Sir, – Enoxaparin as a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is able to inhibit the platelet function, increase the microvas-cular permeability, interfere with the interac -tion between platelets and vessel walls, and decrease inflammatory cells, fibroblasts, and growth factors [1, 2]. In addition, it has pre-viously been stated by several investigators that it prevents the post-surgical intraperito-neal adhesion and also minimizes the hepat-ic, cardiac and retina fibrosis [3, 4, 5, 6, 7].The present study was designed for the first time to investigate the therapeutic ef-fects of enoxaparin on the intra-articular fibrosis, a serious complication in modern orthopedic surgery. The study was approved by the local ethics committee of our faculty, in accordance with the ethics standards of “Principles of Laboratory Animal Care”.Arthrofibrosis was induced in both knee joints of 20 mature male rabbits by transect-ing the anterior cruciate ligament under in-tramuscular anesthesia with ketamine and xylazine. Enoxaparin sodium (Clexane, Sanofi Aventis Pharma, France) was daily injected subcutaneously (2 mg/kg) for 35 days in 10 rabbits and the other remaining 10 animals received physiologic saline in the same way as the control animals. After 12 weeks, the rabbits were anesthetized to remove the stiff joint. The severity of adhe-sion was assessed by modified visual scor-ing system described by Rothkopf et al. [8] and histologic parameters.Four samples were excluded due to sep-tic arthritis and unfortunately a sample was missed; therefore, 18 joints in the control group and 17 in the experimental group were tested.Based on the macroscopic adhesion scores, no significant difference was seen between the experimental and control groups (p-value = 0.279). The mean ± standard de-viation values for the control and experimen-tal group were 1.77 ± 0.73 and 1.41 ± 0.61, respectively. In addition, except the vascular proliferation, other microscopic variables such as the inflammatory cell count, con-nective tissue deposition, cartilage and bone content and adhesion, were not significantly different between the two groups (Table 1). It should be mentioned that no giant cell was seen in the tissue sections of either experi-mental or control animals.Enoxaparin has been shown to have both anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic activities in addition to its well-known an-ticoagulant activity. Ergul et al. [9] stated that the fibrinolytic effect of LMWHs could be due to its serine esterase activ-ity. It has been reported that enoxaparin decreased the extent of fibrosis by 36% in liver suggesting its antithrombotic effect as an important role in preventing fibro-sis progression [10]. In addition, Abe et al. [4] stated that the mechanism of anti-fibrotic effects of dalteparin most likely involve down-regulation of transforming growth factor β1.However, the results of some other in-vestigators demonstrated that LMWHs is not effective in reducing fibrosis and adhe-sion formation. Laxer et al. [11] showed that enoxaparin did not ameliorate bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis in mice. Moreover, it has been shown that enoxaparin improved the intestinal wound healing in rat [12] that is opposite to its antifibrotic effect.Subjectively LMWHs was able to reduce arthrofibrosis, but the findings of the present study showed that it is not an effective anti-arthrofibrotic agent. The only variable with significant difference was vascular prolifer-ation; however, vascular proliferation is not a worthy variable in comparison to others. Therefore, we dispense with its significant difference.
Read full abstract