Bone Gain Research Articles

Do autologous platelet concentrates (APCs) have a role in intra-oral bone regeneration? A critical review of clinical guidelines on decision-making process.

In the past decades, personalized regenerative medicine has gained increased attention. Autologous platelet concentrates (APCs) such as PRP, PRGF, and L-PRF, all serving as a source of a large variety of cells and growth factors that participate in hard and soft tissue healing and regeneration, could play a significant role in regenerative periodontal procedures. This narrative review evaluated the relative impact of APCs in alveolar ridge preservation, sinus floor augmentation, and the regeneration of bony craters around teeth, both as a single substitute or in combination with a xenograft. L-PRF has a significant beneficial effect on alveolar ridge preservation (<alveolar bone resorption, >bone quality). The data for PRGF are less convincing, and PRP is controversial. L-PRF can successfully be used as a single substitute during transcrestal (≥3.5 mm bone gain) as well as 1-stage lateral window sinus floor elevation (>5 mm bone gain). For PRGF and especially PRP the data are very scarce. In the treatment of bony craters around teeth, during open flap debridement, L-PRF as a single substitute showed significant adjunctive benefits (e.g., >PPD reduction, >CAL gain, >crater depth reduction). The data for PRP and PRGF were non-conclusive. Adding PRP or L-PRF to a xenograft during OFD resulted in additional improvements (>PPD reduction, >CAL gain, >bone fill), for PRGF no data were found. Autologous platelet concentrates demonstrated to enhance bone and soft tissue healing in periodontal regenerative procedures. The data for L-PRF were most convincing. L-PRF also has the advantage of a greater simplicity of production, and its 100% autologous character.

Sinus floor augmentation using mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft combined with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2): A long-term retrospective study

Background/purposeThe combination of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) with a carrier material has not been extensively studied. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical, radiological, and histomorphometric outcomes of sinus floor augmentation using a 3:7 mixture of cancellous and cortical freeze-dried bone allografts (mixed AG) combined with rhBMP-2. Materials and methodsMixed AG was used for sinus floor augmentation in a total of 21 patients with a residual alveolar bone height <5 mm. Among the total 47 sites, augmentation with and without rhBMP-2 was performed in 26 and 21 sites, respectively. Radiographic parameters were assessed using cone-beam computed tomography. After a six-month healing period, core biopsies were harvested for histomorphometric analysis. ResultsThe bone gain after healing was 13.36 ± 3.9 mm and 12.07 ± 3.8 mm in the mixed AG alone and mixed AG with rhBMP-2 groups, respectively. The survival rate of implants in both groups was 100% during the follow-up period. The proportion of newly formed bone was 24.6 ± 10.2% and 39.7 ± 18.3% in the mixed AG alone and mixed AG with rhBMP-2 groups, respectively (P < 0.05). Moreover, the percentage of residual graft material was 21.0 ± 12.2% and 9.6 ± 10.0% in the mixed AG alone and mixed AG with rhBMP-2 groups, respectively (P < 0.05). ConclusionMixed AG combined with rhBMP-2 could be a suitable material for sinus floor augmentation. This combination may reduce the treatment time and improve the predictability of implant placement.

Measuring the outcomes of lateral ridge augmentation using cone-beam computed tomography.

Lateral ridge augmentation (LRA) is a surgical technique to gain bone prior to implant placement. Performing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) pre- and post-surgery allows for quantitative comparison of the buccal-lingual width and the vertical height of the edentulous ridges. This study used CBCT images to evaluate the bone regeneration following surgery. A total of 30 cases from adult patients who underwent LRA and had high-quality CBCT images taken pre- and post-surgery from the same CBCT scanner were available for the retrospective study. Study data included linear measurements of the bone ridge width and height obtained from the middle of the edentulous ridge and a volumetric measurement of bone growth at the edentulous site observed on the CBCT scan. The reliability of the measurements was excellent as indicated by Intra-Class Coefficient values of 0.974 or higher. There was a significant mean bone increase from pre-surgery compared to post-surgery for both the linear and volumetric measurements. The linear bone gain ranged from 1.5 to 2.5 mm and volumetric gain from 250 to 750 mm3 . However, two patients did not gain any bone. Multivariate regression showed the strongest predictors of bone gain post-surgery were the pre-surgery bone volume and a surgical site being in the mandible. For maxillary surgical sites, particularly anterior areas, the LRA surgeries were the least successful. LRA before implant placement helped to increase bone for the majority of patients, particularly for surgical sites in the mandible. The quantitative analyses in the CBCT images showed excellent intra-examiner agreement.

Transalveolar Sinus Lift and Implant Site Preparation using Motorized Threaded Bone Expanders: A 2-year Retrospective Study

Background and Objectives: The pneumatization of the maxillary sinus presents serious challenges to the dentist, and the management of such cases is essential for the rehabilitation of the posterior maxilla. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of using motorized threaded bone expanders in transalveolar sinus lift procedures. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on patients presented to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Tishreen University who had transalveolar sinus lift using motorized threaded bone expanders with simultaneous dental implant placement between January, 2020, and August, 2022. The patients were followed up regularly for six months until loading. Statistical analyses were performed to assess intrasinus bone gain, marginal bone loss, implant diameter, and insertion torque. The correlation coefficient was used to measure the relationship between marginal bone loss and insertion torque value. Results: Three membrane perforations were observed in 34 procedures (8.82%). The survival rate for all implants was 100%. The main insertion torque was 32.58 N.cm. The mean intrasinus bone gain was 1.69 ± 0.44 mm. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.27 mm. The difference between IBH and bone height after 6 months showed a statistically significant difference. No correlation was found between marginal bone loss and insertion torque value. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, transalveolar sinus lift using motorized bone expanders showed effective lifting of the sinus floor with minimum marginal bone loss, thus presenting a good solution for pneumatization of the maxillary sinus to achieve a successful rate for implant placement.

The bone shielding versus dual-zone concept in treating thin-walled fresh extraction sockets with immediate implant placement: Soft and hard tissue changes. A randomized clinical trial.

To evaluate the ridge alterations and esthetic outcome 1 year after immediate implant placement using the dual-zone (DZ) technique versus the bone shielding concept in patients with intact thin-walled sockets in the esthetic zone. This randomized clinical trial included 26 patients with nonrestorable maxillary teeth in the esthetic zone who were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 13 each) to receive immediate implants using either the bone shielding concept or DZ. Definitive restorations were delivered after 2 months. Pink esthetic scores (PESs), vertical soft tissue alterations, and bucco-palatal ridge dimensional changes were measured and assessed using intra-oral digital scans at baseline and 1 year post-procedure. Labial bone thickness was measured using cone beam computed tomography scans at baseline and after 1 year. The bone shielding group provided bucco-palatal ridge thickness stability after 1 year (9.43 mm) compared to baseline values (9.82 mm), while DZ showed a significant loss in the bucco-palatal ridge thickness after 1 year (7.83) compared to baseline values (9.49). No significant difference was reported in the baseline bucco-palatal ridge thickness between the two groups (p = 0.6). After 1 year, the bone shielding group demonstrated 0.38 mm ridge shrinkage which was statistically significant (p = 0.0002) compared to 1.67 mm ridge shrinkage in the DZ group. In addition, the average total PES in the bone shielding group was 12.04 versus 10.28 in the DZ group. No significant difference was reported in the mesial papilla length between the DZ and the bone shielding group after 1 year (p > 0.05). However, the midfacial gingival margin (p = 0.026) and distal papilla were significantly higher in the DZ group (p = 0.0025). There was no significant difference in the mean ± SD mm bone gain at the apical level between the two studied groups after 1 year (p = 0.06) showing 0.85 ± 0.23 and 0.64 ± 0.32 mm, respectively. However, the bone shielding concept showed a statistically significant more bone gain mm (p < 0.001) at the (0.56 ± 0.43) and crestal (0.03 ± 0.8) levels after 1 year compared to DZ which revealed 0.18 ± 0.5 and 0.38 ± 0.29 mm bone loss, respectively. The bone shielding concept might offer a reliable alternative for restoring thin-walled sockets by minimizing postextraction ridge dimensional alterations effect following immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone. Nevertheless, the study suffers from confounding bias since there are two systematic differences between the groups, the barrier membrane type, and the level of bone filling. "This clinical trial was not registered prior to participant recruitment and randomization." NCT05381467.

Third Molar Coronectomy vs Total Removal in Second Molar Periodontal Healing

The objective of this randomised controlled trial was to compare the periodontal healing at the distal of the adjacent second molar after coronectomy or surgical removal and the surgical morbidities of the 2 techniques. This is a pilot study of a split-mouth randomised clinical trial comparing the periodontal healing of the adjacent second molar after coronectomy or total removal of lower third molars, which was registered with the University of Hong Kong Clinical Trial Centre as HKUCTR-2948 on 21 February 2020. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Changes in the bone level from the cemento-enamel junction, periodontal probing depth (PPD), and clinical attachment level (CAL) at the distal of the adjacent second molar were compared. Surgical morbidities in terms of pain, infection, neurologic deficit, root exposure, and need for second surgery for removal were assessed. Forty patients (22 male, 18 female) with mean age of 26.7 years were evaluated at 6 months postoperatively. Both coronectomy and total removal groups demonstrated statistically significant reduction in PPD and CAL. There was an alveolar bone gain of 1.28 ± 0.88 mm in the coronectomy group and 1.13 ± 0.73mm in the control group, which was statistically significant (P < .001 for both groups). Early findings show the periodontal healing at the adjacent second molar of coronectomy was as good as that of total removal of lower third molar. There were no differences in terms of surgical morbidities between both groups.

Full block or split block?-Comparison of two different autogenous block grafting techniques for alveolar ridge reconstruction.

To evaluate radiographic bone gain after alveolar ridge augmentation with two different designs of autogenous block graft harvested from the mandible. Alveolar ridge defects were evaluated by preoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and grafted in a staged approach using intraoral block grafts. The ridge augmentation was either performed using the full-block technique (group 1) or the split-block technique (cortical plate with autogenous bone chips) (group 2). After 4 months of bone healing, a further CBCT scan was performed before implant placement. Horizontal and vertical bone gain were measured. In this retrospective study, 91 patients were grafted with block grafts (36 patients with full-block grafts; 55 patients with split-block grafts) resulting in 171 block grafts in total. The mean horizontal bone gain was 3.37 ± 0.71 mm in group 1 and 5.79 ± 2.20 mm in group 2. A linear mixed-effect model also showed a statistically significant group difference (p < 0.001, estimate: 3.455, 95% CI: [2.082-4.829]). The mean vertical bone gain was 2.85 ± 0.73 mm in group 1 and 7.60 ± 1.87 mm in group 2. A linear mixed-effect model also showed a statistically significant group difference (p: 0.029, estimate: 3.126, 95% CI: [0.718-5.557]). Mean marginal bone level was 0.33 ± 0.37 mm (group 1) and 0.17 ± 0.29 mm (group 2). The split-block technique resulted in a greater bone gain than the full-block technique. This effect was observed in both the vertical and the horizontal dimensions.

Evaluation of the efficacy of horizontal distraction osteogenesis using expansion screws in the repair of the acquired jaw bone defects.

A total of eight patients ( age 17-36 years) who came with atrophy of the maxilla were treated by horizontal DO. The used device consisted of two parts: one was an orthodontic expander and the other was a screw-ring. The expansion screws were set on the transport bone, which was osteotomized and fixed to the segments using microscrews. Radiographical documentation of the patients was obtained with cone beam computed tomography prior to the surgery and after 4 months of the distraction phase. The average of the actual bone gain at the end of the consolidation period was 7mm (range 5-9mm). Intraoral DO failed in one patient. The average bone density in the distraction gap after 4 months of the DO was 460.40. The average bone density of the bone defect region after 4 months of the DO was 487.90. Our results confirm that horizontal DO using expansion screws is a predictable and effective regenerative procedure for patients with acquired bone defects in the jaw.

Immediate dental implantation after indirect sinus elevation using osseodensification concept: a case report.

A 52-year-old male presented to the oral and maxillofacial surgery department with a main complaint of chewing difficulties in the right posterior area maxilla (teeth numbers: 26 and 27). A cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging showed that the residual bone height ranged between 1 and 4mm and the width ranged between 9 and 12mm in the area of teeth numbers 16 and 17. The treatment plan was to extract the teeth (numbers: 16 and 17) and conduct internal sinus lifting and bone grafting using the OD burs with immediate implantation. OD is proposed as an alternative procedure to the direct (lateral window) sinus floor elevation procedure. The amount of vertical bone gain obtained by this technique in transcrestal sinus lifting can be the same as external sinus lifting in this case. OD can be considered a promising technique for direct sinus floor elevation, considering the amount of vertical bone gain obtained by this technique.

Comparative evidence of different surgical techniques for the management of vertical alveolar ridge defects in terms of complications and efficacy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

To systematically appraise the available evidence on vertical ridge augmentation (VRA) techniques and estimate a treatment-based ranking on the incidence of complications as well as their clinical effectiveness. Searches were conducted in six databases to identify randomized clinical trials comparing VRA techniques up to November 2022. The incidence of complications (primary) and of early, major, surgical and intra-operative complications, vertical bone gain (VBG), marginal bone loss, need for additional grafting, implant success/survival, and patient-reported outcome measures (secondary) were chosen as outcomes. Direct and indirect effects and treatment ranking were estimated using Bayesian pair-wise and network meta-analysis (NMA) models. Thirty-two trials (761 participants and 943 defects) were included. Five NMA models involving nine treatment groups were created: onlay, inlay, dense-polytetrafluoroethylene, expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene, titanium, resorbable membranes, distraction osteogenesis, tissue expansion and short implants. Compared with short implants, statistically significant higher odds ratios of healing complications were confirmed for all groups except those with resorbable membranes (odds ratio 5.4, 95% credible interval 0.92-29.14). The latter group, however, ranked last in clinical VBG. VRA techniques achieving greater VBG are also associated with higher incidence of healing complications. Guided bone regeneration techniques using non-resorbable membranes yield the most favourable results in relation to VBG and complications.

The clinical efficacy of autogenous dentin blocks prepared chairside for alveolar ridge augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review aimed to evaluate the current evidence on the effectiveness of autogenous dentin block graft prepared chairside for alveolar ridge augmentation and compare its clinical outcomes to the main available grafting materials and techniques. Three databases were screened, including prospective clinical studies, utilizing autogenous dentin blocks for ridge augmentation, with at least 3 months of postoperative follow-up. Eight articles were included, and four of them were meta-analyzed. Dentin blocks demonstrated similar vertical bone gain and significantly higher width gain, compared to bone blocks (WMD = 0.03, 95% CI -0.51 to 0.57, p = .92 and WMD = 1.34, 95% CI 0.57 to 2.12, p = .0007, respectively). Vertical and horizontal resorption were similar between the two groups (WMD = -0.36, 95% CI -0.91 to 0.18, p = .19, and WMD = -0.47, 95% CI -1.05 to 0.11, p = .11, respectively). Dentin blocks showed more incidences of postoperative complications, however, with no statistical significance (RR = 4.30, 95% CI 0.97 to 18.96, p = .054). The need for additional augmentation upon implant placement was also similar between both grafts (RR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.39 to 2.28, p = .90). Recorded incidences of graft exposure were low (2.27%), and no study stated surgical site infection. Within its limitations, this study indicates that the autogenous dentin blocks prepared chairside could be a possible alternative to the other established bone augmentation techniques for staged ridge augmentation. Nevertheless, future studies are needed to confirm its efficacy and implant success/survival in sites grafted with this material.

Risk factors contributing to early implant failure following sinus augmentation: A study of a challenging cohort.

Sinus augmentation has become a more predictable and successful procedure as the knowledge of its indications and complications increased. However, knowledge of risk factors leading to early implant failure (EIF) among challenging systemic and local conditions is insufficient. The present study aims to assess risk factors for EIF following sinus augmentation in a challenging cohort. A retrospective cohort study conducted during a period of 8 years in a tertiary referral centre providing surgical and dental health care. Implant and patient variables including age, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) physical status classification, smoking, residual alveolar bone, type of anaesthesia and EIF were collected. Cohort was comprised of 751 implants placed in 271 individuals. EIF rates at the implant and patient level were 6.3% and 12.5%, respectively. EIF was found to be higher among smokers (patient level: χ2 (1) = 8.74, p = .003), ASA 2 physical classification patients (patient level: χ2 (2) = 6.75, p = .03), sinuses augmented under general anaesthesia (patient level: χ2 (1)=8.97, p = .003), higher bone gain (implant level: W = 12 350, p = .004), lower residual alveolar bone height (implant level: W = 13 837, p = .001) and multiple implantations (patient level: W = 3016.5, p = 0.01). However, other variables such as age, gender, collagen membrane and implant's dimensions did not reach significance. Within the limits of the study, we can conclude that smoking, ASA 2 physical status classification, general anaesthesia, low residual alveolar bone height and numerous implants are risk factors for EIF following sinus augmentation in challenging cohorts.

Defect angle as prognostic indicator in the reconstructive therapy of peri-implantitis.

To analyze the influence of the characteristics of bone defects caused by peri-implantitis on the clinical resolution and radiographic bone gain following reconstructive surgery. This is a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Periapical x-rays of bone defects, caused by peri-implantitis exhibiting intrabony component, were analyzed at baseline and 12-month follow-up after reconstructive surgery. Therapy consisted of anti-infective therapy along with a mixture of allografts with or without a collagen barrier membrane. The association of defect configuration, defect angle (DA), defect width (DW), and baseline marginal bone level (MBL) with clinical resolution (based on a prior defined composite criteria) and radiographic bone gain was correlated by means of generalized estimating equations. Overall, 33 patients with a total of 48 implants exhibiting peri-implantitis were included. None of the evaluated variables yielded statistical significance with disease resolution. Defect configuration demonstrated statistical significance when compared to class 1B and 3B, favoring radiographic bone gain for the former (p = 0.005). DW and MBL did not demonstrate statistical significance with radiographic bone gain. On the contrary, DA exhibited strong statistical significance with bone gain (p < 0.001) in the simple and multiple logistic regression analyses. Mean DA reported in this study was 40°, and this resulted in 1.85 mm radiographic bone gain. To achieve ≥1 mm of bone gain, DA must be <57°, while to attain ≥2 mm of bone gain, DA must be <30°. Baseline DA of peri-implantitis intrabony components predicts radiographic bone gain in reconstructive therapy (NCT05282667-this clinical trial was not registered prior to participant recruitment and randomization).

Influence of implant protrusion length and initial bone height on intrasinus bone gain in transalveolar sinus floor elevation without bone graft: a 2-year retrospective study.

This retrospective cohort study was carried out on patients who had reported to the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery at Tishreen University between January 2020 and September 2022. The sample consisted of patients who had a transalveolar sinus lift with simultaneous dental implants placement. TSFE was performed using motorized threaded bone expanders. The IBH, the IPL, and the IBG height were analyzed using CBCT scans that were taken preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the relationship of the IBG with the IPL and the IBH. The P values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. A total of 34 implants were placed using motorized threaded bone expanders in 29 patients who were included in the study. Three membrane perforations were observed out of 34 procedures (8.82%). The survival rate for all implants was 100%. The mean IBH was 6.37±0.85mm, the mean IPL was 2.01±0.55mm, and the mean IBG was 1.69±0.44mm. A strong positive correlation was found between bone gain and IPL. No correlation was found between bone gain and IBH. According to the result of this study, the IPL is a critical factor in TSFE and dental implant placement simultaneously without bone graft procedures.

Comparison of Guided Bone Regeneration with Periosteal Pocket Flap Technique Versus Autogenous Bone Block Graft for Horizontal Bone Augmentation: A Clinical Trial Study

The aim of this study was to assess changes in the horizontal dimension of the alveolar ridge when the autogenous bone block (ABB) or periosteal pocket flap (PPF) techniques were performed prior to implant placement. This randomized trial study was conducted on 25 patients in need of horizontal bone augmentation, who were randomly divided into two groups as follows: 13 patients underwent ridge augmentation using ABB, allograft, and a collagen membrane, while the remaining 12 underwent horizontal bone augmentation via the PPF technique. For all patients, radiographic examinations via CBCT were performed both before and 26 weeks after the operation. Following the surgery, dimensional changes in the ridge width were measured both within and between the two groups in the three regions of 0, 3, and 5 mm from the top of the alveolar crest. A total of 11 patients in the ABB group and 12 patients in the PPF group successfully completed the study. Statistical analysis showed that the increase in alveolar ridge width in each group was significant, but not significantly different between the two groups at any of the measured spots (0 mm from the crest, P = .25; 3 mm, P = .38; and 5 mm, P = .73). However, more postoperative complications were observed with the ABB technique. According to the results of the present study, there was no statistically significant difference between the PPF and ABB techniques in terms of horizontal bone gain.

Shell Technique with a Xenogeneic Cortical Bone Lamina and Particulate Bone Graft for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Case Series

The aim of this prospective case series was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a xenogeneic cortical bone lamina utilized as a "shell" on the buccal aspect of narrow alveolar ridges for horizontal bone augmentation. Fifteen patients requiring multiple implant restorations at sites with moderate to severe horizontal bone deficiency were consecutively enrolled. Horizontal bone augmentation was performed using a xenogeneic cortical bone lamina (XCBL), that was fixed on the buccal aspect of the ridge using titanium screws, and a mixture of particulate autogenous bone graft and porcine hydroxyapatite. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken at baseline and 6 months after bone augmentation. The healing was uneventful, with no intra- or post-operative complications. Twenty-seven dental implants were placed in the augmented sites. The calculated average horizontal bone gain from CBCT scans was 4.79 ± 1.64 mm, 5.59 ± 1.51 mm, and 5.79 ± 2.53 mm at 1-, 3- and 5-mm reference points apical to the buccal bone crest, respectively. The present case series demonstrated that the shell technique with the xenogeneic cortical bone lamina and particulate bone graft can be an effective approach for horizontal bone augmentation prior to implant placement.

Maxillary Sinus Elevation by Crestal Window: Influence of 3D Sinus Size on Bone Regeneration-A Retrospective Clinical and Histologic Evaluation.

This evaluation correlates maxillary sinus 3D morphology with bone regeneration. In 39 patients with crestal bone ≤ 2 mm, mineralized human bone allografts were used to augment the sinus floor through the crestal window sinus elevation approach. CBCT was used to measure the buccopalatal diameter (BPD), mesiodistal diameter (MDD), and hemi-ellipsoidal volume (Vh) in all sinuses. A bone core biopsy sample was taken at implant placement (4 to 5 months after sinus augmentation). Microradiographs of methacrylate-embedded sections were used to evaluate the amounts of bone, residual graft, and soft tissue. All 51 implants placed in the 39 patients successfully osseointegrated. A linear regression analysis showed that as BPD, MMD, and Vh increased, the amount of bone gain decreased and the amount of soft tissue increased (P < .05). The amount of residual graft was little affected by sinus morphology. Microradiographic data were grouped into four different sinus types (from small to great) using BPD and Vh medians. The best amount of bone formation was achieved in the narrow and short sinus type, while no great differences were found in the remaining three sinus types. Understanding of 3D sinus cavity morphology, especially the buccopalatal diameter and mesiodistal dimensions, is fundamental for achieving the best possible sinus augmentation outcomes.

The Effect of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (BMP-2) on Volumetric and Histometric Outcomes for Peri-Implant Defects in the Animal Model: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: To study the effect of BMP-2 on the volumetric and histometric changes in peri-implant defect treatments in animal models. Materials and Methods: An electronic search of four databases and a manual search of peer-reviewed journals for relevant articles were performed. Animal studies with data that compared the volumetric and/or histometric outcomes of peri-implant defect treatment with and without the use of BMP-2 were included. Meta-analyses were performed to analyze the weighted mean difference (WMD) and confidence interval (CI) for the recorded variables. Results: After completing the search process, 21 randomized controlled trials were included. The results of the meta-analyses showed that the WMD of bone-to-implant contact (%BIC) with 4 to 8 weeks and 12 to 24 weeks of follow-up was 15.50% (95% CI = 3.28% to 27.72%, P = .01) and 16.17% (95% CI = 11.17% to 21.16%, P < .00001), respectively, favoring the BMP-2 group. The WMD for the percentage of defect fill with 4 to 8 weeks and 12 to 24 weeks of follow-up was 15.88% (95% CI = 3.90% to 27.86%, P = .009) and 10.48% (95% CI = 0.95% to 20.02%, P = .03), respectively, favoring the BMP-2 group. The WMD for the vertical bone gain with 8 to 16 weeks of follow-up was 1.63 mm (95% CI = 0.58 to 2.67 mm, P = .002), also favoring the BMP-2 group. Conclusion: This review demonstrated that the use of BMP-2 in treating peri-implant defects showed better clinical and histometric outcomes than defects not treated with BMP-2 in animal models.

Clinical and Radiological Benefits of Hyaluronic Acid in Periodontal Infrabony Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Purpose:There is no consensus on the clinical and radiological benefits of hyaluronic acid (HA) in patients with periodontitis having infrabony defects. Hence, this study examined the effects of HA in periodontitis patients with infrabony defects through a comprehensive systematic review process.Methodology:A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane Library from inception to March 2022. Randomized or non-randomized clinical trials and single-arm clinical trials that assessed the clinical and radiological benefits of HA in periodontitis patients with infrabony defects with a minimum of 6 months follow-up were included in this study. Surgical regenerative therapy was considered as the comparator. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool and Downs and Black checklist was used for the quality assessment of randomized and non-randomized interventional studies, respectively. A subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the heterogeneity and robustness of the findings, respectively.Results:A total of 13 out of 725 studies were included in this systematic review, of which 9 were considered for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis indicated significant benefits of HA in terms of reduction in probing pocket depth (SMD: 1.12 mm; 95% CI: 0.60-1.65; 9 studies), bone defect depth (SMD: 1.04mm; 95%CI: 0.62-1.47; 3 studies) and gain in clinical attachment level (1.04 mm; 95% CI: 0.33-2.47; 8 studies). Overall, the quality of included studies was good.Conclusion:The current evidence indicates that the administration of HA in the periodontal regenerative treatment of infrabony defects was significantly effective in increasing clinical attachment levels and reducing probing pocket and bone defect depth.

The Effect of Diabetes and Hyperglycemia on Horizontal Guided Bone Regeneration: A Clinical Prospective Analysis.

Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a reconstructive procedure for treating atrophic alveolar ridges. This study aims to assess the correlation between different glycemic control levels and clinical findings in patients undergoing horizontal GBR before implant placement. The study population consisted of all patients requiring horizontal GBR. Patients were divided into three groups based on HbA1c levels: non-diabetic normoglycemic patients (HbA1c < 5.7%), non-diabetic hyperglycaemic patients (HbA1c < 6.5%), and patients with controlled diabetes (HbA1c < 7%). The primary outcomes were the horizontal (mm) and vertical (mm) dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge 6 months after the procedure. The study sample consisted of 54 patients. Sixty-eight implants (95.8%) were classified as "successful," meaning the possibility of inserting a standard-sized implant following the GBR (diameter ≥ 4 mm). There was a statistically significant difference between the three groups in terms of horizontal gain at 6 months: in particular, there was a statistically significant difference between group 1 and group 2 (p = 0.026) and between group 1 and group 3 (p = 0.030). The present investigation showed that patients with HbA1c levels below 7% could undergo GBR and obtain a statistically significant horizontal bone gain.