subset of kidneys with KDRI >1.14 but not in those with KDRI >0.78-≤0.94 and >0.94-≤1.14, compared with the reference group. We suggest that clinicians should not decline kidneys on the basis of DWIT in favor of potential offers of DBD or other DCD kidneys with shorter DWIT, provided that their KDRI scores are within an acceptable limit. Our study highlights opportunities for more efficient usage of DCD kidneys and improving the shortage of transplantable organs.

Predicting outcomes after transplantation of deceased donor kidneys of marginal quality within the Eurotransplant service area.

Kidneys of marginal quality are increasingly being used to overcome the shortage of donor organs. However, accurate prediction of outcome is needed to optimise the use of these kidneys. We aimed to test the performance of a recently proposed score consisting of delayed graft function (DGF), renal function recovery (RFR), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) &lt;30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 90 days after transplantation for risk assessment of patient and graft survival. A total of 221 adult brain death donors with marginal kidneys, transplanted into 223 recipients within Eurotransplant were included in the analysis. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to assess death-censored and all-cause censored graft failure and recipient mortality at one and three years. Recipients with DGF had a higher risk of death-censored graft loss (HR, 95%CIs: 3.058 (1.195 - 7.825)). Recipients with a GFR &lt;30ml/min/1.73m² at 90 days after transplantation had a higher risk of death censored and all-cause graft failure (HR, 95%CIs: 2.122 (1.129-3.990 and 2.122 (1.129 - 3.990)). None of the three components of the proposed score was associated with a higher risk of mortality. DGF and eGFR &lt;30 ml/min/1.73m² but not RFR at 90 days predicted graft failure after transplantation of marginal kidneys. However, no combination of these factors was able to predict short-term patient and graft survival.

Routine end-ischemic hypothermic machine perfusion in liver transplantation from donors after brain death: results of two-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

Data on routine hypothermic machine perfusion of livers procured from donors after brain death (DBD) are scarce, and the benefits of the method have only been demonstrated in extended criteria grafts. The aim of this study was to assess if end-ischemic dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (dHOPE) is superior to static cold storage (SCS) in preservation of livers procured from DBD donors with respect to long-term outcomes. Existing data on short-term outcomes favours dHOPE in patients receiving high-risk grafts. This prospective randomized controlled trial included 104 recipients of DBD livers randomly assigned to static cold storage arm (78 patients) and dHOPE arm (26 patients). Endpoints of interest were occurrence of biliary complications (biliary fistula, anastomotic, and nonanastomotic strictures) and overall patient (OS) and graft survival (GS) during two-year follow-up. A total of 36 patients developed biliary complications (at least one event) - 6 events in dHOPE arm and 30 in SCS arm. There was no significant difference in biliary complications between groups (23.7% vs. 43.4% [P=0.11]). No differences were found significant with respect to anastomotic (19.9% vs. 33.7% [P=0.20]) and non-anastomotic strictures (0% vs. 11.1% [P=0.10]) as well as biliary fistulas (11.7% vs. 12.2% [P=0.93]). Survival analysis did not show significantly different result in the study population - OS: 92.3% in dHOPE and 83.9% in SCS (P=0.35), and GS: 92.3% and 81.4% (P=0.23), respectively. However, significant difference in GS was noted in recipients of high-risk grafts - 100% in dHOPE and 73.1% in SCS, respectively (P=0.038). The long-term outcome data suggest that the routine use of dHOPE may be beneficial for recipients of high-risk grafts from DBD donors. The present study does not provide any evidence for benefits of dHOPE in low-risk grafts.

A multicenter analysis of lung transplantation outcomes comparing donation after circulatory death and donation after brain death

BackgroundDonor organ shortage is a barrier to lung transplantation. Donation after circulatory death (DCD) may offer a solution, although it is underutilized. The objective of this study was to compare survival and other postoperative outcomes between DCD and donation after brain death (DBD). MethodsWe performed a multi-center analysis of Multi-Institutional Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS) Registry data from 11 lung transplant centers in the United States and Europe. Demographics and clinical parameters were compared using Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared by log-rank test with propensity score matching. ResultsOf 1585 patients included in the study, 135 (8.5%) received DCD lungs and 1450 (91.5%) received DBD lungs. DCD recipients had higher rates of obstructive lung disease (p=0.042), longer total ischemic time (p<0.0001), and higher rates of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) at t0h (p<0.0001) and t24h (p=0.0005). PGD at t48h and t72h was not significantly different between DCD and DBD recipients. 90-day survival was lower among DCD recipients (91.2%) compared to DBD recipients (97.4%, p=0.038). Survival was higher without ECLS (p=0.014), whereas EVLP (p=0.47) did not affect survival. ConclusionOverall, our data showed excellent 90-day survival for DCD and DBD recipients, although DCD recipients had relatively lower survival. EVLP was not associated with survival, which may guide future strategies to optimize DCD utilization.

Long-term Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation From DBD Donors Aged 70 y and Older.

Transplantation of kidneys from elderly donations after brain death (DBD) donors has increased owing to organ shortages. We aimed to assess the impact on long-term kidney transplant outcomes from DBD donors aged 70 y and older compared with kidneys from younger donors. From 2007 to 2022, 2274 first single kidney transplantations from DBD donors were performed at our center. Data from 1417 kidney transplant recipients receiving a DBD organ were included and categorized into 3 groups according to donor age: 70 y and older (n = 444, median age 74 y), 60-69 y (n = 527, median age 64 y), and a reference group consisting of donors aged 45-54 y (n = 446, median age 50 y). Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariate Cox regression with correction for recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics were used to investigate patient and kidney graft survival outcomes. The median patient follow-up time was 9.3 y (interquartile range, 5.3-13.1). The adjusted hazard ratios for patient death in recipients of kidneys from DBD donors aged 70 y and older compared with 60-69 y and 45-54 y were 1.12 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-1.36; P = 0.26) and 1.62 (95% CI, 1.26-2.07; P < 0.001), respectively. Compared with recipients of donors aged 60-69 y and 45-54 y, the adjusted hazard ratios for kidney graft loss in recipients of donors aged 70 y and older were 1.23 (95% CI, 1.02-1.48; P = 0.029) and 1.94 (95% CI, 1.54-2.45; P < 0.001), respectively. Transplantation of kidneys from DBD donors aged 70 y and older resulted in acceptable long-term outcomes and is encouraging.

Potential Association of Blood Transfusion in Deceased Donors With Outcomes of Liver Transplantation in the United States

BackgroundDonor blood transfusion may potentially affect transplant outcomes through an inflammatory response, recipient sensitization, or transmission of infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of donor blood transfusion with outcomes of liver transplantation (LT). MethodsFrom January 2004 to December 2022, donor blood transfusion information was available for 113,017 adult recipients of LT in the United Network for Organ Sharing database and was classified into 4 levels of transfusion: no-transfusion (N = 68,130), transfusion of 1-5 units (N = 33,629), 6-10 units (N = 8067), and >10 units (N = 5329). Recipient survival analysis was performed by Kaplan–Meier method and multivariable Cox-hazard model. ResultsAmong this cohort, 40.8% of donors (N = 46,261) received blood transfusion during the index hospitalization. Compared to no-blood transfusion donors, blood transfusion donors were younger (median age 37 versus 46 y P < 0.001) and were more brain death donors (94.5% versus 92.1%, P < 0.001). An increased risk of rejection at 6-mo (transfusion 10.3% versus no-transfusion 9.9%, P = 0.055) and 1 y (transfusion 12.5% versus no-transfusion 11.9%, P = 0.0036) post-LT was noted in this cohort. Multivariable Cox-hazard model showed blood transfusion was associated with increased 1-y mortality (transfusion 1.07; 95% CI 1.02-1.12, P = 0.007) and graft failure (transfusion 1.09; 95% CI 1.04-1.13, P < 0.001). ConclusionsDonor blood transfusion was associated with an increased risk of rejection at 6 mo and 1 y among LT recipients and worse post-transplant graft and overall survival. Additional information regarding donor blood transfusion, along with other known factors, may be considered when deciding the optimization of overall immune suppression in LT recipients to decrease the risk of delayed rejection.

Exploring Preservation Modalities in a Split Human Pancreas Model to Investigate the Effect on the Islet Isolation Outcomes.

In islet transplantation, the use of dynamic hypothermic preservation techniques is a current challenge. This study compares the efficacy of 3 pancreas preservation methods: static cold storage, hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP), and oxygenated HMP. A standardized human pancreas split model was employed using discarded organs from both donation after brain death (n = 15) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) (n = 9) donors. The pancreas head was preserved using static cold storage (control group), whereas the tail was preserved using the 3 different methods (study group). Data on donor characteristics, pancreas histology, isolation outcomes, and functional tests of isolated islets were collected. Insulin secretory function evaluated by calculating stimulation indices and total amount of secreted insulin during high glucose stimulation (area under the curve) through dynamic perifusion experiments was similar across all paired groups from both DCD and donation after brain death donors. In our hands, islet yield (IEQ/g) from the pancreas tails used as study groups was higher than that of the pancreas heads as expected although this difference did not always reach statistical significance because of great variability probably due to suboptimal quality of organs released for research purposes. Moreover, islets from DCD organs had greater purity than controls (P ≤ 0.01) in the HMP study group. Furthermore, our investigation revealed no significant differences in pancreas histology, oxidative stress markers, and apoptosis indicators. For the first time, a comparative analysis was conducted, using a split model, to assess the effects of various preservation methods on islets derived from pancreas donors. Nevertheless, no discernible variances were observed in terms of islet functionality, histological attributes, or isolation efficacy. Further investigations are needed to validate these findings for clinical application.

Comparative Study of Acute Kidney Injury in Liver Transplantation: Donation after Circulatory Death versus Brain Death.

BACKGROUND Acute kidney injury (AKI) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) contributes to morbidity and mortality. Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has been established to increase the pool of organs. While surgical complications are reported to be comparable in DCD and donation after brain death (DBD) OLT, there is a knowledge gap concerning adverse kidney events in these 2 groups. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, 154 patients received a DBD and 68 received a DCD organ (2016-2020). The primary outcome was a major adverse kidney event within 30 days (MAKE-30). The secondary outcome was dynamics of AKI and kidney replacement therapy (KRT) during the first postoperative week and on postoperative day 30. Incidence and resolution from AKI and KRT and patient survival (PS) 30 days after OLT were compared between the DCD and DBD recipients. RESULTS MAKE-30 incidence after OLT was comparable in DCD (n=27, 40%) vs DBD (n=41, 27%) recipients (risk ratio 1.49 [95% CI 1.01, 2.21], p=0.073). AKI incidence was comparable in DCD (n=58, 94%) vs DBD (n=95, 82%) recipients (risk ratio 1.14 [95% CI: 1.03, 1.27], P=0.057). Overall, 40% (n=88) of patients required KRT, with no difference between DCD (n=27, 40%) vs DBD (n=61, 40%) recipients (risk ratio 1.00 [95% CI 0.71, 1.43], P>0.999). Resolution of AKI by day 30 was lower in DCD (n=29, 50%) than in DBD (n=66, 69%) recipients (risk ratio 0.71 [95% CI: 0.53, 0.95], P=0.032). Survival after 30 days (DCD: n=64, 94% vs DBD: n=146, 95%, risk ratio 0.99 [95% CI 0.93, 1.06], P>0.999) was also comparable. CONCLUSIONS MAKE-30, short-term renal outcome, and survival did not significantly differ between DBD and DCD-OLT. Resolution of AKI by day 30 was lower in DCD than in DBD recipients.

Brain Death Donors on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support.

We investigated donors with brain death on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, a clinically challenging situation due to hemodynamic instability frequently encountered in these donors, which may threaten organ function. We described our experience with 15 utilized brain death donors on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, consecutively admit-ted in our intensive care unit (which is a referral center for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) from 2018 to 2023. We investigated whether utilization rate for brain death donors on extracor-poreal membrane oxygenation was affected by the introduction of a monitoring hemodynamic schedule during the 6-hour observation period. The utilization rate was 78% in period 1 and 88% in period 2. No statistically significant differences were observed for age, sex, and the incidence of cardiovascular risk factors between period 1 and period 2. The cause of death was postanoxic encephalopathy in all but 1 donor, who was on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory respiratory failure and developed cerebral hemorrhage. Number of organs per donor was 2 in all the population with no significant differences between period 1 and period 2. In the overall population, 15 livers were transplanted, 11 kidneys, 1 heart, and 1 pancreas. In our population, left ventricular ejection fraction severe dysfunction was observed in all donors except in the donor on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; the organ from this donor was deemed unsuitable for transplant. No significant differences were observed in hemodynamic data between the 2 subgroups. All donors were on 2 vasoactive drugs (norepinephrine and vasopressin) to maintain adequate perfusion (mean arterial pressure >60 mm Hg). Three donors were oligoanuric (due to postarrest acute renal failure). In our series of 15 consecutive brain death donors on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, a strict monitoring regimen during the 6-hour obser-vation period was associated with a higher utilization rate.

Detection of inflammasome activation in liver tissue during the donation process as potential biomarker for liver transplantation

Deceased donor liver transplantation (LT) is a crucial lifesaving option for patients with end-stage liver diseases. Although donation after brain death (DBD) remains the main source of donated organs, exploration of donation after circulatory death (DCD) addresses donor scarcity but introduces challenges due to warm ischemia. While technical advances have improved outcomes, challenges persist, with a 13% mortality rate within the first year. Delving into liver transplantation complexities reveals the profound impact of molecular signaling on organ fate. NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation play a pivotal role, influencing inflammatory responses. The NLRP3 inflammasome, found in hepatocytes, contributes to inflammation, fibrosis, and liver cell death. This study explores these dynamics, shedding light on potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Samples from 36 liver transplant patients were analyzed for ASC specks detection and inflammasome-related gene expression. Liver biopsies, obtained before and after cold ischemia storage, were processed for immunofluorescence, qRT-PCR, and Western blot. One year post-LT clinical follow-up included diagnostic procedures for complications, and global survival was assessed. Immunofluorescence detected activated inflammasome complexes in fixed liver tissues. ASC specks were identified in hepatocytes, showing a trend toward more specks in DCD livers. Likewise, inflammasome-related gene expression analysis indicated higher expression in DCD livers, decreasing after cold ischemia. Similar results were found at protein level. Patients with increased ASC specks staining exhibited lower overall survival rates, correlating with IL1B expression after cold ischemia. Although preliminary, these findings offer novel insights into utilizing direct detection of inflammasome activation in liver tissue as a biomarker. They suggest its potential impact on post-transplant outcomes, potentially paving the way for improved diagnostic approaches and personalized treatment strategies in LT.

Heart Transplantation After Donation After Circulatory Death: Early United States Experience

BackgroundGiven the renewed interest in heart transplantation after donation after circulatory death (DCD), a contemporary analysis of trends and longer-term survival is warranted. MethodsAdult heart transplant recipients (December 2019-September 2023) were identified in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Recipients were stratified as donation after brain death (DBD) or DCD. DCD procurements were further classified as direct procurement and perfusion (DCD-DPP) or normothermic regional perfusion (DCD-NRP), based on the declaration of death to cross-clamp interval (≥40 minutes DCD-NRP). The main outcome was posttransplant survival at 1 and 3 years. ResultsOf 11,625 transplantations, 792 (7%) involved DCD allografts (249 DCD-NRP, 543 DCD-DPP). The proportion of transplants involving DCD allografts significantly increased from 2% (December 2019) to 11% (January-September 2023, P < .001). Upon adjusted analysis, 1-year posttransplant survival was similar for DBD vs DCD-DPP (hazard ratio [HR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.66-1.66) or DCD-NRP (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.49-1.72). This remained true at 3 years for DCD-DPP (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.77-1.48) and DCD-NRP (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.62-1.73). Incidence of postoperative stroke, dialysis, acute graft rejection, and primary graft dysfunction were similar across groups. Across various strata of recipient risk and center volume, survival was equivalent between the DBD and DCD cohorts. ConclusionsRates of DCD heart transplantation continue to rise. Across various recipient risk and center volume categories, DCD and DBD recipients show comparable posttransplant survival up to 3 years. These findings encourage broader use of such donors in attempts to expand the organ pool.

Better liver transplant outcomes by donor interventions?

Donor risk factors and events surrounding donation impact the quantity and quality of grafts generated to meet liver transplant waitlist demands. Donor interventions represent an opportunity to mitigate injury and risk factors within donors themselves. The purpose of this review is to describe issues to address among donation after brain death, donation after circulatory determination of death, and living donors directly, for the sake of optimizing relevant outcomes among donors and recipients. Studies on donor management practices and high-level evidence supporting specific interventions are scarce. Nonetheless, for donation after brain death (DBD), critical care principles are employed to correct cardiocirculatory compromise, impaired tissue oxygenation and perfusion, and neurohormonal deficits. As well, certain treatments as well as marginally prolonging duration of brain death among otherwise stable donors may help improve posttransplant outcomes. In donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD), interventions are performed to limit warm ischemia and reverse its adverse effects. Finally, dietary and exercise programs have improved donation outcomes for both standard as well as overweight living donor (LD) candidates, while minimally invasive surgical techniques may offer improved outcomes among LD themselves. Donor interventions represent means to improve liver transplant yield and outcomes of liver donors and grafts.

Reduction in pacemaker rates post-heart transplantation with use of organ preservation systems

Abstract Background Approximately 10% of heart transplant recipients require permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. (1) Prolonged graft ischaemic time may contribute to conduction system injury and PPM requirement. (2) Ex-vivo preservation of heart allografts at the time of organ retrieval, using either normothermic or hypothermic organ preservation systems (OPS), allows for the reduction of graft ischaemic time which can facilitate long-distance procurements and use of marginal donors including donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors. (3) Purpose We sought to determine if the use of organ preservation systems reduced PPM implantation in heart transplant recipients. Methods This was a single-centre retrospective study of 405 consecutive heart transplant recipients between July 2014 and March 2023. Baseline demographics, utilisation of organ preservation systems, donor ischaemic times, history of graft dysfunction, rejection and chronic allograft vasculopathy were obtained from the medical records. The primary outcome was PPM implantation. Results Of 405 heart transplants performed, an organ preservation system (OPS) was utilised in 118 (29.1%) patients. Normothermic OPS was used in 93/405 (23%) transplants, 90 of which were DCD transplants. Twenty-five of 405 (6.2%) transplants were performed using a hypothermic OPS to facilitate donation after brain death (DBD). The remaining 287 (70.9%) organs underwent cold ischaemic storage (CIS) from retrieval until transplant. Apart from male sex (81% in OPS group versus 69% in the CIS group), there were no significant differences in baseline demographics between the two groups (table 1). Two of 118 (1.7%) patients in the OPS group required PPM implantation, compared to 27/287 (9.4%) in the cold ischaemic storage group (Chi-Square 7.5, p = 0.006). Kaplan-Meier analysis (figure 1) demonstrates a significantly lower rate of PPM implantation in the OPS arm (Log Rank 6.975, p = 0.008). Of the 29 patients who required pacing, 12/29 (41.4%) had AV block and 17/29 (58.6%) had sinus node dysfunction. Thirteen of 29 patients (44.8%) required PPM implantation within 30 days of transplant. Six of 29 patients (20.7%) were pacing dependent at last follow up. Conclusion Heart transplants performed utilising an organ preservation system were associated with lower PPM rates.Table 1.Figure 1.