Bond Strength Of Resin Cement Research Articles

Effect of water glass treatment for zirconia and silane coupling on bond strength of resin cement.

To evaluate the ability of the water glass treatment to penetrate zirconia and improve the bond strength of resin cement. Water glass was applied to zirconia specimens, which were then sintered. The specimens were divided into water-glass-treated and untreated zirconia (control) groups. The surface properties of the water-glass-treated specimens were evaluated using surface roughness and electron probe micro-analyser (EPMA) analysis. A resin cement was used to evaluate the tensile bond strength, with2 and without a silane-containing primer. After 24h in water storage at 37°C and thermal cycling, the bond strengths were statistically evaluated with t-test, and the fracture surfaces were observed using SEM. The water glass treatment slightly increased the surface roughness of the zirconia specimens, and the EPMA analysis detected the water glass penetration to be 50μm below the zirconia surface. The application of primer improved the tensile bond strength in all groups. After 24h, the water-glass-treated zirconia exhibited a tensile strength of 24.8 ± 5.5MPa, which was significantly higher than that of the control zirconia (17.6 ± 3.5MPa) (p < 0.05). After thermal cycling, the water-glass-treated zirconia showed significantly higher tensile strength than the control zirconia. The fracture surface morphology was mainly an adhesive pattern, whereas resin cement residue was occasionally detected on the water-glass-treated zirconia surfaces. The water glass treatment resulted in the formation of a stable silica phase on the zirconia surface. This process enabled silane coupling to the zirconia and improved the adhesion of the resin cement.

Bond Strength of Resin Cement Following Biomimetic Remineralization: An in vitro Study

Objectives This research assessed the efficacy of self-assembling peptide P11-4 (Curodont protect) in promoting biomimetic remineralization of dentin, thereby stabilizing the hybrid layer and enhancing the long-lasting of the resin-dentin bond. Methods Five premolar teeth were longitudinally sectioned to assess dentin microhardness before and after demineralization, as well as after the application of P11-4 (Curodont protect). For the microtensile test, ten premolar teeth were sectioned perpendicular to their long axes. The teeth were assigned to different groups. Following acid etching and rinsing, samples in control group I received no pretreatment, while the prepared dentin surface of group II was treated with 0.1 mL of P11-4 before the placement of the adhesive restoration. All specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 ± 2 °C for 24 hours and then underwent thermocycling. The microtensile test was measured, and the type of bond failure was evaluated. The obtained information, expressed in megapascals, was analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s multiple post hoc test. Results There was a statistically significant difference in hardness values after demineralization, followed by a significant increase in hardness after the application of P11-4 (Curodont protect) (p &lt; 0.001, effect size = 0.985). No statistically significant difference was found in the microtensile bond strength between the two groups (p = 0.384, effect size = 0.582). Adhesive-type failure was more commonly observed. Conclusion The use of self-assembling peptide P11-4 (Curodont protect) on dentin resulted in higher microhardness than the control group without adversely affecting resin cement bond strength.

Influence of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of Yttria-Stabilized Tetragonal Zirconia Ceramic.

Objective: This in vitro study evaluates the shear bond strength (SBS) of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP) and resin cement after different surface treatments. Materials and methods: Forty-eight ceramic cubes were divided into four groups (n = 12): G1 (control) sandblasting with Al2O3; G2-sandblasting with silica-coated Al2O3 (Rocatec); G3-Rocatec + CO2 laser; and G4-CO2 laser + Rocatec. A metallic primer was applied to the pretreated ceramic. A rubber ring was adapted on the central area, and then, the resin cement was inserted into the matrix and photoactivated. The samples were evaluated regarding surface roughness (Ra), SBS, failure type, and qualitatively with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's test (p < 0.05). Results: The mean values of Ra (μm) were as follows: G1-4.52a, G2-4.24a,b, G3-4.10a,b, and G4-2.90b and the mean values of SBS (MPa) were as follows: G1-7.84a , G2-4.41b , G3-4.61b and G4-6.14a,b. SEM analyses showed superficial irregularities for all groups, being more prominent for G1. The presence of silica deposits was observed for G2, G3, and G4, but in the last two groups there were some linear areas, promoted by the fusion of silica, due to the thermomechanical action of the CO2 laser. Conclusions: The surface treatment with CO2 laser + Rocatec, using one MDP-based cement, can be an alternative protocol for the adhesion cementation of Y-TZP ceramic since it was as effective as the conventional pretreatment with aluminum oxide sandblasting.

Resin Cements in Dentistry

Even though the GIC has undergone many advances, its chemistry is fundamentally different from that of modern resin based composite direct filling products, which feature a silica or glass particle filled polymer matrix that enhances repair retention. When the restoration is etched or air abraded after the tooth has been conditioned with an adhesive resin and etched, retention becomes "micromechanical," ensuring the resin cement's high tensile strength. Cementation of the extraoral fabricated restoration is very important for the longevity of the restoration. The bond strength of resin cement to ceramic and fibre post is better than conventional cements. This article discusses about the various types of resin cements and there uses for luting indirect restorations such crowns, veneers, inlays, and onlays, etc.

Assessing push-out bond strength in re-irradiated teeth: Universal resin cement performance in self-etch and self-adhesive modes.

To investigate the effect of cumulative doses of radiation on the pushout bond strength (BS) of a universal resin cement used in the self-etch (SE) and self-adhesive (SA) modes to the intraradicular dentin. Forty-eight human teeth were distributed into three groups (n = 16) according to the radiation therapy dose (RT): NoRT (no-radiotherapy), 70RT (70 Gy), and 70 + 70RT (70 Gy + 70 Gy). The teeth were redistributed into two subgroups (n = 8), according to the adhesive mode: SE (NoRT-SE, 70RT-SE, and 70 + 70RT-SE) and SA (NoRT-SA, 70RT-SA, and 70 + 70RT-SA). Data were statistically compared after BS test (ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc test, and Fisher's exact test). In the SA mode, BS was significantly higher in nonirradiated teeth compared with 70RT and 70 + 70RT (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between SE and SA modes in nonirradiated teeth (p = 0.14). In the 70RT group, SE mode increased BS compared with SA mode (p < 0.0001). Most specimens had adhesive and mixed failures in SA and SE modes, respectively. The universal resin cement in the SE mode had greater BS to the irradiated dentin. When teeth were re-irradiated, the universal resin cement had similar performance in terms of BS, regardless of the adhesive approach. There is no research establishing a correlation between radiotherapy and its impact on the BS of a universal resin cement used in SE and SA modes to intraradicular dentin.

Evaluation of the microshear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia treated by different nanomaterials using the dip coating technique

Evaluation of the microshear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia treated by different nanomaterials using the dip coating technique

The Effect of Bioglass Coating on Microshear Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Zirconia.

Objectives: Durable bonding to zirconia is a challenging issue in dentistry. This study aimed to assess the effect of bioglass coating of zirconia on the microshear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia and to study the effect of thermocycling on this bond. Materials and Methods: This in-vitro experimental study was conducted on 60 yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia blocks in six groups (N=10) based on surface pretreatment and thermocycling. Surface pretreatments included no treatment control, alumina particle abrasion, and bioglass-coating of zirconia. Resin bonding was performed with Panavia F2.0 cements. Then, half of the specimens underwent a 24-hour incubation in 37°C water, while the other half were subjected to thermocycling (12000 cycles, 5-55°C, 60s for each batch) following the same incubation period. Subsequently, the microshear bond strength of the specimens was measured. Additionally, one block from each group was subjected to scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. The data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: There was a significant difference between the bond strength values of different groups (P<0.001). Alumina particle abrasion and bioglass coating equally increased the bond strength compared to the untreated control group (P<0.001). Thermocycling caused significant decreases in bond strength in all the groups (P<0.001); however, the bond strength value of the thermocycled bioglass-coated group was significantly higher than that reported for the thermocycled alumina particle abraded group (P=0.015). Conclusion: Despite the decrease in the bond strength values after thermocycling, the long-term efficacy of the bioglass coating of zirconia was promising.

Self-etching primer versus hydrofluoric acid and air-abrasion: effects on flexural and resin bond strengths of resin-based CAD/CAM material

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of self-etching primer (Monobond Etch & Prime; MEP), hydrofluoric acid (HF), and air-abrasion (A) protocols on shear bond strength (SBS) of resin cement and flexural strength (FS) of nanoparticle-filled resin-based CAD/CAM material. Bar- and rectangular-shaped specimens (n = 130 for each) were obtained from a resin-based material (Cerasmart 270). The specimens were divided into 13 subgroups according to surface treatments: Control (C); HF for 60, 90, and 120 s; MEP for 60, 90, and 120 s; air-abrasion for 10, 15, and 20 s; air-abrasion followed by HF; air-abrasion followed by MEP; HF followed by MEP. Surface roughness (Ra) values were measured using a profilometer (Surftest SJ-210) by applying 9 readings per specimen. One specimen per group was examined by atomic force microscopy (AFM; Multimode 8) in a 20 μm × 20 μm area, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM; EVO LS-10) under ×1000 magnification. FS and SBS data were obtained using a universal test device (Marestek) at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Air-abraded groups showed the highest Ra (A10: 1.331 ± 0.213; A15: 1.409 ± 0.110; A20: 1.491 ± 0.111; A + HF: 1.415 ± 0.138; A + MEP: 1.309 ± 0.071 μm) and the lowest FS values (A10: 122.59 ± 16.80; A15: 118.94 ± 11.74; A20: 117.22 ± 11.18; A + HF: 114.42 ± 18.09; A + MEP: 128.98 ± 19.74 MPa). FS values of HF- and/or MEP-applied groups were statistically similar to the control group (C: 167.37 ± 27.02; HF60: 186.74 ± 30.66; HF90: 162.79 ± 29.31; HF120: 184.11 ± 17.18; MEP60: 171.98 ± 29.65; MEP90: 162.49 ± 20.38; MEP120: 173.55 ± 22.50; HF + MEP: 175.09 ± 21.64 MPa). SBS values of MEP-applied groups were higher than those of HF-etched groups with the same duration. Significant differences in SBS values were found after etching protocols with different durations (HF60: 4.14 ± 0.64; HF90: 4.48 ± 0.33; HF120: 6.76 ± 1.65; MEP60: 6.24 ± 1.23; MEP90: 9.92 ± 1.25; MEP120: 10.22 ± 1.27 MPa). Prolonged MEP application (90 s and 120 s) can be the preferred surface treatment for resin-based CAD/CAM materials. However, air-abrasion may adversely affect its mechanical properties.

Comparison of bond strength of self-adhesive and self-etch or total-etch resin cement to zirconia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of this study was to systematically compare the bond strength of self-adhesive and self-etch or total-etch resin cement to zirconia. The PubMed, ISI (all), and Scopus databases were searched for the selected keywords up to November 1, 2021, without date or language restrictions. In vitro studies comparing the bond strength of self-adhesive and self-etch or total-etch resin cement to zirconia were eligible for inclusion in the study. The selected articles were divided into four groups based on the type of resin cement and the storage time. Statistical analysis was performed using the Biostat Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software version 2 (α = 0.05). The effect of conventional cement ( Glass Ionomer (GI), Resin Modified Glass Ionomer (RMGI) and zinc phosphate) was analyzed using descriptive analysis. The initial search yielded 376 articles, of which 26 were selected after a methodological assessment. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The results showed that the immediate or delay bond strength of the self-adhesive resin cement to zirconia has no significant difference with the bond strength of self-etch resin cement to zirconia. The immediate and delay bond strength of total-etch cement-zirconia was significantly lower than that of self-adhesive cement-zirconia (P = 0.00). A descriptive analysis of the selected articles showed that the bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to zirconia was significantly higher than total-etch cement. The results of the meta-analysis showed that both self-adhesive and self-etch resin cement (if applied according to their manufacturer's instruction) are suitable for bonding to zirconia.

Effect of 4-META on microtensile bond strength of cements to ceramics

Background: This study assessed the effect of different concentrations of 4-methacryloyloxyethy trimellitate anhydride (4-META) added to silane on microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of light-cure and dual-cure resin cement to hybrid and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramics. Materials and Methods: This in vitro, experimental study was conducted on 32 Celtra Duo and 32 VITA Enamic ceramics bonded to Allcem Veneer light-cure and Allcem dual-cure resin cements using silane impregnated with 4-META in 0%, 2.5%, 5%, and 10 wt% concentrations in 16 groups (n = 4). The µTBS of specimens was measured by a universal testing machine and analyzed by the Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests, and the mode of failure was determined under a stereomicroscope and analyzed by the Chi-square test (alpha = 0.05). Results: The lowest mean µTBS was recorded in the Enamic ceramic group with 4-META (0%) bonded to dual-cure cement (14.26 MPa), and the highest mean µTBS was recorded in Enamic ceramic with 4-META (10%) bonded to light-cure cement (18.59 MPa) (P &lt; 0.001). The µTBS of Celtra Duo was significantly higher than that of Enamic in bonding to light-cure cement using 4-META (2.5%) (P = 0.003). All failures (100%) were adhesive in most groups. The frequency of adhesive failure was the lowest (90%) in Celtra Duo bonded to dual-cure cement with 4-META (5%). Conclusion: According to the results of this pilot study, the addition of 4-META (10%) to silane caused a significant improvement in µTBS to light-cure cement. The addition of 4-META in all concentrations significantly improved the µTBS to Enamic ceramic in the use of dual-cure cement; however, it had no significant effect on µTBS of Celtra Duo. Nonetheless, the results should be interpreted with caution due to the relatively small sample size.

Evaluation of zirconia surfaces and shear bond strength after acid–etching with ultrasonic vibration

To evaluate the effect of surface reaction process after hydrofluoric (HF) acid etching using ultrasound and the shear bond strength (SBS) of resin cement to zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) ceramic. Y-TZP ceramic sheets were divided into rinsing group (Group P), ultrasonic cleaning group (Group C), and ultrasonic reaction + rinsing group (Group CP), and all the groups were treated for 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min, respectively. The surface morphology, elements distribution, roughness, and wettability of the ceramic sheets in each group were observed. The SBS of ceramic-resin bonding specimens was tested after immersion and after cooling-heating cycles, respectively. Octahedral and spiculate products were observed on the surface of Y-TZP that was etched with HF acid in Group P. The amount of these products increased over time. In contrast, only a few octahedral products remained on the surface of Y-TZP in Groups C and CP. Within the same reaction time, the surface reaction of the CP group was stronger than that of the other two groups, accompanied by a more uniform morphology. The shear force in Group C was the lowest, and the shear force reduction in Group CP was the least after cooling-heating cycling, with statistically significant differences (P< 0.05). After the reaction time exceeded 30 min, the shear force in each group decreased instead of increasing. Octahedral and spiculate acid etching products on the surface of HF acid-etched Y-TZP can enhance the bonding force of zirconia. Ultrasonic cleaning would drive the exfoliation of acid etching products from the sample surface, leading to the decrease of the bonding force. The acid etching with ultrasonic vibration can accelerate the HF acid etching process of Y-TZP ceramics, which is conducive to improving the bond strength to resin and durability.

Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Bond Strength of Resin Cement with Lithium Silicate Ceramics

Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Bond Strength of Resin Cement with Lithium Silicate Ceramics

Effect of universal adhesive pretreatments on the bond strength durability of conventional and adhesive resin cements to zirconia ceramic.

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of pretreatment of three different universal adhesives (Single Bond Universal [SBU], All-Bond Universal [ABU], and Prime&Bond universal [PBU]) on the bonding durability of an adhesive (Panavia F 2.0, PF) and a conventional (Duo-Link, DL) resin cements to air-abraded zirconia. Rectangular-shaped zirconia specimens were prepared. The chemical composition and surface energy parameters of the materials were studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and contact angle measurement, respectively. To evaluate resin bonding to the zirconia, all the bonding specimens were immersed in water for 24 h and the specimens to be aged were additionally thermocycled 10000 times before the shear bond strength (SBS) test. The materials showed different surface energy parameters, including the degree of hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity. While the DL/CON (no pretreatment) showed the lowest SBS and a significant decrease in the value after thermocycling (P < .001), the PF/CON obtained a higher SBS value than the DL/CON (P < .001) and no decrease even after thermocycling (P = .839). When the universal adhesives were used with DL, their SBS values were higher than the CON (P < .05), but the trend was adhesive-specific. In conjunction with PF, the PF/SBU produced the highest SBS followed by the PF/ABU (P = .002), showing no significant decrease after thermocycling (P > .05). The initial SBS of the PF/PBU was similar to the PF/CON (P = .999), but the value decreased after thermocycling (P < .001). The universal adhesive pretreatment did not necessarily show a synergistic effect on the bonding performance of an adhesive resin cement, whereas the pretreatment was beneficial to bond strength and durability of a conventional resin cement.

Shelf life effects on the bond strength and microhardness of self-adhesive resin cements

Shelf life effects on the bond strength and microhardness of self-adhesive resin cements

Bond Strength of a Novel Universal Resin Cement to Dentin with or without an Adhesive Bonding Agent: An In Vitro Study.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength and fracture mode of universal resin cement to dentin compared to self-adhesive and adhesive resin cement with and without an adhesive bonding agent. Seventy-two molar teeth were sectioned to expose coronal dentin, divided into three groups, and assigned to RelyX Universal (universal), RelyX Ultimate (adhesive), or RelyX Unicem 2 (self-adhesive) cements from 3M. The 3 groups were further subdivided into 2 subgroups of 12 specimens each, with or without the use of an adhesive bonding agent. Lithium-disilicate discs were bonded to the dentin surface using the cements, stored for 24 hours in distilled water, and subjected to 2,000 thermocycles before shear bond strength testing and fracture mode analysis. Significant differences in bond strength and fracture mode were found between groups based on cement or the use of a bonding agent. Both the universal and adhesive cements had significantly greater bond strengths to dentin with the use of a bonding agent versus no bonding agent. With the self-adhesive cement, there was no significant increase in bond strength to dentin with the use of a bonding agent. The novel universal resin cement had similar bond strengths to dentin as the adhesive cement with the use of a bonding agent, and similar bond strengths as the self-adhesive cement without the use of a bonding agent. The adhesively bonded universal cement had the greatest percentage of mixed and cohesive fractures. When greater adhesion is needed clinically, the novel universal resin cement may be used with an adhesive bonding agent. However, when less adhesion is needed, it could be used without a bonding agent in self-adhesive mode.

Effect of glass-ceramic coating versus alumina air-abrasion on the bond strength and residual stress of zirconia.

To assess the effect of glass-ceramic coated zirconia versus alumina air-abraded zirconia on the shear bond strength (SBS) of resin cement and investigate the residual stresses present on both mechanically pre-treated surfaces. A total of 180 zirconia disks, with diameters of 10mm and 5mm, were divided into two groups: DCMhotbond glass-ceramic coated, followed by hydrofluoric acid etching (DCM), and alumina air-abraded (AB). All mechanically pre-treated disks were conditioned with G-Multi Primer and bonded using G-Cem Linkforce Cement. Ninety specimens were immersed in distilled water for 24h and subsequently allocated into three groups based on aging conditions (n = 15/subgroups): immediate testing, 5000 thermal cycles, and 10,000 thermal cycles. Then, the shear bond strength was assessed, and the obtained data were subjected to analysis using a two-way ANOVA, followed by a one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD post hoc test (α = 0.05). The residual stresses present on both mechanically pre-treated surfaces were examined using X-ray diffraction analysis. The mean SBS values of the DCM and AB groups showed no significant difference under each aging condition. The SBS of DCM groups was not affected by thermal cycles, whereas the SBS of AB groups exhibited a significant decrease following thermal cycles. Glass-ceramic coated surfaces exhibited higher compressive stresses than alumina air-abrasion. The DCMhotbond glass-ceramic coated zirconia showed comparable bond strength to the alumina air-abrasion technique. The DCMhotbond glass-ceramic coating technique is a promising alternative for zirconia surface pre-treatment. However, further investigations are needed before suggesting its clinical use.

Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Resin Cement on the Surface of a Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic Restorative Material after Various Surface Treatments

With bonded restorations gaining rapid popularity in clinical dentistry, manufacturers have introduced a variety of bonding protocols and materials. These materials, including surface modifiers and cleaning agents, are designed to decontaminate surfaces and enhance bonding effectiveness. In this study, six different combinations of mechanical and chemical modifications were tested on a lithium disilicate surface to determine the combination that offers optimal resistance to shear stresses. The tested surface modifications included 9% hydrofluoric acid, sandblasting with 29 μm aluminum oxide (Al2O3) particles, Ivoclean (a recently introduced decontamination agent), Monobond Etch &amp; Prime (a one-stage etching and priming agent for ceramic surfaces), Monobond Plus (a silane agent), and the bonding agent Adhese Universal. Six different sequence combinations were tested and compared to the negative control group. The highest bond strength was achieved using all materials and cleansing methods in a logical order, while the bond strength was lowest in the absence of surface modification (control group). The results indicate a significantly positive influence on bond strength of silane coupling agents present in surface modifiers, including pure forms like Monobond Plus. Potential negative effects of cleansing agents or methods on bond strength were not observed. Multiple and separate stages in the treatment of the lithium disilicate surface positively impact bond strength. Cleansing agents may prove beneficial in clinical conditions, and they do not interfere with bonding.

Effect of ER: YAG Laser Treatment on the Bond Strength of Self-adhesive Resin Cements on Contaminated and Non-contaminated Dentin Surface

Background: Nowadays, lasers are used to modify the surface of dentin and enamel and improve the surface bond with resin cement while contamination weakens this bond. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different contamination types on the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of two self-adhesive resin cements to dentin with/without laser treatment. Methods: One-hundred and twenty molar teeth were prepared and randomly divided into three groups: blood, saliva, and control. In the blood group, blood was applied to the samples for 10 seconds; in the saliva group, saliva was applied to the samples for 10 seconds; and in the control group, distilled water was applied to the samples. Each group was further divided into two subgroups; in one, the Er: YAG laser was applied to samples for 5 seconds, and in the other, no laser treatment was performed. Next, TheraCem and Embrace WetBond cements were placed on each sample. μSBS was measured using a universal testing machine. Results: In Embrace WetBond, μSBS was not affected by contamination type regardless of laser treatment. In TheraCem, μSBS was not affected by contamination type when the laser was not used. In contrast, with laser treatment, blood contamination decreased μSBS compared to control and saliva. After laser treatment in the presence of blood, μSBS of Embrace WetBond was significantly higher than that of TheraCem, while without laser treatment, no significant difference was observed between the two cements. Conclusion: Dentin conditioning with an erbium laser can increase the cement bond strength to dentin if proper isolation is achievable. If proper isolation cannot be obtained, dentin conditioning with erbium laser followed by application of Embrace WetBond cement can increase the microshear bond strength of cement to dentin.

Effect of ER: YAG Laser Treatment on the Bond Strength of Self-adhesive Resin Cements on Contaminated and Non-contaminated Dentin Surface

Background: Nowadays, lasers are used to modify the surface of dentin and enamel and improve the surface bond with resin cement while contamination weakens this bond. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different contamination types on the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of two self-adhesive resin cements to dentin with/without laser treatment. Methods: One-hundred and twenty molar teeth were prepared and randomly divided into three groups: blood, saliva, and control. In the blood group, blood was applied to the samples for 10 seconds; in the saliva group, saliva was applied to the samples for 10 seconds; and in the control group, distilled water was applied to the samples. Each group was further divided into two subgroups; in one, the Er: YAG laser was applied to samples for 5 seconds, and in the other, no laser treatment was performed. Next, TheraCem and Embrace WetBond cements were placed on each sample. μSBS was measured using a universal testing machine. Results: In Embrace WetBond, μSBS was not affected by contamination type regardless of laser treatment. In TheraCem, μSBS was not affected by contamination type when the laser was not used. In contrast, with laser treatment, blood contamination decreased μSBS compared to control and saliva. After laser treatment in the presence of blood, μSBS of Embrace WetBond was significantly higher than that of TheraCem, while without laser treatment, no significant difference was observed between the two cements. Conclusion: Dentin conditioning with an erbium laser can increase the cement bond strength to dentin if proper isolation is achievable. If proper isolation cannot be obtained, dentin conditioning with erbium laser followed by application of Embrace WetBond cement can increase the microshear bond strength of cement to dentin.

Does the Elapsed Time from Bleaching and the Use of Sodium Ascorbate Influence the Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Bleached Enamel?

The objective of this study was to evaluate different delaying times after bleaching and the use of different sodium ascorbate (SA) concentrations (10% and 35%) in the bond strength of adhesive cementation to enamel. This study used 54 sound bovine incisors, which were randomly assigned to the following groups: G1 (unbleached/control+ adhesive cementation (AC)); G2 (bleached + AC after 7 days); G3 (bleached + 10% SA + AC after 24 h); G4 (bleached + 10% SA + AC after 7 days); G5 (bleached + 35% SA + AC after 24 h); and G6 (bleached + 35% SA + AC after 7 days). After bleaching, G3, G4, G5, and G6 received an application of SA before the cylinders build up with RelyX Veneer cement. The samples were subjected to microshear test, and the results were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test. Group one presented the highest mean bond strength (19.1 MPa) and G3 the lowest (16.96 MPa). There was no statistical difference between the groups tested (p ˃ 0.05). The fracture pattern observed was predominantly mixed. The adhesive cementation may be performed 24 h after bleaching when SA (10% or 35%) is used or after 7 days, without compromising bond strength.