Blacks Research Articles

Racial disparities in pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

10031 Background: Leukemia is a cancer of the blood and bone marrow characterized by the rapid and uncontrolled production of abnormal white blood cells. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) makes up 15–20% of all childhood acute leukemias (1). The purpose of this study is to use the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to provide an updated investigation of racial disparities in survival in pediatric patients with AML. Investigating the different factors associated with poor outcomes provides valuable information when allocating resources and understanding where policies will be useful to improve patient outcomes. Methods: Pediatric (0-19 years old) AML patients were identified in this retrospective cohort study via the 2004-2020 NCDB. Chi square analysis, Fischer's exact test, and t-tests were used to analyze demographic variables. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was used to compare mean survival across race categories which was repeated with demographic variables of interest using a multivariate Cox regression. Results: A total of 4765 patients were identified in this study. Most patients were male (53.5%), White (73.0%), held private insurance (52.3%), and resided in metropolitan areas (82.0%). The mean age at diagnosis was 8.1 years old. There was no significant difference in age at diagnosis and time to treatment start across racial categories. Black patients had lower mean survival compared to White patients (131 vs 148 months, p<0.001). When controlling for age, sex, metropolitan status, comorbidity status, income, education, and insurance status as covariates, Black race independently portended a poorer prognosis compared to White race (hazard ratio: 1.174, 95% confidence interval: 1.003-1.376, p=0.046). Black patients were more likely to be uninsured (4.1%) compared to White patients (2.8%) (p<0.001). Black patients were more likely to reside in zip codes with lower incomes (36.0% vs 17.6%, p<0.001) and lower education attainment (38.7% vs 27.8%, p<0.001) compared to White patients. Black patients were more likely to have comorbidities with a Charlson-Deyo score of >1 than White patients (11.2% vs 6.2%, p<0.001). Black patients were also more likely to be from metropolitan areas than White patients (90.5% compared to 83.9%, p<0.001). Conclusions: This study indicates that Black AML patients experience lower survival rates and are subject to more predictors of poor outcomes. Black patients were more likely to be uninsured, have comorbidities, live in zip codes with lower incomes and lower education attainment. 1. Morais, R. V. de et al (2021). J De Pediatria, 97(2), 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2020.02.003.

National survey of patient perspectives on medication costs among co-pay assistance recipients with cancer.

11062 Background: Individuals with cancer may seek assistance from co-pay assistance programs (CAPs) to help with high medication costs. However, little is known about these individuals’ perspectives on medication costs and their associations with other patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Methods: From 10-11/2022, we conducted a national, cross-sectional survey of CAP recipients with cancer, which asked about patient perspectives on medication costs (knowing monthly spending on medications, belief that health insurance would prevent high medication costs, and inability to afford care even with help paying for medications). We fit logistic regression models to describe associations between patient characteristics, including patient demographics and PROs (depression/anxiety symptoms [PHQ-4], financial toxicity [COST tool, score <14 indicates high financial toxicity], and health literacy [Brief Health Literacy Screener]), with patient perspectives. Results: Among 1,108 survey participants (median age=72 [range 41-92], 60% male sex), the most common cancer types were multiple myeloma (54%) and prostate cancer (13%). The majority of participants reported knowing their monthly spending on medications (75%); most believed their health insurance would prevent them from high medication costs (67%); under half reported an inability to afford care even with help paying for medications (41%). Factors associated with lower odds of knowing monthly medication spending included Black race (OR=0.45, P=.005), having Medicare Advantage (OR=0.73, P=.036), lack of supplemental insurance (OR=0.68, P=.011), more comorbidities (OR=0.52, P=.002), depression symptoms (OR=0.61, P=.013), and low health literacy (OR=0.43, P<.001). Factors associated with believing that health insurance would prevent high medication costs were depression symptoms (OR=1.54, P=.02), anxiety symptoms (OR=1.40, P=.045), and financial toxicity (OR=2.24, P<.001). Factors associated with reporting an inability to afford care even with help paying for medications included Hispanic ethnicity (OR=2.55, P=.024), more comorbidities (OR=1.84, P=.003), depression symptoms (OR=3.16, P<.001), anxiety symptoms (OR=3.60, P<.001), and financial toxicity (OR=7.83, P<.001). Conclusions: In this large sample of CAP recipients with cancer, most reported knowing their monthly medication spending, believing health insurance would prevent high medication costs, and feeling able to afford care with help paying for medications. We identified patient characteristics associated with these perspectives and found correlations between depression/anxiety symptoms, financial toxicity, and low health literacy with greater concerns regarding medication costs. Efforts to mitigate financial toxicity by reducing adverse effects of medication costs in oncology should consider patients' perspectives and their impact on PROs.

The survival benefits and the risk of severe renal injury of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with cancer: The real-world evidence from the National Clinical Cohort Collaborative (N3C).

e24142 Background: The survival benefits and the risks of severe immune-related adverse events (sirAEs) of Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) vary dramatically among cancer patients. Among sirAEs, acute kidney injury (AKI) incidences are rising, often cause sustained renal damage, and are responsible for the deterioration of patients’ overall health and quality of life. There is an urgent need to support oncologists and nephrologists in choosing the right ICI drugs for the right patients. We aim to comprehensively scrutinize the tradeoff between the survival benefits and the severe AKI risk for ICI patients by leveraging the national electronic medical records (EMR) from the National Clinical Cohort Collaborative (N3C) registry. Our work provides real-world evidence for clinical decisions on ICI use. Methods: Cancer patients treated with ICI are followed up for at least 6 months using N3C data (01/01/2018 - 01/19/2024). Primary outcomes included severe AKI within 6 months of initiation or mortality up to the last follow-up. We fit multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the effect of various ICI types, adjusting for age, gender, race, cancer types, smoking status, and comorbidities. Results: Our study cohort included 55,767 patients who received an ICI, with 25,197 deaths and 6,458 severe AKI events. The most common ICI used were PD-1 inhibitors (74.3%), PD-L1 inhibitors (16.6%), CTLA-4 inhibitors (0.3%), and combination treatments of PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors (8.8%). Observed long-term severe AKI incidences exceeded prior reports, with 96%, 92%, 88%, and 71% at 1, 3, 6, and 36 months. Survival benefits of PD-1, CTLA-4 and their combinations versus PD-L1 inhibitors were comparable (HR: 0.94 [95%CI: 0.91–0.97]; HR: 0.81 [95%CI: 0.63–1.02]; HR: 1.09 [95%CI: 1.04–1.15]). Severe AKI risks were higher with CTLA-4 and combination therapy (HR: 1.48 [95%CI: 0.96–2.28]; HR: 1.96 [95%CI: 1.78–2.16]) compared to PD-L1 inhibitors, with PD-1 inhibitors also showing increased risk (HR: 1.15 [95%CI: 1.07–1.23]). We also scrutinize risk factors associated with significant AKI risk, including a history of AKI, congestive heart failure, dementia, complicated diabetes, hypertension, liver disease, other immunocompromised diseases, and cancers of the gynecologic type, prostate cancer, and gastrointestinal cancers, and being of Black race. Conclusions: Our work provides up-to-date and comprehensive real-world evidence of the survival benefits and severe renal injury risks for clinical decisions of ICI therapy. PD-L1 inhibitors are associated with a lower risk of severe AKI compared to PD-1, CTLA-4 inhibitors, and their combination. Future research should focus on identifying patient subgroups that may benefit from specific ICI therapies while minimizing adverse outcomes.

Impact of frailty on hospitalized patients with prostate cancer: A retrospective analysis.

e23054 Background: The impact of Hospital frailty risk score on outcomes in hospitalized patients with prostate cancer has not been previously studied. This research aimed to examine the association between frailty and prostate cancer outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study utilized hospitalization data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020. Data of patients with a primary or secondary discharge diagnosis of prostate cancer (ICD10-CM codes C61.0, D07.5, and Z85.46) were obtained. The objective was to evaluate the correlation between frailty and prostate cancer. Multivariate analysis was performed, stratified by race, age, Charlson index, median annual income in the patient's zip code, hospital bed size, teaching status, and census division of the hospital. Results: A total of 51,980 hospitalizations for prostate cancer were identified, with 72.7% in the intermediate to high frailty score (IHFS) group and 27.3% in the low frailty score (LFS) group. The IHFS group had a higher unadjusted in-hospital mortality rate than the LFS group (5.85% vs. 1.2%). Patients with IHFS had increased odds of adjusted mortality compared to those with LFS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.45, 95% Cl [3.80-5.22], P < 0.01). Hispanic and Black race patients also had increased odds of adjusted mortality compared to Caucasian race patients (aOR = 1.42, 95%CI [1.19-1.70], P < 0.01); aOR = 1.16, 95%CI [1.00-1.32], P = 0.037, respectively). Additionally, the IHFS group had longer lengths of stay (5.65 ± 0.038 vs. 3.26 ± 0.28 days) and higher adjusted total costs ($66,107 ± 850 vs. $64,308 ± 1066) compared to the LFS group. Conclusions: Patients with prostate cancer and a high hospital frailty risk score exhibited significantly higher mortality rates, longer lengths of stay, and increased total adjusted costs. Frailty assessment plays a crucial role in predicting outcomes in patients with prostate cancer. Physicians can use frailty assessment to stratify patients based on risk and improve their ability to anticipate consequences.

Improving the multiple myeloma and clinical trial awareness among Los Angeles County adults.

e23108 Background: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is the second most common bone marrow cancer in the United States. The prominent risk factors include Black race and male gender. The purpose of this study was to assess the awareness of MM and clinical trial access among a diverse community of people in the Los Angeles County, and to educate the participants. Methods: An IRB-approved Qualtrics survey was administered electronically to a group of 132 participants aged 18 years and older in Los Angeles County between May 3rd and July 15th of 2023. The survey investigated participants’ knowledge on MM risk factors and symptoms, as well as their understanding and attitudes towards resource and clinical trial access. Information on participant demographics was also collected. Statistical tests including chi-square analysis, descriptive statistics, filtering and sub-setting, and correlation analysis, were all utilized and conducted using the software, R-Studio. MiOra Health Educators provided face-to-face education on MM and clinical trials using CDC-based flyers. Results: Out of 132 respondents, 40 (30.3%) were male, 92 (69.7%) were Latinx, and 78 (59.0%) were a first-generation resident of the United States. 71 out of 92 females (77.4%) and 9 out of the 40 males (22.6%) reported attending their annual wellness visit. Prior to the educational intervention, only 6 out of the 132 participants (4.5%) reported being very knowledgeable about cancer and the way it works. Interestingly, 87 (65.9%) reported being aware of the familial risk of MM. 77 (58.1%) of the respondents reported not knowing what a clinical trial is and clinical trial awareness was found to be the main factor predicting the willingness to participate in one (p < 0.01). 108 (81.8%) of the respondents reported that hearing from past clinical trial participants may be useful, but 111 (84.1%) reported that healthcare professionals (including primary care doctors, nurses, medical practitioners, and oncologists) would be the most appropriate educators on clinical trials. Following the health education intervention, 89 (66.9%) of the respondents reported feeling more knowledgeable about clinical trials, and 93 (70.8%) reported feeling more willing to participate in one. Additionally, 87 (65.9%) reported feeling more knowledgeable about MM risk factors, symptoms, screening, and treatment. Conclusions: Although the risk for MM is higher among males, this group appears to significantly less likely than females to comply with their annual wellness visit, signalling a gender disparity in primary care resource utilization. Knowledge on clinical trials appears to influence participation and although primary care providers are the most trusted resources, community health educators and exposure to past clinical trial participants may help close these gaps in clinical trials.

Factors associated with delays in receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer.

e13541 Background: Delays in neoadjuvant chemotherapy initiation (NACTI) after breast cancer (BC) diagnosis have been associated with worse outcomes. We evaluated incidence and predictors of delays of NACTI among high clinical risk patients treated with NACT on a national level. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database. Eligibility included age ≥18 years, diagnosis of non-metastatic BC between 1/1/2010 – 12/31/2020, who were treated with NACT within 180 days of diagnosis. Patients who received neoadjuvant endocrine therapy were excluded. Time to chemotherapy (TTC) in days was recorded. Patients were categorized into sub-cohorts by receptor status and clinical stage: 1) Hormone Receptor positive/HER-2 negative (HR+/HER2-) and were lymph node (LN) LN+; 2) HER-2 positive (HER2+) cT2+ or LN+; and 3) triple negative BC (TNBC) cT2+ or LN+. Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic and tumor characteristics, was used to identify characteristics associated with delays > 60 days from diagnosis to NACTI. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. Results: We identified 145,697 eligible patients, 74% were White, 18% were Black, 3.3% were Asian, and 4.6% were Other/Unknown. Across all racial categories, 9.2% were Hispanic. Median age at diagnosis was 52 years (range 18-90), median TTC was 32 days (range 0-180), and 10% had a delay > 60 days. There were 40,345 patients in the HR+/HER2- cohort, 56,868 in the HER2+ cohort, and 48,484 in the TNBC cohort; 12%, 9.0%, and 8.9% (p <0.001) had a delay in NACTI, respectively. In multivariable analysis among the HR+/HER2- sub-cohort, characteristics associated with delays in NACTI included Black race (OR 1.71, 95%CI 1.57-1.86) and Hispanic ethnicity (OR 1.76, 95%CI 1.60-1.94) compared to White and non-Hispanic patients. Patients with Medicare, Medicaid, or who were uninsured were more likely to be delayed (OR 1.44 95%CI 1.30-1.58, 2.10, 95%CI 1.92-2.29, 2.28, 95%CI 1.99-2.61) compared to those with commercial insurance. Results were similar in the HER2+ and TNBC cohorts, as seen in Table. Conclusions: Among patients with operable BC who received NACT, patients who were Black, Hispanic, had Medicaid or no insurance had as high as a twofold increase in odds of a delay in NACTI. Targeted interventions to address these racial and socioeconomic disparities are necessary to ensure equitable care. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic and tumor characteristics variables (n= 145,697). [Table: see text]

Racial disparities in presentation and survival for lobular breast cancer.

1596 Background: We characterized differences in presentation and survival, and identified predictors of survival, among women of varying race with lobular breast cancer. We also assessed if these trends were unique to ILC by comparing with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and mixed invasive ductal-lobular carcinoma (IDLC). Methods: Using the SEER database, we performed a population-based retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed with ILC, IDC, and IDLC between 1998 and 2019. We collected race, age, marital status, and income. Clinical data included grade, size, laterality, clinical stage, receptor status, surgery type, chemotherapy, radiation, and breast-cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Differences between racial groups were assessed using Chi-square tests or one-way ANOVA. To identify predictors of survival, Cox-proportional hazard models were constructed. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS and P values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results: 38,769 women with ILC were identified, including 32,857 White, 2398 Black, 2352 Asian, and 1162 women of other race. Black women presented with higher-grade, advanced clinical stage, ER+ disease, N2-3 stage, and lower rates of unilateral/bilateral mastectomy than White women. Black women were more likely to not undergo surgery (7.13%), compared with White (4.25%) and Asian (4.04%) women ( P = .0001). Asian women were younger, had more ER-/PR- ILC, and received more chemotherapy. The five-year BCSS rates in Black, White, Asian, and women of other race were 91.5%, 94.2%, 93.7%, and 95.7%, respectively ( P< .0001). Predictors of worse survival include Black race (HR 1.32, P < .0001), ER-/PR- (HR 2.18, P< .0001), ER+/PR- (HR 1.52, P< .0001), and no surgery (HR 4.19, P < .0001). Radiotherapy was associated with improved survival (HR 0.82, P < .0001), while chemotherapy did not affect survival (HR 1.1, P= 0.0504). In comparing across breast cancer subtypes, Black women similarly present with higher grade tumors, advanced clinical stage, ER+ disease, and had higher rates of surgery omission in IDC and IDLC. However, ER-/PR- subtype was notably higher in ILC among Asian women compared with IDC, whereas Black women have higher rates of ER+/PR+ and ER-/PR- ILC. Black women had the lowest five-year BCSS rates across all breast cancer subtypes. Predictors of worse survival in IDC and IDLC include Black race and negative hormone receptor status, while radiation therapy was associated with improved survival. Conclusions: There are differences in clinical presentation of invasive lobular breast cancer according to race.Black women had more advanced disease, while Asian women were younger. Across all subtypes, overall survival for Black women at 5 years was worse compared to other racial groups. Our data provides insight into the complex interactions of race, clinical characteristics, and survival outcomes in lobular breast cancer, with implications for screening considerations.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Distal Symmetric Polyneuropathy Among Predominantly Non-Hispanic Black, Low-Income Patients.

Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) is a disabling, often painful condition associated with falls and reduced quality of life. Non-Hispanic Black people and people with low income are underrepresented in existing DSP studies; therefore, it is unknown whether data accurately reflect the prevalence, risk factors, and burden of disease in these populations. Patients older than 40 years presenting to an outpatient internal medicine clinic predominantly serving Medicaid patients in Flint, Michigan, were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. Demographics, clinical characteristics, including medication use, anthropomorphic measurements, fasting lipids, and hemoglobin A1c were collected. DSP was defined using the modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (mTCNS). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to model DSP and undiagnosed DSP as a function of potential risk factors age, metabolic syndrome, and race. DSP burden was measured using Peripheral Neuropathy Quality of Life Instrument-97. Two hundred participants were enrolled, and 169 (85%) completed all data collection. The population was 55% female of mean age (SD) 58.2 years (10.4) and 69% non-Hispanic Black. Among the population, 50% had diabetes, 67% had metabolic syndrome, and 47% had a household income <$20,000. DSP was present in 73% of the population, of which 75% were previously undiagnosed. Neuropathic pain was documented in 57% of participants with DSP. DSP based on mTCNS criteria was associated with older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.2]) and metabolic syndrome (OR 4.4 [1.1-18.1]). Non-Hispanic Black participants had lower odds of DSP (OR 0.1 [0.01-0.4]) than non-Hispanic White and Hispanic participants. DSP burden was high, including increased pain, health-related worry, and poorer quality of life (all p < 0.001). DSP is extremely common and often underrecognized in this predominantly non-Hispanic Black, low-income population and leads to substantial disease burden. Metabolic syndrome is a highly prevalent, modifiable risk factor in this population that should be managed to lower DSP prevalence.

Persistent Racial Disparities in Morbidity Following Major Elective Operations.

Introduction: Despite considerable national attention, racial disparities in surgical outcomes persist. We sought to consider whether race-based inequities in outcomes following major elective surgery have improved in the contemporary era. Methods: All adult hospitalization records for elective coronary artery bypass grafting, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, colectomy, and hip replacement were tabulated from the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample. Patients were stratified by Black or White race. To consider the evolution in outcomes, we included an interaction term between race and year. We designated centers in the top quartile of annual procedural volume as high-volume hospitals (HVH). Results: Of ∼2,838,485 patients, 245,405 (8.6%) were of Black race. Following risk-adjustment, Black race was linked with similar odds of in-hospital mortality, but increased likelihood of major complications (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 1.41, 95%Confidence Interval [CI] 1.36-1.47). From 2016-2020, overall risk-adjusted rates of major complications declined (patients of White race: 9.2% to 8.4%; patients of Black race 11.8% to 10.8%, both P < .001). Yet, the delta in risk of adverse outcomes between patients of White and Black race did not significantly change. Of the cohort, 158,060 (8.4%) were treated at HVH. Following adjustment, Black race remained associated with greater odds of morbidity (AOR 1.37, CI 1.23-1.52; Ref:White). The race-based difference in risk of complications at HVH did not significantly change from 2016 to 2020. Conclusion: While overall rates of complications following major elective procedures declined from 2016 to 2020, patients of Black race faced persistently greater risk of adverse outcomes. Novel interventions are needed to address persistent racial disparities and ensure acceptable outcomes for all patients.

A qualitative exploration of facilitators and barriers to adopting a healthy lifestyle among Black, Hispanic, and American Indian males with diabetes or at risk for type 2 diabetes

ABSTRACT Objectives Higher prevalence of several chronic diseases occurs in men in the United States, including diabetes and prediabetes. Of the 34 million adults with diabetes and 88 million with prediabetes there is a higher prevalence of both conditions in men compared to women. Black, Hispanic, and American Indian men have some of the highest rates of diabetes and diabetes complications. Adopting a healthy lifestyle including healthy eating and physical activity, is important in preventing type 2 diabetes and diabetes complications. Design This study included six focus groups that explored facilitators and barriers to adopting a healthy lifestyle in Black, Hispanic, and American Indian men with diabetes or at risk for type 2 diabetes. Thematic analysis was used to identify facilitators and barriers to adopting a healthy lifestyle. Results Participants included males 18 years of age and older identifying as Black, Hispanic, or American Indian and diagnosed with prediabetes, diabetes, hypertension, or otherwise at risk for type 2 diabetes. Thirty-seven men participated, 19 diagnosed with diabetes and 18 at risk for type 2 diabetes. Fourteen Black, 14 Hispanic, and 9 American Indian men participated. The themes of facilitators to a healthy lifestyle included: family and the social network; psychosocial factors; health status, health priorities and beliefs about aging; knowledge about health and healthy behavior; and healthy community resources. Themes of barriers to a healthy lifestyle also included: mistrust of the health care system, cost, and low socioeconomic status. Conclusions This study underscores the complexity of factors involved in adopting a healthy lifestyle for some racial and ethnic minority men with diabetes or at risk for type 2 diabetes.

Commercial Tobacco Retailers Need to Be Included in Research on Policies Restricting the Sale of Menthol Cigarettes.

Menthol cigarettes are disproportionately marketed and advertised in the commercial tobacco retail environment in Black communities across the United States, contributing to menthol cigarette-related disparities and lower likelihood of successful quitting among Black people who smoke. Policies restricting retail sales of menthol cigarettes are aimed at preventing initiation, promoting quitting, and reducing related disparities. Structured phone interview surveys were conducted from January to July 2021 with commercial tobacco retailers in Los Angeles County, California, unincorporated communities with a high percentage of Black residents, eight months after a local policy restricting retail sales of menthol cigarettes and other flavored nicotine and commercial tobacco products became effective on May 20, 2020. Interviews examined menthol cigarette sales restrictions-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Among 22 retailers interviewed, most (86.4%) reported having knowledge of the local ban on menthol cigarettes, and more than half (54.5%) reported offering price promotions for menthol cigarettes. Additionally, more than half (54.5%) reported believing customers who buy menthol cigarettes would stop smoking altogether following the ban. Most retailers reported having knowledge of the menthol ban, yet half reported offering price promotions for menthol cigarettes. Findings suggest retail availability of menthol cigarettes in Los Angeles County unincorporated communities with a high percentage of Black residents, post ban. Public health and policy implications are discussed.

“I Thought I Was Going to Die like Him”: Racial Authoritarianism and the Afterlife of George Floyd in the United States and Brazil

This paper offers a brief yet comprehensive comparative analysis of historical and contemporary racial authoritarian violence in the United States and Brazil. Utilizing Black feminist historian and literary scholar Saidiya Hartman’s theorization of the “afterlife of slavery” and Michael Dawson’s linked fate, I examine how the processes of racialization and the racial logics of subordination have and continue to shape the contours of Black life in the United States and in Brazil. Moreover, in this work, I interrogate the afterlife of George Floyd and the afterlives of Black Brazilian victims and survivors of racial authoritarian violence; the political, transnational, and symbolic impacts of Floyd’s death; and Diasporic understandings of linked fate on racial authoritarian violence between Black communities in the United States and in Brazil.

Youth and Young Adult Awareness of and Perceptions About Tobacco Marketing as a Social Justice Issue.

Systemic racism and tobacco-industry targeting contribute to disparities in communities of color. However, understanding tobacco as a social justice issue and the industry's role in perpetuating inequities remains limited. This study explored youth and young adult awareness of tobacco marketing and perceptions of tobacco marketing as a social justice issue. Focus groups were conducted with youth and young adults in 2020 and 2021, including individuals who used tobacco and e-cigarettes and those who did not use either. Online surveys were conducted in 2021 with youth (n = 1227) and young adults (n = 2643) using AmeriSpeak's nationally representative panel, oversampling for black and Hispanic Americans and people who smoke. Perceptions of flavor bans, social justice, and industry marketing were assessed. Most (>80%) survey respondents agreed that tobacco companies target youth. However, only 20% saw tobacco as a social justice issue. Focus group participants regardless of their tobacco or e-cigarette use, reported higher prevalence of tobacco advertising in their communities relative to survey respondents but did not view it as targeting communities of color. Black non-Hispanic (20.9%) and Hispanic (21.4%) survey respondents perceived tobacco as a social justice issue more than white non-Hispanic (16.1%) respondents. The majority (>60%) of survey respondents supported bans on menthol and flavored tobacco, regardless of race or ethnicity. Respondents broadly supported menthol and flavored tobacco bans and recognized tobacco-industry influence on youth. Low awareness of tobacco as a social justice issue highlights the need to raise awareness of the underlying factors driving tobacco-related disparities. The majority of young people see the tobacco industry as targeting them. Most young people support bans on menthol and flavored tobacco bans, with support across racial and ethnic groups. While few young respondents perceived tobacco as a social justice issue, some perceived tobacco companies as targeting low-income and communities of color. Black non-Hispanic and Hispanic respondents were more likely to perceive tobacco as a social justice issue than white non-Hispanic respondents. Efforts to raise awareness among young people of tobacco as a social justice issue may be key in addressing tobacco disparities and advancing support for flavor tobacco bans.

Gender health equity: The case for including men's health

United States' federal policy and infrastructure fail to explicitly consider the health of men, particularly the poor health of marginalized men. This inattention to men's health hinders the nation's ability to improve population health, to achieve gender health equity, and to achieve health equity more broadly. Expanding efforts to consider gender in federal policy and infrastructure to include men, naming men as a population whose poor health warrants policy attention, creating offices of men's health in federal agencies, and utilizing an intersectional lens to develop and analyze policies that affect health would likely yield critical improvements in population health and health equity in the United States. Using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, I illustrate the persistence of sex differences in mortality and leading causes of death, and how these patterns mask gender gaps in health that are driven largely by marginalized men. Given the common practice of presenting data by sex and race separately, it is difficult to recognize when the health of specific groups of men warrants attention. I utilize the case of Black men to illustrate the importance of an intersectional approach, and why men's health is critical to achieving gender and racial equity in health. While a gender mainstreaming approach has enhanced the nation's ability to consider and address the health of women and girls, it has not expanded to be inclusive of boys and men. Consequently, I argue that if our goal is to achieve health equity, it is critical to employ an intersectional approach that simultaneously considers the full range of factors that influence individual and population health and well-being. An intersectional approach would facilitate efforts to simultaneously explore strategies to achieve racial, ethnic, and gender health equity, which are driven by structural determinants beyond sex and gender related factors.

Community Voices: A Qualitative Study Exploring Perceptions of Menthol Cigarette Sales Restrictions in Los Angeles County Among Black Adults Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes.

The commercial tobacco industry has long targeted Black communities by making menthol cigarettes not only appealing but affordable through marketing, advertising, and pricing strategies, particularly in the retail environment. Policies that focus on restricting the sale of menthol cigarettes have the potential to significantly reduce the death toll from smoking while also mitigating health inequities and advancing racial equity. However, limited qualitative research exists on the perceptions of menthol cigarette sales restrictions, including local policies, among Black adults who smoke menthol cigarettes. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted between January and September 2021 with self-identified non-Hispanic Black adults who reported current menthol cigarette use (n = 26). Participants were asked open-ended questions about awareness and perceptions of the Los Angeles County law banning the retail sale of menthol cigarettes in unincorporated communities, including how it influences their smoking and purchasing behaviors. We used three thematic categories to structure the results: (1) Are People Aware of Local Menthol Cigarette Sales Restrictions? Levels of Awareness and Strategies to Increase Awareness, (2) Why Ban Menthol? Concerns About Equity and Fairness, and (3) Will Menthol Cigarette Bans Decrease Smoking? Mixed Perceptions About Potential Impact. Most participants (88.5%) had heard about the menthol ban in their communities. Participants described ambivalence towards the ban and identified several factors that hinder support, participation, and well-being, including uncertainty regarding the rationale for banning menthol cigarettes; perceptions that the ban specifically targets Black communities; and concerns regarding government overreach and constraining individual choice. Participants had differing views on whether the ban would likely help them and others who smoke menthol cigarettes reduce or quit smoking. Participants also described situations in which they would purchase menthol cigarettes in another state, country, online, or in the illicit market. Furthermore, participants often viewed the ban as perpetuating criminalization and over-policing of Black communities-arguments used by the commercial tobacco industry to oppose menthol bans. Our community-based sample of Black adults who smoke menthol cigarettes face challenges and concerns about local menthol bans. Community-centered interventions, messages, and materials about racial equity in menthol bans, access to free cessation services, and countering commercial tobacco industry interference, in addition to measurable steps toward rectifying injustice from the commercial tobacco industry and repeated exemptions of menthol cigarettes from federal legislation through tangible reparations, would be helpful to this community. We sought to add to the literature on flavored nicotine and commercial tobacco policies in the United States by centering the voices of Black adults who smoke menthol cigarettes regarding their awareness, perceptions, and opinions of local laws restricting menthol cigarette retail sales and how such polices influence their smoking and purchasing behaviors. Our findings suggest that Black adults who smoke menthol cigarettes are aware of local laws restricting menthol cigarette retail sales and are ambivalent about the rationale. Our findings have implications for the development and delivery of equity-focused strategies and resources to increase awareness of and rationale for the ban; counter commercial tobacco industry interference; and facilitate smoking cessation among Black adults who experience more combustible tobacco-related morbidity and mortality than their racial/ethnic counterparts. By understanding this relevance, we can also recognize how individual awareness and perceptions are moored within and contextualized by broader social structures and systemic inequities that warrant policy considerations.

Shop Talk: A Qualitative Study to Understand Peer Health-related Communication Among Black Men at the Barbershop.

While successful health promotion efforts among Black men have been implemented at barbershops, the focus has largely been on outcomes as opposed to the processes by which outcomes are produced. An understanding of processes can be leveraged in the design and implementation of future efforts to improve the health of Black men. The objectives of the present study were to: (i) understand peer-derived sources of health-related support at the barbershop and (ii) understand the role of the barbershop in promoting health among Black men. Seven focus groups were conducted at barbershops used predominately by Black men. Each focus group lasted between 45 and 60 min. Using a thematic approach, each focus group was independently coded by two coders using a codebook derived from an inductive and deductive approach. The results were confirmed with members of the community advisory board. Three themes emerged: (i) dynamic and candid exchange of health-related support at the barbershop; (ii) tailored forms of health-related and judgment-free communication that provide encouragement and increase motivation; and (iii) characteristics of a supportive environment at the barbershop that facilitate health-related communication. The findings of the present study offer a potential pathway for public health efforts seeking to improve health among Black men. Those interested in designing and implementing these efforts can create tailored programs for Black men by recognizing and leveraging the unique dynamics of health-related conversations at the barbershop.

The interrelationship between obesity and race in breast cancer prognosis: a prospective cohort study

BackgroundObesity is associated with an increased breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women and may contribute to worse outcomes. Black women experience higher obesity and breast cancer mortality rates than non-Black women. We examined associations between race, obesity, and clinical tumor stage with breast cancer prognosis.MethodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study in 1,110 breast cancer patients, using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses to evaluate the effects of obesity, race/ethnicity, and clinical tumor stage on progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS).Results22% of participants were Black, 64% were Hispanic White, and 14% were non-Hispanic White or another race. 39% of participants were obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m2). In univariable analyses, tumor stage III-IV was associated with worse PFS and OS compared to tumor stage 0-II (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.52–6.22 for PFS and HR = 5.92, 95% CI = 4.00-8.77 for OS). Multivariable analysis revealed an association between Black race and worse PFS in obese (HR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.06–4.51) and non-obese (HR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.05–4.21) women with tumors staged 0-II. Obesity alone was not associated with worse PFS or OS.ConclusionsResults suggest a complex interrelationship between obesity and race in breast cancer prognosis. The association between the Black race and worse PFS in tumor stages 0-II underscores the importance of early intervention in this group. Future studies are warranted to evaluate whether alternative measures of body composition and biomarkers are better prognostic indicators than BMI among Black breast cancer survivors.

Age, GVHD prophylaxis, and timing matter in thrombotic microangiopathy after haematopoietic cell transplantation-Asecondary CIBMTR analysis.

Most reports of risk factors (RF) for developing transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) and death are derived from paediatric and young adult cohorts, with minimal data on differences in RF and outcomes by age. In this secondary CIBMTR analysis, we used a previously prepared dataset that included all first allogenic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients with malignant or non-malignant diseases between 2008 and 2016. The incidence of TA-TMA 6 months post HCT was similar in children and adults 2.1% and 2.0% respectively. Grade 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) was a significant adjusted RF for developing TA-TMA in both children and adults. In adults, additional adjusted RFs for TA-TMA included female sex and black race, and in children an unrelated donor. Compared to a calcineurin inhibitor and sirolimus, other forms of GVHD prophylaxis had an adjusted decreased risk of developing TA-TMA in adults. Adjusted RF for death in those with TA-TMA (n = 652) included age ≥18 years old, early onset of TA-TMA diagnosis (<100 days post HCT), grade 3-4 aGVHD and a performance score of <90 prior to HCT. In this cohort, the incidence of TA-TMA was similar in children and adults, and TA-TMA timing was a newly identified RF for death.

Characteristics of Older Adults with Alzheimer's Disease Who Were Hospitalized during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Secondary Data Analysis.

We aim to investigate the relationships between the population characteristics of patients with Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and their Healthcare Utilization (HU) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Electronic health records (EHRs) were utilized. The study sample comprised those with ICD-10 codes G30.0, G30.1, G30.8, and G30.9 between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2021. Pearson's correlation and multiple regression were used. The analysis utilized 1537 patient records with an average age of 82.20 years (SD = 7.71); 62.3% were female. Patients had an average of 1.64 hospitalizations (SD = 1.18) with an average length of stay (ALOS) of 7.45 days (SD = 9.13). Discharge dispositions were primarily home (55.1%) and nursing facilities (32.4%). Among patients with multiple hospitalizations, a negative correlation was observed between age and both ALOS (r = -0.1264, p = 0.0030) and number of hospitalizations (r = -0.1499, p = 0.0004). Predictors of longer ALOS included male gender (p = 0.0227), divorced or widowed (p = 0.0056), and the use of Medicare Advantage and other private insurance (p = 0.0178). Male gender (p = 0.0050) and Black race (p = 0.0069) were associated with a higher hospitalization frequency. We recommend future studies including the co-morbidities of AD patients, larger samples, and longitudinal data.

Race-Conscious Teacher Coaching: Disrupting Implicit Bias and Improving Teachers’ Relationships with Black Students

ABSTRACT Racial discipline disproportionality is a persistent issue in schools with Black students experiencing exclusionary discipline two to three times more than their White peers, and Black males more likely to be diagnosed with an emotional and behavioral disorder. Interventions that target malleable root causes of disproportionality and have an explicit racial bias component may disrupt these processes. The study took place in an alternative school setting across two classrooms with White, fifth- and sixth-grade teachers (n = 2) and their Black students (n = 6). A single-case, withdrawal design (A-B-A-B) examined the impact of a semi-structured teacher coaching intervention on disrupting biases, improving classroom management and cultural competency, and ultimately improving student-teacher relationships. The coaching included Mindful STOP as a self-regulation strategy, the Mindful Reflection Protocol to discuss behaviors, and performance feedback, all focusing on outcomes related to student-teacher relationships and discipline. During intervention phases, Teacher 1 showed improvements in positive communication while keeping negative communication low. Teacher 2 showed smaller, more variable improvements. Teachers and students in both classrooms reported improvements in their relationships based on pre/post rating scales. Teacher-reported discipline outcomes were variable. These findings may provide concrete strategies for supporting the development of equitable discipline practices for Black students. Future studies will explore modifications to the current coaching package.