BRAF-mutant Colorectal Cancer Research Articles

Cytotoxic CD8+ T cells and tissue resident memory cells in colorectal cancer based on microsatellite instability and BRAF status.

BACKGROUNDRecent studies in non-colorectal malignancy have associated T resident memory (TRM) cells with improved patient survival. It is unknown if TRM plays a role in colorectal cancer (CRC).AIMTo examine the potential role of TRM cells in providing immunogenicity in CRC stratified by microsatellite instability (MSI) and BRAF status.METHODSPatients with known MSI and BRAF mutation status were eligible for inclusion in this study. CRC tumour sections stained with haematoxylin and eosin were microscopically reviewed and the images scanned prior to assessment for location of invading edge and core of tumour. Sequential sections were prepared for quantitative multiplex immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining. Opal Multiplex IHC staining was performed with appropriate positive and negative controls and imaged using a standard fluorescent microscope fitted with a spectral scanning camera (Mantra) in conjunction with Mantra snap software. Images were unmixed and annotated in inForm 2.2.0. Statistical analysis was performed using Graphpad Prism Version 7 and Stata Version 15.RESULTSSeventy-two patients with known MSI and BRAF status were included in the study. All patients were assessed for MSI by IHC and high resolution capillary electrophoresis testing and 44 of these patients successfully underwent quantitative multiplex IHC staining. Overall, there was a statistically significant increase in CD8+ TRM cells in the MSI (BRAF mutant and wild type) group over the microsatellite stable (MSS) group. There was a statistically significant difference in CD8+ TRM between high level MSI (MSI-H):BRAF mutant [22.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 14.31-30.84] vs MSS [8.031 (95%CI: 4.698-11.36)], P = 0.0076 andMSI-H:BRAF wild type [16.18 (95%CI: 10.44-21.93)] vs MSS [8.031 (95%CI: 4.698-11.36)], P = 0.0279. There was no statistically significant difference in CD8 T cells (both CD8+CD103- and CD8+CD103+TRM) between MSI-H: BRAF mutant and wild type CRC.CONCLUSIONThis study has shown that CD8+ TRM are found in greater abundance in MSI-H CRC, both BRAF mutant and MSI-H:BRAF wild type, when compared with their MSS counterpart. CD8+ TRM may play a role in the immunogenicity in MSI-H CRC (BRAF mutant and BRAF wild type). Further studies should focus on the potential immunogenic qualities of TRM cells and investigate potential immunotherapeutic approaches to improve treatment and survival associated with CRC.

Quantifying single-cell ERK dynamics in colorectal cancer organoids reveals EGFR as an amplifier of oncogenic MAPK pathway signalling.

Direct targeting of the downstream MAPK pathway to suppress ERK activation in KRAS and BRAF mutant colorectal cancer (CRC) has proven clinically unsuccessful, but promising results have been obtained with combination therapies including EGFR-inhibition. To elucidate the interplay between EGF signaling and ERK activation in tumors, we used patient-derived organoids (PDOs) from KRAS and BRAF mutant CRCs. PDOs resemble in vivo tumors, model treatment response and are compatible with live-cell microscopy. We established real-time, quantitative drug response assessment in PDOs with single-cell resolution, using our improved FRET-based ERK biosensor EKAREN5. We reveal that oncogene-driven signaling is strikingly limited without EGFR activity and insufficient to sustain full proliferative potential. In PDOs and in vivo, upstream EGFR activity rigorously amplifies signal transduction efficiency in KRAS or BRAF mutant MAPK pathways. Our data provide a mechanistic understanding of the effectivity of EGFR inhibitors within combination therapies against KRAS and BRAF mutant CRC.

V600E and Non-V600E BRAF Mutations in Colorectal Cancer: Clinicopathologic Correlations in a Single Institution

V600E and Non-V600E BRAF Mutations in Colorectal Cancer: Clinicopathologic Correlations in a Single Institution

AIM2 Inhibits BRAF-Mutant Colorectal Cancer Growth in a Caspase-1-Dependent Manner.

Absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2), a DNA sensor that plays an important role in natural immunity system, has been reported to participate in colorectal cancer (CRC) development. However, the functional role of AIM2 in BRAF-mutant CRC remains unclear. In this study, we first investigated AIM2 expression level in BRAF-mutant CRC tumor tissues. Overexpression of AIM2 in CRC cells was performed to investigate the effect of AIM2 on CRC cell viability, and cell death detection and caspase activity assay were performed to explore the mechanism that AIM2 impacts the growth of BRAF-mutant CRC cells. Moreover, we confirmed the antitumor effect of AIM2 in BRAF-mutant CRC cell-derived tumor xenograft (CDX) models as well as patient-derived organoids (PDOs). Herein, we reported that AIM2 expression was lower in BRAF-mutant than that in BRAF wild-type CRC tumor tissues. Restoring the expression of AIM2 in BRAF-mutant CRC cells greatly inhibits the tumor cell growth by inducing necrotic cell death. Mechanism studies revealed that AIM2-induced cell death is in a caspase-1-dependent manner. Additionally, overexpression of AIM2 significantly inhibits tumor growth and metastasis in BRAF-mutant CRC in vivo, which was further confirmed in BRAF-mutant CRC PDOs. Taken together, our data suggested that AIM2 inhibits BRAF-mutant colon cancer growth in a caspase-1-dependent manner, which may provide evidence to understand the pathogenesis of CRC with BRAF-mutant, as well as new strategies for manipulation of CRC.

UGT1A1 Polymorphism for Irinotecan Dose Escalation in Patients with BRAF-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with First-Line Bevacizumab and FOLFIRI.

Background Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and BRAF V600E mutation have a poor prognosis, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of only 5–7 months after initial therapy. The current standard first-line chemotherapy for these patients includes FOLFOX or FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab. In this study, we explored the effects and oncological outcomes of UGT1A1 polymorphism for irinotecan escalation in patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC. Patients and Methods. This retrospective study included 17 patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC between April 2016 and December 2019. UGT1A1 genotyping was performed on all patients prior to initiating bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was PFS, and the secondary endpoints were toxicity, response rate, disease control rate, and overall survival (OS). Results Fifteen and two patients had UGT1A1 1∗/1∗ and 1∗/28∗, respectively. Eight underwent irinotecan dose escalation with tolerable adverse effects (AEs), and nine maintained an irinotecan dose of 180 mg/m2 or required deescalation to 150 mg/m2 due to intolerable AEs. After a median follow-up period of 15.7 (range, 3–54) months, the median PFS and OS were 9.4 and 15.7 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 AEs were observed in three (6%) patients. The disease control and partial response rates were 64.7% and 11.8%, respectively, indicating that most patients (14, 82.3%) could maintain this as a first-line line therapy with stable disease or proceed to second-line therapy if disease progression occurred, thereby maintaining acceptable performance status. Conclusions The oncological outcomes of patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC treated using FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab with irinotecan dose escalation as a first-line therapy are acceptable with tolerable AEs; this may be a feasible treatment option in such patients. Pretherapeutic UGT1A1 genotyping-guided dose adjustment can achieve favorable outcomes.

Curcumin Chemoprevention Reduces the Incidence of Braf Mutant Colorectal Cancer in a Preclinical Study.

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide and approximately 20% of cases can be attributed to a mutation in the BRAF oncogene. Curcumin is a promising chemopreventive agent with various anti-cancer benefits. Although curcumin has been reported to have poor bioavailability, this limitation has been overcome by the formulation of nano-carriers. In this preclinical study, we investigated the ability of an improved formulation of curcumin to reduce the incidence of Braf mutant carcinoma. To investigate curcumin as a chemopreventive forBrafmutant colorectal cancer in a preclinical study utilizing a murine model of serrated neoplasia. An intestine-specific Braf mutant murine model (BrafV637E/+/Villin-CreERT2/+) was administered curcumin micelles (240mg/kg, n = 69) in normal drinking water. Mice in the control group consumed normal drinking water (n = 83). Mice were euthanized at 14months and the incidence of murine serrated lesions and carcinoma in each cohort were determined by histologic examination. At completion of the study (14months), it was found that curcumin did not reduce the incidence or multiplicity of murine serrated lesions but did significantly reduce the number of invasive carcinomas (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69-0.9985, P = 0.0360) compared to control. We have performed the first long-term study assessing curcumin's effect on the development of serrated neoplasia. We found that curcumin significantly reduces the risk of developing Braf mutant colorectal cancer. Our data supports further investigation of curcumin as a chemopreventive to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer arising via the serrated pathway.

Role of Tumor Mutation Burden Analysis in Detecting Lynch Syndrome in Precision Medicine: Analysis of 2,501 Japanese Cancer Patients.

Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is the total exonic mutation count per megabase of tumor DNA. Recent advances in precision medicine occasionally detect Lynch syndrome (LS) by germline sequencing for mismatch-repair (g.MMR) genes but not using TMB. The current study analyzes the utility of TMB in detecting LS. Whole-exome sequencing (ion-semiconductor sequencing) was performed for somatic and germline DNA from 2,501 various cancer patients to detect TMB and g.MMR sequencing. MMR IHC was conducted when high TMB (≥10) was detected in LS-related cancers with an additional condition of wild-type BRAF in colorectal cancers. Target sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) were further performed for g.MMR genes in MMR-deficient cancers (TMB-based g.MMR target sequencing). We compared universal sequencing and TMB-based target sequencing in their sensitivity for detecting LS. LS was detected in 16 (0.6%) of the 2,501 patients: 1.1% (9/826) of colorectal cancer patients, 16.2% (6/37) of endometrial cancer patients, and 14.3% (1/7) of small intestine cancer patients. TMB-based g.MMR target sequencing (81.3%) showed superior sensitivity for detecting LS than universal g.MMR sequencing (56.3%; P = 0.127) but missed 3 LS patients (1 with a low-TMB cancer, 1 with a BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer, and 1 with an MMR-proficient cancer). Ion-semiconductor sequencing could detect single-nucleotide substitutions but not large deletions. POL-mutated cancers showed extremely high TMBs (48.4-749.2). g.MMR target sequencing, combined with TMB, somatic BRAF mutation, and MMR IHC is an effective strategy for detecting LS. TMB can be a biomarker for detecting LS in precision medicine.

Microsatellite instability status delineates braf mutation classes and patterns of metastases in braf-mutant colorectal cancer

Microsatellite instability status delineates braf mutation classes and patterns of metastases in braf-mutant colorectal cancer

Genetic and phenotypic characteristics of Russian patients with BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in the world. It's estimated about 1.8 M new CRC cases worldwide per year. A somatic mutation in the BRAF gene in the tumor is a negative prognostic factor. This work is aimed at studying the clinical and genetic characteristics of Russian CRC patients with the BRAF mutation. The BRAF mutations were studied by Sanger sequencing and digital droplet PCR in 489 patients and found in 34 (7%) cases. The most common mutation was p.V600E (82%). Also, rare variants were found: p.K601E, p.N581I, p.G596R, and p.D594N. All the patients with rare mutations were characterized by an unfavorable prognosis of the disease. The clinical features of the patients with BRAF mutations in the study include the predominant primary tumor site in the rectum, in addition to the right colon. Then, most of the cases were diagnosed in the advanced stages of the disease and were represented by high-grade adenocarcinomas. This article demonstrates the feasibility of analysis of the entire exon 15 of BRAF gene in CRC patients regardless of tumor localization.

Ibuprofen disrupts a WNK1/GSK3β/SRPK1 protein complex required for expression of tumor-related splicing variant RAC1B in colorectal cells.

A major risk factor promoting tumor development is chronic inflammation and the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), including ibuprofen, can decrease the risk of developing various types of cancer, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Although the molecular mechanism behind the antitumor properties of NSAIDs has been largely attributed to inhibition of cyclooxygenases (COXs), several studies have shown that the chemopreventive properties of ibuprofen also involve multiple COX-independent effects. One example is its ability to inhibit the alternative splicing event generating RAC1B, which is overexpressed in a specific subset of BRAF-mutated colorectal tumors and sustains cell survival. Here we describe the mechanism by which ibuprofen prevents RAC1B alternative splicing in a BRAF mutant CRC cell line: it leads to decreased translocation of SRPK1 and SRSF1 to the nucleus and is regulated by a WNK1/GSK3β/SRPK1 protein kinase complex. Surprisingly, we demonstrate that ibuprofen does not inhibit the activity of any of the involved kinases but rather promotes disassembly of this regulatory complex, exposing GSK3β serine 9 to inhibitory phosphorylation, namely by AKT, which results in nuclear exclusion of SRPK1 and SRSF1 hypophosphorylation. The data shed new light on the biochemical mechanisms behind ibuprofen’s action on alternative spliced RAC1B and may support its use in personalized approaches to CRC therapy or chemoprevention regimens.

Clinicopathologic Features and Prognosis of BRAF Mutated Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Background: BRAFV600E mutation is associated with poor prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, but the comparison of clinic-pathologic features between V600E and non-V600E mutation was not well-known in CRC patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and pathological features, prognostic value of BRAF mutations in CRC.Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to characterize the clinical and pathological features and survival of patients with BRAF mutated CRC. Patients were classified according to BRAF status as BRAFV600E mutation and non-V600E mutations. Difference of characteristics and survival between the two groups was analyzed.Results: There was no significant difference in gender, family history, location of primary tumor, metastatic sites between patients with BRAF-V600E mutation and non-V600E mutations. Patients with V600E mutation were younger than those with non-V600E mutations (p = 0.002). Patients with BRAFV600E mutation showed a poorer outcome than those with non-V600E mutations (23.1 vs. 49.9 months, respectively, p = 0.0024). Lack of CDX2 expression was associated with worse prognosis (mOS: 9.4 m vs. not reached, respectively, p = 0.016). Status of V600E mutation did not affect the mPFS and ORR of first-line or second-line treatment.Conclusion: BRAFV600E mutation defines a distinct subgroup of CRC with worse prognosis. Lack of CDX2 expression is associated with poor OS. Status of V600E mutation did not affect the mPFS of first-line or second-line treatment.

Contemporary treatment approaches for metastatic colorectal cancer driven by BRAF V600 mutations.

The treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) harboring BRAF V600 mutations is challenging. These tumors are often refractory to standard treatment. Therefore, the patients may exhibit rapid clinical deterioration, depriving them of the chance to receive salvage therapy. In newly diagnosed patients with good performance status, the administration of an intensive chemotherapy regimen like FOLFOXIRI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) along with the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab can modify this aggressive behavior of the disease and improve patient clinical outcomes. The recently published results of the BEACON (Binimetinib, Encorafenib, and Cetuximab Combined to Treat BRAF-Mutant Colorectal Cancer) study demonstrated that a combination therapy consisting of BRAF, epidermal growth factor receptor, and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors could be a useful second-or third-line alternative. This review summarizes the current treatment strategies for BRAF-mutant mCRC.

The meiosis-specific cohesin component stromal antigen 3 promotes cell migration and chemotherapeutic resistance in colorectal cancer.

Chromosome instability is one of the hallmarks of cancer. Stromal antigen (STAG) 3 is a core component of the meiosis-specific cohesin complex, which regulates sister chromatid cohesion. Although aberrantly activated genes encoding the cohesin complex have been identified in cancers, little is known about the role of STAG3 in colorectal cancer (CRC). Here, we evaluated the prognostic impact and role of STAG3 in CRC. Analysis of 172 CRC surgical specimens revealed that high STAG3 expression was associated with poor prognosis. STAG3 knockdown inhibited cell migration and increased drug sensitivity to oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride hydrate, and BRAF inhibitor in CRC cell lines. The enhanced drug sensitivity was also confirmed in a human organoid established from a CRC specimen. Moreover, suppression of STAG3 increased γH2AX foci. Particularly, in BRAF-mutant CRC cells, STAG3 silencing suppressed the expression of snail family transcriptional repressor 1 and phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase via upregulation of dual-specificity phosphatase 6. Our findings suggest that STAG3 is related to poor clinical outcomes and promotes metastasis and chemotherapeutic resistance in CRC. STAG3 may be a novel prognostic marker and potential therapeutic target for CRC.

Trends in epidemiology, treatment and molecular testing of metastatic colorectal cancer in a real-world multi-institution cohort study.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in Australia, and survival after diagnosis of metastatic disease is improving. Our aim was to assess trends in epidemiology, treatment, molecular testing and survival in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). Clinical data from February 2013 to December 2018 was recorded in a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study conducted in Queensland, Australia, examining clinical and molecular biomarkers in cases of mCRC. A total of 159 patients who had metastasis diagnosed after February 2013 were included in survival analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 63.9 years, but 29% had early-onset disease (diagnosis aged<50 years). Median overall survival was 2.5 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-3.0) for the 159 patients included in survival analysis. Independent factors correlated with poor prognosis included right-sided primary tumor, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio>5, increased alkaline phosphatase level (ALP) and an increasing number of sites of metastatic disease. In contrast, metastasectomy was associated with improved overall survival (adjusted HR = 0.29' 95% CI, 0.16-0.54), with similar survival between patients who had liver and non-liver metastasectomy sites. Half (10/20) of the BRAF mutant CRC were also microsatellite unstable. The proportion of detected mutations amongst tested samples increased over time for Kirsten Rat Sarcoma (KRAS; OR [per year] = 1.19; 95% CI, 1.01-1.39). Concurrently, the methods of molecular genetics testing employed in routine clinical practice changed towards the adoption of next-generation sequencing. Metastasectomy in mCRC may be beneficial regardless of the anatomical site of metastasis. The adoption of next-generation sequencing techniques for molecular genetics testing coincided with a slightly increased rate of detection of KRAS and BRAF mutations, potentially reflecting greater test sensitivity. Further translational research is required in mCRC to define novel targets for treatment.

Age-dependent performance of BRAF mutation testing in Lynch syndrome diagnostics.

BRAF V600E mutations have been reported as a marker of sporadic microsatellite instability (MSI) colorectal cancer (CRC). Current international diagnostic guidelines recommend BRAF mutation testing in MSI CRC patients to predict low risk of Lynch syndrome (LS). We evaluated the age-specific performance of BRAF testing in LS diagnostics. We systematically compared the prevalence of BRAF mutations in LS-associated CRCs and unselected MSI CRCs in different age groups as available from published studies, databases and population-based patient cohorts. Sensitivity/specificity analysis of BRAF testing for exclusion of LS and cost calculations were performed. Among 969 MSI CRCs from LS carriers in the literature and German HNPCC Consortium, 15 (1.6%) harbored BRAF mutations. Six of seven LS patients with BRAF-mutant CRC and reported age were <50 years. Among 339 of 756 (44.8%) of BRAF mutations detected in unselected MSI CRC, only 2 of 339 (0.6%) BRAF mutations were detected in patients <50 years. The inclusion of BRAF testing led to high risk of missing LS patients and increased costs at age <50 years. BRAF testing in patients <50 years carries a high risk of missing a hereditary cancer predisposition and is cost-inefficient. We suggest direct referral of MSI CRC patients <50 years to genetic counseling without BRAF testing.

The Real-Life Data of BRAF Mutation on the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: a TOG Study.

Colorectal cancer is the third leading diagnosis accounting for nearly 10% of all new cancers worldwide. The distinct features among BRAF mutant colorectal cancers make these tumor groups hard to treat for oncologists. The median overall survival (OS) of these types of cancers is reported to be 9 to 14 months. The study was declared on the Turkish Oncology Study Group Conference and approved. The patients' data was received from the centers who confirmed to participate. The BRAF-mutated patients were included in the study. The demographic features (age, gender, etc.), type of mutation, tumor localizations, histology, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, metastasis patterns chemotherapeutic agents and progression, and death times were recorded. Thirty-nine patients were enrolled in the study. Sixteen patients had concurrent KRAS mutations, while 7 had NRAS mutations. Most of the patients received doublet chemotherapies in combination with anti-VEGF agents in the first and second line of the treatment. There was a significant difference in OS according to the stage which showed a decreased survival in stage IV patients at the time of diagnosis. Concurrent KRAS mutation resulted in increased OS. The median OS was 47 and 24 months favoring the KRAS mutant group. The patients whose primary tumor operated had better survival when compared with other patients. The median OS of the operated group was 47 months, while the non-operated group was 24 months. Liver metastasis was related to worse prognosis at the time of diagnosis in univariate analysis. In our study we found a high concurrent RAS mutation ratio in a BRAF mutant patient group which was different from prior studies. The concurrent mutations resulted in a favorable outcome in terms of OS which is also different from the current knowledge. More prospective studies are needed especially BRAF-mutated patient population and especially with concurrent RAS mutations.

Applying Precision to the Management of BRAF-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Identifying the presence or absence of a BRAFV600E mutation is paramount for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) as there are distinct predictive and prognostic implications, as well as unique therapeutic approaches for this molecular subtype. Traditional cytotoxic doublet chemotherapy has historically been ineffective for this poor prognostic group, thereby highlighting the critical need for novel targeted therapies to drive management. Unlike the early success achieved with BRAF-inhibitor monotherapy for patients with BRAFV600E-mutated metastatic melanoma, response rates were found to only be 5% in early-phase clinical trials for patients with BRAFV600E mCRC. A deeper understanding of predominant resistance mechanisms in BRAFV600E mCRC after exposure to BRAF inhibition has resulted in innovative combinatorial approaches targeting the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, revitalizing the treatment portfolio for these patients. Of note, in recent years non-V600 BRAF mutations have been appreciated as a distinct molecular subset in mCRC, representing 2-4% of patients with a unique clinical presentation and complex signaling biology. These mutations, referred to as "atypical" BRAF mutations, warrant individual clinical investigation and demand innovative drug development that leverages known signaling class biology. Here, we summarize the current molecular and clinicopathologic understanding of BRAFV600E mCRC, as well as the landmark clinical trials that have led to successful targeted therapy for this historically aggressive subtype of colorectal cancer. Additionally, we briefly describe the current understanding of patients with atypical BRAF mutations, highlighting the importance of continued research efforts to appropriately treat this evolving subset of BRAF mutations.

Oncogenic mutation in RAS-RAF axis leads to increased expression of GREB1, resulting in tumor proliferation in colorectal cancer.

BRAFV600E mutation accounts for up to 90% of all BRAF mutations in human colorectal cancer (CRC), and constitutively activates the MEK‐MAPK pathway. It is recognized that neutralizing mAbs for epidermal growth factor receptor alone are not effective for CRC with BRAFV600E mutation. Therefore, there is increasing interest in identification of the possible therapeutic targets in downstream of BRAF mutation in CRCs. To address this, we studied genome engineered mouse models for colonic neoplasia that has BrafV600E mutation on the basis of Apc inactivation, induced in 2 distinct Cre mouse models, CDX2P‐G22Cre and CDX2P‐CreERT2 mice. We carried out oligonucleotide microarray analysis for colonic neoplasia generated in these mouse models, and compared gene expression profiles among Kras/Braf WT, Kras‐mutated, and Braf‐mutated mouse colon tumors to seek new molecular targets corresponding to the KRAS‐BRAF‐MAPK axis. We found that the expression of the growth regulation by estrogen in breast cancer protein 1 (Greb1) was the most upregulated gene in Braf‐mutated mouse tumors compared to Kras/Braf WT counterparts. The silencing of GREB1 significantly reduced the proliferation and tumorigenesis of CRC cell lines, whereas the overexpression of GREB1 promoted cell proliferation. Although GREB1 was first identified as a hormone‐responsive gene mediating estrogen‐stimulated cell proliferation in endometriosis, breast, and ovarian cancers, these results suggest that RAS‐RAF‐MAPK signaling upregulates GREB1 expression in CRC, resulting in cellular proliferation. Thus, GREB1 is a possible therapeutic target for CRCs with BrafV600E mutation.

Paradox breaker BRAF inhibitors have comparable potency and MAPK pathway reactivation to encorafenib in BRAF mutant colorectal cancer.

The BEACON CRC trial demonstrated a survival advantage over chemotherapy for a combination of targeted agents comprising the potent BRAF inhibitor encorafenib together with cetuximab and binimetinib. Resistance to BRAF inhibition in CRC arises in part through the generation and activation of RAF dimers resulting in MEK-ERK pathway reactivation. Paradox breaker BRAF inhibitors, such as PLX8394, are designed to inhibit RAF dimer formation. We analyzed whether paradox breakers reduce pathway reactivation and so have enhanced potency compared with encorafenib in BRAF mutant CRC. The potency of encorafenib and PLX8394 was greater than vemurafenib and the degree of pathway reactivation somewhat less. However, dose response curves for encorafenib and PLX8394 were similar and there was no significant differences in degree of pathway reactivation. To our knowledge these data represent the first comparative data of encorafenib and paradox breaker inhibitors in BRAF mutant CRC. Whilst these results support further investigation of PLX8394, all three agents tested reactivated the pathway in melanoma cells, a disease in which monotherapy is effective. Strategies focused on restricting RAF dimerization fail to address the impact that specific context of BRAF mutation in CRC has on targeted therapy outcomes.

Abstract 2062: Delta prognosis: A novel clinical outcome based on automated analysis of unstructured cancer EHR data

Abstract Introduction: Efforts such as AACR Project GENIE pool genomic data across institutions to facilitate understanding of the clinical impact of genomic biomarkers in cancer. However, correlating genomic data with treatment outcomes is challenging, since outside clinical trials, outcomes such as improving or worsening cancer may be recorded only in electronic health record (EHR) free text. Automated methods could accelerate discovery by reliably characterizing treatment outcomes from unstructured EHR data. Methods: We analyzed unstructured imaging reports for patients with solid tumors (any stage) who participated in an institutional next generation sequencing study from 2013-2018 and received palliative-intent systemic therapy. A recurrent neural network was trained to predict overall survival (OS) following each report, using text from the report and the sequence of prior reports for the patient. Model performance was measured using the concordance (c)-index in a 10% held-out validation set. Next, the ‘delta prognosis, (ΔP)' was measured for each report. ‘Delta prognosis' (ΔP) captures the change in the number of months a patient is predicted to be alive out of the 12 months following each report, compared to the exponentially weighted moving average of prior prognostic predictions for that patient. Finally, a second neural network was trained to predict ΔP using each report. Ten-fold cross validation was used to annotate each report so ΔP measures for each patient would not be based on that patient's actual survival time. Using joint modeling of ΔP, biomarker status, and report frequency, associations were measured between ΔP and previously described prognostic biomarkers for cancer types in which prolonged survival with advanced disease is common, including BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer and BRCA1/2 mutations in ovarian cancer. Results: Model training was performed using 78,371 imaging reports for 4,512 patients with 273 cancer histologies. In a validation set of 9,306 reports for 595 patients, the c-index for survival prediction was 0.76. Within the first 6 months of palliative-intent therapy, among 597 patients with colorectal cancer, BRAF mutations were associated with worse mean ΔP (-0.33 months per report; 95% CI, -0.55 to -0.11 months; p = 0.003); among 395 patients with ovarian cancer, BRCA1/2 mutations were associated with better mean ΔP (+0.39 months per report; 95% CI, 0.17-0.61 months; p &amp;lt; 0.001). The latter association could not have been evaluated statistically using an overall survival endpoint, since no patients with BRCA1/2 mutations died within 6 months. Conclusion: Neural networks trained to identify shifts in prognosis using EHR text may enable ascertainment of improving and worsening cancer with no manual labeling, even if overall survival data are unavailable or immature at inference time. This technique could be relevant to any analysis of cancer outcomes using EHR data. Citation Format: Kenneth L. Kehl, Haitham A. Elmarakeby, Michael J. Hassett, Eliezer M. Van Allen, Deb Schrag. Delta prognosis: A novel clinical outcome based on automated analysis of unstructured cancer EHR data [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 2062.