You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP55-19 MICRO-ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSIES: EXPERIENCE FROM A HIGH-VOLUME CENTER Davide Maffei, Pier Paolo Avolio, Marco Paciotti, Vittorio Fasulo, Nicola Frego, Fabio De Carne, Cesare Saitta, Pier Giuseppe Colombo, Alberto Rosario Saita, Rodolfo Fausto Hurle, Massimo Lazzeri, Giorgio Ferruccio Guazzoni, Paolo Casale, Nicolò Maria Buffi, and Giovanni Lughezzani Davide MaffeiDavide Maffei More articles by this author , Pier Paolo AvolioPier Paolo Avolio More articles by this author , Marco PaciottiMarco Paciotti More articles by this author , Vittorio FasuloVittorio Fasulo More articles by this author , Nicola FregoNicola Frego More articles by this author , Fabio De CarneFabio De Carne More articles by this author , Cesare SaittaCesare Saitta More articles by this author , Pier Giuseppe ColomboPier Giuseppe Colombo More articles by this author , Alberto Rosario SaitaAlberto Rosario Saita More articles by this author , Rodolfo Fausto HurleRodolfo Fausto Hurle More articles by this author , Massimo LazzeriMassimo Lazzeri More articles by this author , Giorgio Ferruccio GuazzoniGiorgio Ferruccio Guazzoni More articles by this author , Paolo CasalePaolo Casale More articles by this author , Nicolò Maria BuffiNicolò Maria Buffi More articles by this author , and Giovanni LughezzaniGiovanni Lughezzani More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003308.19AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Micro-ultrasound (mUS) is a recently developed transrectal ultrasonography device with with high resolution (70um) for prostate cancer diagnosis. It has been implemented in the diagnostic process for screening and lesion targeting during prostate biopsies. This study reports on our clinical experience after introducing mUS into our prostate biopsy clinic. METHODS: Data on 1002 consecutive patients imaged with the ExactVu mUS system between October 2017 and March 2022 were prospectively collected. All patients were scheduled for prostate biopsy due to clinical suspicion of PCa. The PRI-MUS protocol was used to locate targets on mUS. Lesions with a PRI-MUS score≥3 were targeted. Patients were also subjected to systematic prostatic biopsies. The presence of overall PCa and of clinically significant PCa (defined as a Gleason score≥7; csPCa) was determined and the diagnostic performance of mUS was assessed. RESULTS: Mean age was 65.7(SD 8.0) yrs, median total PSA was 9.0(SD) ng/mL and median prostate volume was 50.0(IQR 35.0-70.0)mL. Overall, 389/1002 (38.9%) patients were in the repeat biopsy setting, with 149(14.9%) patients on active surveillance. MUS detected prostate lesions with a PRI-MUS score of 3, 4 and 5 in respectively 98(9.8%), 457 (45.7%) and 211(21.1%) patients, while in 236(23.6%) individuals mUS did not identify any target. Overall PCa and csPca detection rates were 51.7% and 36.5%(366). Micro-US provided high sensitivity, with 89.3% (327/366) of csPCa patients having at least one PRI-mMUS score≥3 lesion. Similarly, NPV was 82.8% with 188/227 patients with no micro-US targets receiving a benign or insignificant PCa diagnosis (after systematic and MRI-target biopsy). Conversely, PPV and specificity were lower (42.2% and 18.6%), likely due to over-targeting. csPCa rate according to PRI-MUS score was in 26.5% for PRI- MUS 3, 35.2% (151/457) for PRI-MUS 4 and 58.5% (138/236) for PRI-MUS 5. The ratio between csPCa and overall PCa diagnosed increased with increasing PRIMUS score (60.5%, 65.7% and 90.8% for PRIMUS 3, 4 and 5 lesions). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm mUS as a fast and efficient modality with high accuracy for PCa diagnosis. It has a high sensitivity and negative predictive value for csPCa as well as allowing real-time lesion identification and targeting during prostate biopsy. Source of Funding: None. © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e771 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Davide Maffei More articles by this author Pier Paolo Avolio More articles by this author Marco Paciotti More articles by this author Vittorio Fasulo More articles by this author Nicola Frego More articles by this author Fabio De Carne More articles by this author Cesare Saitta More articles by this author Pier Giuseppe Colombo More articles by this author Alberto Rosario Saita More articles by this author Rodolfo Fausto Hurle More articles by this author Massimo Lazzeri More articles by this author Giorgio Ferruccio Guazzoni More articles by this author Paolo Casale More articles by this author Nicolò Maria Buffi More articles by this author Giovanni Lughezzani More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract