Bankart Research Articles

Contribution of the Bony Bankart in Calculating Glenoid Bone Loss.

Determining the magnitude of glenoid bone loss in patients with anterior shoulder instability is an important step in guiding management. Most calculations to estimate the bone loss do not include the bony Bankart fragment. However, if it can be reduced and adequately fixed, the estimation of bone loss may be decreased. To derive a simple equation to calculate the surface area of the bony fragment in Bankart fractures. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. A total of 26 patients suspected of having clinically significant bone loss underwent computed tomography imaging preoperatively, and the percentage of glenoid bone loss (%BL) was approximated with imaging software using a freehand region of interest area measurement with and without the inclusion of the bony Bankart fragment. By assuming this bony fragment as a hemi-ellipse with height, H, and thickness, d, we represented the surface are of the bony piece (), and subtracted it from the overall %BL. They compared this value with the one found using imaging software. Without the inclusion of the bony Bankart, the overall %BL by the standard true-fit circle measured using imaging software was 23.8% ± 9.7%. When including the bony Bankart, the glenoid %BL measured using imaging software was found to be 12.1% ± 8.5%. The %BL calculated by our equation with the bony Bankart included was 10% ± 11.1%. There was no statistically significant difference between the %BL values measured using the equation and the imaging software (P = .46). Using a simple equation that approximates the bony Bankart fragment as a hemiellipse allowed for estimation of the glenoid bone loss, assuming that the fragment can be reduced and adequately fixed. This method may serve as a helpful tool in preoperative planning when there are considerations for incorporating the bony fragment in the repair.

Do We Need A Bone Block Procedure in Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability?: A Case Report

Background: Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability (RASI) is usually preceded by trauma. The incidence recurrence rate is high in trauma Induced RASI, especially in younger patients. The right diagnosis and management must be ruled out immediately for a better outcome. Case Report: The 28-year-old man complained of right shoulder instability for the past eight years, which worsened in the last year. The patient had a history of trauma. Anterior apprehension and relocation test for the right shoulder showed a positive result. Radiologic imaging showed bony bankart loss (27%) and an on-track hillsach lesion of the humeral head. The Instability Severity Index Score (ISIS) is 7 points. Based on these results, an open surgery bone block-Latarjet procedure was done. The surgery was successfully performed, and there was no sign of recurrent instability and pain after one year.Discussion: The number of recurrent shoulder dislocations is over 75%. Bone loss found in the patient will increase the chance of RASI. No block procedure effectively prevented future recurrence from the bone stop effect, which increases the glenoid cavity, stretching effect, and tensioning effect that prevents excessive humeral translation.Conclusion: In the case of RASI, treatment decisions need to be based on the patient's exact condition. Bone block-Latarjet procedure is indicated in patients with bony bankart loss >25%, on track hillsach lesion, and >6 ISIS. In this research, the patient showed improved functional and clinical outcomes after eight years of chronic shoulder instability.

Arthroscopic findings of the glenohumeral joint in symptomatic anterior instabilities: comparison between overhead throwing disorders and traumatic shoulder dislocation.

The term shoulder instability refers to a variety of mechanisms and clinical presentations. One of the common pathologies of throwing disorders is internal impingement with anterior instability. Most throwing athletes with symptomatic internal impingement with anterior instability exhibit positive apprehension and relocation test results, whereas those with recurrent anterior shoulder instability display positive apprehension test results. While the glenoid labrum-inferior glenohumeral ligament complex is a significant critical stabilizer for the prevention of anterior shoulder dislocation, the characteristics of the essential lesion in internal impingement with anterior instability have not been determined yet. This study aimed to compare the intra-articular lesion of athletes with internal impingement related to the overhead throwing motion in athletes with a traumatic shoulder dislocation. Sixty-one athletes (all men; mean age, 25.2±12.6yr) who underwent an arthroscopic procedure were divided into 2 groups: 25 in the throwing group and 36 in the dislocation group. All shoulders had subtle glenohumeral instability defined by a positive anterior apprehension test and a relocation test. Those with voluntary and multidirectional instability and large glenoid bone loss (more than 25%) were excluded from the current study. All shoulders were evaluated for the following evidence: rotator cuff injury, superior labrum tear anterior and posterior lesions, labral pathologies including Bankart lesions, osteochondral lesions to the humeral head, biceps tendon fraying or rupture, and inferior glenohumeral ligament and middle glenohumeral ligament (MGHL) conditions. Arthroscopic findings of the throwing group showed more supraspinatus injuries (92% and 25%, P<.001), type II superior labrum tear anterior and posterior lesions (60% and 3%, P<.001), posterosuperior labral lesions (92% and 39%, P<.001), and hypoplastic MGHLs (56% and 6%, P<.001) and lesser Bankart lesions (8% and 92%, P<.05) than those of the dislocation group. These results indicate that the characteristic lesions of internal impingement with anterior instability in throwing athletes include partial thickness rotator cuff tears, superior labrum tear anterior and posterior lesions, posterosuperior labral tears, and hypoplastic MGHLs. As expected, the physiopathology of internal impingement with anterior instability in throwing athletes may be related to the dysfunction of the anterosuperior glenohumeral capsular ligament, including the MGHL, rather than the inferior glenohumeral ligament as in traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations. These findings would be useful for defining treatment strategies for internal impingement with anterior instability in overhead throwing athletes.

A Study of Clinical and Functional Outcome of Arthroscopic Repair versus Open Latarjet Surgery for Bankart Lesion (Minimum Six (6) Months Follow Up

A Study of Clinical and Functional Outcome of Arthroscopic Repair versus Open Latarjet Surgery for Bankart Lesion (Minimum Six (6) Months Follow Up

Knotless All-Suture, Soft Anchor Bankart Repair Results in Excellent Patient-Reported Outcomes, High Patient Satisfaction, and Acceptable Recurrent Instability Rates at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

To evaluate minimum 2-year outcomes after arthroscopic knotless all-suture soft anchor Bankart repair in patients with anterior shoulder instability. This was a retrospective case series of patients who underwent Bankart repair using soft, all-suture, knotless anchors (FiberTak anchors) from 10/2017 to 06/2019. Exclusion criteria were concomitant bony Bankart lesion, shoulder pathology other than that involving the superior labrum or long head biceps tendon, or previous shoulder surgery. Scores collected preoperatively and postoperatively included SF-12 PCS, ASES, SANE, QuickDASH, and patient satisfaction with various sports participation questions. Surgical failure was defined as revision instability surgery or redislocation requiring reduction. A total of 31 active patients, 8 females and 23 males, with a mean age of 29 (range: 16-55) years were included. At a mean of 2.6 years (range: 2.0-4.0), patient-reported outcomes significantly improved over preoperative levels. ASES score improved from 69.9 to 93.3 (P < .001), SANE improved from 56.3 to 93.8 (P < .001), QuickDASH improved from 32.1 to 6.3 (P < .001) and SF-12 PCS improved from 45.6 to 55.7 (P < .001). Median patient postoperative satisfaction was 10/10 (range: 4-10). Patients reported a significant improvement sports participation (P < .001), pain with competition (P= .001), ability to compete in sports (P < .001), painless use of arm for overhead activities (P= .001), and shoulder function during recreational sporting activity (P < .001). Postoperative shoulder redislocations were reported in 4 cases (12.9%)-all after major trauma-with 2 patients progressing to Latarjet (6.45%) at 2 and 3 years postoperatively. There were no cases of postoperative instability without major trauma. Knotless all-suture, soft anchor Bankart repair resulted in excellent patient-reported outcomes, high patient satisfaction, and acceptable recurrent instability rates, in this series of active patients. Redislocation after arthroscopic Bankart repair with a soft, all-suture anchor only occurred after return to competitive sports with new high-level trauma. Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

Return to sports after arthroscopic Bankart repair in teenage athletes: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundAnterior shoulder instability is frequent among young athletes. Surgical treatment for this injury aims to facilitate an early return to sports (RTS). However, the rate of recurrent instability after surgery is reportedly high among young patients, and it is unclear whether surgery ensures satisfactory RTS. The purpose of this study was to verify the clinical outcomes and RTS after arthroscopic Bankart repair in competitive teenage athletes without critical bone loss in the glenoid.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed competitive teenage athletes who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair. Patients with large bony defects in the glenoid, larger than 20% of the healthy side, were excluded. Clinical outcomes, recurrent instability, the final level of RTS, and the time needed for RTS were analyzed.ResultsIn total, 50 patients with a mean follow-up period of 44.5 ± 19.6 (range, 24–85 months) months were included. The mean age at surgery was 16.8 ± 1.7 (range, 13–19 years) years. Two patients (4.0%) experienced recurrent instability. All patients returned to sports, 96% of patients participated competitively, and 76% achieved a complete return to the pre-injury level without any complaints. The time for RTS was 6.6 ± 2.7 months (range, 3–18 months), to competitions was 9.3 ± 4.0 (range, 6–24 months) months, and to complete return was 10.6 ± 4.3 (range, 8–24 months) months. The complete return rates varied by sports type, with 82% in contact athletes, 59% in dominant-hand overhead athletes, and 100% in other athletes (P = 0.026). Other preoperative factors or concomitant lesion such as bony Bankart, superior labrum tear, or humeral avulsion of glenohumeral ligament lesion did not affect the complete RTS.ConclusionArthroscopic Bankart repair is an effective surgical procedure for anterior shoulder instability, even among competitive teenage athletes. Sports type was the only factor associated with complete RTS after surgery.

Latarjet Procedure to Restore Glenohumeral Stability in a Patient With a Postage Stamp Fracture

The “postage stamp fracture” is an anterior glenoid rim fracture following arthroscopic repair of a Bankart lesion. Often occurring at the time of an acute trauma, a fracture line propagates though the previous Bankart repair anchor sites, resulting in recurrent anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint. The resultant glenoid rim fracture edge gives a similar appearance as the edge of a stamp, with the osseous edge having the classic “perforation” pattern. When patients present with a postage stamp fracture, even in the setting of subcritical glenoid bone loss, we believe that additional soft-tissue stabilization procedures and/or fracture fixation pose a significant risk of failure. In our opinion, a Latarjet procedure is recommended in a majority of patients with a postage stamp fracture for restoration of glenohumeral stability. The procedure offers a reliable, reproducible surgical intervention that controls for many of the factors that can make arthroscopic revision unreliable, such as poor bone quality, adhesions, labral degeneration, and bone loss. Here, we outline our preferred surgical technique to restore glenohumeral stability using the Latarjet procedure for a patient with a postage stamp fracture.

Arthroscopic Bony Bankart Repair Technique: A Technical Note

Introduction: Labrum is a static stabilitator of the glenohumeral joint. Tear to this fibrocartilaginous structure could cause shoulder instability. Lately, anterior detachment of labrum is known as a contributor to recurrent anterior instability. Anterior labrum detachments are the classic Bankart lesion. Bankart lesion involving avulsion fracture is known as bony Bankart lesion. Management for this lesion is done operatively by doing antomical repair to return rigidity to its original state. Bankart repairs were originally done openly with coracoid osteotomy and subscapularis tenotomy. Currently, arthroscopic Bankart repair is often used as the preferred surgical management. Variations of portal placements, suture placements, suture technique and other components of Bankart repair can be found today, giving options for surgeons to achieve optimal results. Surgical Technique: In athletes, bony Bankart lesion, as an intraarticular lesion with displaced labrum and avulsion causing instability, is an absolute indication for surgical intervention to ensure function return. Nonoperative treatments have been reported on small bony Bankart lesions, but outcome on follow-up showed 25% recurrent instability. We performed arthroscopic bony Brankart repair by implementing labral repair, intraosesus tunneling and double-row suture bridge techniques. First, landmarks of incisions and portals were made. Incisions for visualisation were then done. Anterior portal and posterior portal were established before identifying bony Bankart lesion. A 5 o’ clock, trans subscapularis portal was then created. We released the bony Bankart and curatage the margin. A 6 o’clock stitch was anchored through rigid suture passage (drilled bone tunnel) in 5 o’clock direction. A 4.30 o’clock stitch was anchored in a 4 o’clock suture passage. The last stitch was a 3 o’clock stitch anchored through a 3 o’clock passage. Soft tissue release was conducted until subscapularis fibers were exposed. In the remodelling process, we performed overcorrection repair. Modifications done to the Bankart repair in this paper were done to achieve excellent post-op anterior stabilization.

Arthroscopic-Assisted Anterior Glenoid Reconstruction Using Nonrigid Fixation With Distal Tibia Osteochondral Allograft

Introduction: Traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability events result in a capsulolabral (Bankart lesion) and/or osseous injury with subsequent attritional bone loss, particularly with recurrence. Up to 88% of patients with recurrent instability experience glenoid bone loss, which predisposes to future dislocations and subluxations, even with arthroscopic capsulolabral repair. The surgical management of glenoid bone loss includes a number of different techniques such as the Latarjet or coracoid transfer as well as other osseous and osteoarticular autografts and allografts. However, operative management of shoulder instability has increasingly shifted toward arthroscopic approaches with preservation of anatomy when possible. Indications: Arthroscopic-assisted allograft distal tibia bone block augmentation to the anterior glenoid is indicated for revision anterior glenohumeral instability procedures with anterior bone loss and in primary cases of anterior instability with critical bone loss. Technique: Our technique for nonrigid arthroscopic anterior glenoid reconstruction with allograft distal tibia and anterior labral repair is performed preferentially in the lateral position without necessitating patient repositioning. The preplanned tibial bone block is prepared on a back table prior to the arthroscopic procedure. After creation of portals and elevation of labral tissue, a guide and drill are used to introduce a retrograde reamer which is deployed to create a perpendicular edge for apposition of the allograft tibia. The bone block is then introduced through a rotator interval portal by pulling sutures retrograde through glenoid bone tunnels and is secured to the prepared surface medial to the liberated labrum. The articular surface of the graft and glenoid are aligned and suture-based fixation is used to compress the bone block against the native glenoid. The anterior labral tissue is then mobilized over the graft and repaired to the native glenoid when possible. Description/Conclusion: The benefits of allograft tibia augmentation for anterior instability with glenoid bone loss include an anatomic joint surface restoration including articular cartilage, lack of donor site morbidity, and a minimally invasive arthroscopic approach. When performed arthroscopically and with nonrigid fixation, this technique permits concurrent anterior labral repair and anatomic reconstruction, safe graft passage without necessity of a far medial portal, and expeditious return to function.

Isolated Large Glenoid Fracture and Acute Glenohumeral Dislocation in Elderly Patients: A Case Series Treated Surgically With Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty and Augmented Glenoid.

One of the most frequent complications in patients affected by traumatic anterior dislocations is bony Bankart lesion. This study evaluates the clinical and functional outcomes of 10 patients with isolated large glenoid fracture and acute glenohumeral dislocation treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Patients older than 69 years who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty after isolated large glenoid fracture and acute glenohumeral dislocation between 2016 and 2022 at the same institute were selected. Shoulder range of motion and pain level was assessed. The impact on quality of life has been evaluated through four measures: the constant scale, the simple shoulder test (SST), the OXFORD scale, and The University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder scale. The mean Constant score was 77.1 (range 68-84), the mean SST score was 9.4 (range 8-10), the Oxford score was 44.3 (range 35-48), and the UCLA shoulder scale was 27.1 (range 24-30). No reoperation was performed on any patient in this series. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for elderly patients with bony Bankart lesion and acute glenohumeral dislocation represents a valuable option in terms of clinical results, patient satisfaction and early- to medium-term complications.

Results of Arthroscopic Repair of Bankart Lesion in Chronic Anterior Instability of the Shoulder

Background: The shoulder is the most commonly dislocated major joint, affecting roughly 2% of the general population. Long-term studies have demonstrated a correlation between the number of instability episodes and the risk of degenerative arthritis. In an effort to treat the unstable shoulder, orthopedic surgeons have described several different operations that may help to prevent recurrent subluxation or dislocation in chronic instability cases. This study has been undertaken to assess the short-term functional outcome of Arthroscopic repair of Bankart’s Lesion in patients with Chronic Anterior Instability of the Shoulder using Constant Murley’s Score.

Glenoid defect size increases but the bone fragment rarely resorbs in shoulders with recurrent anterior instability

With recurrent anterior instability the bone fragment of a bony Bankart lesion is often small compared to the glenoid defect. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the changes to both the bone fragment and glenoid defect over time in a single subject. Participants were patients who underwent computed tomography (CT) at least twice after an instability event between 2004 and 2021 and had a fragment-type glenoid at first CT. The glenoid rim width (A), glenoid defect width (B), and bone fragment width (C) were measured in millimeters. If B or C increased by 1 mm or more from the first to final CT, the change was judged as "enlarged," and if B or C decreased by 1 mm or more, it was judged as "reduced"; all other cases were judged as "similar." Then, glenoid defect size and bone fragment size were calculated as B/A×100% and C/A×100%, respectively, and the changes from the first to final CT were compared. From the first to final CT, the glenoid defect was enlarged in 30 shoulders, similar in 13shoulders, and reduced in 4 shoulders, and the bone fragment was enlarged in 18 shoulders, similar in 24 shoulders, and reduced in 5 shoulders. The mean glenoid defect size significantly increased from 10.9% to 15.3% (P<.001), and the mean bone fragment size increased from 6.4% to 7.8%, respectively (P=.005). At the final CT, in 6 shoulders a new glenoid fracture was observed at a different site from the original fracture. When they were excluded from the analyses, the mean glenoid defect size still significantly increased (from 11.2% to 15.2%; P<.001), but the mean bone fragment size did not (6.5% vs. 7.3%, respectively; P=.088). In shoulders with recurrent anterior instability, glenoid defect size appears to increase significantly over time, whereas the bone fragment size remains unchanged or increases only slightly. Bone fragment resorption is quite rare, and a bone fragment appears to be small because of an enlarged glenoid defect.

Arthroscopic Hill-Sachs Filling Technique Using an Absorbable Interference Screw

We present an arthroscopic technique used to treat traumatic shoulder instability in the patient with a Hill-Sachs lesion, especially an off-track lesion. The incidence of this bony defect is approximately 40% to 90% of all anterior shoulder instability cases—and up to 100% in patients with recurrent anterior instability. Incorrect management of this humeral bone defect can lead to treatment failure, and it is essential to define characteristics such as the lesion’s location, depth, width, and orientation. Many arthroscopic and open procedures have been described for the surgical management of the Hill-Sachs lesion. Using arthroscopy for the surgical treatment of shoulder instability offers numerous advantages. We describe an arthroscopic technique that consists of filling the Hill-Sachs lesion with absorbable interference screws made out of an advanced biocomposite material. After repair of the Hill-Sachs lesion, the Bankart lesion is repaired. As these screws are resorbed by bone tissue over several months, the bony anatomy is restored.

The Remplissage Technique for Hill–Sachs Lesions in Competitive Athletes: A Narrative Review

Anterior shoulder instability with Bankart lesion and associated posterior humeral head injury (Hill–Sachs) is common in athletes. Several treatments have been proposed for the management of the Hill–Sachs lesion, from bone grafts or rotation osteotomies to capsulotendinous interposition, such as remplissage. This procedure has been shown to be safe and effective in increasing glenohumeral stability. However, the correct indication concerning the bone defect and its effects in terms of range of motion and function, especially in highly demanding patients, is still debated. This narrative review aims to present the current state-of-the-art of the posterior capsulotenodesis in association with Bankart repair, for treating anterior shoulder instability in competitive athletes.

The process of bone union after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair in younger athletes with a subcritical glenoid defect: An advantage of remained large bone fragment

BackgroundThe purpose of the present study was to investigate the bone union process after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair (ABBR) in shoulders with a subcritical glenoid defect of 13.5% or larger. MethodsBone union process after ABBR performed from 2011 to 2018 were retrospectively investigated in 47 athletes younger than 30 years with a subcritical glenoid defect, who underwent CT at least twice postoperatively. The change of bone union between first CT within 6 months and final CT later than 6 months was investigated, especially noticing bone fragment size (≥7.5% versus <7.5%). ResultsThe mean period at first CT and at final CT was 4.1 ± 0.6 months (3–6 months) and 16.8 ± 11.6 months (7–71 months), respectively. From the first to final CT, among 15 shoulders with a small bone fragment (<7.5%), complete union increased from 4 shoulders (26.7%) to 8 shoulders (53.3%), while among 32 shoulders with a large bone fragment (≥7.5%), complete union increased from 15 shoulders (46.9%) to 25 shoulders (78.1%). On the other hand, while non-union or disappeared bone fragment was recognized in 8 shoulders (53.3%) with a small fragment and in 2 shoulders (6.3%) with a large fragment at first CT, it was solely recognized in 4 shoulders (26.7%) with a small fragment and in no shoulders with a large fragment at final CT. While postoperative glenoid fracture at the site of bone union was recognized in 7 shoulders, complete union was finally obtained after conservative treatment in 5 shoulders. So, final complete union was obtained in 9 (60%) of 15 shoulders with a small fragment and in 29 (90.6%) of 32 shoulders with a large fragment (p = 0.021). ConclusionsIn shoulders with a subcritical glenoid defect, when a large bone fragment (≥7.5%) was repaired, complete union rate was higher and complete union could be obtained earlier.

The "purse string" technique for anterior glenohumeral instability: long-term results 7-13-year follow-up.

The "Purse-String Technique" (PST) is an arthroscopic horizontal mattress suture technique for recurrent anterior shoulder instability that uses a single double-loaded suture anchor at the 4-o' clock position, achieving a Bankart labral repair and an infero-superior capsular shift. In this study, we describe the long-term results of the PST. The study included 69 individuals (70 shoulders), with a mean age of 30years, who had recurrent post-traumatic anteroinferior instability. Apurse-stringsuture anchor at the 4-o'clock position was used to address the Bankart lesion and capsular laxity, recreating the anterior glenoid bumper. All patients were assessed via telephone interview at a mean of 116months after surgery (7-13-year follow-up). Postoperatively, the mean Constant score was 94, mean Rowe score was 93 and mean Walch-Duplay score was 89. 89% of patients resumed their preinjury sport activities, with 61% of patients achieving preinjury levels and most professional athletes returning to full activity. Seven patients had recurrent dislocation postoperatively (10% failure rate). Of these patients, three had revision arthroscopic stabilization, one patient had revision arthroscopic stabilization with remplissage, two had a Latarjet procedure, whereas one patient decided to seek no further treatment. The long-term results of PST are promising, with a low failure rate, high patient satisfaction and a high rate of return to sport. Level IV; Case series; Treatment study.

Unrecognized glenoid fracture in opposite shoulders with symptomatic anterior instability

BackgroundThe purpose of the present study was to investigate the characteristics of unrecognized glenoid fracture in opposite shoulders with symptomatic anterior instability. MethodsParticipants were 38 patients, who had complaints of instability on only one side (symptomatic shoulder) and had no complaints despite of a glenoid fracture on the other shoulder (asymptomatic shoulder) from 2011 to 2020. Factors that could influence the onset of symptoms including glenoid rim morphology were retrospectively investigated. ResultsAmong the asymptomatic shoulders, 16 had a single traumatic event and 22 had no history of trauma. The glenoid morphology was normal in 6, erosion in 12 and bony Bankart in 20 on the symptomatic side, whereas the respective shoulders were 0, 16 and 22 on the asymptomatic side. Bone union of bony Bankart was complete in 9, partial in 3 and non-union in 8 on the symptomatic side, whereas the respective shoulders were 18, 3 and 1 on the asymptomatic side. The mean glenoid defect size was 10.4% and 7.8%, and the mean bone fragment size was 5.0% and 4.5%, respectively. The mean medial displacement of bone fragments was 2.6 mm and 1.0 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). A larger glenoid defect (≥10%) was recognized in 19 symptomatic shoulders and 10 asymptomatic shoulders. Among them, erosion was solely recognized in 5 symptomatic shoulders. In shoulders with bony Bankart, all 10 asymptomatic shoulders had a completely or partially united fragment with less than 2 mm displacement. On the other hand, among 14 symptomatic shoulders, united fragment was solely recognized in 8 shoulders, in which medial displacement was less than 2 mm in 3 shoulders. ConclusionsEven if a glenoid fracture occurred, symptom such as instability or pain was not always recognized by all patients. Regardless of glenoid defect size, shoulders with a completely or partially united bone fragment and with less than 2 mm displacement were found to be asymptomatic.

Biomechanical Analysis of Posterior Open-Wedge Osteotomy and Glenoid Concavity Reconstruction Using an Implant-Free, J-Shaped Iliac Crest Bone Graft

Background: Posterior open-wedge osteotomy and glenoid reconstruction using a J-shaped iliac crest bone graft showed promising clinical results for the treatment of posterior instability with excessive glenoid retroversion and posteroinferior glenoid deficiency. Purpose: To evaluate the biomechanical performance of the posterior J-shaped graft to restore glenoid retroversion and posteroinferior deficiency in a cadaveric shoulder instability model. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A posterior glenoid open-wedge osteotomy was performed in 6 fresh-frozen shoulders, allowing the glenoid retroversion to be set at 0°, 10°, and 20°. At each of these 3 preset angles of glenoid retroversion, the following conditions were simulated: (1) intact joint, (2) posterior Bankart lesion, (3) 20% posteroinferior glenoid deficiency, and (4) posterior J-shaped graft (at 0° of retroversion). With the humerus in the Jerk position (60° of glenohumeral anteflexion, 60° of internal rotation), stability was evaluated by measuring posterior humeral head (HH) translation (in mm) and peak translational force (in N) to translate the HH over 25% of the glenoid width. Glenohumeral contact patterns were measured using pressure-sensitive sensors. Fixation of the posterior J-graft was analyzed by recording graft micromovements during 3000 cycles of 5-mm anteroposterior HH translations. Results: Reconstructing the glenoid with a posterior J-graft to 0° of retroversion significantly increased stability compared with a posterior Bankart lesion and posteroinferior glenoid deficiency in all 3 preset degrees of retroversion (P < .05). There was no significant difference in joint stability comparing the posterior J-graft with an intact joint at 0° of retroversion. The posterior J-graft restored mean contact area and contact pressure comparable with that of the intact condition with 0° of retroversion (222 vs 223 mm2, P = .980; and 0.450 vs 0.550 MPa, P = .203). The mean total graft displacement after 3000 cycles of loading was 43 ± 84 µm, and the mean maximal mediolateral graft bending was 508 ± 488 µm. Conclusion: Biomechanical analysis of the posterior J-graft demonstrated reliable restoration of initial glenohumeral joint stability, normalization of contact patterns comparable with that of an intact shoulder joint with neutral retroversion, and secure initial graft fixation in the cadaveric model. Clinical Relevance: This study confirms that the posterior J-graft can restore stability and glenohumeral loading conditions comparable with those of an intact shoulder.

Designing and validating a comparison card method for quantification of glenoid bone defect

To design and investigate a comparison card to evaluate the glenoid bone defect compared with Sugaya method. 33 patients with bony Bankart lesions were included. The comparison card and Sugaya method were performed on two occasions by three participants. The intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis and the inter-group correlation coefficient analysis of two measurements was performed. The concordance of the two methods was assessed using Bland–Altman analysis. Firstly, the percentage of defect measured by Sugaya method was 10.32 ± 8.38, and the comparison card method was 10.26 ± 8.41, 10.15 ± 8.23, and 10.62 ± 8.48, separately. There was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). The second measurement showed it was 10.37 ± 8.39 for Sugaya method, and 10.23 ± 8.37, 10.15 ± 8.35, 10.54 ± 8.49 for the comparison card, without a statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). For the comparison card, the intra- and inter-observer ICC values were all > 0.75. In the first measurement, Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated agreement between the two methods (bias, −0.03; SD, 0.48; − 0.97– 0.91; 95% CI, − 0.1999– 0.1413). Agreement was also found between them (bias, 0.07; SD, 0.61; − 1.13– 1.26; 95% CI, − 0.1509– 0.2812) in the second measurement. The comparison card method has similar accuracy with Sugaya method, which is of great reliability and convenience.

Recurrence of glenohumeral instability in patients with isolated rotator cuff repair after a traumatic shoulder dislocation.

The primary objective of this study was to assess the incidence of recurrent glenohumeral instability in patients over 40years with isolated rotator cuff (RC) repair for traumatic shoulder dislocation. The secondary objectives were to identify risk factors for glenohumeral recurrence after RC repair and to describe the causes and incidences of re-intervention. In this retrospective cohort study, data of consecutive patients at a single trauma center between January 2014 and July 2019 were reviewed, and 84 patients with a mean age of 57 (range: 40-75) years and follow-up duration of 3.9 (2-6) years were included. The inclusion criteria were as follows: first traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation, reparable RC tear, primary arthroscopic RC repair, no labral or bony Bankart lesion repair, and at least 2years of follow-up. Patients less than 40years of age were excluded. Shoulder instability recurrences and surgical reinterventions were reviewed with medical records. Statistical analysis was performed for qualitative variables using the Chi-squared test. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. There was one patient with a redislocation episode (1.2%) at 2.5years after surgery, who was surgically treated. Age, subscapular tears, bony Bankart injuries, humeral defects, and associated neurological injuries were not risk factors for recurrence in this study. Ten patients (11.9%) required reintervention. Nine patients (10.7%) re-tore their RCs. Recurrent glenohumeral instability in active patients over 40years with isolated RC repair after traumatic shoulder dislocation was infrequent, despite the incidence of significant Hill-Sachs defects, anterior glenoid defects, bipolar bone defects, size of the RC injury, and tendon re-tears. The incidence of re-interventions was 11.9%, with symptomatic RC retear as the main cause.