Background It is challenging to assess molar furcation bone loss by clinical detection and intraoral radiographs in many instances. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is expected to open a new horizon in periodontal assessment. Objective(s) The aim of this study was to compare and correlate molar furcation assessment via clinical detection, intraoral radiography, and CBCT. Study Design Eighty-three patients, seen at the University of Texas School of Dentistry (UTSD), with chronic periodontitis who had existing CBCT scans were included. Furcation involvement was assessed on maxillary and mandibular first molars. Periodontal charts (modified Glickman classification), intraoral (periapical and/or bitewing) radiographs, and sagittal and axial CBCT reconstructions were used to identify furcation involvement on buccal and palatal/lingual sites. The correlation of furcation assessment by the 3 methods was evaluated by Pearson's analysis. Results There were significant correlations (P < .05) between clinical detection and intraoral radiography, clinical detection and CBCT, and intraoral radiography and CBCT at all the measured sites (r values ranged from 0.230 to 0.644). CBCT exhibited generally higher correlation with clinical detection compared with intraoral radiography, especially at the distal–palatal side of the maxillary first molar (P < .05). In addition, CBCT provided more accurate furcation assessment, because it measured up to 2 decimals in millimeters, whereas clinical detection had 3 classes, and the intraoral radiographs usually only detected the presence of furcation involvement in Glickman Class 2 and 3. Discussion/Conclusions This study validates that CBCT is a valuable tool in molar furcation assessment in addition to clinical examination and intraoral radiography. It is challenging to assess molar furcation bone loss by clinical detection and intraoral radiographs in many instances. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is expected to open a new horizon in periodontal assessment. The aim of this study was to compare and correlate molar furcation assessment via clinical detection, intraoral radiography, and CBCT. Eighty-three patients, seen at the University of Texas School of Dentistry (UTSD), with chronic periodontitis who had existing CBCT scans were included. Furcation involvement was assessed on maxillary and mandibular first molars. Periodontal charts (modified Glickman classification), intraoral (periapical and/or bitewing) radiographs, and sagittal and axial CBCT reconstructions were used to identify furcation involvement on buccal and palatal/lingual sites. The correlation of furcation assessment by the 3 methods was evaluated by Pearson's analysis. There were significant correlations (P < .05) between clinical detection and intraoral radiography, clinical detection and CBCT, and intraoral radiography and CBCT at all the measured sites (r values ranged from 0.230 to 0.644). CBCT exhibited generally higher correlation with clinical detection compared with intraoral radiography, especially at the distal–palatal side of the maxillary first molar (P < .05). In addition, CBCT provided more accurate furcation assessment, because it measured up to 2 decimals in millimeters, whereas clinical detection had 3 classes, and the intraoral radiographs usually only detected the presence of furcation involvement in Glickman Class 2 and 3. This study validates that CBCT is a valuable tool in molar furcation assessment in addition to clinical examination and intraoral radiography.
Read full abstract