The process of bone union after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair in younger athletes with a subcritical glenoid defect: An advantage of remained large bone fragment

Abstract

BackgroundThe purpose of the present study was to investigate the bone union process after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair (ABBR) in shoulders with a subcritical glenoid defect of 13.5% or larger. MethodsBone union process after ABBR performed from 2011 to 2018 were retrospectively investigated in 47 athletes younger than 30 years with a subcritical glenoid defect, who underwent CT at least twice postoperatively. The change of bone union between first CT within 6 months and final CT later than 6 months was investigated, especially noticing bone fragment size (≥7.5% versus <7.5%). ResultsThe mean period at first CT and at final CT was 4.1 ± 0.6 months (3–6 months) and 16.8 ± 11.6 months (7–71 months), respectively. From the first to final CT, among 15 shoulders with a small bone fragment (<7.5%), complete union increased from 4 shoulders (26.7%) to 8 shoulders (53.3%), while among 32 shoulders with a large bone fragment (≥7.5%), complete union increased from 15 shoulders (46.9%) to 25 shoulders (78.1%). On the other hand, while non-union or disappeared bone fragment was recognized in 8 shoulders (53.3%) with a small fragment and in 2 shoulders (6.3%) with a large fragment at first CT, it was solely recognized in 4 shoulders (26.7%) with a small fragment and in no shoulders with a large fragment at final CT. While postoperative glenoid fracture at the site of bone union was recognized in 7 shoulders, complete union was finally obtained after conservative treatment in 5 shoulders. So, final complete union was obtained in 9 (60%) of 15 shoulders with a small fragment and in 29 (90.6%) of 32 shoulders with a large fragment (p = 0.021). ConclusionsIn shoulders with a subcritical glenoid defect, when a large bone fragment (≥7.5%) was repaired, complete union rate was higher and complete union could be obtained earlier.