Brachytherapy Treatment Planning System Research Articles

AAPMWGDCAB Report 372:A joint AAPM, ESTRO, ABG, and ABS report oncommissioning of model-based dose calculation algorithms in brachytherapy.

The introduction of model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) in brachytherapy provides an opportunity for a more accurate dose calculation and opens the possibility for novel, innovative treatment modalities. The joint AAPM, ESTRO, and ABG Task Group 186 (TG-186) report provided guidance to early adopters. However, the commissioning aspect of these algorithms was described only in general terms with no quantitative goals. This report, from the Working Group on Model-Based Dose Calculation Algorithms in Brachytherapy, introduced a field-tested approach to MBDCA commissioning. It is based on a set of well-characterized test cases for which reference Monte Carlo (MC) and vendor-specific MBDCA dose distributions are available in a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine-Radiotherapy (DICOM-RT) format to the clinical users. The key elements of the TG-186 commissioning workflow are now described in detail, and quantitative goals are provided. This approach leverages the well-known Brachytherapy Source Registry jointly managed by the AAPM and the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) Houston Quality Assurance Center (with associated links at ESTRO) to provide open access to test cases as well as step-by-step user guides. While the current report is limited to the two most widely commercially available MBDCAs and only for 192 Ir-based afterloading brachytherapy at this time, this report establishes a general framework that can easily be extended to other brachytherapy MBDCAs and brachytherapy sources. The AAPM, ESTRO, ABG, and ABS recommend that clinical medical physicists implement the workflow presented in this report to validate both the basic and the advanced dose calculation features of their commercial MBDCAs. Recommendations are also given to vendors to integrate advanced analysis tools into their brachytherapy treatment planning system to facilitate extensive dose comparisons. The use of the test cases for research and educational purposes is further encouraged.

Variations and effects of bladder and rectal volume following uniform preparation procedure in cervical cancer: Five fractions of 6 Gy.

To analyze the effects of different bladder and rectal volumes on the dose of organ at risks (OARs) and primary tumors following uniform preparation procedure. In this retrospective study, a total of 60 patients with cervical cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) combined with chemotherapy and brachytherapy (BT) during 2019-2022 were included (300 insertions). Then, tandem-ovoid applicators were placed and computed tomography (CT) scanning was performed after each insertion. Delineation of OARs and clinical target volumes (CTVs) were done according to GEC-ESTRO group recommendations. Finally, doses of high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) and OARs were obtained from dose volume histogram (DVH) automatically generated by BT treatment planning system. Following a uniform preparation procedure, the median bladder volume of 68.36 cc (range, 29.9-235.68 cc) was in optimal agreement with the recommended bladder volume of ≤ 70 ml, which avoided more manipulation and possible risk of adverse events during general anesthesia. As the bladder filling volume increased, there was no corresponding increase in rectal, HR-CTV, and small bowel volumes, while the sigmoid colon volume decreased. The median rectal volume was 54.95 cc (range, 24.92-168.1 cc), and as the rectal volume increased, HR-CTV, sigmoid colon, and rectum volumes increased, and conversely, small bowel volume decreased. HR-CTV changes with volume affected the rectum, bladder, and HR-CTV, but not the sigmoid colon and small intestine. Following a uniform preparation procedure, the bladder and rectum can also be controlled to an optimal volume (B ≤ 70 cc, R ≈ 40 cc), which is related to the dose of the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon.

Accuracy of Acuros^{text {TM}} BV as determined from GATE monte-carlo simulation

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine’s Task Group No.43 has provided a standardised dose calculation methodology that is now the international benchmark for all brachytherapy dosimetry publications and treatment planning systems. However, limitations in this methodology has seen the development of Model-Based Dose Calculation Algorithms (MBDCA). In 2009, Varian (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) released Acuros^{text {TM}} BrachyVision (ABV) which calculates dose by explicitly solving the Linear Boltzmann Transport Equation. In this study we have assessed the accuracy of ABV dose calculations within a range of materials relevant to high dose rate brachytherapy with an iridium-192 (^{text {192}}Ir) source. Accuracy assessment has been achieved by implementing a modelled GamaMed Plus ^{text {192}}Ir source within a series of phantoms using the GEANT4 Application for Emission Tomography (GATE) to calculate dose for comparison with dose as determined by ABV. Comparisons between GATE and ABV were made using point-to-point profile comparisons and 1D gamma analysis. Source validation results yielded good agreement with published data. Spectrum and TG43U1 comparisons showed no major differences, with TG43U1 comparisons agreeing within ± 1%. Point-to-point comparisons showed large differences between GATE and ABV near the source and in low density materials. 1D gamma analysis pass criteria of 2%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm yielded passing rates ranging between 51.72–100% and 62.07–100% respectively. A critical analysis of this study’s results suggest that ABV is unable to accurately calculate doses in low density materials. Furthermore, spatial accuracy of dose near the source is within 2 mm.

BEBIG 60Co HDR brachytherapy source dosimetric parameters validation using GATE Geant4-based simulation code

PurposeThis study aims to validate the dosimetric characteristics of High Dose Rate (HDR) 60Co source (Co0.A86 model) using GATE Geant4-based Monte Carlo code. According to the recommendation of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) task group report number 43, the dosimetric parameters of a new brachytherapy source should be verified either experimentally or by Monte Carlo calculation before clinical applications. The validated 60Co source in this study will be used for the simulation of intensity-modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) of vaginal cancer using the same GATE Geant4-based Monte Carlo code in the future. Materials and methodsGATE (version 9.0) simulation code was used to model and calculate the required TG-43U1 dosimetric data of the 60Co HDR source. DoseActors were defined for calculation of dose rate constant, radial dose function, and anisotropy function in a water phantom with an 80 cm radius. ResultsThe dose rate constant was obtained as 1.070±0.008cGy.h−1.U−1 which shows a relative difference of 2.01% compared to the consensus value, 1.092 ​cGy.h−1.U−1. The calculated results of anisotropy and radial dose functions starting from 0.1 cm to 10 cm around the source showed excellent agreement with the results of published studies. The mean variation of the radial dose and anisotropy functions values from the consensus data were 1% and 0.9% respectively. ConclusionFindings from this investigation revealed that the validation of the HDR 60Co source is feasible by the GATE Geant4-based Monte Carlo code. As a result, the GATE Monte Carlo code can be used for the verification of the brachytherapy treatment planning system.

A New Approach for a Safe and Reproducible Seeds Positioning for Diffusing Alpha-Emitters Radiation Therapy of Squamous Cell Skin Cancer: A Feasibility Study.

The purpose of this study is to discuss how to use an external radio-opaque template in the Diffusing Alpha-emitters Radiation Therapy (DaRT) technique's pre-planning and treatment stages. This device would help to determine the proper number of sources for tumour coverage, accounting for subcutaneous invasion and augmenting DaRT safety. The procedure will be carried out in a first phase on a phantom and then applied to a clinical case. A typical DaRT procedure workflow comprises steps like tumour measurements and delineation, source number assessment, and therapy administration. As a first step, an adhesive fiberglass mesh (spaced by 2 mm) tape was applied on the skin of the patient and employed as frame of reference. A physician contoured the lesion and marked the entrance points for the needles with a radio opaque ink marker. According to the radio opaque marks and metabolic uptake the clinical target volume was defined, and with a commercial brachytherapy treatment planning system (TPS) it was possible to simulate and adjust the spatial seeds distribution. After the implant procedure a CT was again performed to check the agreement between simulations and seeds positions. With the procedure described above it was possible to simulate a DaRT procedure on a phantom in order to train physicians and subsequently apply the novel approach on patients, outlining the major issues involved in the technique. The present work innovates and supports DaRT technique for the treatment of cutaneous cancers, improving its efficacy and safety.

The Design of an Audit Test for 60Co Brachytherapy Treatment Planning System.

Background:Auditing the treatment planning system (TPS) software for a radiotherapy unit is of paramount importance in any radiation therapy department. A Plexiglas phantom was proposed to measure the ionization of 60Co high dose rate (HDR) source and compare dose points in the planning system for auditing and verifying TPS.Methods:Auditing was performed using a Plexiglas phantom in an end-to-end test, and relative dose points were detected by a farmer-type ionization chamber and compared with the relative dose of similar points in TPS. The audit results were determined as pass optimal level (<3.3%), pass action level (between 3.3% and 5%), and out of tolerance (>5%).Results:The comparison of the collected data revealed that 80% of the measured values were ≤5% in the pass level, and 20% of the points were out of tolerance (between 5% and 6.99%).Conclusion:This study documented the appropriateness of the dosimetry audit test and this phantom design for the HDR brachytherapy TPS.

Commissioning Validation of a Brachytherapy Treatment Planning System with EGSnrc Monte Carlo Code and EBT3 GAFChromic Film.

Most brachytherapy treatment planning system (TPS) commissioning requires data input based on the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group-43 formalism. The commissioning accuracy is very important for dose calculation. The aim of this study is the implementation of a brachytherapy TPS into a clinical environment and check the TPS calculated dose accuracy. After introducing data of the different catheters (CIS Bio International, Saclay, France), composed of several Cesium-137 Eckert and Ziegler BEBIG CSM-11 radioactive sources; for XiO (CMS, St. Louis) brachytherapy TPS, the TPS dose calculation accuracy was investigated by comparing between the TPS calculated dose distribution (DD) for all the catheters with (1) the measuring DD using EBT3 GAFChromic film and (2) calculating DD by egs_brachy (Electron Gamma Shower, National Research Council of Canada) Monte Carlo simulation. The phantom used for this study consists of six PTW slabs 30 cm × 30 cm × 1 cm of polymethyl methacrylate with a Delouche MEDpro applicator on the top. The TPS DD was calculated on the computed tomography scan of this phantom. PTW VeriSoft version 6.0.1.7 (PTW-Freiburg, Germany) software was used for analyzing scanned films and to perform the comparison based on the gamma index distribution. For each catheter, the gamma index distribution showed agreement >95% of all pixels in both verification methods, with gamma ≤1. We confirm the commissioning accuracy and that the TPS can be used for clinical purposes.

Chinese Expert Consensus on Iodine125 Seed Implantation for Recurrent Cervical Cancer in 2021.

The treatment modality for recurrent cervical cancer (rCC) is limited, and the prognosis of these patients is poor. Seed implantation could be an important component of rCC management in the context of dose boost or salvage therapy after surgery or radiotherapy, which is characterized by a minimally invasive, high local dose, and rapidly does fall, sparing normal tissue. For patients with good performance status and lateral pelvic wall recurrence with an available puncture path, seed implantation was recommended, as well as for selected central pelvic recurrence and extra-pelvic recurrence. The combination of brachytherapy treatment planning system and CT guidance was needed, and three-dimensional printing templates could greatly improve the accuracy, efficiency, and quality of seed implantation to achieve a potential ablative effect and provide an efficient treatment for rCC. However, the recommendations of seed implantation were mainly based on retrospective articles and lack high-quality evidence, and multicenter prospective randomized studies are needed. In this consensus on iodine125 seed implantation for rCC, indication selection, technical process and requirements, dosimetry criteria, radiation protection, combined systemic therapy, and outcomes of seed implantation for rCC are discussed.

Accuracy and dosimetric parameters comparison of 3D-printed non-coplanar template-assisted computed tomography-guided iodine-125 seed ablative brachytherapy in pelvic lateral recurrence of gynecological carcinomas.

PurposeTo investigate the accuracy of needle distribution and dosimetric parameter differences of 3D-printing non-coplanar template (3D-PNCT)-assisted computed tomography (CT)-guided iodine-125 seed ablative brachytherapy (125I-SAB) in gynecological cancer patients with non-central pelvic recurrence between pre-operative plan and post-operative plan.Material and methodsThirty-eight patients with forty-one non-central pelvic recurrent gynecological carcinomas after radiotherapy were enrolled in this study. All patients received 3D-PNCT-assisted CT-guided 125I-SAB from January 2016 to January 2019. The position, angle, and depth of seed needles were measured in both pre-operative plan and intra-operative real-time plan in brachytherapy treatment planning system (B-TPS). Dosimetric parameters of D90, D100, V100, V150, and V200 as well as quality parameters of conformal index (CI), external index (EI), and homogeneity index (HI) were compared between pre-operative plan and post-operative plan. Peri-operation complications and radiation-related toxicity were assessed.ResultsMedian follow-up time was 12 months (range, 5-34 months). Prescribed dose was 100-170 Gy (median, 120 Gy). Radioactivity of 125I seed was 0.4-0.7 mCi (median, 0.55 mCi). Mean depth deviation for 499 needles was 0.8 ±1.0 cm. Mean angular deviation was 2.2 ±2.1 degrees. Mean tip distance deviation of needles was 0.4 ±0.3 cm. There were significant differences between pre-operative and post-operative plans in CI (p = 0.001) and EI (p = 0.005). No significant differences were shown in D90, D100, V100, V150, V200, and HI between pre-operative and post-operative plans. Only few patients suffered from ≤ grade 2 toxicities.Conclusions3D-PNCT-assisted CT-guided 125I-SAB is safe and feasible for non-central pelvic recurrence of gynecological cancer. All complications are tolerable and mild.

The accuracy and safety of CT-guided iodine-125 seed implantation assisted by 3D non-coplanar template for retroperitoneal recurrent carcinoma

PurposeTo investigate the accuracy, dosimetric parameters, and safety of 3D-printing non-coplanar template (3D-PNCT)-assisted CT guidance for radioactive iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation brachytherapy (RSI-BT) for retroperitoneal recurrent carcinomasMethods and materialsWe enrolled 15 patients with 17 retroperitoneal recurrent carcinomas after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). All patients received CT-guided 125I RSI-BT assisted by 3D-PNCT successfully. We compared the original needle insertion position, angular, and the needle tip distance deviations of preoperative plan with that of intraoperative in brachytherapy treatment planning system (B-TPS). The dosimetric parameters of RSI-BT were evaluated on preoperative plan, intraoperative real-time plan, and postoperative plan, including D90, D100 (the dose to 90% and 100% of the target volume), V100, V150, and V200 (the volume receives 100%, 150%, and 200% of the prescribed doses). The quality assurance of RSI-BT evaluated on conformal index (CI), external index (EI), and homogeneity index (HI) of the targets were compared among preoperative plan, intraoperative real-time plan, and postoperative plan. The perioperation complications and RSI-BT-related toxicity were assessed.ResultsThe median follow-up was 8.2 months (range 1–18.5 months). One patient was lost to follow-up after RSI-BT. Fourteen patients were assessed for response rate and toxicity. The mean entrance point distance deviation for all 165 needles was 4.50 ± 4.10 mm (range, 0–30). The mean angular deviation was 2.70 ± 3.00° (range, 0–20). The needle tip distance deviation was 6.90 ± 6.00 mm (range, − 30–28). D90 for preoperative plan, intraoperative plan, and postoperative plan were 140.55 ± 23.93, 124.25 ± 28.04, and 128.98 ± 22.75, respectively. There was significant difference between D90 of preoperative plan with that of intraoperative plan (p = 0.036). Four lesions reached CR, six lesions reached PR, three lesions were SD, and three lesions were PD. Four patients with moderate pain became mild, and two with mild pain relieved completely after RSI-BT. The other parameters showed no differences among preoperative plan, intraoperative plan, and postoperative plan. The perioperative complications were observed in four patients, including three patients of grade 1 and one patient of grade 2. No ≥ grade 3 side effects were observed.ConclusionCT-guided 125I RSI-BT assisted by 3D-PNCT was a safe, accurate, and feasible strategy for recurrent carcinomas located in the retroperitoneal regions.

An Inverse Dose Optimization Algorithm for Three-Dimensional Brachytherapy.

PurposeTo investigate an implementation method and the results of an inverse dose optimization algorithm, Gradient Based Planning Optimization (GBPO), for three-dimensional brachytherapy.MethodsThe GBPO used a quadratic objective function, and a dwell time modulation item was added to the objective function to restrict the dwell time variance. We retrospectively studied 4 cervical cancer patients using different applicators and 15 cervical cancer patients using the Fletcher applicator. We assessed the plan quality of GBPO by isodose lines for the patients using different applicators. For the 15 patients using the Fletcher applicator, we utilized dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters of HR-CTV (D100%, V150%) and organs at risk (OARs) (D0.1cc, D1cc, D2cc) to evaluate the difference between the GBPO plans and the IPSA (Inverse Planning Simulated Annealing) plans, as well as the GBPO plans and the Graphic plans.ResultsFor the 4 patients using different applicators, the dose distributions are conformable. For the 15 patients using the Fletcher applicator, when the dwell time modulation factor (DTMF) is less than 20, the dwell time deviation reduces quickly; however, after the DTMF increased to 100, the dwell time deviation has no remarkable change. The difference in dosimetric parameters between the GBPO plans and the IPSA plans is not statistically significant (P>0.05). The GBPO plans have a higher D100% (3.57 ± 0.36, 3.38 ± 0.34; P<0.01) and a lower V150% (55.73 ± 4.06, 57.75 ± 3.79; P<0.01) than those of the Graphic plans. The differences in other DVH parameters are negligible between the GBPO plans and the Graphic plans.ConclusionsThe GBPO plans have a comparable quality as the IPSA plans and the Graphic plans for the studied cervical cancer cases. The GBPO algorithm could be integrated into a three-dimensional brachytherapy treatment planning system after studying more sites.

Towards real time in-vivo rectal dosimetry during trans-rectal ultrasound based high dose rate prostate brachytherapy using MOSkin dosimeters

PurposeTo compare the dose measured by MOSkin dosimeters coupled to a trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) probe to the dose predicted by the brachytherapy treatment planning system (BTPS) during high dose rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy (pBT), and to examine the feasibility of performing real-time catheter-by-catheter analysis of in-vivo rectal dosimetry during TRUS based HDR pBT. MethodFour MOSkin dosimeters were coupled to a TRUS probe during 20 TRUS-based HDR pBT treatment fractions. The measured MOSkin doses were retrospectively compared to those predicted by the BTPS for the total treatment fraction, as well as on a per catheter basis. ResultsThe average relative percentage difference between MOSkin measured and BTPS predicted doses for a total treatment fraction was 0.3% ± 11.6% (k = 1), with a maximum of 23.2% and a minimum of −29.0%. The average relative percentage difference per catheter was +2.5% ± 16.9% (k = 1). The majority (64%) of per catheter MOSkin measured doses agreed with the treatment planning system within the calculated uncertainty budget of 12.3%. ConclusionThe results of the study agreed well with previously published data, despite differences in clinical workflows. To improve the redundancy to potential dosimeter errors, a minimum of 4 MOSkin dosimeters should be used when performing real-time in-vivo rectal dosimetry for HDR pBT, and error thresholds should be based off the total combined uncertainty estimate of measurement. ‘Real time’ error thresholds can be more confidently applied in the future through enhanced integration between IVD systems with both the imaging device and the BTPS/afterloader.

Clinical implementation, logistics and workflow guide for MRI image based interstitial HDR brachytherapy for gynecological cancers.

Interstitial brachytherapy (IBT) is often utilized to treat women with bulky endometrial or cervical cancers not amendable to intracavitary treatments. A modern trend in IBT is the utilization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a high dose rate (HDR) afterloader for conformal 3D image‐based treatments. The challenging part of this procedure is to properly complete many sequenced and co‐related physics preparations. We presented the physics preparations and clinical workflow required for implementing MRI‐based HDR IBT (MRI‐HDR‐IBT) of gynecologic cancer patients in a high‐volume brachytherapy center. The present document is designed to focus on the clinical steps required from a physicist’s standpoint. Those steps include: (a) testing IBT equipment with MRI scanner, (b) preparation of templates and catheters, (c) preparation of MRI line markers, (d) acquisition, importation and registration of MRI images, (e) development of treatment plans and (f) treatment evaluation and documentation. The checklists of imaging acquisition, registration and plan development are also presented. Based on the TG‐100 recommendations, a workflow chart, a fault tree analysis and an error‐solution table listing the speculated errors and solutions of each step are provided. Our workflow and practice indicated the MRI‐HDR‐IBT is achievable in most radiation oncology clinics if the following equipment is available: MRI scanner, CT (computed tomography) scanner, MRI/CT compatible templates and applicators, MRI line markers, HDR afterloader and a brachytherapy treatment planning system capable of utilizing MRI images. The OR/procedure room availability and anesthesiology support are also important. The techniques and approaches adopted from the GEC‐ESTRO (Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie ‐ European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology) recommendations and other publications are proven to be feasible. The MRI‐HDR‐IBT program can be developed over time and progressively validated through clinical experience, this document is expected to serve as a reference workflow guideline for implementing and performing the procedure.

Derivation of in vivo source tracking error thresholds for TRUS-based HDR prostate brachytherapy through simulation of source positioning errors

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to simulate treatment planning source positioning errors in transrectal ultrasound–based real-time high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatments and determine appropriate in vivo source tracking error thresholds. Methods and MaterialsTreatment planning source positioning errors were simulated for 20 patient plans in the brachytherapy treatment planning system by manually adjusting the dwell position coordinates within selected catheters without plan reoptimization. The change in dose-volume histogram (DVH) indices was calculated as a function of the source positioning error. The magnitude of the change in the DVH indices was then used to derive appropriate in vivo source tracking error thresholds. ResultsSource positioning error thresholds to prevent potentially significant changes in prostate (target) DVH metrics ranged from 2 to 5 mm, dependent on the direction of the source positioning error, as well as the relative weight of the dwell position within the plan, and its position relative to the patient anatomy. Source positioning error thresholds to prevent potentially clinically significant changes in organ at risk DVH metrics were found to be complex and patient-dependent. ConclusionsIn vivo source tracking error thresholds for transrectal ultrasound–based real-time high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy were investigated via the simulation of treatment planning source positioning errors. These error thresholds were found to be dependent not only on the direction of the error, but also on the endpoint. There is still the potential for larger changes in DVH indices to occur for catheter shifts smaller than the proposed threshold levels in this study.

Study of surgery combined with 125I brachytherapy for adenoid cystic carcinoma of oral and maxillofacial region

To retrospectively analyze the results of treatment outcome by surgery combined with 125I brachytherapy and correlative factors of adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). In the study, 75 patients with primary ACC of oral and maxillofacial region were treated by surgery combined with 125I seeds brachytherapy. Radical resection or subtotal resection was applied for the tumor. The brachytherapy treatment planning system was used to create implant plans with the prescribed dose of 60 Gy to 120 Gy. The 125I seeds were implanted intraoperatively or postoperatively. The regular follow-up was required. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess the tumor control rate and the patients' survival rates. Meanwhile, the Cox regression analysis was used to find out the prognostic factors. Local control rates at the end of 3 and 5 years were as follows: T1-T2, 92.2% and 82.0%; T3-T4, 82.6% and 82.6%; and overall, 90.0% and 78.8%. The disease-free survival rates were 74.9% and 54.3%, respectively. The overall survival rates for all the patients were 86.0% and 79.6%, respectively at the end of 3 and 5 years and were 91.3% and 91.3% for T1-T2 patients vs. 73.9% and 59.7% for T3-T4 patients. Distant metastasis-free survival rates at the end of 3 and 5 years were 84.4% and 76.7%, respectively. The distant metastasis-free survival rates at the end of 3 and 5 years were 83.4% and 79.6% with T1-T2 lesion compared with 86.0% and 67.8% with T3-T4 lesion. According to the COX univariate analysis and multivariate analysis, the risk of local recurrence would be raised by the age. Tumor stage and tumor site were the prognostic factors of the overall survival rates. 125I brachytherapy conducted as an adjuvant therapy postoperatively of ACC of oral and maxillofacial region can acquire satisfactory localregional control, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival. Tumors are prone to recur on the older patients. Patients having advanced tumor stage or tumor located in the nasal cavity or sinuses will suffer lower survival rates.

Subdermal injection of hyaluronic acid to decrease skin toxicity from radiation delivered with low-dose-rate brachytherapy for cancer patients.

PurposeTo study the feasibility of hyaluronic acid (HA) injection to increase the distance between skin and radioactive sources, and dose reduction of skin during low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy.Material and methods: A total of 11 patients with subdermal malignant tumors were enrolled in this study. HA was injected after I-125 seed implantation, and dosimetric parameters were calculated by a brachytherapy treatment planning system (BTPS). The distance of the new space between radioactive sources and skin was measured on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Clinical signs were observed and followed up for every patient.ResultsAfter HA injection, the average of newly generated maximum distance was 1.0 cm along the entire length of the tumor. The D90 and V100 did not significantly change for tumors before or after injection (p = 0.39, p = 0.50, respectively). The maximum dose to a relatively small volume (0.1 cc) of the skin (OAR-Max) decreased from 100.66 Gy to 61.20 Gy (p < 0.05), and the mean skin dose (OAR-Mean) decreased from 49.20 Gy to 17.27 Gy (p < 0.05) after injection. On follow-up CT and MRI, HA was quite stable in shape and position for nearly 6 months.ConclusionsOur study results showed that an additional 1.0 cm distance between the radioactive source and skin could be induced by HA injection in patients with subdermal tumor, and this distance could significantly decrease the skin dose in LDR brachytherapy. In addition, no obvious toxicity and side effects were produced by HA injection. Therefore, hyaluronic acid injection is a safe and effective technique.

Hybrid optimization based on non-coplanar needles for brachytherapy dose planning.

PurposeAn ideal dose distribution in a target is the ultimate goal of preoperative dose planning. Furthermore, avoiding vital organs or tissues such as blood vessels or bones during the puncture procedure is significant in low-dose-rate brachytherapy. The aim of this work is to develop a hybrid inverse optimization method based on non-coplanar needles to assist the physician during conformal dose planning, which cannot be properly achieved with a traditional coplanar template.Material and methodsThe hybrid inverse optimization technique include two novel technologies: an inverse optimization algorithm and a dose volume histogram evaluation method. Brachytherapy treatment planning system was designed as an experimental platform. Left lung adenocarcinoma case was used to test the performance of the method in non-coplanar and coplanar needles, and malignant tumor of spine case was involved to test the practical application of this technique. In addition, the optimization time of every test was also recorded.ResultsThe proposed method can achieve an ideal dose distribution, avoiding vital organs (bones). In the first experiment, 13 non-coplanar needles and 24 seeds were used to get an ideal dose distribution to cover the target, whereas 11 coplanar needles and 23 seeds were used to cover the same target. In the second experiment, the new method used 22 non-coplanar needles and 65 seeds to cover the target, while 63 seeds and 22 needles were used in the actual operation. In addition, the computation time of the hybrid inverse optimization method was 20.5 seconds in the tumor of 94.67 cm3 by using 22 needles, which was fast enough for clinical application.ConclusionsThe hybrid inverse optimization method achieved high conformity in the clinical practice. The non-coplanar needle can help to achieve a better dose distribution than the coplanar needle.

P241] Factors affecting urethral dose in intracavitary brachytherapy using multichannel vaginal applicator

Purpose In intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBRT) performed with multichannel vaginal applicators (MVA), there is scarce data on the factors affecting urethral dose. In this study it was aimed to define the factors influencing urethral dose in patients with vaginal involvement treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and ICBRT using tandem + Miami applicators (MA). Methods Five consecutive gynecological cancer patients (4 with cervical and 1 with vaginal cancer) given 3-D conformal ICBRT using tandem + MA were included in this retrospective dosimetric study. The patients’ disease stage was II in 2, and III in 3 of them. EBRT total dose was 4500–5050 cGy while brachytherapy total dose dose was 1950–2600 cGy delivered with 400–700 cGy fraction dose in 3–5 fractions. Angulated tandem was used in all patients. The diameter of the MA ranged between 3 and 4 cm. Mean HR CTV D90 (as percentage of the prescribed dose) was 86% (77.6%-99.3%) in all patients. For this study urethra was contoured retrospectively by a radiation oncology specialist and controlled by a radiation oncology lecturer. Brachytherapy urethra D0.1 cc (as percentage of the prescribed dose) was obtained from the DVHs in brachytherapy treatment planning system. Patients were divided into two groups according to the diameter of MA used (diameter = 4 cm vs diameter ≥ 0.6 vs ratio 0.6). Mann Whitney test was used to compare groups with respect to urethra D0.1 cc. Results Brachytherapy mean urethra D0.1 cc was 99.8% (43.3%-134.9%) of the prescribed dose. Mean values were 113.9%, and 78.5% for high and low anterior loading groups, respectively (p = 0.564). Also, mean values were 120.4%, and 68.9% for large and small diameter applicator groups, respectively. Although mean urethra D0.1 cc was higher in the patients with large diameter MA, this difference didn’t reach statistical significance (p = 0.083). This may be due to the small number of patients in the study. Conclusions Larger and prospective studies are needed in order to determine factors affecting urethral dose when using MVAs.

Verification of the dose distribution calculated by the treatment planning system in high dose rate brachytherapy

For HDR brachytherapy, there is still no clear optimum method used to measure dosimetric accuracy. For brachytherapy, there is a steep dose fall off with distance which can make dosimetric measurements more challenging when compared with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). It is important that as HDR brachytherapy continues to develop that quality control measures develop also. The aim of this study is to verify the dose distribution for HDR brachytherapy using Gafchromic film. This was done by verifying the treatment dose for three brachytherapy applicators; the cylinder, fletcher and flap applicators. Each applicator was placed in a water phantom with calibrated Gafchromic film placed at known locations. The phantoms were scanned and planned on the brachytherapy treatment planning system (TPS), and the dose to the film noted. After irradiation the Gafchromic film was scanned and analysed. The results showed that the cylinder applicator had the largest percentage difference between the TPS dose and calculated dose with a difference of 11.93%. Smaller differences of 7.99% and 6.07% were seen for the fletcher and flap applicators respectively. However, uncertainties in these results were seen for each of the applicators and should be taken into account. It was observed that the Gafchromic film overestimated the dose for the three applicators, however provided steps were taken to reduce these uncertainties Gafchromic film does have the potential to be used as a QA tool to measure the dose distribution for HDR brachytherapy which this study set out to do.

Dosimetric feasibility of an anthropomorphic three-dimensional PRESAGE® dosimeter for verification of single entry hybrid catheter accelerated partial breast brachytherapy

AbstractPurposeTo determine the feasibility of an anthropomorphic breast polyurethane-based three-dimensional (3D) dosimeter with cavity to measure dose distributions and skin dose for a commercial strut-based applicator strut-adjusted volume implant (SAVI™) 6–1.Materials and methodsAn anthropomorphic breast 3D dosimeter was created with a cavity to accommodate the SAVI™ strut-based device. 2 Gy was prescribed to the breast dosimeter having D95 to planning target volume evaluation (PTV_EVAL) while limiting 125% of the prescribed dose to the skin. Independent dose distribution verification was performed with GAFCHROMIC® EBT2 film. The dose distribution from the 3D dosimeter was compared to the distributions from commercial brachytherapy treatment planning system (TPS) and film. Point skin doses, line profiles and dose–volume histogram (DVHs) for the skin and PTV_EVAL were compared.ResultsThe maximum difference in skin dose for TPS and the 3D dosimeter was 4% whereas 41% between the TPS and EBT2 film. The maximum dose difference for line profiles between TPS, 3D dosimeter, and film was 4·1%. DVHs of skin and PTV_EVAL for TPS and 3D dosimeter differed by a maximum of 4% at 5 mm depth and skin differed by a maximum 1·5% between TPS and 3D dosimeter. The criterion for gamma analysis comparison was 92·5% at ±5%±3 mm criterion. The TPS demonstrated at least ±5% comparability in predicting dose to the skin, PTV_EVAL and normal breast tissue.Conclusions3D anthropomorphic polyurethane dosimeter with cavity gives comparable results to the TPS dose predictions and GAFCHROMIC® EBT2 film results in the context of HDR brachytherapy.