Abstract
The aim was to investigate histomorphometrically whether or not implant surface nanotopography improves the bone response under immediate loading simultaneous to sinus grafting. Dual acid-etched titanium microimplants with/without crystalline surface deposition of calcium phosphate particles were placed in bilateral sinuslift areas grafted with a mixture of iliac crest bone and BioOss. Surface topography of microimplants was characterized using interferometry. Loaded microimplants (MsL) were immobilized in a provisional bridge supported by four normal size implants. Some patients had unloaded microimplants as controls (MsU). Biopsies were trephined after 2 or 4months and histomorphometric analysis of bone area (BA) and bone-to-implant contact (BC) was performed. Nonparametric methods for dependent data were used to compare effect of surface modification, and healing time (2 vs. 4months). A total of 53 biopsies were available from 13 patients. A total of 4/28 and 1/11 MsL failed after resp. 2 and 4months vs. 0/6 and 1/5 MsU. Many loaded biopsies were damaged at the apical portion and showed no bone adhesion. MsL decreased in BA from coronal to apical from 2 to 4months; Coronal>Middle (P=0.047), Coronal>Apical (P<0.001) and Middle>Apical (P<0.001). This gradual decrease was not observed for BC; Coronal<Middle and Middle>Apical (P<0.001). Only the middle part showed significant bone contact after 2months. For MsL there was no statistically significant difference between surface or time indicating that improvement of osseointegration over time due to maturation of the graft was poor. The MsU did not show any difference between Osseotite and Nanotite for BIC and BA (P>0.05) but doubled both their BA and BIC (P<0.05) between 2 and 4months. Osseointegration in sinus-grafted bone mixed with BioOss was poor irrespective of healing time or nanotopographical surface modification. The apex of MsL showed minimal bone contact suggesting that the graft does not add to the loading capacity. Surface enhancement was not beneficial despite the enlarged surface area. Overloading, most critical coronally of an implant, increases risks for implant failure and jeopardizes bone healing especially under immediate loading conditions with high load.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
