Changes In Bone Turnover Markers Research Articles

Changes in bone turnover markers (BTM) and association with outcomes in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) +/- docetaxel (D) in CHAARTED (ECOG-ACRIN E3805).

145 Background: In the phase 3 CHAARTED trial pts with mHSPC treated with ADT + D had an improved overall survival (OS) and longer time to castrate resistant prostate cancer (TTCRPC) than pts treated with ADT alone. We aimed to define the association of BTM levels with pt outcomes recognizing both ADT and bone metastases impact bone turnover. Methods: Serum samples were collected at baseline (BL) (within 28 days of starting ADT) in 233 (116 in ADT, 117 in ADT+D) pts and at week 24 in 423 (224 ADT+D, 199 ADT) pts. Samples were analyzed for osteocalcin (OC), osteoprotegrin (OPG), sclerostin (SL), RANKL and bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP). Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the prognostic and predictive effects of the BTM in terms of OS and TTCPRC. Results: Whereas BALP baseline (BL) level < BL median was associated with longer OS independent of therapy (HR 0.44 95% CI 0.31-0.63, p<0.001); BL OPG > BL median and BL RANKL < BL median were associated with longer OS in the ADT+D arm (HR 0.54 95% CI 0.32-0.9, p=0.015 and HR 1.69 95% CI 1,03-2.79, p=0.037) but not in the ADT alone arm (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.45 − 1.25, p=0.271 and HR 1.06 95% CI 0.65 − 1.73 p=0.827). Changes in markers from BL to week 24 varied based on treatment and volume of disease with statistically significant changes noted (Table). A rise in OC or BALP on therapy from BL to week 24 was associated with improved TTCRPC and OS (OC: HR(TTCRPC) 0.792, p=0.033, HR(OS) 0.78 p=0.047; BALP: HR(TTCRPC) 0.82, p=0.03, HR (OS) 0.79, p=0.013) controlling for week 24 levels. However higher absolute OC and BALP levels at week 24 were associated with worse outcomes. (OC: HR(TTCRPC) 1.37, p=0.003, HR(OS)1.38, p=0.006; BALP: HR(TTCRPC) 1.54, p=0.007, HR(OS) 1.77, p=0.001). Conclusions: The BL finding with BALP are consistent with higher BALP being a poor prognostic marker. The BL OPG and RANKL findings suggest these markers might identify men who benefit from addingf D to ADT. The paradoxical improved survival with a rise in OC and BALP on therapy but worse outcomes with absolute higher levels at week 24 highlights complex dynamics of bone turnover related to varied impact from ADT, bone healing when responding to therapy versus active cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT00309985. [Table: see text]

Declining serum bone turnover markers are associated with the short-term positive change of lumbar spine bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.

Objective:While serum bone turnover markers (BTMs) and bone mineral density (BMD) have been confirmed as useable risk assessment tools for postmenopausal osteoporosis, the associations between BTMs and BMD changes are still ambiguous. The aim of this study was to explore the underlying associations between BTMs and BMD changes in postmenopausal women.Methods:Between January 2015 and October 2020, 135 postmenopausal women were retrospectively enrolled. They were divided into two groups according to lumbar spine (LS) 1-4 BMD change (1 y T-score minus baseline T-score, Group 1 [n = 36] < 0 and Group 2 [n = 99] ≥ 0). The changes of BTMs (N-terminal middle segment osteocalcin [N-MID], propeptide of type I procollagen [P1NP], and β-C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen [β-CTX]) and their associations with LS 1-4 BMD change were analyzed. The biochemical indices and clinical parameters related with LS 1-4 BMD change were also evaluated.Results:The 1 year N-MID, P1NP, β-CTX and Phosphorus in Group 2 were lower than those in Group 1 (P < 0.05), their changes within 1 year were significantly negatively correlated with LS 1-4 BMD change (R2 = –0.200, P < 0.001; R2 = –0.230, P < 0.001; R2 = –0.186, P < 0.001; R2 = –0.044, P = 0.015; respectively). Except for the Phosphorus change (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.623), the changes of N-MID, P1NP, and β-CTX and their 1 year levels had similar AUC to diagnose the short-term LS 1-4 BMD change (AUC > 0.7 for all, with the AUC of 1 y P1NP being the largest at 0.803). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that the physical activity and drug intervention were the determinant factors for the LS 1-4 BMD change (odds ratio = 6.856, 95% confidence interval: 2.058-22.839, P = 0.002; odds ratio = 5.114, 95% confidence interval: 1.551-16.864, P = 0.007; respectively).Conclusions:Declining N-MID, P1NP, β-CTX, and Phosphorus are associated with the short-term increase of LS 1-4 BMD within 1 year. Physical activity and drug intervention are factors significantly influencing the change of LS 1-4 BMD in postmenopausal women.

The impact of acute fracture on interpretation of bone turnover marker measurements for patients starting anti-resorptive therapies.

Bone turnover markers (BTM) are used in evaluating patients' response to anti-resorptive agents (ARA). Fracture and its healing process, however, can influence the measurements, which might make their interpretation difficult in patients with a recent fracture. We aimed to evaluate the effect of oral ARA on changes in BTM levels in patients with a recent distal radius fracture (DRF). In 143 women who had a new DRF and then received oral ARA including selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM, n=101), and bisphosphonate (n=42), we measured serum cross-linked C-telopeptides of type I collagen (CTXI) and osteocalcin, at baseline and six months, as well as lumbar and total hip bone mineral density (BMD) at baseline and one year after fracture. We determined the predictive value of BTM at six months in determining one-year responses in BMD. Both BTM levels decreased significantly at six months, with the average decrease of 27±63% for CTX-I and 11%±37% for osteocalcin. The percent changes of BTM at six months were independent predictors of the BMD change. Cutoff points of 50.0% CTX-I decrease and 23.5% for osteocalcin decrease had the highest sensitivities and specificities for detecting BMD responders for bisphosphonate users, but cutoffs could not be found for SERM users. Although a fresh fracture can influence BTM, ARA therapy significantly reduced their levels and their percent change at six months could predict BMD improvement at one year. However, adjusted cutoff points can be necessary to increase sensitivity for detecting patients responsive to ARA treatment after a new DRF.

Bariatric surgery and skeletal health: A narrative review and position statement for management by the European Calcified Tissue Society (ECTS).

Numerous studies have demonstrated detrimental skeletal consequences following bariatric surgery. A working group of the European Calcified Tissue Society (ECTS) performed an updated review of existing literature on changes of bone turnover markers (BTMs), bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture risk following bariatric surgery and provided advice on management based on expert opinion. Based on observational studies, bariatric surgery is associated with a 21-44% higher risk of all fractures. Fracture risk is time-dependent and increases approximately 3years after bariatric surgery. The bariatric procedures that have a malabsorptive component (including Roux-en-Y Gastric bypass (RYGB) and biliopancreatic diversion (BPD)) have clearly been associated with the highest risk of fracture. The extent of high-turnover bone loss suggests a severe skeletal insult. This is associated with diminished bone strength and compromised microarchitecture. RYGB was the most performed bariatric procedure worldwide until very recently, when sleeve gastrectomy (SG) became more prominent. There is growing evidence that RYGB is associated with greater reduction in BMD, greater increase in BTMs, and higher risk of fractures compared with SG but RCTs on optimal management are still lacking. In all patients, it is mandatory to treat vitamin D deficiency, to achieve adequate daily calcium and protein intake and to promote physical activity before and following bariatric surgery. In post-menopausal women and men older than 50years, osteoporosis treatment would be reasonable in the presence of any of the following criteria: i) history of recent fragility fracture after 40years of age, ii) BMD T-score≤-2 at hip or spine, iii) FRAX score with femoral neck BMD exceeding 20% for the 10-year major osteoporotic fracture probability or exceeding 3% for hip fracture. Zoledronate as first choice should be preferred due to intolerance of oral formulations and malabsorption. Zoledronate should be used with caution due to hypocemia risk. It is recommended to ensure adequate 25-OH vitamin D level and calcium supplementation before administering zoledronate. The bariatric procedures that have a malabsorptive component have been associated with the highest turnover bone loss and risk of fracture. There is a knowledge gap on osteoporosis treatment in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. More research is necessary to direct and support guidelines.

Bone turnover marker responses to sleep restriction and weekend recovery sleep.

Prior data demonstrated three weeks of sleep restriction and concurrent circadian disruption uncoupled bone turnover markers (BTMs), indicating decreased bone formation and no change or increased bone resorption. The effect of insufficient sleep with or without ad libitum weekend recovery sleep on BTMs is unknown. BTMs were measured in stored serum from 20 healthy adults randomized to one of three study groups consisting of a control group (N=3 men; 9h/night) or one of two nocturnal sleep restriction groups in an inpatient laboratory environment. One Sleep Restriction group ("SR"; N=9; 4 women) had 5h sleep opportunity per night for nine nights. The other sleep restriction group had an opportunity for ad libitum Weekend Recovery sleep ("WR"; N=8; 4 women) after four nights of 5h sleep opportunity per night. Food intake was energy balanced at baseline and ad libitum thereafter. Fasted morning BTM levels and hourly 24h melatonin levels were obtained on study days 3 (baseline), 5 (after 1 night of sleep restriction for WR and SR), and 11 (after a sleep restricted workweek with weekend recovery sleep in WR or 7 nights of sleep restriction in SR). Linear mixed-effects modeling was used to examine the effect of study duration (e.g., change over time), study condition, age, and sex on BTMs. Pearson correlations were used to determine associations between changes in BTMs and changes in weight and morning circadian misalignment (i.e., duration of high melatonin levels after wake time). There was no significant difference between the three study groups in change over time (p ≥ 0.4 for interaction between assigned group and time for all BTMs), adjusted for age and sex. There was no significant change in N-terminal propeptide of procollagen type I (P1NP), osteocalcin, or C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) from baseline to day 11 (all p ≥ 0.3). In women <25years old, there was a non-significant decline in P1NP from day 3 to day 5 (= -15.74±7.80ng/mL; p=0.06). Change in weight and morning circadian misalignment from baseline to day 11 were correlated with statistically non-significant changes in BTMs (all p ≤ 0.05). In this small secondary analysis, we showed that nine nights of prescribed sleep restriction with or without weekend recovery sleep and ad libitum food intake did not alter BTMs. It is possible that age, sex, weight change and morning circadian misalignment modify the effects of sleep restriction on bone metabolism.

12: Changes in bone turnover markers following hospital admission for acute pulmonary exacerbation in adults with CF

12: Changes in bone turnover markers following hospital admission for acute pulmonary exacerbation in adults with CF

Development of the Bone Phenotype and microRNA Profile in Adults With Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein 5-High Bone Mass (LRP5-HBM) Disease.

ABSTRACTPathogenic variants in the Wnt‐pathway co‐receptor low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor‐related protein 5 (LRP5) cause high bone mass (LRP5‐HBM) due to insensitivity to the endogenous antagonist of Wnt‐signaling. Although indicating incessant progression of BMD and biomarkers reflecting bone formation, this has not been confirmed in individuals with LRP5‐HBM. We investigated how the LRP5‐HBM bone phenotype changes with age in adults and is associated with quantitative changes of bone turnover markers and bone‐related microRNAs (miRNAs) in the circulation. Whole body, lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck areal BMD (aBMD) and radial and tibial bone microarchitecture and geometry were assessed using DXA and HR‐pQCT scans of 15 individuals with LRP5‐HBMT253I (11 women; median age 51 years; range, 19 to 85 years) with a time interval between scans of 5.8 years (range, 4.9 to 7.6 years). Fasting P1NP and CTX were measured in 14 LRP5‐HBMT253I individuals and age‐, sex‐, and body mass index (BMI)‐matched controls, and 187 preselected miRNAs were quantified using qPCR in 12 individuals and age‐, sex‐, and BMI‐matched controls. DXA and HR‐pQCT scans were assessed in subjects who had reached peak bone mass (aged >25 years, n = 12). Femoral neck aBMD decreased by 0.8%/year (p = 0.01) and total hip by 0.3%/year, and radial volumetric BMD (vBMD) increased 0.3%/year (p = 0.03). Differences in bone turnover markers at follow‐up were not observed. Compared to controls, 11 of the 178 detectable miRNAs were downregulated and none upregulated in LRP5‐HBM individuals, and five of the downregulated miRNAs are reported to be involved in Wnt‐signaling. Bone loss at the hip in LRP5‐HBM individuals demonstrates that the bone phenotype does not uniformly progress with age. Differentially expressed miRNAs may reflect changes in the regulation of bone turnover and balance in LRP5‐HBM individuals. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Effects of sleeve gastrectomy on bone mass, microstructure of femurs and bone metabolism associated serum factors in obese rats

BackgroundSleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a profoundly effective operation for severe obese patients, but is closely associated with bone mass loss. Previous studies have reported changes of various serum factors which may be associated with bone mass loss after SG. However, those results are contradictory. In this study, we assessed the effects of SG on bone mass, microstructure of femurs, and changes in bone turnover markers (BTMs), serum adipokines, inflammatory factors and gastrointestinal hormones after SG in high-fat diet (HFD) induced obese rats.MethodsEight-week-old male Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats were fed with HFD to induce obesity. Then, SG and sham surgery were performed in anesthetized obese rats. SD rats in control group were fed with standard chow. Microstructure of femurs was scanned and analyzed by micro-computed tomography in control group, HFD sham group and HFD SG group. Serum inflammatory factors, adipokines markers, gastrointestinal hormones and BTMs were also measured.ResultsBone mineral density (BMD) of trabecular bone in both HFD sham group and HFD SG group were remarkably decreased compared with control group. All serum BTMs were significantly higher in HFD SG group than HFD sham group. In the meantime, serum levels of several important inflammatory factors, gastrointestinal hormones and adipokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1(MCP-1), ghrelin, insulin and leptin in HFD SG group were remarkably reduced compared with HFD sham group, whereas glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), adiponectin, fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-19 and FGF-21 were dramatically increased after SG. Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) was significantly increased in the HFD sham group than control group. Spearman’s correlation analysis indicated that serum osteocalcin (OC) and 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 (25(OH)D3) were positively correlated with BMD of trabecular bone, whereas serum PTP1B and TNF-α were negatively related to BMD of trabecular bone.ConclusionsSG aggravates bone mass loss and activates bone remodeling in obese rats. Levels of BTMs, adipokines, inflammatory factors, and gastrointestinal hormones could be affected by SG in obese rats. Serum PTP1B level might be associated with abnormal bone mass in obese rats.

Acute Phase Reactions After Intravenous Infusion of Zoledronic Acid in Japanese Patients with Osteoporosis: Sub-analyses of the Phase III ZONE Study

In a clinical trial involving Japanese patients with osteoporosis, post hoc analyses were performed to evaluate the incidence of acute phase reactions (APRs) after infusion of zoledronic acid (ZOL). The results highlighted differences in baseline factors between patients with vs without APRs. Changes in efficacy indicators such as bone turnover markers (BTMs) also showed significant differences. We, therefore, investigated the factors involved in the development of APRs in Japanese patients treated with a once-yearly intravenous infusion of ZOL 5 mg for 2 years by assessing the relation between APRs and efficacy. APRs reported in patients with primary osteoporosis from the ZONE study were analyzed post hoc. Baseline factors were compared in patients with vs without APRs, and changes in BTMs and bone mineral density (BMD) were also investigated. In the ZOL group, 51.2% (169/330) of patients developed APRs after the first infusion and 12.3% (33/268) after the second infusion. Comparison of baseline factors showed that patients without APRs in the ZOL group had a significantly higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, lower serum levels of procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide, older age, and higher likelihood of prior bisphosphonate use vs patients with APRs. Patients with APRs showed significantly higher increases in total hip BMD at 6 and 12 months and larger reductions in BTMs vs patients without APRs. Patient profiles differed significantly between patients with vs without APRs, with APRs after the first infusion of ZOL being related to increases in total hip BMD and suppression of BTMs.This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT01522521; January 31, 2012).

Denosumab versus romosozumab for postmenopausal osteoporosis treatment

Denosumab and romosozumab, a recently approved new drug, are effective and widely known molecular-targeted drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis treatment. However, no studies have directly compared their therapeutic effects or safety in postmenopausal osteoporosis. This retrospective observational registry study compared the efficacy of 12-month denosumab or romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients. The primary outcome was the change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine. Secondary outcomes included BMD changes at the total hip and femoral neck, changes in bone turnover markers, and adverse events. Propensity score matching was employed to assemble patient groups with similar baseline characteristics. Sixty-nine patients each received either denosumab or romosozumab for 12 months. The mean 12-month percentage change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD was 7.2% in the denosumab group and 12.5% in the romosozumab group, indicating a significant difference between the groups. The percentage changes in BMD at both the total hip and femoral neck were also significantly higher at 12 months in the romosozumab group than in the denosumab group. In denosumab patients, bone formation and bone resorption markers were significantly decreased at 6 and 12 months from baseline. In the romosozumab group, the bone formation marker was significantly increased at 6 months and then returned to baseline, while the bone resorption marker was significantly decreased at both time points. Adverse events were few and predominantly minor in both groups, with no remarkable difference in the incidence of new vertebral fractures. Romosozumab showed a higher potential for improving BMD than denosumab in this clinical study of postmenopausal osteoporosis patient treatment.

Bone turnover markers are associated with the PTH levels in different subtypes of pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1 patients.

Bone responsiveness to parathyroid hormone (PTH) in different subtypes of pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1 (PHP1) remains controversial. We aimed to investigate this phenomenon using bone turnover markers (BTMs) in a large cohort of PHP1 patients. Retrospective study. Sixty-three PHP1 patients diagnosed by molecular analysis were used as subjects, and 48 sex- and age-matched patients with nonsurgical hypoparathyroidism (NS-HP) were used for comparison. Bone turnover markers, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (β-CTX) and related parameters in PHP1 were compared among different subtypes and with NS-HP. Among all the PHP1 patients (15 PHP1A, 14 familial 1B and 34 sporadic 1B), 23.8% had elevated baseline BTM levels. No significant difference was found in the β-CTX levels among different subtypes. The β-CTX level was positively correlated with the PTH level for all PHP1, PHP1B and PHP1A patients (B=0.001, 0.001 and 0.004, respectively; all p<.05). The BTM levels of PHP1 patients were significantly higher than those of NS-HP patients (β-CTX: 0.56ng/ml vs. 0.20ng/ml, p=.001; ALP: 105 U/L vs. 72 U/L, p=.001). The serum β-CTX levels in different PHP1 subtypes were all significantly higher than those in NS-HP patients in adults. Among the 22 followed up patients, changes in BTMs were associated with changes in PTH (β-CTX: r=.507, p=.023; ALP: r=.475, p=.034). Bone tissues respond to PTH in different PHP1 subtypes, and it is reasonable to monitor and normalize PTH and BTMs in addition to the serum and urinary calcium levels in the follow-up of PHP1 patients.

Effects of prior osteoporosis treatment on 12-month treatment response of romosozumab in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

To investigate the effects of prior treatment and determine the predictors of a 12-month treatment response of romosozumab (ROMO) in 148 patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. In this prospective, observational, and multicenter study, treatment naïve patients (Naïve; n=50) or patients previously treated with bisphosphonates (BP; n=37) or denosumab (DMAb; n=45) or teriparatide (TPTD; n=16) (mean age, 75.0 years; T-scores of the lumbar spine [LS] -3.2 and total hip [TH] -2.6) were switched to ROMO due to insufficient effects of prior treatment. Bone mineral density (BMD) and serum bone turnover markers were evaluated for 12 months. At 12 months, changes in LS BMD were Naïve (18.2%), BP (10.2%), DMAb (6.4%), and TPTD (11.2%) (P<0.001 between groups) and changes in TH BMD were Naïve (5.6%), BP (3.3%), DMAb (0.6%), and TPTD (4.4%) (P<0.01 between groups), respectively. In all groups, the LS BMD significantly increased from baseline at 6 and 12 months, although only the DMAb group failed to obtain a significant increase in TH BMD during 12-month treatment. Mean values of N-terminal type I procollagen propeptide (PINP; μg/L) from baseline → 1 month → 12 months were Naïve (67.9 → 134.1 → 51.0), BP (32. 2 → 81.7 → 40.9), DMAb (30.4 → 56.2 → 75.3), and TPTD (97.4 → 105.1 → 37.1), and those of isoform 5b of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP-5b; mU/dL) were Naïve (500.4 → 283.8 → 267.1), BP (273.4 → 203.1 → 242.0), DMAb (220.3 → 246.1 → 304.8), and TPTD (446.6 → 305.1 → 235.7), respectively. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the significant predictors of BMD change at 12 months were difference of prior treatment (r=-2.8, P<0.001) and value of PINP at 1 month (r=0.04, P<0.01) for LS, and difference of prior treatment (r=-1.3, P<0.05) and percentage change of TRACP-5b at 1 month (r=-0.06, P<0.05) for TH. The early effects of ROMO on LS and TH BMD increase at 12 months were significantly affected by the difference of prior treatment and are predicted by the early change in bone turnover markers.

Final results of the randomized phase 2 LEO trial and bone protective effects of everolimus for premenopausal hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

The phase 2 LEO study showed that everolimus (EVE) plus letrozole (LET) with ovarian suppression increased progression-free survival (PFS) in tamoxifen-exposed premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer with visceral metastases. Here we report final survival outcomes from the LEO study, and the results of exploratory analyses of bone turnover marker changes and bone-specific progressive disease. Patients who were exposed to or progressed on tamoxifen as adjuvant/palliative treatments were randomly assigned (2:1) to the EVE (leuprorelin + LET + EVE, n=92) or LET (leuprorelin + LET, n=45) arm. In a median 51-months of follow-up, the median PFS was 17.5 and 13.8months in the EVE and LET arms, respectively (P=.245). Patients in the EVE arm with baseline visceral (median PFS 16.4 vs 9.5months, P=.040) and bone (median PFS 17.1 vs 10.9, P=.003) metastases had greater PFS compared to the LET arm. No differences in overall survival (OS) were observed (median OS, 48.3 vs 50.8months, P=.948). The 1-year cumulative incidences of bone-specific disease progression were 6.0% and 23.4% in the EVE and LET arms, respectively (hazard ratio 0.26, P < .001). Bone turnover markers at 6 and 12 weeks after treatment decreased in the EVE arm but were increased or stationary in the LET arm. Skeletal-related events occurred in 6.5% and 11.1% of patients in the EVE and LET arms, respectively. EVE + LET with ovarian suppression prolonged PFS in patients with baseline visceral or bone metastases and offered bone-protective effects in the overall study population. However, these clinical benefits did not translate into an OS benefit.

103P Long-term results and bone-protective effect of everolimus added to letrozole and ovarian function suppression for premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: An updated analysis of the LEO study

In phase II LEO study, everolimus (EVE) plus letrozole (LET) with ovarian suppression resulted in longer progression-free survival (PFS) in tamoxifen-exposed premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer with visceral metastases. Here, we report an updated survival for the LEO study, along with the results of exploratory analyses on bone turnover marker changes and bone-specific progressive disease.

Longitudinal Analysis of Circulating Markers of Bone Turnover Across Multiple Decades in Osteoporotic Women

The objective of this study was to analyze changes in serum markers of bone turnover across multiple decades in osteoporotic women compared with nonosteoporotic controls, to determine their utility as potential predictors for osteoporosis. Early prediction of those at risk for osteoporosis can enable early intervention before the irreversible loss of critical bone mass. Serum samples were obtained from 20 women given the diagnosis of osteoporosis after age 46 years and 20 age-matched women with normal bone mineral density from 4 time points in their life (ages 25-31, 32-38, 39-45, and 46-60 years). Serum levels of bone turnover markers (propeptide of type I collagen, parathyroid hormone, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, sclerostin, osteoprotegerin, osteopontin, and 25-OH vitamin D) were measured using commercially available arrays and kits. We used logistic regression to assess these individual serum markers as potential predictors of osteoporosis, and mixed-effects modeling to assess the change in bone turnover markers between osteoporotic and control groups over time, then performed fivefold cross-validation to assess the classification ability of the models. Markers of bone turnover, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, sclerostin, and osteocalcin were all independent predictors at multiple time points; osteopontin was an independent predictor in the 39- to 45-year age group. Receiver operating characteristic analyses demonstrated moderately strong classification ability at all time points. Sclerostin levels among groups diverged over time and were higher in the control group than the osteoporotic group, with significant differences observed at time points 3 and4. Serum markers of bone turnover may be used to estimate the likelihood of osteoporosis development in individuals over time. Although prospective validation is necessary before recommending widespread clinical use, this information may be used to identify patients at risk for developing low bone mineral density long before traditional screening would ostensibly take place. Diagnostic II.

Bone Metabolism in the Healing Process of Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Temporal Changes of Bone Turnover Markers.

Prospective longitudinal study. The aim of this study was to evaluate temporal changes of bone turnover markers (BTMs) after lumbar spinal fusion in patients without osteoporosis. Radiological studies are the standard method to monitor bony fusion, but they do not allow a timely assessment of bone healing. BTMs react rapidly to changes in bone metabolism during fusion process and could be an additional tool to monitor this process. A total of 78 nonosteoporosis patients who had undergone one- or two-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion were included. Fusion status was assessed using computed tomography sagittal and coronal images. Serum levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP), and osteocalcin (OC) were measured to assess bone formation, and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b) was measured to assess bone resorption. Serum samples were obtained before surgery and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 13, 26, 39, and 52 weeks after surgery. A solid fusion was achieved in 71 of 78 patients (91%), and seven patients resulted in pseudarthrosis. In the fusion group, the level of all BTMs once decreased at 1 postoperative week. Then, BAP and P1NP reached a peak at 4 weeks after surgery, and TRACP-5b and OC peaked at 8 weeks. Thereafter, the level of P1NP and TRACP-5b gradually got closer to the baseline over a year, and BAP kept high until 52 postoperative weeks. In the pseudarthrosis group, peak level of BTMs was significantly higher and the increased level of BAP and P1NP was kept until 52 weeks. The present study demonstrated dynamics of BTMs after lumbar spinal fusion in patients without osteoporosis. These normal population data contribute as a baseline to evaluate the effect of osteogenic agents on bone metabolism after spinal fusion.Level of Evidence: 2.

Real-world effects and adverse events of romosozumab in Japanese osteoporotic patients: A prospective cohort study

Real-world data on the new anti-sclerostin antibody drug, romosozumab, remain scarce. There is a strong need to accumulate and analyze data on romosozumab treatment for such conditions as osteoporosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the therapeutic and adverse effects of romosozumab for osteoporosis treatment in clinical practice. Of the 230 osteoporosis patients prescribed romosozumab from September 2019 in this prospective multicenter cohort study, 204 patients completed 12 months of treatment. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of change in bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Secondary outcomes included changes in bone turnover markers and serum-corrected calcium level as well as the incidence of adverse events. At 6 and 12 months of romosozumab treatment, the respective percentage change in BMD from baseline was 7.4% and 12.2% for the lumbar spine, 1.8% and 5.8% for the total hip, and 2.9% and 6.0% for the femoral neck, all of which were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than baseline values. Patients who switched from another osteoporosis regimen exhibited significantly lower lumbar spine BMD gains versus treatment-naïve patients, especially for cases switching from denosumab. P1NP was significantly increased at 6 months (58.9%; P < 0.01), while TRACP-5b was significantly decreased at 6 months (−14.7%; P < 0.001) and 12 months (−18.8%; P < 0.001) versus baseline values. The largest rate of decrease in serum-corrected calcium was 3.7% at 12 months. Sixty-four (27.8%) of 230 patients experienced an adverse event, and 7 (3.0%) new fractures were recorded. In sum, romosozumab treatment for 12 months significantly improved lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck BMD according to real-world data.

Which Bone-Modifying Agent is Associated with Better Outcomes in Patients with Skeletal Metastases from Lung Cancer? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Lung cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers and is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Metastatic bone disease occurs in 20% to 40% of patients with lung cancer, and these patients often present with pain or skeletal-related events (SREs) that are associated with decreased survival. Bone-modifying agents such as denosumab or bisphosphonates are routinely used; however, to our knowledge, there has been no quantitative synthesis of randomized controlled trial data to determine the most effective pharmacologic treatment of metastatic bone disease because of lung cancer. We aimed to perform a network meta-analysis of randomized trials to identify the bone-modifying agent that is associated with the (1) highest overall survival, (2) longest time to SRE, (3) lowest SRE incidence, and (4) greatest likelihood of pain resolution. We conducted our study according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol and pre-registered the analysis on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42019124364). We performed a librarian-assisted search of MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Chinese databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang Data. We included randomized controlled trials reporting outcomes specifically for patients with lung cancer treated with a bisphosphonate or denosumab. SREs included pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, hypercalcemia of malignancy, or pain resulting in surgical intervention or radiation therapy. We excluded trials exclusively reporting surrogate outcomes such as changes in bone turnover markers. Screening, data extraction, risk of bias evaluation, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation evaluations were performed in duplicate. We included 131 randomized controlled trials that evaluated 11,105 patients with skeletal metastases from lung cancer. The network meta-analysis was performed using a frequentist model and the R statistical software. Results are reported as relative risks or mean differences, and the I2 value is reported for heterogeneity. The P-score, a measure of ranking certainty that accounts for standard error, is reported for each outcome. Heterogeneity in the network was considered moderate for overall survival and time to SRE, mild for the incidence of SRE, and low for pain resolution. For overall survival, denosumab was ranked above zoledronic acid and estimated to confer a mean of 3.3 months (95% CI 0.3-6.3) of increased overall survival compared with untreated patients (P-score = 89%). For the time to SRE, denosumab was ranked first with a mean of 9.1 additional SRE-free months (95% CI 6.7-11.5) compared with untreated patients (P-score = 99%), while zoledronic acid conferred an additional 4.8 SRE-free months (95% CI 3.6-6.1). Reduction in the incidence of SREs was not different between patients treated with denosumab (relative risk 0.54; 95% CI 0.33-0.87) and those treated with zoledronic acid (relative risk 0.56; 95% CI 0.46-0.67). Patients treated with the combination of ibandronate and systemic therapy were more likely to experience successful pain resolution than untreated patients (relative risk 2.4; 95% CI 1.8-3.2). In this comprehensive synthesis of all available randomized controlled trial evidence guiding the pharmacologic treatment of bone metastases from lung cancer, denosumab was ranked above zoledronic acid for overall survival and time to SRE and was not different for reducing the incidence of SRE. Both were superior to no treatment for each of these outcomes. Given this, we encourage physicians to consider the use of denosumab or zoledronic acid in treating this patient population. The combination of ibandronate and systemic therapy was the most effective at reducing pain because of metastases. No cost-effectiveness analysis has yet been performed for denosumab and zoledronic acid on patients with metastatic lung cancer, and this represents an avenue for future research. Level I, therapeutic study.

Denosumab Reduces Lesional Fluoride Skeletal Burden on Na[18F]F PET-CT in Patients With Fibrous Dysplasia/McCune-Albright Syndrome.

ContextThe correlation between fibrous dysplasia/McCune–Albright syndrome (FD/MAS) skeletal disease burden on Na[18F]F positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) and serum bone turnover markers (BTMs) was recently described. The effect of treatment on lesional fluoride burden in FD/MAS is unknown.ObjectiveTo investigate treatment response measurements in patients with FD/MAS who underwent Na[18F]F-PET-CT and treatment with antiresorptives.MethodsObservational case series at an academic center of expertise for rare bone diseases. Fifteen consecutive patients were observed with FD/MAS with baseline and follow-up Na[18F]F-PET-CT parameters of healthy bone and FD lesions, BTMs, and pain scores at start of denosumab (n = 8) treatment and non-denosumab patients (n = 7). On Na[18F]F-PET-CT the volumetric measures of FD burden (fluoride tumor volume [FTV]) and “fraction affected skeleton” (FAS) represented the portion of the skeleton affected. This was correlated with BTMs and pain.ResultsDisease activity decreased significantly, with FTV 361 cm3 to 97 cm3 (P = .018) in denosumab-treated patients, but not in non-denosumab patients (P = .249). Serum P1NP and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) decreased significantly: 82 ng/mL vs 55 ng/mL (P = .023) and 119 IU/L vs 84 IU/L (P = .020), respectively. In denosumab-treated patients pain scores improved leading to pain medication reduction. This correlated with lesional uptake, but healthy bone activity did not change. BTMs and FTV correlated positively (P1NP r = 0.730, P < .001; and ALP r = 0.406, P = .006), as did change in BTMs and FTV: P1NP (P = 0.032) and ALP (P = 0.024). FAS strongly correlated with treatment-induced decrease in ALP (P = .027) and P1NP (P = .009).ConclusionNa[18F]F-PET-CT captured treatment-induced lesional changes which correlated with BTMs and pain reduction. Therefore Na[18F]F-PET-CT can be used as an objective local parameter of response to denosumab treatment in FD/MAS.

Effects of denosumab on rheumatic diseases and refractory glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a prospective study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of denosumab in patients with rheumatic diseases and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) refractory to previous osteoporosis treatment. All patients were treated with 60 mg of denosumab subcutaneously every 6 months for 2 years after administration of bisphosphonates or rhPTH was stopped. We assessed bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and bilateral hip at baseline, and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. We measured serum levels of bone alkaline acid phosphatase (BAP) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP)-5b at baseline, and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Fifty-five patients with rheumatic diseases and GIOP were enrolled in this study. All patients were treated with bisphosphonates (n=40), recombinant human parathyroid hormone (n=4), or active vitamin D3 (n=11). Over the 24-month study period, denosumab significantly increased the mean BMD of the lumbar spine and bilateral hip (5.8 ± 0.7%, and 1.3 ± 0.4%, respectively). Additionally, denosumab also significantly reduced the serum levels of TRACP-5b and BAP over this same period (by -38.8 ± 3.5% and -16.3 ± 3.1%, respectively), although these changes in bone turnover markers were not predictive factors of an improvement in BMD values. While three patients developed fragility fractures during the study period, all three had several risk factors for fragility fractures in GIOP. In conclusion, denosumab is a potential treatment for GIOP in rheumatic diseases, especially in patients refractory to previous therapy, including bisphosphonate therapy.