You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP02-09 THE IMPACT OF RACE AND SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS ON RENAL TRAUMA CARE: A POPULATION BASED RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY Rano Matta, Kevin Hebert, Joemy Ramsay, Niraj Paudel, Benjamin McCormick, Joshua Horns, and Jeremy Myers Rano MattaRano Matta More articles by this author , Kevin HebertKevin Hebert More articles by this author , Joemy RamsayJoemy Ramsay More articles by this author , Niraj PaudelNiraj Paudel More articles by this author , Benjamin McCormickBenjamin McCormick More articles by this author , Joshua HornsJoshua Horns More articles by this author , and Jeremy MyersJeremy Myers More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003213.09AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: To understand the association of race, ethnicity, and payer status with the treatment setting and treatment choices during hospital care for patients with renal trauma. We hypothesize that race, ethnicity, and payer status influence triage, management, and outcomes after renal trauma. METHODS: The National Trauma Databank (NTDB) from 2007-2016 was used to conduct a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with blunt or penetrating renal trauma, without any other significant extra-renal injury (abbreviated injury scale ≥3 in other areas). The primary outcome was under triage, defined as receiving definitive care at NTDB hospitals without state level designation or ACS level I or II verification. Definitive care was defined as treatment and release from emergency department [ED], admission to hospital, or death in ED. Secondary outcomes were procedures for renal hemorrhage (nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, angioembolization, renorrhapy), total hospital length of stay, discharge disposition from hospital, and mortality. Outcomes of interest were analyzed by racial/ethnic minorities relative to Non-Hispanic Whites using generalized estimating equations models to allow for correlation at the facility level. GEE models with a binomial family and logit link and GEE models with Gaussian family and identity link were used to generate effect estimates for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively. Robust standard errors were used. Models were adjusted for injury year, age, sex, insurance, facility level, academic facility, facility patient mix, injury type, injury severity score, shock, blood transfusion, revised trauma score, and predefined comorbidities. RESULTS: We identified 28,894 patients with isolated renal trauma. Of these, 39% (n=11,328) were identified with a race/ethnicity other than non-Hispanic white, and 35% (n= 10,139) were uninsured. Among the cohort, 7% (n=1,908) were under triaged, 11% received a renal procedure, and 3% died. There was no significant association between race or ethnicity and under triage (non-white vs. non-Hispanic white; OR=0.98; 95% CI 0.96, 1.01), renal procedures (OR=1.06; 95% CI 0.94, 1.19), or discharge disposition (Rehab/Nursing facility vs. Home; OR=0.93; 95% CI 0.81, 1.06). However, non-white patients had a shorter length of hospital stay (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.21, 0.76) and an increased risk of mortality (OR=1.25; 95% CI 1.03, 1.53). There was no association between insurance status and under triage. Patients with public insurance had an increased risk of renal procedures (OR 1.22; 95% CI 1.06, 1.40). Patients without insurance had increased odds of discharge to home (vs. rehab or nursing facility; OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.39, 0.59), shorter length of hospital stay (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.29, 0.55), and an increased odds of mortality (OR 2.31; 95% CI 1.75, 3.01). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in under triage of patients with isolated renal trauma based on race/ethnicity and insurance status. Despite adjusting for hospital and patient level demographics, injury, and physiology, we found noteworthy differences based on race/ethnicity and insurance status in the rate of renal procedures, hospital length of stay, discharge disposition, and mortality. Further research is needed to identify root causes of these disparities. Source of Funding: None © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e14 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Rano Matta More articles by this author Kevin Hebert More articles by this author Joemy Ramsay More articles by this author Niraj Paudel More articles by this author Benjamin McCormick More articles by this author Joshua Horns More articles by this author Jeremy Myers More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract