The majority of bonus-malus systems (BMS) determine the premium for each policyholder solely based on their claim frequency. Adopting this method would be unjust. A driver who files a claim for small damage cannot be subjected to the same penalties as a driver responsible for a claim involving significant damage. To achieve a balance in the portfolio between good and bad drivers, a new portion of the premium is computed as a compromise. To do this, the claim severity is created and assessed to provide a fair premium. The consideration was determined by taking into account both the quantity and magnitude of the claims. This work assumes that the frequency of claims follows a Poisson-Akash distribution, but the severity of claims follows a newly proposed distribution known as the Inverse-Gamma Lindley distribution. The bonus-malus premiums were computed using the Bayesian approach for both the frequency and severity of claims. The premium is computed using the asymmetric Linex loss function for both the frequency and severity of claims in the bonus-malus system. Illustrative instances utilizing an actual dataset for the application of BMS are presented, showcasing the use of claim frequency alone and the combination of claim frequency and claim severity. The R software is employed for these demonstrations. We concluded this paper with a discussion comparing the premiums obtained in each case.